*Laughs in Distant Horizons mod with infinite view distance*

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

This is the way to go for sure. But only giga chads do it legitimately. xD

@Chlrintruc

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt Yeah totally

@huhj963

Жыл бұрын

I cant use that mod correctly for some reasson

@6Twisted

Жыл бұрын

@@huhj963 It doesn't work with shaders at the moment

@orbyfied

Жыл бұрын

Renders an estimate of terrain height tho so incredibly undetailed

I cannot wait for like 10-20 years from now, computers will be so advanced that we can play at like 200 chunks with 100+ fps 😄

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

More like 3-4 years if Mojang decides to do a major rewrite of the java code or merges all the variants to one version. xD I can only hope...

@ScottLucian

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt True! Mojang needs to seriously up their game because MC is insanely unoptimized

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@@ScottLucian Agreed. The new features are always nice but all the techy people want all the optimizations.

@minibigbox8313

Жыл бұрын

​@@poky-- MC bedrock have insane lack of features for server hosting and modding

@Nerderkips

Жыл бұрын

@@poky-- NO thanks 💀

Imagine if Minecraft was properly optimized with the ability to do multithreading with multiple cores on the CPU...

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Some day... ;)

@jordanlazarus7345

Жыл бұрын

It can to an extent. Sodium adds a slider that allows you to allocate more threads to rendering chunks which does make high render distance usable. I run 64 chunks with shaders regularly and it runs fine if you're not flying because of the additional threads being used through sodium.

@le9038

Жыл бұрын

@@jordanlazarus7345 Seriously??? Why isn't this in Vanilla Minecraft???

@jordanlazarus7345

Жыл бұрын

@@le9038 dont get me wrong, it's not perfect, but terrain generation on high core count CPU's is so much faster, and the game normally runs way better when everything is already loaded and you're just fully loaded a lot more often with that option

@electronnuclear

Жыл бұрын

Well bedrock edition is multithreaded and it's the reason why it suffers from bugs, bcz even the mob behaviours and redstone make use of multiple threads causing it to glitch out the game. You may have heard ppl complaining about bedrock redstone being random. Well guess what you have it.

0:47 the way you said "cool" sounds like old Minecraft Steve's hurt sound

I've been using Distant Horizons, but this is so much cooler seeing this much actually rendered! Great video!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I use that too if I don't want to play with 1fps which is always xD I also use Iris haha.

@BakeBakePi

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt I wish minecraft had built in LOD and more optimization lol

@stanleybochenek1862

Жыл бұрын

@@BakeBakePi yea

@Ferrichrome

Жыл бұрын

Distant Horizons is more interesting because it does it in a more efficient way that can be run more smoothly, but this is neat too

@randomguy15865

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt you should've tried that in bedrock edition

One client should not have this much power...

@AJ-Palermo

Жыл бұрын

​@@worldslogic5301 but also more bugs

@JakeDevs

Жыл бұрын

@@AJ-Palermo the point is more chunks so that is irrelevant

@rexperverziff

Жыл бұрын

@@worldslogic5301 how do you get bedrock on a pc- *WINDOWS 10 EDITION*

@JakeDevs

Жыл бұрын

@@AJ-Palermo there's always a way

@TylerTMG

Жыл бұрын

@@rexperverziff if you have java you have the launcher and when you buy mc you get both

At 1:51 those frame time spikes align with memory usage drops. That suggests the multi treaded JVM garbage collection wasn't able to complete before the memory allocated to the "new generation" was exhausted. This would cause a single threaded full garbage collection which is a "stop the world" event, meaning all other threads get paused. I like what you are trying to do, but the JVM garbage collection and generation sizing is probably going to need to be tweaked to cope with a 4.6GB/s allocation rate.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'll have to try that again in the future when I have 512GB of ram to work with.

@no-defun-allowed

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt Prolly enabling ZGC should help; I think G1 newgen collection is always stop-the-world?

@AkneeGrow

7 ай бұрын

​@@no-defun-allowedhow can jvm improve performance?

@katto1937

2 ай бұрын

@@Ahptt More memory wouldn't help that, it's an issue with java that minecraft is using, it simply pauses everything while it waits for the huge amounts of memory to load. More memory would actually make it worse.

@NatetheNintendofan

18 күн бұрын

​@@katto1937Exactly that's what everyone tells me Because I play It's hotted and trust me.When you install a lot of mods there's a lot of memory leaks

The pinnacle of human technology will be when computers can run Minecraft at 32 chunk render distance at a constant 60fps with shaders turned on!

@colbyboucher6391

Жыл бұрын

There *are* PCs that can do that.

@KingOfTheKindle

Жыл бұрын

Bro my pc can do that, you just need performance mods. Sodium + starlight can more than triple your fps, and increase your 1% lows even more so.

@realixx9375

Жыл бұрын

Sodium + Starlight gives me about 50 more fps, Idk how people are getting double. I go from 100 in singleplayer to 150. 200 in multi-player to 250.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Sodium, Iris, Starlight, Lithium is a good start!

@realixx9375

Жыл бұрын

I have all of them. Plus FerriteCore and some entity culling mods. Still only around a 50 fps increase

Gosh you are so underrated... i expected you to have thousands of subscribers but to see this video only getting 2 thousands views is insane you deserve more then that, you will go far broski, you gained a Subscriber for sure.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Dang, I appreciate the support. You are a legend.

@kulled

Жыл бұрын

the channel bio alone warrants an automatic subscription from me

@ShiroiAkumaSama

Жыл бұрын

Only 2 thousand views? Look again :D

@palkay875

Жыл бұрын

I hate it when people use the word "underrated" wrong.

@kulled

Жыл бұрын

@@palkay875 fortunately this is not one of those times :)

There is a setting in Sodium/Rubidium under Performance to increase the amount of cores used for chunk rendering. Not sure if that actually works but who knows

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'll have to give it a go when I build an actually good computer haha.

@yooogort

10 ай бұрын

@@Ahptt You have an amazing computer wdym?

@Dragoon710

10 ай бұрын

@@yooogort its outdated

@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty

8 ай бұрын

​@@Dragoon710No it's not, that's a monster he has built. 5900X and 3080 bro that's high class.

@Dragoon710

8 ай бұрын

@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty it's still a really good computer dont get me wrong

This is amazing content! You definitely deserve more recognition for your work.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are a legend and I really appreciate your kind words.

@puppergump4117

Жыл бұрын

What about the poor computer

Now I wanna see what you can do with Distant Horizons AND this much RAM

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I will be making another video with 512GB of ram and a threadripper CPU. Let's see just how far I can make it with these mods, and other generous improvements to my process some have offered in the comments section already.

@Sithhy

Жыл бұрын

@@antonio32a More RAM per each RAM stick

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, big boi ram sticks. Like 512gb sticks hehe

@attilavs2

Жыл бұрын

@@antonio32a 8x64gb with threadripper

I can't almost believe you can render thousand of blocks without using distant horizon, pretty good video, please make these more.

You can also use the settings file to go wild until the game keeps crashing, about 4,000,000 chunks is the limit for my i9 and 64GB, so I can only imagine how far your machine will go.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I hadn't thought of that before. I'll have to look into that when I get a threadripper system with +512GB of RAM xD

@ItsartoTV

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt That's much I think i will but RAM for my 4GB RAM phone

@Infinite-INF

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt im sittng here with a cool 64 gb so i would find if you leant me a spare 128gb or better yet a spare threadripper or something from my 5900x :)

@itzjustrandom5673

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt remember that without mods minecraft utilizes 1 core of the cpu so for now the 13900k and a very large amount of ram is going to work pretty well, you could install a multicore mod and then check if you got better framerates

@bilge677

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt isn't the single core performance on threadrippers worse than traditional CPUs?

Came for the crazy chunk distance, stayed for the sick dwm rice. actually awesome dude, just discovered your channel, and am now going through and watching your old videos.

No bs like other ytbers, straight to the point good job underrated one.

man i WISH i could do this. i cant play with more than 10 render distance most times and it gets so much in my way. specially when flying around with an elytra. good video tho this is excellent quality work and i hope you grow more and more!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'd try out Distant Horizons. It uses LOD's to mimic render distance without turning your game into a slideshow. modrinth.com/mod/distanthorizons

@delory4591

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt oh yeah i forgot about those. thanks!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@@delory4591 You're welcome. Let me know if you need any more mod suggestions. I've dove deep into many projects. xD

Try using Linux's swap feature, which allows you to use an SSD for extra RAM. You will need to turn down swappiness to around 5 or smth to make it not lag that much.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'll consider buying two 8tb m.2's for my future 512gb system and give one full 8tb of swap. Just casually run Minecraft with 8704GB of RAM.. xD

@flintfrommother3gaming

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt How to thrash an SSD 101

@ApertureSciencePsycho

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt, ayooo that's nice. If you experience any performance issues with this setup, try running the SSDs in RAID 0 (with fragments being as small as possible), which basically combines 2 into 1, so it's 2x faster. People usually hate RAID 0 cause of data corruption, but we don't care coz it's not like if it's gonna contain any important data.

@ApertureSciencePsycho

Жыл бұрын

@@flintfrommother3gaming I don't think that's gonna take up all read/write cycles in a single session

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. We just run algorithms to create fancy region files. Those 8tb's are expensive now so I will hold off for the time being lol.

Didn't know a 6 minute render commentary is what I needed now

@Chicken_Soy

10 ай бұрын

I like your vids

Man this really makes you appreciate the clever engineering that went into distant horizons

people have mentioned distant horizons, but it’s so interesting how with some basic LOD scaling this wouldn’t be nearly as intensive

@zaccorpseman7366

8 ай бұрын

And its funnier how the fanbase could even get ahead of Mojang themselves with things like this

0:46 bro sounds like the old minecraft hurt sound

Im working on developing a voxel game, this actually helps me understand the soft boundaries of the number of chunks I can render 😂

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Glad to be of help!

Ill tell you that we love some good content about Minecraft performance, love the detailed specs given like cpu etc, very entertaining!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'm glad you thought it was entertaining!

there is also a software limit that minecraft itself can handle before it crashes. This is also the reason why if you allocate more memory than needed to minecraft it can decrease performance

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I've heard of that. It would be cool to see what 512GB will do with a threadripper system and the like.

@pvpsushi

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt it may make minecraft become pretty unstable or outright crash, it would be interesting to see

@honzahavlas4061

Жыл бұрын

Never heard of that? I allowed almost my entire RAM to be used for minecraft to get better performance which made the fps a little better but caused more micro lags Any tips on how I could build on this limit mechanic?

@pvpsushi

Жыл бұрын

@@honzahavlas4061 that microlag is what im talking about. I think theres way to go around it using multithreading or other things but theres not really any point in fixing or working around it since minecraft doesnt really take many resources

@benjezimo

Жыл бұрын

​@Honza Havlas Normally, for something like the FTB app, I tested it to be best around 8gb

You can turn up your chunk render threads in the sodium settings

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I totally forgot about that setting. I'm adding it to a list when I redo this with a threadripper system and 512GB or more of RAM... ;)

@SOTP.

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt i wanna see 256 chunks working lol (and i dont count things like reducing lod)

I'm here before you got 1 million subs, your contents are wild

Jeez I didn't realize you had so few subs, I'm happy this video blew up and I hope you're now inspired to continue working on new videos and accomplish even more, subbed.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You're a legend!

You should try running a Paper server on your computer and joining it locally instead of a singleplayer world. Paper has multithreaded chunk generation, so maybe that'll help your R9 5900X keep up.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Good idea!

This was a really cool video! Great job! Though I do have a question. Around 4:10 you mentioned you had a ton of performance mods to get this to work properly, and I'm wondering what mods you used for performance. I mean, if you can render hundreds of chunks and not immediately crash then I can only imagine how well the performance would be on a regular Minecraft world.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I get nearly 1,000 fps with a rtx 3080, 5900x, and that amount of allocated RAM. It's pretty juicy haha.

@B_Jamer

Жыл бұрын

Yea but what mods did you use?

@commander3494

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt imagine if you had a ryzen 7000 and a radeon gpu. That would make it go even crazier since youre on linux

@puppergump4117

Жыл бұрын

@@B_Jamer It's a secret. He's with the Russians and they finally hacked minecraft to work properly.

also been recommended this so you made front page great work shall deserve like 25k subs

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

AYYYY IT MADE IT. WOHOOOO!! Thanks for your kind words.

@randomstudiocreatorrbx3440

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt your welcome and your video seems somewhat professionally done

you rendered out a whole world wow, this is really cool!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Pretty much lol. Now imagine 512GB of ram with Minecraft optimized in a few years?!? xD

@TornMarmot

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt lol that would be amazing!

there is a mod called concurrent chunk management engine that runs chunks on separate threads. might fix the issues

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I used this. Still getting this FPS. I think Java itself needs to be modernized lol

@wiillou

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt someone is porting the vulkan renderer to replace openGL so maybe we will eventually be able to do more, but currently breaks every single performance mod.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@@wiillou That's what I've noticed when attempting that mod

Imagine running bedrock edition instead though, the render distance could be easily doubled, possibly tripled

I watched the video thinking im watching a big youtuber, you deserve a lot more subscribers than you currently have, keep it up!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You're a legend for that compliment. Thank you!

Only 2k subs? This is top tier content for your class! Great work!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are a legend!

0:56 best part of the video 💀

in Future we would probably be able to play with 512 render distance with 60+ fps :) can't wait for it

@JACKHARRINGTON

Жыл бұрын

Well if it weren't written in java and had good optimisation then 512 probably would be possible in this video.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I agree with Jack. It would be nice to see a major rewrite or a singular Minecraft version with pros taken from each current version, but that will probably take time. I will keep my ever-searching eyes out for it though. Probably will be hard to miss.

@fitipapani9805

Жыл бұрын

we can now

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

With LOD's yes. But actually loading the chunks like a giga chad with decent framerate, well, I'll see in a bit when I go again with 512GB... :)

@JACKHARRINGTON

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt I can't even comprehend 512GB of RAM lol.

Man, I so see you as being the next big MC Tuber, good luck!

@xdeep_freeze3684

2 ай бұрын

lmao this did not age like fine wine.

Nice video, looking forward to your 512GB video! My most viewed video is also taking Minecraft RD to the extremes. I only got 64GB in my PC so waiting for an older server I bought to ship out that has 384GB of DDR3. I'm planning to try to use Chunky with it to get an image of the entire Greenfield City map. Not sure if it'll be quite enough, but guess we'll see. :)

Fyi for normal usage I recommend sticking to max 31GB of RAM allocated as compressed OOPs in Java means that 31GB and 48GB of RAM are pretty much equivalent to each other.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I don't normally run this xD Though that would be a flex. Maybe when I build a 512GB system ;)

@ThreeTreee

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt Minecraft on 1tb of ram

@commander3494

Жыл бұрын

You basically dont need more than 8gb for mc, unless you do what was done in this video. Even Greedycraft with 500 mods runs on 10gb with normal settings.

Even 12 core processor can't run this game on ultra graphics

I love how the end of the video is basically how my i3 6100 runs on 9 render distance

Nice video! this is the first on i watched and im gonna watch more keep up the great work!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are amazing. Keep up the positive vibes, you legend!

It's hard for me to imagine what kind of grandiose results you would get on an optimized "bedrock edition" It runs in C++ instead of Java

@deilusi

Жыл бұрын

Likely not much different as at that scale even small issue in code would bloat to showstopping scale. M$ is not interested in turning that game into simulation monster, they only want to sell realms subscription.

@giakhanhvn2mc

11 ай бұрын

bedrock is a hot piece of garbage, they "optimize" by just chopping off chunks far away, most bedrock chunks arent loaded, they're just there, showing you the bare minimum, the chunk itself isnt alive, and keep in mind JVM (java) will run incredibly close to native (C/C++) code when all code compiled by JIT java is not that slow, the programming language is not the one to blame, the one to blame is minecraft incredibly messy and unoptimized rendering engine, as Notch written it back when cpu has only 2 cores

have you tried using gentoo on this pc? with this specs you would compile kernel and packages in seconds lmao

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Gotta go fast!!!! I'm in Void right now. I would like to try out Gentoo at some point.

I remember trying to play minecraft at more than 8 chunks like this. Was like frames per minute rather than per second.

Love this guys commentary it appeals greatly to my BS humor. He deserves more subs, but just earned 1 more from me

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are a legend. I appreciate you!

Is there a mod you use to allow more than 32 chunks and if so what is it? I want to try this on my laptop and is what it can do.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I use a mod called Distant Horizons. It uses level of detail (LOD's) commonly used in other games to mimic high render distance without turning your game into a slide show. modrinth.com/mod/distanthorizons

@guidedexplosiveprojectileg9943

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt I wonder why mojang hasnt implimented it🤔

@TheRian125

Жыл бұрын

@@guidedexplosiveprojectileg9943 vanilla minecraft JE can't handle that, in order to achieve a playable experience with high render distance you'll need mods, this is a lot of work that could go to an update that the majority of the player base will see as an "actual update"

@JakeDevs

Жыл бұрын

@@TheRian125 truth is devs are just lazy. its significantly easier to implement something with the native engine rather than a modding api. they have dont literally nothing good for years with small updates that they call "major"

@TheRian125

Жыл бұрын

@@JakeDevs are you saying that from a programmers background? is not about lazyness, minecraft is HUGE, most of the playerbase plays BE, wich already has a much better render engine than JE, its just out of scope for now ps: i strongly believe that their plan is to drop JE support and have everyone on the BE

My device would crash immediately 😂

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Haha! Yeah, next system is 512GB. It's honestly hilarious to me that some people don't even have 128/512GB of solid state storage and here I am with that much in random access memory.

@coraversor5023

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt Also congrats on your mission! My sister (Alia) told me. Funny how your last video is so popular!

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@@coraversor5023 shhhhhh ;)

1:10 computers will remember this torture

Minecraft looks cool when you can see into the distance, they should make a thing that makes a 2d image of the distance so that you can still see into the distance but it isnt as demanding as rendering every block in a chunk

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, or just rewrite Java so it runs well haha.

Teoricamente, cada Valor de "Render Dist" requer um núcleo real de um bom processador para gerar em tempo real todos os "chunks". Para 64 "Render Dist", necessita-se de um processador 64/128. Além de memórias bem rápidas para não haver "fps drop" enquanto anda no mapa

By the way, PolyMC is not really being maintaned anymore. Most of the devs have moved to Prism Launcher (a fork), so it's recommended to switch to that.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I saw the whole fiasco. I'm just trying to avoid the drama so I'll keep my eye out. Thanks!

@Filipex13

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt I am using Prism launcher without any issues. Switched from multimc ;)

Nice video and cool channel. Keep up the good work 👍

I hope you get more popular one day! btw amazing video I enjoyed it a lot

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You're a legend! Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.

2:21 big smoke

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are so right. RIP to the system. That's okay, because it's still alive.

@gn6969

5 ай бұрын

Big smoke its me carl chill chill

wait how did you get render distance higher than 32 on sodium??

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Just casually allocate 128GB to Minecraft xD

@commander3494

Жыл бұрын

There was a mod that allowed you to edit it, i forgot which one it was though

Do this except render it to a super high resolution screenshot, you can then zoom really far in on the screenshot it looks super cool

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I like that idea. Will have to give it a go!

should do it in the end and see lots of end cities from the main end island

turn off fog and you will see more :D

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, like 5 chunks which doesn't even matter lol. When I try it next, I will have to do that. 512GB of RAM, here we come!

@aryansaini2648

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt :)

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@Saiv46 Oh yeah, I'm going all the way. Threadripper system, the big boi gpus.

@aryansaini2648

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt 💸

Try bedrock edition, that would let you go to 4096 chunks with 10 fps

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'll have to try that with a threadripper and 512GB ram ;)

@unwrdo

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ahptt 512 GB RAM??? ON BEDROCK EDITION???? ARE YOU GONNA SEE THE WHOLE WORLD NOW TO FARLANDS NOW?

Please actually do the threadripper system. That would be soo cool!

If they add level of detail to vanilla mc that would be great

View distance also requires a lot of VRAM on your GPU, because rendered chunks are stored in display lists in the GPU VRAM Waiting for the 128GB VRAM video lmfao

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Yeah. I can only imagine what'll happen when I build my 512GB threadripper system. Might just buy more ram cause why not and try this again with more mods and such.

@bonenaut7

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt Sounds great, but i'm not sure vanilla will be able to utilize so much power, but who knows how it will turn out Good luck anyway, crazy ideas are always great

@simon6658

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt Maybe you need Quadro RTX 6000 Ada 48GB

You are strongly advised to try bedrock, it's true it is very optimized, I play with 84 chunks at 60 fps, but there is one problem, the maximum distance there is 96 chunks, so you will have to look for a way to get around this limitation.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the info, I'll have to look into that when I try again.

@itzjustrandom5673

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt i saw somewere that there is a mc bedrock version in google that is capable of going past 96 chunks

@vasik9645

Жыл бұрын

i think bcoz of the 1.18 update they made mistake in the code and now u can edit the files of bedrock for unlimited render distance

@elpsykoongro5379

Жыл бұрын

As far as I know it hasn't been optimal optimized for a time, bedrock runs worse than java in my case

@vasik9645

Жыл бұрын

also bedrock doesnt load the chunks after a certain chunks are loaded i had 400 render distance and it looked like 128 or less

This reminded me about that the CroTeam made 70 cubic kilometers out of bounds territory on one map in SS4 just to make an analog of SKYBOX

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I have no idea what you're referencing but it sounds neat.

Hello! nice video! Just be careful of your CPU temps if you have a static OC on. You dont have the CPU throtling when loading all those chunks, so you might brake your CPU. I nearly did it so be care m8 :D

*Minecraft Bedrock Edition: I offer you 96+ Chunks Render Distance on Vanilla at 60 FPS Constant and I'll load the all the Chunks under 4 Seconds and won't take 30 Mins to Render if you have enough RAM and Decent Midrange Hardware and I'll not Blast your PC off into the Space after Loading all the Chunks* This is Probably the Definition of Bedrock Edition's Performance as Compared to Java

@colbyboucher6391

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, but then it'll straight-up delete the blocks you just placed as you're walking on them and dump you in a lava lake.

@Something_Disgusting

Жыл бұрын

​@@colbyboucher6391 which is caused by the same reason it runs so much more efficiently. It utilizes a task scheduling service that works asynchronously allowing for less processing bottlenecks, but that can cause desync issues.

@colbyboucher6391

Жыл бұрын

@@Something_Disgusting Interesting, didn't know that.

@simon6658

Жыл бұрын

are there worldedit and worldedit CUI mods available in Bedrock?

Try the same test on bedrock. The render distance on bedrock is insane compared to java with how optimized it is. I set my render distance to 1000 and my laptop with 16gb ram only slide showed while loading the chunks in view and was semi smooth once they were loaded. I could reasonably play on a render distance of like 200+. Just imagine that with 128 gb ram

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Bro, I can only imagine. I've had quite a few people recommend this. I'll have to try this out.

@mocha5483

Жыл бұрын

Distant horizons better

Minecraft still to this day is the biggest pc fryer

How is this guy only getting about 700 subs, bro I even thought it was a reupload, you deserve way more bro 👍

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You're so kind. I wish you the best, you absolute king you are.

I'd love to see how far you can push this with some performance mods

Bro I actually liked this idea ❤

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Glad you did!

"The council has allotted you a singular frame per second"

Bro will be a good ytber someday i belive it right guys?

Im so glad that we have our eyes that can render 20 km without any lag.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Me too.

Bro is underrated he made me laugh multiple times during those 5 mins

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

You are a legend. You should hear me in a live voice call xD

Now you can get multi thread support for Minecraft you should try that with chunky

why is this so underrated tho? you deserve more subs HERE BEFORE THE BLOW UPP

It actually looks really beautiful

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Hey, thanks! Next is to get at least 1,000 chunks with shaders and 2fps xD

I bet bedrock would be able to render more of them with more distance, but I'm unsure if you can set it that high.

Certified underrated youtuber

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I appreciate that, you legend.

NICE VIDEO 😄😄THE DESTRUCTION OF THE POOR RYZEN 9 WAS ENTERTAINING

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it, you legend. What can I say, I love to destroy my system for my entertainment, and the entertainment of others.... xD

the f3 mod you are using is very fps intensive I find myself losing around 20% of my fps when just using it

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I notice that too. Will need to do something different next time I try this out.

void is cool thats my favorite distro

Ram: i can do it but there's a problem Cpu: That's right

amazing vid btw what mod did you use to hit 229 without lod chunks?

Haha the GC spikes were awesome lol

imagine how high your render distance could be if mojang added official LOD support

A small distance fog and it would look verry good

this also flex about the linux stability on memory management

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

Software elitism is good in moderation. Gotta say, I love GNU/Linux and more specifically Void GNU/Linux.

At that high RAM usage, cosmic rays start to become issues.

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

heh

i would love to see this test happen in bedrock

Minecraft can run on anything moment.

bro found one of the rarest biomes

"Got my PC a hundred gigabytes of ram, I don't feed trolls and I never read spam"

No way you have less than 1k subs these are 1m + quality vids😭😭 ill subscribe tho this vid is awesome

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

I'm at 1k subs now lol. She's going and going!

@banned2911

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahptt oh wow you grew like 40 subs im 20 minutes lets hope that continues to grow faster

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

@@banned2911 It just keeps going lol. Thank you for the kind words. Onwards and upwards!

That multi thread suppport minecraft has 🥶

@Ahptt

Жыл бұрын

hehe

keep them coming fellow ger man