Пікірлер

• 
  @LeahDeGannes3 сағат бұрын

  Omg thank you so much sir I finally found a video that helped me fully understand this part of sets thank youuuuu may God bless you because if it wasn't for this video I might have failed my math test tomorrow❤❤❤❤❤

• 
  @WrathofMath2 сағат бұрын

  Glad to help, good luck!

• 
  @nerdymath1984 сағат бұрын

  Which software you use to make such videos?

• 
  @WrathofMath3 сағат бұрын

  Lots of different softwares go into the whole process, but the primary software you're seeing in the videos is Notability.

• 
  @nerdymath1982 сағат бұрын

  @@WrathofMath Alright thanks 🌺

• 
  @PsYcHoCI2usHeI25 сағат бұрын

  can i give derivative problem that im having issues with

• 
  @WrathofMath5 сағат бұрын

  Please do!

• 
  @pugal.j50858 сағат бұрын

  ❤Thank you so much for teaching ❤

• 
  @WrathofMath7 сағат бұрын

  It's my pleasure!

• 
  @khondwanibanda55379 сағат бұрын

  How does one determine that the ace is red. given that we have two options.

• 
  @Ian-bb7vv12 сағат бұрын

  thx for the clear definition and explanation. You made an easy concept easy.

• 
  @WrathofMath7 сағат бұрын

  Glad it helped!

• 
  @suryanshjohri598112 сағат бұрын

  should we use expansion?????

• 
  @OPAnaya13 сағат бұрын

  I am so excited for class on Monday!

• 
  @user-bk7lm1nz3m14 сағат бұрын

  Nice explaination

• 
  @WrathofMath7 сағат бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @user-xe5ve8fm2v17 сағат бұрын

  This is on space or real line?

• 
  @nonentity16818 сағат бұрын

  This is some top-notch educational content. It deserves much better attention, imho.

• 
  @WrathofMath7 сағат бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @mattsuya762018 сағат бұрын

  even if it's mathematically backed up.. i personally believe 0.999... will never be equal to 1. why? well, i'm gonna have to go more outside the sphere of maths to back my answer up. a decimal will never be fully equal to a whole number (ex. 34.58 will never be equal to 34 or 35, such as 0.284 will never be equal to 1), that's basic math that we were taught in 3rd grade. if you take that definition without conjuring it or providing technicalities (which is how definitions are supposed to be taken as--at face value. if not taken as such, it is not a definition, but that's another conversation), 0.999... will never reach 1 as what separates the two on a more fundamental level is the fact that one IS a decimal and the other IS a whole number. another argument that's less bullshitty and a little more mathematically backed up: if the number keeps going infinitely, all that is happening is that 9's are being put next to each other for an infinitely long distance and time. let's go back to the number at the very start of its infiniteness, as in 0.9. if it goes on for infinity, then the number two 9 additions later would be 0.999. what keeps them from being separate numbers would be 0.99. another example, the difference between the quantities 0.999999 and 0.99999999 in the all put together number sequence that is 0.999... would be 0.9999999. in a infinite number, there will always be a number separating two other numbers. so what would be between 0.999... and 1? well that'd be the number before 1 of course, just like there's numbers behind any other number on the number scale. but as infinity works, there will be number between the number before 1 and 1 itself. so maybe *that* number that separates the two is the number that is before 1 that has no number in-between the two to make them distinct numbers, right? well of course not, because again, the way infinity works wouldn't allow for that. there will yet again be a number between *that* number and 1 itself. hopefully you get what i'm getting at here. infinity works in a strange way that it will always be infinitely far and simultaneously infinitely close to 1. so in reality, you could say either or and i wouldn't see a problem with either because that is what this argument of mine backs up. however, the ice breaker for me that is *why* i believe 0.999... isn't equal to 1 is because of my first paragraph. it's more thought based than it is anything else, so you can brush that off as mere philosophy. but yet again, isn't that what math also is? either way, it's a fun discussion. and as much mathematical evidence there is to back up the original video's claim, i naively think 0.999... = / =/= 1 goes beyond pure math.

• 
  @jakeaustria544521 сағат бұрын

  Can lambda 0 possibly be a complex number?

• 
  @WrathofMath20 сағат бұрын

  Certainly! I discuss that situation some here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/X6RkyJaGgabeYNY.html

• 
  @jakeaustria544517 сағат бұрын

  @@WrathofMath If I want to get the eigenbasis of a Linear Transformation Matrix, does the eigenvalue multiplicity matter?

• 
  @imbruno255422 сағат бұрын

  I use hopital for the last problem. What are alternative approaches that we can use?

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Consider supporting the production of this course by joining the channel! You get access to early and exclusive videos, music, and the lecture notes from the course at the premium level or above! kzread.info/dron/yEKvaxi8mt9FMc62MHcliw.htmljoin Linear Algebra course: kzread.info/head/PLztBpqftvzxWT5z53AxSqkSaWDhAeToDG Linear Algebra exercises: kzread.info/head/PLztBpqftvzxVmiiFW7KtPwBpnHNkTVeJc

• 
  @user-wh1hf9vx9uКүн бұрын

  Beautifully explained 😊

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thanks a lot 😊

• 
  @alexandrosvardakostas6270Күн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Glad to help, thanks so much!

• 
  @DexterdevloperКүн бұрын

  At least the page number is perfect square .

• 
  @WillHobkirkКүн бұрын

  This is my first time coming across your channel. I really love this idea! It's nice seeing high quality content on topics outside the usual high school / first year maths curriculum.

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thank you! My new videos are higher quality but not so decorative haha, I haven't had time for the halloween decor since this one year I did it - but hopefully I will have time to decorate again soon!

• 
  @isaacconder9901Күн бұрын

  Did I see shrek? 😂

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  you sure did kzread.infont-y5iBrIrs

• 
  @averytaylor2816Күн бұрын

  This video was a whole lotta steps and u still left me confused

• 
  @jellymath2 күн бұрын

  that's a well made video

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @Gd_Monsterforce2 күн бұрын

  And also the integral

• 
  @user-im3eg4vj3g2 күн бұрын

  أستاذ هل لديك فيديوهات عن الدومين والرينج الدوال متعددة المتغيرات في القناة اعطني رابط قائمة التشغيل أنت الأفضل دائما مادام هناك أستاذ مثلك نحن بخير أنت ملهمي ومثلي الأعلى ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ انور ابراهيم محجوب من العراق😊😊😊😊

• 
  @pianoplayer123able2 күн бұрын

  I learn calculus on my own and used de l' Hospital. But good to see other ways too to get more varied and more in depth what can work too.

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Yeah, it's fun to avoid using it and see how you can still evaluate the limit, and for Calculus students early on in the course, practice like this is very important (before derivatives and L'Hospital's rule are introduced or permitted on tests).

• 
  @be_present_now2 күн бұрын

  Amazing explanation! Thanks. This playlist is incomplete without a video on SVD. Unleash the wrath!

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thank you and I agree! All in due time!

• 
  @RAVEmashup012 күн бұрын

  hii bro from INDIA

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Hi from Cape Cod! Thanks for watching!

• 
  @ThomsenTagobe2 күн бұрын

  hello

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Season's greetings!

• 
  @Sonny20092 күн бұрын

  I find it kind of fascinating.. How he start teaching relatively simple concepts in tank top.. And as the problems get gradually harder, he dresses up with shirts and even suits.. Wouldn't it be other way around honestly? The harder the math problem. The more comfortable you want to be.. As a matter of fact, when you reach Calculus Optimization problems. I want you to run amuck bare shirted. Please keep the pants on though.

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Lol, any patterns you may notice in style of dress and the difficulty of the content is coincidental! For the last two years I have lived in a very, very hot apartment, and so sometimes during the summer months I need to dress appropriately so I don't die during my recording sessions!

• 
  @tomasalves51823 күн бұрын

  this is by far the best video on this topic available on the internet

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thanks so much!

• 
  @BradleySchietekat3 күн бұрын

  Oh my word, this put so simply, and now I know it. I remember being taught something with arrows, but that got messy. This is a lot simpler, thank you.

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Glad to help, thanks for watching!

• 
  @queenbrynja3 күн бұрын

  factor out the e^x from the final answer and it looks like a polynomial i don't know what to do with this realization

• 
  @strncatt3 күн бұрын

  This was amazing! I had trouble understanding why we converged at the end in the book's proof but this video explained it very clearly!

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thanks so much! Glad I was able to help with this video.

• 
  @jairoselin51193 күн бұрын

  Thank you Sir 😊

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Welcome!

• 
  @MikeT101013 күн бұрын

  Excellent video, thank you. I have really been enjoying your linear algebra videos.

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thank you, Mike! Lots more to come!

• 
  @kennethgelnett89023 күн бұрын

  Shout out to Mr Rainville. One of if not the most influential teacher in the entirely of both my kids lives. Short career but you crushed it. All the best on your new path Sir.

• 
  @ICSEMathsHub3 күн бұрын

  It is b ÷ a, then you listen the video, then all your doubts will be cleared

• 
  @kristianseepaul39613 күн бұрын

  I LOVE YOU SMMM

• 
  @onikamonker86044 күн бұрын

  Thanks for telling me that the other videos were too complicated

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Happy to help!

• 
  @jothiveera9774 күн бұрын

  Super ❤❤❤❤😊

• 
  @WrathofMathКүн бұрын

  Thank you!

• 
  @Aman_iitbh4 күн бұрын

  can we say directly when we first time delete edge from cycle that the remaining graph is connected and deg is still n but edge is n-2 so its violating theorem that any connected graph of order n has size atleast n-1

• 
  @Fatfaty-di3hr4 күн бұрын

  🤍🤍👏🏼👏🏼

• 
  @user-is8gm1qn1v4 күн бұрын

  Arigato

• 
  @spectrumwenly21714 күн бұрын

  10:57 why do we already know -1 is one of the eigenvalues?

• 
  @WrathofMath4 күн бұрын

  Just because it was part of an example we did earlier in the video when verifying an eigenvector!

• 
  @spectrumwenly21713 күн бұрын

  @@WrathofMath I see! Thanks a lot!

• 
  @ZuwairaUsman-pi5rx5 күн бұрын

  You can't be asked to find radius with only height given

• 
  @WrathofMath5 күн бұрын

  Correct

• 
  @jennifergarcia80805 күн бұрын

  All sports and soccer : is it considered disjoint?

• 
  @lox71825 күн бұрын

  if anyone's curious about the irrationals if a and b are irrational, atleast one of (a+b)/2 or (a+3b)/4 will be irrational, if both were rational, then (a+3b)/2 would be rational and (a+3b)/2 - (a+b)/2 = 2b/2 = b would be rational, which wouldn't make sense if only one of them is irrational, just do (a+b)/2 if both are rational, do (a + pi(b))/(1+pi), since that is just equal to b - (b-a)/(1+pi) and b-a isn't zero, it's irrational

• 
  @bartoszpominski93045 күн бұрын

  Good video, but I'm Euclidean algorithm enjoyer 😅