I love the reporter, he simplified everything and helped this man to break out of his shell!!

@steffenjespersen247

4 жыл бұрын

Yea I hate it when the seller is too flashy, but this guy is a bit too much in his shell.

@korkunge

2 жыл бұрын

@@steffenjespersen247 The thing is i do not understand why Swedish people have such a hard time explaining things in English, i am Swedish and i cant explain stuff that interests me, an if i would work in bred making industry i would leran the bred making industry lingo in English so i can sell the stuff!!

Love the CV90, awesome system 👍🏻

How can you be interested in military staff and working in defense field and not know about cv 90?! Cv 90 is first degree homework

@RJM1011

4 жыл бұрын

Also thinks you can refuel a tank/afv when your still driving it ! LOL

@petter5721

4 жыл бұрын

Great interview and two nice people 😀👍🏻

Great honesty by a reporter

Swedish camo is awezome!

@KamiKaZantA

4 жыл бұрын

M90 is the name of the camo. It's sexy as fuck, but I'm biased. It works well for our primarily dark green evergreen forests.

I wish the UK selected this vehicle over the Ajax.

@garwhittaker3743

4 жыл бұрын

Why did they not ?

@scottyj8112

2 жыл бұрын

I agree, we should have just gone with the CV90 from the get-go, a proven design with many variations with lots of expandability which the Army was looking for, used by many western and Scandinavian countries, and they are built by Bofors and Haglund's which are both well-renowned companies owned by BAE which is a British company. Not an upgrade of an existing design by the south koreans for the Australians, put forward by the Americans and built by the Spanish, now I've got nothing against the countries but I think it's not right for us.

@scottyj8112

2 жыл бұрын

@@garwhittaker3743 Because the ajax is plauged by so many proplems, Noise issues primarily and they are quite bad if you look it up among other problems.

Looks like - kind of like a braedley ;-))) - ok it ha s a turret and a gun ;-)

@petter5721

4 жыл бұрын

Minimax Hahaha that was a stupid comment 😂

BAE should bring back tank building to the UK! We invented the dam things! The British named them tanks to fool everyone, they said they were movable water tanks, fact.the name Tank stuck...

@Anolbea

5 жыл бұрын

Having a decent steel manufacturing base would be a good start. Shame Vickers got taken over by BAE.

@GI.Jared1984

5 жыл бұрын

we are the Ajax is being built in Wales

@garwhittaker3743

4 жыл бұрын

@@GI.Jared1984 With Spanish steel .

@RJM1011

4 жыл бұрын

@@GI.Jared1984 Most of it is built in Spain !

@RJM1011

4 жыл бұрын

Problem is no one wants to buy from the UK.

"Can it refuel on the fly?" Is he imagining like a ground version of midair refueling? Refueling the vehicle while a fuel truck drives alongside it? No military force on earth does that with ground vehicles, nor have any expressed any interest in doing it. Refueling on the move makes sense for jets because it's such a complicated operation to land and take off again. Putting a ground vehicle in park while you refuel it and then driving off again isn't hard, so you wouldn't really be saving any time or bypassing any complications by refueling a CV90 while on the move.

@rossg4788

5 жыл бұрын

Actually, the USMC and Army can do a tactical roadmarch/vehicle convoy and conduct refueling on the move. This was originally done during WWII.

40mm teleskop ammo .

Cv 140 zırhlı lastik paletli araç üzerine k9 a2 zırhlı 155.58 kalibre obus topunu entegre ettim etkili mevzIl 120km azmi mevzil 210km zırhlı kulesine 30mm 3namlulu makineli topu entegre ettim 800kw lazer topunu entegre ettim mühimmat bölüm entegre ettim zırhlı kulesine iki yanina omtas tank savar füze savunma sistemi entegre ettim insansı robot pilot lar kullanacak

Professor X ahhahahaha

ED209

Should have bought this than ajax

@GI.Jared1984

5 жыл бұрын

I agree but there's not much difference between the two systems

@simonmonk7266

5 жыл бұрын

I always preferred the cv90 looks nicer lol

@Some_Random_Asshole

5 жыл бұрын

Yup, but we'll learn to love the ajax.

@kashmirha

4 жыл бұрын

Because its nicer? This is not a videogame.

@simonmonk7266

4 жыл бұрын

@@kashmirha ok because it's now owned by Bae systems.

The level of sophiscation means that hardware is too expensive and only a small professional force can be formed.

Can we work together ?my father retry we have to find some cash money for pay hospital

Sure they have AI in a tank lol wtf

How could this be a tank when it has a 35-50mm gun?

@inzammodasser

5 жыл бұрын

Tank could mean any tracked vehicle with a gun on it but only carry weapons not infantry, back in ww1 or ww2 there were tanks armed with either heavy machine guns or light cannons. WW2 German panzer 3 tanks were armed with high velocity 50mm guns which knocked out much heavier french tanks armed with bigger guns. I think the army might have a vehicle that can have a 50mm gun that will be used as a scout and light tank support vehicle while the same vehicle sporting a remote turreted 30mm gun which can carry infantry to maneuver support the heavier vehicles.

@GlaDi02

5 жыл бұрын

What for? Sweeds use 40mm autocannon. Dutch use 35mm autocannon. It would fit 50 mm but ammo capacity wouuld be low. The future of CV90 is 40mm telescopic munition. And for Anti tank patoons CV 90 with 4-8 Missles. Just like in russian Kornet D with Kornet EM laser-guided missiles with both tandem HEAT and thermobaric variants. This is how tank destroyer looks like in 21st century... www.military-today.com/missiles/kornet_d.htm

@DCB601

5 жыл бұрын

The CV90 is not a tank it is a IFV. These vehicles are not meant to engage tanks but have the capability to defend themselves against them should they require it. These types of IFVs are used by mechanized infantry.

@RJM1011

4 жыл бұрын

The Panzer 1 in WW2 only had a machine gun and was called a tank same with some of the WW1 tanks

@petter5721

4 жыл бұрын

It is a combat vehicle, not at tank. Name is CV90!