Пікірлер

• 
  @sriharshanuthalapati41616 сағат бұрын

  I use 8 artillery infantry(9/6) divisons to make a hole in enemy line. After breakthrough is achieved, I use 8 heavy armor divisons matched to speed of 8. Heavy armor has 1 heavy tank brigade with highest armor and highest piercingcwith 3 light tank brigades supported by 4 motorized and 2 motorized artillery, because of 40%. I have 8 light tank divisons to do go deeper into enemy with maximum speed as possible with only 4 light tanks and 4 motorized with support.

• 
  @h3x0r_21 сағат бұрын

  I know some time passed, but I want ask a question, why not to put 2x Cannon II, they have just a little bit more weight than 4x HMG, but dealing much more dmg

• 
  @NiHiliuZ21 сағат бұрын

  Thanks to this series, ive been able to accomplish one of my childhood dreams; naval invade the UK as monarchist Sweden! 10/10!

• 
  @cyclone159Күн бұрын

  you...... you love me? 😭

• 
  @rustcohle3088Күн бұрын

  When it comes to armored CAs with full light atack you can defeat them with CAs without armor and cause they are cheaper and if you get Tier 3 guns you have high enough percing to deal significant dmg to armored ones and remember since you are cheaper you have more guns and it tends to snowball fast. Also if you know someone is doing no armor cruisers light attack i belive you can win with light attack destroyers but im not sure on that one.

• 
  @MrTreiseКүн бұрын

  For me heavy Chesie planes castumozation needed

• 
  @SkiddlaКүн бұрын

  20:07 temporary solution, someone should come up with a long term solution, some kind of terminal solution, perhaps something more final in its quality

• 
  @XxBloggs2 күн бұрын

  Lost me at choo choo

• 
  @RobsRedHotSpot2 күн бұрын

  I think dual purpose is a worthwhile addition (or refit) for capitals as they are the main target of enemy aircraft. That way you kill more enemy screens and aircraft for a reasonable cost. AA on screens is probably not all that worthwhile as they are low priority targets for enemy aircraft. There is an argument for strong AA on spotting ships as they will be isolated.

• 
  @remi24012 күн бұрын

  Got a 2k dollar gaming pc, still runs slow late game, is it u need a really good cpu or gpu or something?

• 
  @hakon10274 күн бұрын

  As a german, this Panzer-Sniff hurt my soul. But on the other hand, i had to laugh really hard. Thanks for the tips.

• 
  @derekjones69844 күн бұрын

  The navy game is such nostalgia for me. Anyone ever play PTOIV? Pacific Theater of Operations 4. Old PS2 game. Played so many hours in ur building and designing ships. One of the main reasons why I love the navy game in HOI

• 
  @kingsuperbus46174 күн бұрын

  I played the older PTO's, they were crazy fun. All the KOEI games back then were the best in the genre

• 
  @scubandym19414 күн бұрын

  Great series!

• 
  @jajordan21064 күн бұрын

  i am looking this up video up today because i'm playing a low manpower faction in Old World Blues and I needed a better way of playing the early game to save man power for the legion sieging hoover dam. Tons of good info, might need to watch a few more times to get it to sink in

• 
  @ErnestIsGaming5 күн бұрын

  question. can submarine torpedoes still leak through regardless of 100% screen efficiency?

• 
  @montymechanizedmarines5 күн бұрын

  Awesome Dave - thanks. Was this the basic fleets, so no doctrines, no training, no officer corps, no 'damage control' tech etc ? Cheers MMM

• 
  @chriskatenof78955 күн бұрын

  When will we finish the Feedbackgaming Navy tree

• 
  @SealdropGaming5 күн бұрын

  hm

• 
  @aidandavies31085 күн бұрын

  *I think* you can make debug_smooth applicable to Ironman/MP but at the very least turn on automatically by making -debug_smooth a launch option on Steam. Make sure you include the minus sign.

• 
  @LangLebeDasKaisertumOestereich5 күн бұрын

  Thanks for these videos, I didn‘t fucking understand anything, now I do, but I am shit with templates for divisions, could you maybe doa video about it?

• 
  @o_O298665 күн бұрын

  Danke!

• 
  @Torantes5 күн бұрын

  I agree on coring but I really think that cores should be something based on history, not a button to core every province you own...

• 
  @jonidymeti53966 күн бұрын

  10:48 I’m pretty sure that you counter those light cruisers by making the same template but without the armour, so that it’s lower cost and you can have more of them.

• 
  @Nexsyana6 күн бұрын

  Tier 3 and Tier 4 armour on cruisers can't be penetrated by any light gun. Torpedo/Carrier strike/Land NAV is the way

• 
  @jonidymeti53966 күн бұрын

  @@Nexsyana Ah ok thanks for clarifying 👍

• 
  @RubberFacee6 күн бұрын

  Dave, any Vici 3 videos planned in future?

• 
  @skille38056 күн бұрын

  Victoria part 1 when

• 
  @daviddjerf28566 күн бұрын

  Can you explain the difference between main light damage guns and secondary battery light attack damage. If I make two ships with the same amount of light attack, does it matter if the guns are main guns or secondary guns?

• 
  @eisscrat56676 күн бұрын

  Then is there any need for capital ships? Only use light cruisers with high light attack to shred the screens and destroyers with torpedoes to sink capital ships should be enough to kill the enemy fleet. Or i missing something?

• 
  @willywonka64876 күн бұрын

  Thats the real meta, yes. Spam torpedo destroyers and sprinkle in some light attack cruisers. Battleships dont really do anything special. Carriers do lots of DPS but are unneeded.

• 
  @user-wx1iv1fw3d6 күн бұрын

  我們都同意吧? 海軍戰鬥真的需要重新再做

• 
  @user-wx1iv1fw3d6 күн бұрын

  1:46 注意看! 法國的潛艇超級多的，是德軍的三倍 所以軸心國的朋友，記得讓DD戴上反潛的裝備

• 
  @moritzk30046 күн бұрын

  isnt the MIO with +1 deckspace better than the 50% bad wheather?

• 
  @itachiaurion31984 күн бұрын

  I would say that the bad weather penalty is so harsh, even more on carrier, that reducing it will do far more than having one more deckspace.

• 
  @themacker8946 күн бұрын

  Great video. Sure enjoyed it. Thanks!

• 
  @user-wj8hn2yk8y6 күн бұрын

  2:50 when Feedback mouse was hovering italians dead destroyers - there was a tooltip with detail explanation of damage that received dead destroyers. 0 mentioning of heavy damage. And yet 10 seconds later he says that italian screen were sinked by heavy damage from french. First Italian CL (RI Taranto) was sinked by critical hit from torpedo. Zoomed (at 3:38) "first light cruiser" italian was actually heavy cruiser and was first sinked italian ship with mention of heavy damage. Since "heavy damage for heavy ships". At 3:48 long shot with detail info on italian capitals saying of how much dmg from naval bombers they getting. This could be important, since Italian does not have a naval bombers and 0 stats from naval bombers was mentioned at the top panel with all damage types and values from both sides. Missed damage source from French. At 4:34 shot with detail info on french capitals. Info showing that most of dmg came from heavy guns, dmg from torpedoes is almost irrelevant. Not what Feedback saying. His conclusion for results of the battle that heavy damage of French navy obliterated Italian screen is not confirmed by any evidence of combat that I could recognize from this video. Also - it contradicts basic idea of navy warfare that can be simplified as "heavy damage for heavy ship" and "light damage for light ships". This simplification definitely missing something since 2nd battle shows American destroyers with heavy damage, but I did not saw anything of this in ITAvFRA battle. I understand that navy in HOI4 is difficult subject, but these videos is not helping to understand all the mechanics. It creates illusion of false knowledge that would lead to more unpredictable navy battles and more misunderstanding of navy warfare mechanics in this game.

• 
  @themacker8946 күн бұрын

  I saw and heard the same thing. Sometimes streamers misspeak if they are in a hurry. Gave him a pass, because most of what he said was accurate.

• 
  @user-wx1iv1fw3d6 күн бұрын

  後台數據，你覺得有人動手腳嗎?

• 
  @taeko41236 күн бұрын

  Watched all navy videos, but I think I'll keep my strategy. Spamming good torpedo destroyers and then a single Dreadnought with all modules and making it Pride of the Fleet, just after that I think about building other supports like Cruisers

• 
  @kaylenjoyer6 күн бұрын

  I watched all 3 navy tutorials and today I beat the British navy with nothing but a repurposed fishing boat and 4 pointy rocks. Can highly recommend 👍

• 
  @baleenjar66716 күн бұрын

  iceland in the cod wars be like:

• 
  @its_notta_cedar6 күн бұрын

  When next part in the navy series?

• 
  @willywonka64876 күн бұрын

  Luckily (or unfort) the AI doesnt really make torpedo destroyers so light attack cruisers are king

• 
  @datonegamer2186 күн бұрын

  Im not good at the game what so ever but with these guides im actually learning something.

• 
  @StefanRamsen6 күн бұрын

  Thanks for this Video. I complete suck at Navy Battles. I know what to do to win. But how to do really good is still a Miystery to me.

• 
  @MDevion6 күн бұрын

  Funny, I said this once(Cruisers with loads of light attack combined with torpedo destroyers) on Feedback stream years back and he was like "ThAt Is NoT a ThInG". And now he is making a video about it.

• 
  @bigpoppa12346 күн бұрын

  saying things in an authoritative voice often makes up for a lack of actual knowledge

• 
  @darthteej14 күн бұрын

  Feedback admits he's wrong sometimes. Shame he didn't here but blud has done a lot of streams lol.

• 
  @rustcohle3088Күн бұрын

  well depends how long ago since meta was not the same

• 
  @daviddavidson5056 күн бұрын

  Why wouldn't you just mass armored light cruisers? If heavy attacks are only good against heavy ships, and torpedoes from light ships wreck heavies anyway, wouldn't you be best off just making light ships with lots of light attack, armor to protect against light attack, and torpedoes to clean up the enemy heavies?

• 
  @MrBulldog8556 күн бұрын

  Light cruiser spam is very effective but cruisers are expensive so unless you have some destroyers that are HP absorbers you'll loose alot of your cruisers very quickly. Also don't forget that if you don't have sufficient AA you'll loose more cruisers to carriers then you will to battle ships.

• 
  @DthScythe013 күн бұрын

  There is this kind of rock paper scissors to the meta. Light armored cruisers murder dds. Heavy attack cruisers kill light attack cruisers. Torpedo dds kill heavy attack cruisers. And then theres carriers that kills all, but very expensive.

• 
  @andrefreeman70256 күн бұрын

  1) From where do I get the information that my fleet is too big? How to know how my stats are affected? 2) Is it possible to have multiple fleets in one battle? Why dont split the fleet during a battle? Why dont have 20 unique fleets in one battle, instead of one deadstack?

• 
  @MrBulldog8556 күн бұрын

  You'll see it in positioning. The bigger it is, the more debuff to positioning you get. It'll also have other Debuffs aswell. The 4-6 screens per heavy ship is accurate and often times the easiest way to accomplish that is 4 destroyers and 2 light cruisers per heavy/capital ship will give you the most bang for your buck. At max the most amount of capital ships you'll have in a fleet is 8 excluding carriers and by then you'll have a very large stack that is still effective at combating smaller fleets well as big death stack fleets.

• 
  @tbeller805 күн бұрын

  It is possible have multiple fleets show up to a single battle if they're stationed near each other or the battle lasts long enough. You can have a meat grinder of sub fleets involved in the same action lasting days.

• 
  @flamekulenerbedre6 күн бұрын

  When you understand navy, then the only problem with navy becomes that the hoi4 start time dosent start earlier. Meaning you dont really have time to build a good navy as a smaller nation

• 
  @nathanbean87636 күн бұрын

  Even as a larger nation like Germany, all you can typically do is refit existing ships and maybe build one battleship or a couple of heavy cruisers and a few destroyers

• 
  @cromancer32196 күн бұрын

  ​@@nathanbean8763I just spam dds as Germany but you need to build some dockyards

• 
  @user-wx1iv1fw3d6 күн бұрын

  超級愚蠢的遊戲設定，你只能在主力艦上使用五個工廠，耗費15K的生產點數 而一般護衛艦可以用十個工廠，只有1K的生產點數

• 
  @aleksandrmikhail38036 күн бұрын

  not just that, but the production system is kinda stupid too, even US kinda wont be able to match the actual numbers of warships produced during ww2, they had a hundred of escort carrier, and when i try to immitate, the cheapest i could produce is 2 unit per year per slot with 5 dockyards with +75% dockyard output, in order to immitate i need at least 15-20 slots which equals to 75-100 dockyard in span of 3 years, how do we even reach at that level? not to mention other ship like screen etc

• 
  @flamekulenerbedre6 күн бұрын

  ​@@aleksandrmikhail3803 i do get that but i feel like the us would have made so many dockyards historically because they probably didnt make the same ratio of mils and docks as you would in a normal hoi4 game. In other words they probably made a bunch of docks irl

• 
  @michaelwittmann63286 күн бұрын

  I saw in a video that heavy damage doesn't matter, what matters for navies is having as much piercing and armour as possible. My strat (that is good in vanilla without cheesing dumb cruisers) is: Research everything that increases piercing Actually use armour use the fire drill researches. basically, the dmg you deal depends on how much you can pierce the enemy ship, if piercing is low the debuff is absurd. Then the more you pierce, the higher the likelyhood of dealing "critical hits" that obliterate the enemy ship. In sum, imho, it's worth it to for ex refit capital ships to increase piercing (even when they take 100+ days) and use armour. Also, you can make spotting better is you use some crappy subs in another fleet set on "never engage" on a patrol mission in the area. Hope it helps. Correct me if you think differently.

• 
  @willywonka64876 күн бұрын

  retrofitting older starting cruisers with secondary batteries, and radar+computer for hit chance is very strong.

• 
  @rustcohle3088Күн бұрын

  @@willywonka6487 yes but for god of love dont refit main bateries armor etc.

• 
  @toxic60156 күн бұрын

  Saw the guides and started doing navy and I'm actually starting to win (against the AI anyway) so thank you Feedback I can finally rebuild a not horrible high seas fleet!

• 
  @maplerider576 күн бұрын

  I'm a big fan of the naval side of the game but man I wish they could move away from death stacks!

• 
  @tbeller805 күн бұрын

  They need to add massive debuffs for overall fleet size like they do with the carriers. A couple years ago they put in a positioning debuff for having a deathstack, but still having the biggest fleet possible overcame that penalty.

• 
  @JoJoButInverse6 күн бұрын

  got my lezgend done to legendary lvl with only 2 counties

• 
  @djdoubleu16 күн бұрын

  great explanation ty!

• 
  @Liverpool-20047 күн бұрын

  I had no idea that fleets on Strike Force created Naval Sumpremecy

• 
  @rustcohle3088Күн бұрын

  yes but less then those on patrol or naval invasion support

• 
  @xdesai65377 күн бұрын

  submarine spam for the win

• 
  @RandomGuy-uy6hx7 күн бұрын

  I found one to add loyalists and radicals, but not for removing them. If you want to remove radicals you have to search the "ethnicity" of your radicals and add loyalists based on that. For example when I was playing as britain Irish laborers were the main source of my radicals, the only way i could remove them was to do add_loyalists Irish [number] which worked. But then it was English laborers that were the main source, so I did add_loyalists English [numbers] and it said that "invalid ethnicity" which is weird because scottish prussian etc work