Fox one FOX-1 Is semi-active homing (AIM-7, R-27) FOX-2 Is Infrared (AIM-9, R-73), although the AIM-9x is also an optical seeker FOX-3 Is active radar homing (AIM-120, R-77)
@slky326 күн бұрын
@@Redcoat11 Thanks.
@MrAJinAZ11 күн бұрын
Really useless video. Doesn't provide any information. Just some clown showing off.
@frederickwilliams9988 Жыл бұрын
Is there a dcs f-105 vs f-107
@grizzly4736 Жыл бұрын
I've not heard of a F-107 mod.
@steeltribe3967 Жыл бұрын
Thanks. At last a simple explanation. :)
@Cratevoodoo Жыл бұрын
Thanks bro. Summed it up well.
@52Macky2 жыл бұрын
Great effort 👍🏻
@alternative9152 жыл бұрын
I'm really into the Terran enterprise bridge layout, a good mix of old and nu school style bridge design/rules.
@sullywhisonant63012 жыл бұрын
ᎮᏒᎧᎷᎧᏕᎷ 🌸
@gb74182 жыл бұрын
Did you record a tacview by chance?
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
No I did not. I should have. Right after this I got into a pretty good close in fight with a MiG-23 that I lost because I didn't see his wingman!
@gb74182 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 fun! You fly multiplayer much?
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
@@gb7418 I would like to but I really don't get much time to fly even solo. Maybe a spare hour or two during the week and a couple of hours on the weekend, if the weather keeps me in.
@binaryprofessor50132 жыл бұрын
Hey man keep it up👍🏾 one day you’ll definitely be a big KZreadr
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
Thank you for saying so.
@Name-ps9fx2 жыл бұрын
Loft it next time....from like 20k msl, pull back on the stick @3g, and at about 40⁰ nose up pickle it. Device should travel 10+ miles, meanwhile you continue the pull-up and do an Immelman to reverse direction.
@justinbell81062 жыл бұрын
Try getting the 10th anniversary pack to get the verity class dreadnought cruiser
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
I used the Odyssey cruiser for the look to fit the story, but neglected that I haven't given it a proper build.
@nerdymelon212 жыл бұрын
And I only died once!
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
LOL they will sing songs of your glorious battle and you will be welcomed in Stovokor.
@Woody-nc1ru2 жыл бұрын
Didn't they loft those in?
@tanktigertigercomeonlove39702 жыл бұрын
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
@nilskellre35752 жыл бұрын
how can you fly this?
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
It's a mod for DCS. You have to have the Flaming Cliffs 3 module installed first, then download this mod by VSN I believe it is. When I get home I can update this post with links.
@nilskellre35752 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 thank aouy
@nilskellre35752 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 Abo and like do u have from me
@stephenryan3422 жыл бұрын
ok so looking at the video you posted ... firstly you fire youer MAVs out side the WEZ (Weapon Engagement Zone) the bracket on the right of the HUD. Secondly did you "bore sight" your MAVs? thirdly did you get a good hand off from your TGP to you WPN screen? and last but not least - did you read the manual and go through the training TE?
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
Yes to all but the first. My biggest issue is being able to see the targets in the MFDs. As in the MFD's on my monitor are very small, my eyes are not perfect, and even zoomed in (which I don't like using) I still just can't see the vehicles to put the cross hairs on. I need a bigger screen.
@daviddickey98322 жыл бұрын
No matter what I program it to do it still dumps 40 chaff and flare every time. Is there a different button somewhere I'm supposed to be hitting to execute the dispense program? (Edit: ok had to set up hotas fwd to run the program. I had to set up one program to dispense 1 chaff and another program to dispense 1 flare, is there a better way to do that?)
@jameslong42522 жыл бұрын
I saw a post where cmds does not display go on the newer updates. I couldn't use chaff and flare on the runway. So I thought they did not work. They fire off even with the go not displaying.
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
GO, are you referring to being able to fire countermeasures on ground? If so I will look into this as I have not had a need to fire them on ground.
@jameslong42522 жыл бұрын
I got everything figured out. Your video helped me a lot on how to program chaff and flares. I learned you cannot launch chaff and flares on the ground. Also the newer dcs version doesn't show a go in the display in the cockpit above where you turn them on.
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
@@jameslong4252 Good to hear you got it squared away. I was going to say that I don't recall ever seeing a GO in the cockpit displays, I didn't have the Viper back when it first came out so my version may never have had that.
@jameslong42522 жыл бұрын
Please help. My cmds is not on go. Cannot launch flares and chaff. How do I get CMDS to GO? Thanks
@jamesberwick22102 жыл бұрын
Instrument panel all wrong. Thuds had vertical tape instruments for airspeed and altitude. I sat in enough of them fixing them. Despite what others say, the thud could hold it's own against Mig 15, 17 and 19s, 21 were their nemesis. They had their kills and mostly with the gun.
@jacobthewarthogpilot52 жыл бұрын
The Mod has it's cockpit modeled after the Su-27 Flanker, and has the avionics of the Su-25 Frogfoot. It's just a nice external model really, looking forward to an actual module by ED in the future. I mean it still works correctly and deploys weapons just fine, you just need a little bit of experience flying russian aircraft first to understand how to fly this one.
@laurencethornblade83572 жыл бұрын
B model didn't have tape type instuments.
@jamesberwick22102 жыл бұрын
@@laurencethornblade8357 The Radome shows this as a D model, longer radome,
@markusdaxamouli51962 жыл бұрын
Was your Microphone in your Neighbors shed? Hardly hear ya.
@grizzly47362 жыл бұрын
I was having issues with the settings between my mic and the game recording program. I've got it figured out now, just need time to make more videos.
@Bogeyatyour6YT3 жыл бұрын
The Viggen has a thrust reverser. He was probably fiddling in the cockpit and activated it by mistake and couldn't deactivate it in time...
@LeoStixx863 жыл бұрын
Nice relaxing flying dude. Wouldnt mind winging up with you sometime. Just really getting back into DCS after a few months break. Normally flying and streaming X-Plane 11 may get into doing some videos for DCS. Its just such a damn learning curve lol. Currently re teaching my self the F16. Decent with the hornet. Discord is LeoStixx86 #6851 anywho you have a new sub. Keep up the good work.
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Thank you and yeah, we can certainly get together and fly. I just picked up the AV-8B on the summer sale and talk about a learning curve! You might see me posting some of my learning failures with that in the coming weeks. Real life work has me swamped until next week.
@LeoStixx863 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 Ah ok yea I also have the AV8B dont ask me how to fly it lol. Its been ages. So far I have the Hornet Falcon Harrier Huey KA50 Super carrier Hind Syria & PG. Online im usually playing the Through the inferno or Hoggit PGAW or GAW servers. Tried the squadron thing before with joining a squad and it was just too much. Now just looking for 1 maybe 2 buddies to just kick it with learn together die together and pretty much have after work fun. Usually on daily at least when the kids allow me to lol. Hell even if im not on hmu on discord ill hop on.
@nerdymelon213 жыл бұрын
Warthog wednesday and now thud thursday. This is great
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
I hope to have some time to make a Flanker Friday video.
@nerdymelon213 жыл бұрын
Warthog wednesday actually happened? Nice
@florbfnarb70993 жыл бұрын
The F-105 is supposed to be fast as a bat out out of hell on the deck. My dad was an airline pilot who flew with some guys that had flown F-4s in the Air Force. He said they said they'd fly F-4s to escort F-105s, and once the F-105s dropped their bombs they'd light the afterburner and just leave them in their dust.
@joshhoskins64003 жыл бұрын
Your flying the block 15 f16. They are way lighter than the block 50s we are used to lol. Thats why it can hold speed better while pulling g's
@arabianjules3 жыл бұрын
why boresight? not using TGP and they are G`s?
@Reptile19713 жыл бұрын
What was wrong with Mav here?
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Nothing wrong, just thinking of more damage to the target. Wingman scored 2 hits, I had one hit, one miss.
@andysan23 жыл бұрын
I haven't upgraded to 4.35 yet, although I really enjoy playing "for real" once my controls are dialed in. In real life, your first flights aren't combat, but navigational. You just don't take off and land at any arbitrary airport, so I write down and study all the important airport and wind information and procedures before I take off. With 4.35, supposedly, there's flippable kneeboards to help with that. Just adds to the immersion until I run into some glitch!
@ArchOfficial3 жыл бұрын
The newer ED planes in DCS seem to have a way better tire model than BMS, or older DCS planes. Seem to have at least a rudimentary rolling resistance, slip angle and maybe load curve simulation. BMS and many older non-ED DCS planes are just glued to the ground. DCS probably has decent camber curves too, because the plane can actually tip over, which is realistic I've heard. Track and wheelbase are both really small in the F-16. I'm pretty sure the landing gear suspension simulation and tire spring + damping simulation is better in the good DCS planes, hence easier landings. Harder isn't always more realistic; at this kind of simulation accuracy, usually the challenge is having sim tires/aero be as easy to handle as IRL! Need to use all kinds of tricks like more communicative force feedback, sounds or visual cues than you would get IRL, to account for lack of G's, inner ear etc. On top of that everybody has some kind of idea that hard = realistic, so that cancerous idea has plagued the sim industry (and consumers who expect such behavior) for decades. One example is missile performance; it's decently known by now that air to air and surface to air missiles have a somewhat lower hit chance IRL than in sims; yet everybody rags on DCS when their SAMs aren't "deadly" enough and points to BMS' more lethal SAMs (Is it like that nowadays? My info is outdated; coming back to it lately myself too) as proof of BMS being superior and DCS being arcade; but as someone who devs for simulation, I would really guess that DCS missiles are still maybe even in excess of 10% too accurate, in ideal conditions. Who knows how bad it should be in un-ideal conditions. One thing that comes to mind is the 1:27 (?) hit chance for R-27R's in the Eritrea - Ethiopia war. Almost like medium range missiles aren't some kind of silver bullet that will hit a maneuvering target every time, yet that they are especially in older sims with less accurate aero and guidance. BMS plane not being able to tip over is concerning if it had something to do with the CoG, but I'm pretty sure it's just a bad camber curve, tire springrate, whatever it is. In car sims if you have too little grip with high camber, the tires will just slide and not produce enough force to get the car on two wheels or tip over. Probably something similar in most flightsim tires. That + way too much grip I would guess. I like them both and I will stick with BMS purely for its campaign generation possibilities, but you need to give DCS credit where it is due.
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Oh don't get me wrong, I am not ragging on DCS at all. For me it's not one VS the other. I love them both mostly because I love the Viper. With that said, I am just pointing out differences. BMS is the more complete model for the Viper with weapons suite and avionics while DCS is visually amazing with more accurate flight dynamics and "feel" when flying.
@ArchOfficial3 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 Not sure if the flight dynamics are more accurate definitely, haven't seen the data, but it definitely has more FLCS implementation that should be there, and is not in BMS. I'm going to guess they also have some actual flight parameter data and probably did their own CFD as well so I would guess that the flight dynamics are indeed more accurate. Might not be by a massive amount to be honest if F-16 flight parameter data is public but I don't know if that is the case. Some people swear that BMS is more accurate still, but until I see the data... No idea about feel. Even good test pilots can't really comment on that very much to be honest. To me DCS feels the best out of all the combat sims but it can also be simply due to how the head moves around (or mostly lack of it which I like), the sounds, the visual shake effects etc. DCS likely would feel better even with 1:1 identical flight dynamics to BMS. Hence why commenting on feel is so difficult! You'd need a 1:1 replica force sensitive sidestick hooked up to a rig that can handle the forces, to even begin the comparison. Personally I'm really excited by the fact that ED is not that limited by the engine as BMS is. It will only get significantly better in the next few years as the engine improves and the plane modules can be used more realistically and in more compelling scenarios. Right now BMS still wins in that regard by a long shot; and this is taking Liberation into account. One thing DCS will never best Falcon in, is the overall feeling of the menus, intro videos, background music etc. Has that special late 90's feeling to it that is unlikely to be replicated no matter how good the sim or plane is. Just because of that I'm sure Falcon will live essentially forever to some capacity.
@gb74183 жыл бұрын
Hard to imagine those puny tires having enough traction and rigidity to flip many tons of jet plane. Stranger things have happened tho.
@ArchOfficial3 жыл бұрын
@@gb7418 They don't need much, it happens because the CG is so far above the contact patch and the track is so narrow compared to the wheelbase. They tip off one wheel and then usually contact the ground with the rest of the plane. I don't think it'd be doable if the track was much wider, but you gotta remember single fuselage planes like the F-16 are very narrow.
@gb74183 жыл бұрын
@@ArchOfficial wouldn’t you expect them to even engineer tires to pull off the rim and the struts to even collapse under lateral torque to avoid a rollover? I know nothin about planes haha. Everything I know I learned from the bms manual ;)
@Malc21693 жыл бұрын
Oh dear...
@robertsartino76643 жыл бұрын
I take it your a Dodge owner?
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Yes sir. That's all that's in my drive. Ram truck, 2015 Challenger, wife has a Journey, son has an Avenger.
@robertsartino76643 жыл бұрын
@@grizzly4736 same here, wife has 2018 Dodge Journey SXT Bkacktop edition and I have 2010 Dodge Challenger
@Dee-Jay3 жыл бұрын
13:20 ... no ... real one is green only. This is only to help people having color blindness. (kind of accessibility feature).
@thesurfsflat3 жыл бұрын
dee jay....havent seen you in ages. Hope you doing well. (raven6)
@JoJo-vm8vk3 жыл бұрын
Are you still using the pink HUD ? 🤣
@Dee-Jay3 жыл бұрын
Hi! 11:15 ... you can move your torso left/right/forward/backward by pressing mouse-wheel button and moving your mouse. Up/Down by pressing the mouse-wheel button and rolling it. Regards.
@miller7453 жыл бұрын
he's the ATC, you didn't hold position !
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the laugh. That's awesome.
@rwhunt993 жыл бұрын
I find navigating when you're used to the fancy INS/GPS stuff is a real challenge. You don't get much in the way of steer points and you use radio beacon guiding. Other than that, it's fun to fly!
@kc_was_here7373 жыл бұрын
Through the Inferno, good servers. Nice video man.
@grizzly47363 жыл бұрын
Thank you. It is a fun server. When I made this video it was my first time flying in it. I will post my next sortie I flew after this one. Quite fun taking out 2 F-5s while trying to destroy SAMs.
@nerdymelon213 жыл бұрын
Nice
@Youda000084 жыл бұрын
music?
@grizzly47364 жыл бұрын
Some generic music that comes standard with microsoft movie maker program.
Пікірлер
8:57 "THERE I AM GARY! THERE I AM!"
Fox two?
Fox one FOX-1 Is semi-active homing (AIM-7, R-27) FOX-2 Is Infrared (AIM-9, R-73), although the AIM-9x is also an optical seeker FOX-3 Is active radar homing (AIM-120, R-77)
@@Redcoat11 Thanks.
Really useless video. Doesn't provide any information. Just some clown showing off.
Is there a dcs f-105 vs f-107
I've not heard of a F-107 mod.
Thanks. At last a simple explanation. :)
Thanks bro. Summed it up well.
Great effort 👍🏻
I'm really into the Terran enterprise bridge layout, a good mix of old and nu school style bridge design/rules.
ᎮᏒᎧᎷᎧᏕᎷ 🌸
Did you record a tacview by chance?
No I did not. I should have. Right after this I got into a pretty good close in fight with a MiG-23 that I lost because I didn't see his wingman!
@@grizzly4736 fun! You fly multiplayer much?
@@gb7418 I would like to but I really don't get much time to fly even solo. Maybe a spare hour or two during the week and a couple of hours on the weekend, if the weather keeps me in.
Hey man keep it up👍🏾 one day you’ll definitely be a big KZreadr
Thank you for saying so.
Loft it next time....from like 20k msl, pull back on the stick @3g, and at about 40⁰ nose up pickle it. Device should travel 10+ miles, meanwhile you continue the pull-up and do an Immelman to reverse direction.
Try getting the 10th anniversary pack to get the verity class dreadnought cruiser
I used the Odyssey cruiser for the look to fit the story, but neglected that I haven't given it a proper build.
And I only died once!
LOL they will sing songs of your glorious battle and you will be welcomed in Stovokor.
Didn't they loft those in?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
how can you fly this?
It's a mod for DCS. You have to have the Flaming Cliffs 3 module installed first, then download this mod by VSN I believe it is. When I get home I can update this post with links.
@@grizzly4736 thank aouy
@@grizzly4736 Abo and like do u have from me
ok so looking at the video you posted ... firstly you fire youer MAVs out side the WEZ (Weapon Engagement Zone) the bracket on the right of the HUD. Secondly did you "bore sight" your MAVs? thirdly did you get a good hand off from your TGP to you WPN screen? and last but not least - did you read the manual and go through the training TE?
Yes to all but the first. My biggest issue is being able to see the targets in the MFDs. As in the MFD's on my monitor are very small, my eyes are not perfect, and even zoomed in (which I don't like using) I still just can't see the vehicles to put the cross hairs on. I need a bigger screen.
No matter what I program it to do it still dumps 40 chaff and flare every time. Is there a different button somewhere I'm supposed to be hitting to execute the dispense program? (Edit: ok had to set up hotas fwd to run the program. I had to set up one program to dispense 1 chaff and another program to dispense 1 flare, is there a better way to do that?)
I saw a post where cmds does not display go on the newer updates. I couldn't use chaff and flare on the runway. So I thought they did not work. They fire off even with the go not displaying.
GO, are you referring to being able to fire countermeasures on ground? If so I will look into this as I have not had a need to fire them on ground.
I got everything figured out. Your video helped me a lot on how to program chaff and flares. I learned you cannot launch chaff and flares on the ground. Also the newer dcs version doesn't show a go in the display in the cockpit above where you turn them on.
@@jameslong4252 Good to hear you got it squared away. I was going to say that I don't recall ever seeing a GO in the cockpit displays, I didn't have the Viper back when it first came out so my version may never have had that.
Please help. My cmds is not on go. Cannot launch flares and chaff. How do I get CMDS to GO? Thanks
Instrument panel all wrong. Thuds had vertical tape instruments for airspeed and altitude. I sat in enough of them fixing them. Despite what others say, the thud could hold it's own against Mig 15, 17 and 19s, 21 were their nemesis. They had their kills and mostly with the gun.
The Mod has it's cockpit modeled after the Su-27 Flanker, and has the avionics of the Su-25 Frogfoot. It's just a nice external model really, looking forward to an actual module by ED in the future. I mean it still works correctly and deploys weapons just fine, you just need a little bit of experience flying russian aircraft first to understand how to fly this one.
B model didn't have tape type instuments.
@@laurencethornblade8357 The Radome shows this as a D model, longer radome,
Was your Microphone in your Neighbors shed? Hardly hear ya.
I was having issues with the settings between my mic and the game recording program. I've got it figured out now, just need time to make more videos.
The Viggen has a thrust reverser. He was probably fiddling in the cockpit and activated it by mistake and couldn't deactivate it in time...
Nice relaxing flying dude. Wouldnt mind winging up with you sometime. Just really getting back into DCS after a few months break. Normally flying and streaming X-Plane 11 may get into doing some videos for DCS. Its just such a damn learning curve lol. Currently re teaching my self the F16. Decent with the hornet. Discord is LeoStixx86 #6851 anywho you have a new sub. Keep up the good work.
Thank you and yeah, we can certainly get together and fly. I just picked up the AV-8B on the summer sale and talk about a learning curve! You might see me posting some of my learning failures with that in the coming weeks. Real life work has me swamped until next week.
@@grizzly4736 Ah ok yea I also have the AV8B dont ask me how to fly it lol. Its been ages. So far I have the Hornet Falcon Harrier Huey KA50 Super carrier Hind Syria & PG. Online im usually playing the Through the inferno or Hoggit PGAW or GAW servers. Tried the squadron thing before with joining a squad and it was just too much. Now just looking for 1 maybe 2 buddies to just kick it with learn together die together and pretty much have after work fun. Usually on daily at least when the kids allow me to lol. Hell even if im not on hmu on discord ill hop on.
Warthog wednesday and now thud thursday. This is great
I hope to have some time to make a Flanker Friday video.
Warthog wednesday actually happened? Nice
The F-105 is supposed to be fast as a bat out out of hell on the deck. My dad was an airline pilot who flew with some guys that had flown F-4s in the Air Force. He said they said they'd fly F-4s to escort F-105s, and once the F-105s dropped their bombs they'd light the afterburner and just leave them in their dust.
Your flying the block 15 f16. They are way lighter than the block 50s we are used to lol. Thats why it can hold speed better while pulling g's
why boresight? not using TGP and they are G`s?
What was wrong with Mav here?
Nothing wrong, just thinking of more damage to the target. Wingman scored 2 hits, I had one hit, one miss.
I haven't upgraded to 4.35 yet, although I really enjoy playing "for real" once my controls are dialed in. In real life, your first flights aren't combat, but navigational. You just don't take off and land at any arbitrary airport, so I write down and study all the important airport and wind information and procedures before I take off. With 4.35, supposedly, there's flippable kneeboards to help with that. Just adds to the immersion until I run into some glitch!
The newer ED planes in DCS seem to have a way better tire model than BMS, or older DCS planes. Seem to have at least a rudimentary rolling resistance, slip angle and maybe load curve simulation. BMS and many older non-ED DCS planes are just glued to the ground. DCS probably has decent camber curves too, because the plane can actually tip over, which is realistic I've heard. Track and wheelbase are both really small in the F-16. I'm pretty sure the landing gear suspension simulation and tire spring + damping simulation is better in the good DCS planes, hence easier landings. Harder isn't always more realistic; at this kind of simulation accuracy, usually the challenge is having sim tires/aero be as easy to handle as IRL! Need to use all kinds of tricks like more communicative force feedback, sounds or visual cues than you would get IRL, to account for lack of G's, inner ear etc. On top of that everybody has some kind of idea that hard = realistic, so that cancerous idea has plagued the sim industry (and consumers who expect such behavior) for decades. One example is missile performance; it's decently known by now that air to air and surface to air missiles have a somewhat lower hit chance IRL than in sims; yet everybody rags on DCS when their SAMs aren't "deadly" enough and points to BMS' more lethal SAMs (Is it like that nowadays? My info is outdated; coming back to it lately myself too) as proof of BMS being superior and DCS being arcade; but as someone who devs for simulation, I would really guess that DCS missiles are still maybe even in excess of 10% too accurate, in ideal conditions. Who knows how bad it should be in un-ideal conditions. One thing that comes to mind is the 1:27 (?) hit chance for R-27R's in the Eritrea - Ethiopia war. Almost like medium range missiles aren't some kind of silver bullet that will hit a maneuvering target every time, yet that they are especially in older sims with less accurate aero and guidance. BMS plane not being able to tip over is concerning if it had something to do with the CoG, but I'm pretty sure it's just a bad camber curve, tire springrate, whatever it is. In car sims if you have too little grip with high camber, the tires will just slide and not produce enough force to get the car on two wheels or tip over. Probably something similar in most flightsim tires. That + way too much grip I would guess. I like them both and I will stick with BMS purely for its campaign generation possibilities, but you need to give DCS credit where it is due.
Oh don't get me wrong, I am not ragging on DCS at all. For me it's not one VS the other. I love them both mostly because I love the Viper. With that said, I am just pointing out differences. BMS is the more complete model for the Viper with weapons suite and avionics while DCS is visually amazing with more accurate flight dynamics and "feel" when flying.
@@grizzly4736 Not sure if the flight dynamics are more accurate definitely, haven't seen the data, but it definitely has more FLCS implementation that should be there, and is not in BMS. I'm going to guess they also have some actual flight parameter data and probably did their own CFD as well so I would guess that the flight dynamics are indeed more accurate. Might not be by a massive amount to be honest if F-16 flight parameter data is public but I don't know if that is the case. Some people swear that BMS is more accurate still, but until I see the data... No idea about feel. Even good test pilots can't really comment on that very much to be honest. To me DCS feels the best out of all the combat sims but it can also be simply due to how the head moves around (or mostly lack of it which I like), the sounds, the visual shake effects etc. DCS likely would feel better even with 1:1 identical flight dynamics to BMS. Hence why commenting on feel is so difficult! You'd need a 1:1 replica force sensitive sidestick hooked up to a rig that can handle the forces, to even begin the comparison. Personally I'm really excited by the fact that ED is not that limited by the engine as BMS is. It will only get significantly better in the next few years as the engine improves and the plane modules can be used more realistically and in more compelling scenarios. Right now BMS still wins in that regard by a long shot; and this is taking Liberation into account. One thing DCS will never best Falcon in, is the overall feeling of the menus, intro videos, background music etc. Has that special late 90's feeling to it that is unlikely to be replicated no matter how good the sim or plane is. Just because of that I'm sure Falcon will live essentially forever to some capacity.
Hard to imagine those puny tires having enough traction and rigidity to flip many tons of jet plane. Stranger things have happened tho.
@@gb7418 They don't need much, it happens because the CG is so far above the contact patch and the track is so narrow compared to the wheelbase. They tip off one wheel and then usually contact the ground with the rest of the plane. I don't think it'd be doable if the track was much wider, but you gotta remember single fuselage planes like the F-16 are very narrow.
@@ArchOfficial wouldn’t you expect them to even engineer tires to pull off the rim and the struts to even collapse under lateral torque to avoid a rollover? I know nothin about planes haha. Everything I know I learned from the bms manual ;)
Oh dear...
I take it your a Dodge owner?
Yes sir. That's all that's in my drive. Ram truck, 2015 Challenger, wife has a Journey, son has an Avenger.
@@grizzly4736 same here, wife has 2018 Dodge Journey SXT Bkacktop edition and I have 2010 Dodge Challenger
13:20 ... no ... real one is green only. This is only to help people having color blindness. (kind of accessibility feature).
dee jay....havent seen you in ages. Hope you doing well. (raven6)
Are you still using the pink HUD ? 🤣
Hi! 11:15 ... you can move your torso left/right/forward/backward by pressing mouse-wheel button and moving your mouse. Up/Down by pressing the mouse-wheel button and rolling it. Regards.
he's the ATC, you didn't hold position !
Thanks for the laugh. That's awesome.
I find navigating when you're used to the fancy INS/GPS stuff is a real challenge. You don't get much in the way of steer points and you use radio beacon guiding. Other than that, it's fun to fly!
Through the Inferno, good servers. Nice video man.
Thank you. It is a fun server. When I made this video it was my first time flying in it. I will post my next sortie I flew after this one. Quite fun taking out 2 F-5s while trying to destroy SAMs.
Nice
music?
Some generic music that comes standard with microsoft movie maker program.
I think you wanna loft those...