Seeing an ISU-100 flank 2 Super Pershing's makes me wonder why noone has headphones in this game.

@goodguyguy5022

Жыл бұрын

I have

@charlesleethesonandfathero14

Жыл бұрын

Having headphones in war Thunder is basically one of the most important things you should have

@rawchicken3463

Жыл бұрын

Maybe our game sounds don't work

@ankurar6492

Жыл бұрын

what is a ISU-100? Are you talking about ISU-152 or SU-100?

@fallrising5443

Жыл бұрын

@@ankurar6492 su-100y

this video has shown me that the average WT player has the situational and audio awareness of a block of cheese

@emib6599

Жыл бұрын

I never listen to audio. You can run with a Maus behind ne and if I don't turn the camera I wouldn't notice.

@ChaffPro

Жыл бұрын

Hey don't do blocks of cheese that dirty

@bogdand7138

10 ай бұрын

that is offensive! to blocks of cheese

@user-xm6zs6ez6i

8 ай бұрын

You can compare as much as you like, make films about brave American heroes. But. The truth is different. The truth is in the facts. And the fact is that it was Russia (USSR) that won the Second World War. The United States entered the war only in 1944, when Germany was already retreating.

@_virus_9780

2 ай бұрын

Plot for the scoop if the players on amers had hearing: 📉📉📉

While m22 unleashed his full power the bt7 was always killed by the .50

@Actul_Trap

Жыл бұрын

Yeah big reason why the m22 i so good in warthunder

@DawnyBlazeYoutube

2 күн бұрын

Real

6:13 "gone ,reduced to atoms"

I wonder how challenges like these, or even the game as a whole would change if there was a “commander” type role. Somebody who’s job is to look over the battle as a whole as can give out orders to people in response to changing conditions. The game is designed to be far more casual than this, but I think the possibilities could be interesting. Commander has access to artillery strikes and maybe AI attacker plane call ins. They can also issue attack/defend orders that players can follow for small SL/RP gains. In regards to this challenge, it just seemed like there was some coordination, but also a fair bit of individual action that lead to gaps in defense that turned into overwhelming flanks against the Americans. That’s just an observation from the video however, and it may be very different on any potential discord/team speak calls going on. I kinda figured the soviets would win, it just also felt like there were points where the American defense fell apart when it could have been salvaged. Then again, mixing the teams each round does support Soviet superiority here. Interesting challenge. Looking forward to the next one.

@bmohr9826

Жыл бұрын

That would actually be a dope game mode

@Imjustafridge

Жыл бұрын

Perhaps as a seperate gamemode

@davida2240

Жыл бұрын

I aint reading allat

@Joze1090

Жыл бұрын

That would require randoms to be willing to take orders lmao. Just imagine it, commander would say "you go over here" and that person doesn't feel like sacrificing themselves so they don't follow the order lol

@keetonmitchell4669

Жыл бұрын

@@Joze1090 True, it would. I'm not saying this should become a standard feature, but that's also why I added the rp/sl reward aspect to incentivize following orders. Now there are other games that have this concept implemented in some fashion. Hell let loose, squad, probably a couple others I can't recall off the top of my head (I think battlefield did something adjacent to the idea in 4). In the end, this would likely be a separate game mode for people to do challenges like this, and/or for random matches where people know what they are getting into.

To be fair, I'm rather surprised the US managed to win even a single round with those BR placements

@robertharris6092

Жыл бұрын

USA mains shpwing they need to actualy learn to play the game. Seriously. Iv grinded germany, USA, russia, france, sweden, and italy in that order. USA is by far the worst. Their guns are alaays shit for their BR till the post war era.

@CommanderWolf_of_the_77th

Жыл бұрын

I know I'm late but dog I swear I saw a guy on the US using stock AP in one of his tanks I never saw anything other than APHE or KV-2 he being used. Does nobody have their shit vetted before joining this shit? I know Russia has APHEBC or just APHEC stock and that's it, but still it's APHE not just AP, I'd have forgiven it had it at least been APCR cause then it's got something going for it. Literally went back to check and it's at 13:23 he's a Jumbo 76 and he's got stock AP, I understand limiting some rounds to a certain amount, but he had nothing but stock AP in his tank. Like yeah, how was US meant to win any of this when we got shit like this in the match?

@congsandungua8776

11 ай бұрын

same thought, I just pray before every game with America as an ally

@user-xm6zs6ez6i

8 ай бұрын

You can compare as much as you like, make films about brave American heroes. But. The truth is different. The truth is in the facts. And the fact is that it was Russia (USSR) that won the Second World War. The United States entered the war only in 1944, when Germany was already retreating.

@opairsoft8100

7 ай бұрын

@@user-xm6zs6ez6igret joke Kremlin believer

Always love the commentary on these videos, awesome video but damn we got smoked on team USA for those 2 rounds 💀

@hiddenmagnum9590

Жыл бұрын

We the comeback kids tho🇺🇸

@dailyamountofstupidness979

Жыл бұрын

I mean I am a Germany player but I knew that USSR will beat US in 1945 era tanks since they were just better in amour and cannons

@thevortex6754

Жыл бұрын

@@dailyamountofstupidness979 I’m an American player, I’ve been an American main for about 2.5 years now, but had to restart with a new account cause of no fun bs, but I’ve always had a hard time destroying Russian tanks, even when the US guns have more pen than the Russians, I still can’t even hurt a Russian side on half the time while a 122mm as a ridiculous angle and range is able to cut through me like butter. Idk, but the Russian guns are funky to me, I played Russia and I’m not a fan of them, but still I get cleaned out by the most random and bizarre ways

@chaosacsend9653

Жыл бұрын

@@dailyamountofstupidness979 in game maybe

@horrorgames1874

Жыл бұрын

@@dailyamountofstupidness979 no noob US tanks in 1945 era is better but those players are noobs

These videos are the very best War Thunder has to offer! Incredible battles here.

@lextionvlogsandexploration6242

Жыл бұрын

Just Soviet bias

0:58 That was me!!!! Thanks so much Muffin!

I'd love to see an m22 versus like bt2 bt5 and bt7 and bt7m variance

The IS-3 is kinda OP for the time. Esp considering IRL it prob had massive metal quality control issues that it doesnt in game. Same with the T-44.

@woofkaf7724

Жыл бұрын

Давайте ещё ходовую часть сделаем как в реальности ломалась. И чтоб башня ломалась от своего же выстрела под неправильным углом.

@mr.waffentrager4400

10 ай бұрын

Some is3 withstood 105mm apds in real life

Glad you took my idea man 😎 really loved the video

Excellent stuff. Gimme more !!

I want to see some legit tournaments with nations lineups being by the decade.

Love the videos man

I have to say it, this is literally just historical battles, but with wider br range lol. great vid thank love your work

Awesome vid! Can you do something similar but with Rank 1 vehicles?

great video and glad usa made a comeback in the end. seeing the m22 and bt that would make a great video, bt7 vs m22

I was hoping to see more of the USA's heavies, like the Super Pershing and up armoured Pershing. Sad that the US T34 was made in 1945, woulda been fun to see.

@The_winterFox

Жыл бұрын

Idk if I saw a T30 in the mix or a T34 T29

@cookiecraze1310

Жыл бұрын

@@The_winterFox T34 was the production tank, T30 may have been a 1945 prototype but idk.

@robertharris6092

Жыл бұрын

I dont think the jumbo M26 existed in 1945. I think it was designed in the korean war.

@ninofromkitchennightmares1497

Жыл бұрын

It was already established the Soviets would win If every Soviet player ran a Self Propelled gun from 1944-1945 they would of won against the Americans in a 1 on 1 tank fight

@user-xm6zs6ez6i

8 ай бұрын

You can compare as much as you like, make films about brave American heroes. But. The truth is different. The truth is in the facts. And the fact is that it was Russia (USSR) that won the Second World War. The United States entered the war only in 1944, when Germany was already retreating.

Do 1975 Soviets vs 1975 NATO please, with only tanks that saw active service (so no KPZ 70)

The soviet with IS-3 is just too stronk man, those stalinium need atleast T34 or HEAT..

Together with germany vs T-90 the best in my opinion. Please make more of this. 1945germany vs. Brittain. Brittain vs. Usa. Soviet vs. German...

I gotta say that this is the closest thing we can have to a Girls Und Panzer match. Hope to see more of these ww2 countries tanks go against each other.

@Pulpo2301

Жыл бұрын

I was watching the video and it felt like I was watching a GuP episode xD

It was fascinating, especially the 3rd round, can we see the this with modern vehicles as well?

looking at the really late war Americans designs i personally think that they have far better tanks. mostly bias since i have like half of all my time in game on usa ground mostly looking at the T series of heavy tanks. something that i found a bit frustrating that there were no longer range maps with a need for half decent gun depression which is the environment the US tanks thrive in instead for the most part it was close range and no distinct terrain features like dunes and hills which is where the Russians dominate i feel like the Americans could have used better tactics and positioning but they looked like really good fights great vid even tho the map selection somewhat favoured the russians

@benjaminjones7197

Жыл бұрын

Yea your wrong the games Russian bias

@n1co2017

Жыл бұрын

i said i am bias to the American tanks not gaijin i am well aware of the Russian bias thing

@Gary_The_Metro

11 ай бұрын

I am not sure I agree on urban and close range maps not being good for US tanks. If anything, a lot of these US tanks are very good at close range such as the jumbo and the Easy eight and the T26E5. These would dominate the soviets on close range. But everyone only went slow reload T-34's and super pershings, trying to beat the soviets at their own game. Which is big armour big gun. But the US' is super strong in the close range brawler category. Something the soviets are kind of bad at, due to their incredibly long reloads.

this is awesome with no heat involved

I have been subbed since your wotb vids

A lot of older equipment was available during 1945. So give or take some were mak8ng it more authentic.

have to say, love watching these types of challenges. As a warthunder gamer myself, great to see cool types of battles like these on youtube! Haha, I will say, if you get the chance to read my comment, have an interesting challenge for you and the community of tankers you have that do these battles. Israel, American, and British Tanks against Russian Tanks that fought in the 6-day war or in the Arab-Israeli. I know Israel is a hard tech tree to follow but to see those tanks along with the American and British versions of the tanks versus their cold war adversary From the Soviet Union would be cool. Plus having the battles in the desert maps, could be something to try!

@ThunderWithMuffin

Жыл бұрын

Thank you and you should post your idea on the ideas channel on my discord server so people can vote on it

@dylanjohnston5848

Жыл бұрын

@@ThunderWithMuffin Sounds good, I shall do that right now!!

i feel like a team of IS-2s would be terrifying

18:02 Very common footage of a m22 using 0,0001% of its full power

Man I'd love to participate in a Japanese vs America pacific style version.

wait, was't IS 4m built in 1945? upd: I have checked wikipedia and it says the production started in 1946, my bad

@n1co2017

Жыл бұрын

it’s ok the us players used the t32 which i guess technically it was ww2 approved since they accepted the design in march of 1945 but the first pilot model was finished in 1946

@SergZa

Жыл бұрын

Just like T95, T29, T34, T30.

Hehe I was the one who knocked out that Katyusha on the east side of the Advance to the Rhine map in the final round, turns out 15cm AP shells from T30s cause a bit of overpressure and shrapnel.

Alternative history: General Patton received the plan for operation unthinkable from Churchill and actually thought that it was a good idea.

Can you do a video with the strv 102 or a other version against ww2 tanks?

Im so glad katyusha made an appearance

The replay system really puts a damper on these videos. Its not as engaging when everything is sliding around and shots look like they would have missed but still connect.

Seems like it's commander error more than the tech. How the f--k didn't the T-44-100 see the Pershing? lol

The absolute blood bath these battles would've been in real life.

@AFT_05G

Жыл бұрын

I’m pretty sure half of these tanks wouldn’t even be used in combat,especially US heavies as they were test prototypes were with only a few built.

its only because of the IS 7 and 6 and 4 and 3

Germany versus the Russians for 1945 next plzzzzzz lol this is pretty good.

why no is-7? im sure it was made like a few weeks after WWII ended but doesnt it still count as 1945? or would it be balance issue? (or rarity)

@ZOMBIEKILLER5632

Жыл бұрын

I was surprised no one used the T-54 since the first prototype was finished at the end of 1945

@kanestalin7246

Жыл бұрын

I was hoping for the is7

@evilnigga68

Жыл бұрын

likely a balance issue, maybe not in warthunder but if it was real life, it would most definitely be a balance issue.

@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537

Жыл бұрын

IS-7 was a cumstain on a napkin in 1945. It was actually built in the late 40's. We have the last mod, circa1949 plus, easily told by the KPVT mounted, which did not go into service until then. IS-7 would not have been ready until the 50's anyway, lol. Soviet's did that project dirtier than hard R's. At that point you are talking at least T43 pilot and Conqueror Mk1. The T-54 would lack the fancy ammo, and the prototype would be a fat T-44. Earliest T-54 we have is the mod 1947 using, I suspect, much later ammo.

@p_nilly

Жыл бұрын

@@evilnigga68 Defo a balance issue in WT too.... IS-7 is a pain in the butt to kill with anything that isn't modern... I know because I have an IS-7. If you're shooting it front-on with AP, good luck

i always hate competitions like this, that don't truly represent how land combat or mobile warfare unfolded. not your fault, of course, the fault is squarely to be placed on shoddy game design

If I played this game for the US, I would use the Super Pershing to hide and then immediately turn my turret to shoot the person who clearly didn't notice the barrel of the gun sticking out. Lol.

If possible it would be class if you could do one invisible tank against an army of tanks etc

Dude on IS6 is absolustely potato brain. 1 good player on IS6 can RUIN half of the enemy team and if it was still supported by 1-2 IS3 then the enemy's team has already lost

@benpurcell4935

Жыл бұрын

Yes and no because it was US vs Russia the T-95 is available and that thing just bounces most shells frontally. An entire team of T-95s would be a scary sight.

@rammstein7573

Жыл бұрын

@@benpurcell4935 Entire team of T95 is more funny then scary. T95 is the only tank in the US tech tree that can safely stop soviet 122mm shells, howewer IS6 is one of the most mobile heavy tank in game and his armor was designed to stop any projectiles from the most powerful guns of the time, for example german pak43 and pak44

Do one about German vs American aa guns preferably WW2

I wonder how the t32e1 would of fared

when is the next video

I suggest ground with Cas 1939 Russia/Germany/USA vs USA/Germany

using a different map negates the outcome of round 2

I’m surprised no US players used a M36B2

@sebastiandelgado2642

Жыл бұрын

I think it gives a lot up tiers cause the heat and it’s br rating so I don’t use it

It's not about tank, it's about player except IS3.

Operation Unthinkable 😮

Woah

Super Pershing as a 1945 tank is a bit generous.

The intro music is from caterinth

Cold war U.S. vs Cold War Soviets?

Thats russan Bias at its best

@chugunniy_povelitel

Жыл бұрын

Average war thunder player when a russian tank kills another tank

How do I join the fight?

@ThunderWithMuffin

Жыл бұрын

Join my discord to receive the announcements on when we do our events

I like that there's a lot of people crying in the comments because the americans lost lol

@russman3787

8 ай бұрын

US players are easily the whiniest in the game. It's never their fault they lost, it's always russian bias, or undertiered german tanks, or an unfair competition, etc etc.

Now im wait 9.0 - 11.3 USSR vs USA

USA! 0:23 I vote good ole US

USA won the last round only because they were able to respawn endlessly

Going to have to stop you right there. IS-3[M] model we actually have is a later development. The M is a funny time dilating letter when it comes to Soviet tanks. Just like if you did Soviet vs NATO heavies from the early Cold War, there would be no T-10M, because the T-10 didn't get its gun refit until the late 50's nor the special high pen ammos until 1967. Big difference.

@robertharris6092

Жыл бұрын

So what did the IS-3M change?

@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537

Жыл бұрын

​@@robertharris6092 The AA machinegun [pivoting skate mount over the commander/loader hatch], the rear barrels, basically made the thing drivable without falling apart [this especially includes redoing the welds/ hull structure that cracked off the line, mind you there is no room for a "last ditch" excuse on these (it was bad), and the really jank engine that plagued many Soviet tanks]. The top ammo also is in contention [and the WWII ammos performing right, as in they are something like 10% overperforming]. This translates to you being slower, no cold war smoke barrels, no AA roof skate, less penetration, your armor being prone to much more spall.

Think thonk.

0:04 14:56 Tutel :D 🐢

So modern russian tanks vs 1945 american tanks?

А теперь включите советской команде мониторы и переиграйте

@kzxv_

Жыл бұрын

Lmfao

0:19 YES IAM FAMOUS (i knew it because of my rocket launcher on the turret XD)

a lot of these vehicles were being used not so well lol, let alone people using m22's, an sherman 75's which are no way a match against T-44's and shiz

America could have won if they were more organized

It also helps that Russian guns in this game get to 1 tap just cuz they looked at you sideways.

@robertharris6092

Жыл бұрын

The advantage of using 122mm shells. The disadvantage is a 20+ second reload.

I wonder, i mean isnt it called UdSSR? Not ussr! UdSSR its called i think

This is how war thunder should be

war thunder could be such a good strategy game...

I feel like the superpershing is basically the American equivalent of the IS2 Edit: I don’t think these types of competitions are even true, first of all the amount of possibilities are nearly endless. Second it also depends on the players and environment for example Any hilly terrain Most likely American tanks as they have better gun depression and handling Ex2: flat terrain: most likely soviet as their guns hit harder and usually better in that area.

@robertharris6092

Жыл бұрын

It also doesnt factor in production capabilities or russias horrid build quality and steel quality in WWII.

Can you do USSR vs Sweden to pretend a russian cold war invasion of sweden. T62 and t54 vs strv103 and bkan or smth like it

T95???

😮

The thing I noticed in the first round is that the americans just largely fucked off and did whatever. Meanwhile the USSR guys were sticking together and picking off the US one by one

The Ussr team didnt play good on the last match

Where m3lee, m4a1(75mm)? Half of Soviet team is 39-41's

Do a France vs germany 1940 with historical ammo. Other than 88flakbus do german have anything that can defeat a b1 bis/ter?

@AFT_05G

Жыл бұрын

B1 ter was just a prototype,and trust me all German tanks besides Panzer I could knock out a B1 from it’s side armor. Most French tanks in 1940 are massively overrated besides the Somua S-35.

Please mack a vidio Germany 1945 vs Russian 1945

Do Germany and ussr

Operation uinthinkable ?

why is there 75 shermans but 2 FRICKING IS 3s

tutel :)

All kv2 tanks were destroyed by 1943

@russman3787

8 ай бұрын

Then why does one still exist?

Can anyone name the tanks on each team on the first round?

@ezj2820

Жыл бұрын

USA: T26E5, T30, A couple of big forehead event vecs idk the name I just call them forehead tanks. Some 76mm M4 Sherman's, M18s, M22, Calliope and M26. USSR: T44, T44 100, IS3, IS2 (multiple variants), T34. IMO, unfair matchups. 5 T44 100s and 2 IS3s could make easy work of that American team.

@p_nilly

Жыл бұрын

@@ezj2820 Agreed. The IS-3s by themself would be a nightmare to take out

Ayyyy im the 4th to comment sheeshhh never seen a video with this comments

British fv4005 vs maus 20vs20 would be intresting

@Igzilee

Жыл бұрын

Maus would 100% win, the 4005 has a very poor reload and it can't even kill the Maus very reliably. The maus can pen the 4005 with ease pretty much anywhere, and has a much faster reload. I think 20 fv4005s vs 10 maus would be better, the only way the Fv4005s would win is if they got a really long range map and just sat defending a ridgeline.

saunder vs pravda be like

Actually, like the US, soviet tanks also were very balanced in terms of protection, power, and speed and were also very good all-round designs.

@AFT_05G

Жыл бұрын

Though tank and crew casualties of USSR and US says the otherwise.I’d consider most Soviet WW2 tanks as nothing more than “decent enough to get the job done”.Though they had some pretty impressive designs post war.Until 1970s Soviet MBTs were generally superior to their NATO counterparts.

@chaosacsend9653

Жыл бұрын

@@AFT_05G according to who the soviets

@U_Go_Boom

Жыл бұрын

@@AFT_05GThe main reason why Soviet casualties were higher than American one was because unlike the Americans, who entered the war against Germany pretty late, the Soviets had to endure years of attritional fighting against many of the top units the Third Reich had to offer. The Americans entered the war when Germany had already been worn down significantly by the USSR and they subsequently had to deal with less. I actually do think some of the Soviet tanks were really good. Unlike many of the late-war German or allied heavy tanks, the IS-2 in actually did quite well. It was the same size a tiger 1, but with a larger gun, and higher top speed. It's pretty much one of the only very effective heavy tanks of the war. Additionally, in tank-on-tank combat, most people would agree that the Soviets would most likely win against the Americans when testing ww2 ground vehicles. This is mainly due to their involvement with the tank arms race that they had with Germany.

Uk vs ussr would be good

I think USA get dead barrel easier 'cause there front is too strong, so people try to play it as bully, barel, wheels or chenille... And then flank to kill easy

@jasonjobst

Жыл бұрын

Why are you describing Germany for the American tanks? Also the Russian tanks had better armor overall throughout their tanks. Only certain ones were better, like the super Pershing or the doom turtle

Oh, I see. Serial tanks of the USSR in 1943-1945 against American prototypes of 1946 and older years of production. What do T95, T34, T30 do in the video? And why, in this case, is there no IS-4, IS-6, IS-7? If you already called the video 1945 USA VS 1945 USSR, then in this case the USA can only have Super Pershing.

@jonathanallen3688

Жыл бұрын

T95 was like 43.

At this time only seen the first round. The american team, are they deaf? 😂😂

@goodguyguy5022

Жыл бұрын

I don’t think they were using headphones