The problem is staring at us🇿🇦,minority population occupying 80%of the land, majority population forced to live/share 20% of the land, reforms on land & water resource are a must
@justanormalguyhere24083 күн бұрын
Nothing against this video about how Europe colonizing Africa but I would like to see a video happen Middle East slave trade because I don’t see enough of it and more people should now about it
@InsideAfrica.2 күн бұрын
We will look into it! Currently looking into the differences between African slavery and the Trans Atlantic slave trade but will look into this as well
@pedro01f4 күн бұрын
One more time, you are assuming that European countries have a duty to solve problems in foreign countries. It's like the father and their adult sons who need constant help, but they will always complain about the father.
@InsideAfrica.3 күн бұрын
They have no duty. Would have been nice if they realized that many centuries ago and treated Africa as equal partners.
@YasserMaghribiКүн бұрын
The conflict is not a responsibility of the African Union, but of the United Nations, where 3 out of 5 permanent members of the Security Council are from the West. Anyway, there are no other solution than the autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty
@pedro01f4 күн бұрын
Pure propaganda, forcing all responsibility on France, makes no sense, african nations are fuking independent
@InsideAfrica.3 күн бұрын
Well, France controls the monetary system of its former colonies right? And France forces these nations to keep using the franc. Is that not true? I think you are not completely independent if that is the case. That one nation can force you to adopt a certain monetary system and impose its will politically. And what do you think of Niger, then? Are they doing the right thing?
@pedro01f3 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica. give-me citations, where France force this? It's a mutual agreements, everyone negotiates... But i am open to receive your references.
@InsideAfrica.2 күн бұрын
Here are some sources. Essentially, African leaders supported and put in place by France agreed with the stipulations. www.trtworld.com/opinion/cfa-franc-the-colonial-currency-keeping-14-african-nations-on-a-leash-12781184 hir.harvard.edu/true-sovereignty-the-cfa-franc-and-french-influence-in-west-and-central-africa/ academic.oup.com/ehr/article/139/596/193/7630506
@pedro01f2 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica. i am going to read it, thanks
@pedro01f2 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica. first note. financial system are auto regulated, i think they act independently of the government policy. second note. CFA was beneficial for african nations and comes from a necessity, and france embraced it as a good will cooperation. i am going to continuing reading, i think that better solution comes with an good intention discussion based in the truth and honesty.
@pedro01f4 күн бұрын
Why a white man when you mention "corruption"?
@irespect55424 күн бұрын
Oh look another AI shit vid. God so sick of these
@pedro01f4 күн бұрын
Look Africa don't have developed industries, if Africans ambition is a specialized job, they will work in Europe, or United States, or in some regions of Asia. The main languages used internationally in the academic and industrial fields are English. So why would European or United States companies shift their internal language to an African language? All the elements of the narrative that you made, have no logical presumptions. In Portugal, we have to learn English, French, and Chinese as well if we want a high-paying job. Africans are independent; it is a waste of time to make relations at this time between colonization and the problems of Africa. Africa needs to overtake this excuse, and start to build things from scratch. Ocidental contries, are constantly helping the nvestiments, and care programs. Don't paint europe as the villain!
@InsideAfrica.3 күн бұрын
No one is asking companies to change the language. It just a shame that African languages are dying as most schools primarily teach the lingua franca. Besides, best believe that African employees working for multinationals in Africa also speak other languages besides French and English. Look, there are problems in Africa, like corruption and nepotism. However, this there are instances where this corruption is tied to directly, and indirectly, to colonialism, Europe and the US. Look at how the USA and Europa have killed Patrice Lumumba in Congo, supported a dictator for decades and are now funding rebel groups in the east of Congo for minerals. Look at France, still controlling the monetary system of its former colonies. That's why Niger kicked them out. So Niger did what was best for them, even though many people are painting them as the villian. In fact, African countries are building up their nations, with some countries outgrowing and outpacing European and Asian countries when it comes to economic growth. Just look at Botswana, Nigeria and Ethiopia for example. They are trying to make a change and control their own destiny. Things like corruption are being worked on, but do not forget that these nations do not have century old insititutions like other European countries. European countries and the USA have been building them up for centuries and it took a lot of time before these countries had a constitution, civil rights, and voting rights for everyone. In fact, democracy in most European countries and the USA is not even 100 years old. African countries are just 60 years old when it comes to independence.
@pedro01f4 күн бұрын
Sure, it was what weak Africa? Look at the Portuguese's amazing cities that they were left, they are totally wasted. Some villages, don't have electricity since the Portuguese were forced to leave, so I think that it is a complex question, and this narrative is not truly accurate because, there is no evaluation or observation from the point of view of how Africa as being developed by colonizers. Don't forget, places like Brazil, United States, India, Australia, Canada were colonies.
@InsideAfrica.3 күн бұрын
This idea that we should see colonialism as a positive thing that benefitted Africa is, in my opinion, an evaluation that is too positive. Firstly, it implies that Africa was underdeveloped, or undeveloped to begin with, which is not true in a historical sense. Africa did have many developed societies, however, some of them may not have been in line with what Europeans call "development". Also, this narrative that Europe developed Africa has been a justification for many centuries to commit atrocities on African people. Secondly, you named Brazil, the US, India, Australia and Canada. What about them? All these countries have different histories and different contexts. Some of them were settler colonies for example. Also, the US, Australia and Canada all developed on the backs of peoples that have been opprossed and marginalized. Should we ask the Aboriginals, African Americans and First Nation people how it was in the past? Lastly, to quote Dutch professor in History, Pepijn Brandon: "After teasing out the discrete elements of the “case for colonialism”, we now turn to the underlying methodology: the “objective cost/benefit analysis” that allows Gilley and others to pose the question of colonialism’s legacy in the form of a simple balance sheet in the first place. Colonialism, so runs the narrative, did many good things and some bad things. The good things - railways, education, human dignity in all its grandeur - were lasting treasures. The bad things - plunder, famine, the occasional genocide - were quickly reversed and left no lasting impression upon the societies within which they took place. The good things were uniquely and exclusively a European gift and could not have been arrived at without European rule. The bad things would probably have happened anyway and were tempered." The article is called Labour History and the Case against Colonialism if you want to read more.
Why would you use Gallons instead of litres? This video is so lopsided. Yeah blame EVERYTHING on "climate change" (and the good old Apartheid), but never the govt. or lack of maintenance, or corruption.
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
Apartheid has not been mentioned, but you are right, SA has been paying the price for the lack of maintenance, planning and corruption. All of this can be attributed to the government and its failing governance
@user-jx6zs9yt3xКүн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica.Apartheid has not been mentioned,Why 🤔
@michaelw38979 күн бұрын
Bad timing for this video. Cape Town is literally flooding with too much rain and water recently. The dams are full.
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
Hopefully, there is good infrastructure in place to manage it and make good use of it!
@russgodinho335810 күн бұрын
Social Engineering.
@paulthomson246610 күн бұрын
All of these disaster stories have one underlying problem that they ignore! Why is it a problem because there are too many people using scarce resources! The problem is staring you in the face...It's Population! There are too many People!!! It not scarcity, it's too many users!!!
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
That is an interesting perspective. I think this is the least of the problems. At least not as big compared to climate change, lack of maintenance, planning, and bad governance or greater issues
@paulthomson24669 күн бұрын
Do you really think the powers that be will allow anything to upset their profits???
@ZergRadio9 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica. wrote "That is an interesting perspective. I think this is the least of the problems. At least not as big compared to climate change, lack of maintenance, planning, and bad governance or greater issues" OMG stop with the climate change rubbish. The climate is always changing!!!! The communist govt. has stolen all the money that would otherwise be put to good use. Where are all the scientist and engineers that build and maintain the infrastructure? They fled the country for greener pastures. Why? Because in order to get a high profile job you have to be something other than White. You know that they changed the laws. A certain % of a company has to have a certain amount of diverse "colours" here and there. We all know how Escom is doing :) Who is pocketing all the money? Who is stealing all the wires, pipes etc etc
@InsideAfrica.7 күн бұрын
@@paulthomson2466 I believe they will do anything to maximize their profits unfortunately
@katlegorapelang104810 күн бұрын
These people are are next to a F@ckn Ocean 😂😂😂😂
@discerningacumen11 күн бұрын
man made world drought -> lie.
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
The governance of accessible water is definitely a man made world problem
@esirionome298113 күн бұрын
Oil was a curse to my country
@Retr0Br016 күн бұрын
So its Europes fault for drawing borders that made ethnically and religiously diverse nations that fragmented into chaos? So you're saying diversity isn't a strength? Multiculturalism is a nation destroying policy? You are right, but are you truly prepared to follow that logic to it's ultimate conclusion?
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
I see where you are going with this, but I do not agree with your ultimate conclusion, necessarily. Obviously, the current state of Africa is a complex and multifaceted matter, and the borders drawn up by colonial and imperialist nations definitely play a role in what is happening today. Diversity in itself is neither a strength or weakness, per se. It is more about how diversity is managed. Multiculutural policies are a way to manage diversity. Multiculturalism can be a problem, but it does not necessarily have to be. Again, it is about how it is carried out and what it entails. If you want to know more about this, you could read up on diversity ideologies. In this line of literature and research, you can find the nuances in multiculturalism. It will also lead you to other ideologies, or approaches to diversity, such as assimilation, interculturalism and colourblindness. These approaches also have their pros and cons. Feel free engage and discuss!
@Retr0Br02 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica. None of those policies have ever been shown to work except assimilation, and assimilation only works if there is a dominant group, limited immigration slowly over long periods of time, and there is a demand that immigrants assimilate. None of those conditions exist in the west. Therefore, the obvious outcome is ethno-religious conflict, tearing down of historic statues, rewriting of the history books, and an inevitable shattering of western nations. We have a word for the effects of diversity: Balkanization. "Diversity in itself is neither a strength or weakness, per se. It is more about how diversity is managed" But in your video you said it was a problem for Africa and it was Europe's fault...but when the conversation shifts to diversity in Europe you prevaricate and walk it back and act like its not really bad per se...we just need to manage it better. lol CRT in action! You've spent a lot of time in Academia and have been highly "educated" on this topic. I can tell. Admitting what you know is true is the first step towards resolving the terrible issues our civilization faces. This is an existential crisis and you are afraid to even acknowledge the problem because you don't want to be called mean names by your fellow brainwashed "academics". There are groups of certain diverse populations marching through every city in the western world right now demanding that Jewish people be driven into the sea. They burn the flags of the nations that naively welcomed them as they do so. You are an absolute fool if you think that can be "managed". Grow up and accept reality. Stop denying truth in order to appease people who hate you.
@Seagaltalk17 күн бұрын
Dont forget the ottaman empire
@littlewol262017 күн бұрын
pro-west video. sigh. spoiled a good watch. after going on about the remnants of western colonialism being bad, the rest of the video is all about telling u, but its worse now cos the russian and chinese bogey man are helping lift africa out of poverty fairly.
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
Could you elaborate on "he rest of the video is all about telling u, but its worse now cos the russian and chinese bogey man are helping lift africa out of poverty fairly."
@tomcarter958018 күн бұрын
Brown people vs. The Universe.
@aarontheamazing198518 күн бұрын
Nah brown people vs other browns [egged on by the universe]
@LadyBits202318 күн бұрын
... skill issue
@vipneat726517 күн бұрын
@@LadyBits2023honestly tho
@blkhistorydecoded18 күн бұрын
"Come let us go down and confuse their language."
@tomcarter958018 күн бұрын
11:7
@drSvensen19 күн бұрын
lmao no China flag on the thumbnail yet they are the only country actively trying to conquer Africa. There goes your credibility.
@InsideAfrica.18 күн бұрын
What makes you think that? What does "conquering" entail? And how are they doing it actively? Are there any countries that do it passively? As shown in the video, way more countries are involved in Africa than just China. All looking to protect their best interests
@drSvensen18 күн бұрын
@@InsideAfrica.Debt-trap diplomacy and abusimg hostile political conditions. Anyways you thought it was more important to have multiple flags of Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Ireland than to include a single Russia or China flag, so it's already obvious this is just another anti-Western propaganda post.
@user-ze9to3ef1f20 күн бұрын
Also Seretse Khama married a white woman from england those years. Theres no huge crimes in botswana and they got strict laws and death penalty. Very decent people that lives there I worked at a guesthouse in zeerust not far from there and met a few people from there.
@InsideAfrica.9 күн бұрын
Would love to hear more about your experiences over there!
Пікірлер
The problem is staring at us🇿🇦,minority population occupying 80%of the land, majority population forced to live/share 20% of the land, reforms on land & water resource are a must
Nothing against this video about how Europe colonizing Africa but I would like to see a video happen Middle East slave trade because I don’t see enough of it and more people should now about it
We will look into it! Currently looking into the differences between African slavery and the Trans Atlantic slave trade but will look into this as well
One more time, you are assuming that European countries have a duty to solve problems in foreign countries. It's like the father and their adult sons who need constant help, but they will always complain about the father.
They have no duty. Would have been nice if they realized that many centuries ago and treated Africa as equal partners.
The conflict is not a responsibility of the African Union, but of the United Nations, where 3 out of 5 permanent members of the Security Council are from the West. Anyway, there are no other solution than the autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty
Pure propaganda, forcing all responsibility on France, makes no sense, african nations are fuking independent
Well, France controls the monetary system of its former colonies right? And France forces these nations to keep using the franc. Is that not true? I think you are not completely independent if that is the case. That one nation can force you to adopt a certain monetary system and impose its will politically. And what do you think of Niger, then? Are they doing the right thing?
@@InsideAfrica. give-me citations, where France force this? It's a mutual agreements, everyone negotiates... But i am open to receive your references.
Here are some sources. Essentially, African leaders supported and put in place by France agreed with the stipulations. www.trtworld.com/opinion/cfa-franc-the-colonial-currency-keeping-14-african-nations-on-a-leash-12781184 hir.harvard.edu/true-sovereignty-the-cfa-franc-and-french-influence-in-west-and-central-africa/ academic.oup.com/ehr/article/139/596/193/7630506
@@InsideAfrica. i am going to read it, thanks
@@InsideAfrica. first note. financial system are auto regulated, i think they act independently of the government policy. second note. CFA was beneficial for african nations and comes from a necessity, and france embraced it as a good will cooperation. i am going to continuing reading, i think that better solution comes with an good intention discussion based in the truth and honesty.
Why a white man when you mention "corruption"?
Oh look another AI shit vid. God so sick of these
Look Africa don't have developed industries, if Africans ambition is a specialized job, they will work in Europe, or United States, or in some regions of Asia. The main languages used internationally in the academic and industrial fields are English. So why would European or United States companies shift their internal language to an African language? All the elements of the narrative that you made, have no logical presumptions. In Portugal, we have to learn English, French, and Chinese as well if we want a high-paying job. Africans are independent; it is a waste of time to make relations at this time between colonization and the problems of Africa. Africa needs to overtake this excuse, and start to build things from scratch. Ocidental contries, are constantly helping the nvestiments, and care programs. Don't paint europe as the villain!
No one is asking companies to change the language. It just a shame that African languages are dying as most schools primarily teach the lingua franca. Besides, best believe that African employees working for multinationals in Africa also speak other languages besides French and English. Look, there are problems in Africa, like corruption and nepotism. However, this there are instances where this corruption is tied to directly, and indirectly, to colonialism, Europe and the US. Look at how the USA and Europa have killed Patrice Lumumba in Congo, supported a dictator for decades and are now funding rebel groups in the east of Congo for minerals. Look at France, still controlling the monetary system of its former colonies. That's why Niger kicked them out. So Niger did what was best for them, even though many people are painting them as the villian. In fact, African countries are building up their nations, with some countries outgrowing and outpacing European and Asian countries when it comes to economic growth. Just look at Botswana, Nigeria and Ethiopia for example. They are trying to make a change and control their own destiny. Things like corruption are being worked on, but do not forget that these nations do not have century old insititutions like other European countries. European countries and the USA have been building them up for centuries and it took a lot of time before these countries had a constitution, civil rights, and voting rights for everyone. In fact, democracy in most European countries and the USA is not even 100 years old. African countries are just 60 years old when it comes to independence.
Sure, it was what weak Africa? Look at the Portuguese's amazing cities that they were left, they are totally wasted. Some villages, don't have electricity since the Portuguese were forced to leave, so I think that it is a complex question, and this narrative is not truly accurate because, there is no evaluation or observation from the point of view of how Africa as being developed by colonizers. Don't forget, places like Brazil, United States, India, Australia, Canada were colonies.
This idea that we should see colonialism as a positive thing that benefitted Africa is, in my opinion, an evaluation that is too positive. Firstly, it implies that Africa was underdeveloped, or undeveloped to begin with, which is not true in a historical sense. Africa did have many developed societies, however, some of them may not have been in line with what Europeans call "development". Also, this narrative that Europe developed Africa has been a justification for many centuries to commit atrocities on African people. Secondly, you named Brazil, the US, India, Australia and Canada. What about them? All these countries have different histories and different contexts. Some of them were settler colonies for example. Also, the US, Australia and Canada all developed on the backs of peoples that have been opprossed and marginalized. Should we ask the Aboriginals, African Americans and First Nation people how it was in the past? Lastly, to quote Dutch professor in History, Pepijn Brandon: "After teasing out the discrete elements of the “case for colonialism”, we now turn to the underlying methodology: the “objective cost/benefit analysis” that allows Gilley and others to pose the question of colonialism’s legacy in the form of a simple balance sheet in the first place. Colonialism, so runs the narrative, did many good things and some bad things. The good things - railways, education, human dignity in all its grandeur - were lasting treasures. The bad things - plunder, famine, the occasional genocide - were quickly reversed and left no lasting impression upon the societies within which they took place. The good things were uniquely and exclusively a European gift and could not have been arrived at without European rule. The bad things would probably have happened anyway and were tempered." The article is called Labour History and the Case against Colonialism if you want to read more.
Somalia 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴 🇸🇴
Why would you use Gallons instead of litres? This video is so lopsided. Yeah blame EVERYTHING on "climate change" (and the good old Apartheid), but never the govt. or lack of maintenance, or corruption.
Apartheid has not been mentioned, but you are right, SA has been paying the price for the lack of maintenance, planning and corruption. All of this can be attributed to the government and its failing governance
@@InsideAfrica.Apartheid has not been mentioned,Why 🤔
Bad timing for this video. Cape Town is literally flooding with too much rain and water recently. The dams are full.
Hopefully, there is good infrastructure in place to manage it and make good use of it!
Social Engineering.
All of these disaster stories have one underlying problem that they ignore! Why is it a problem because there are too many people using scarce resources! The problem is staring you in the face...It's Population! There are too many People!!! It not scarcity, it's too many users!!!
That is an interesting perspective. I think this is the least of the problems. At least not as big compared to climate change, lack of maintenance, planning, and bad governance or greater issues
Do you really think the powers that be will allow anything to upset their profits???
@@InsideAfrica. wrote "That is an interesting perspective. I think this is the least of the problems. At least not as big compared to climate change, lack of maintenance, planning, and bad governance or greater issues" OMG stop with the climate change rubbish. The climate is always changing!!!! The communist govt. has stolen all the money that would otherwise be put to good use. Where are all the scientist and engineers that build and maintain the infrastructure? They fled the country for greener pastures. Why? Because in order to get a high profile job you have to be something other than White. You know that they changed the laws. A certain % of a company has to have a certain amount of diverse "colours" here and there. We all know how Escom is doing :) Who is pocketing all the money? Who is stealing all the wires, pipes etc etc
@@paulthomson2466 I believe they will do anything to maximize their profits unfortunately
These people are are next to a F@ckn Ocean 😂😂😂😂
man made world drought -> lie.
The governance of accessible water is definitely a man made world problem
Oil was a curse to my country
So its Europes fault for drawing borders that made ethnically and religiously diverse nations that fragmented into chaos? So you're saying diversity isn't a strength? Multiculturalism is a nation destroying policy? You are right, but are you truly prepared to follow that logic to it's ultimate conclusion?
I see where you are going with this, but I do not agree with your ultimate conclusion, necessarily. Obviously, the current state of Africa is a complex and multifaceted matter, and the borders drawn up by colonial and imperialist nations definitely play a role in what is happening today. Diversity in itself is neither a strength or weakness, per se. It is more about how diversity is managed. Multiculutural policies are a way to manage diversity. Multiculturalism can be a problem, but it does not necessarily have to be. Again, it is about how it is carried out and what it entails. If you want to know more about this, you could read up on diversity ideologies. In this line of literature and research, you can find the nuances in multiculturalism. It will also lead you to other ideologies, or approaches to diversity, such as assimilation, interculturalism and colourblindness. These approaches also have their pros and cons. Feel free engage and discuss!
@@InsideAfrica. None of those policies have ever been shown to work except assimilation, and assimilation only works if there is a dominant group, limited immigration slowly over long periods of time, and there is a demand that immigrants assimilate. None of those conditions exist in the west. Therefore, the obvious outcome is ethno-religious conflict, tearing down of historic statues, rewriting of the history books, and an inevitable shattering of western nations. We have a word for the effects of diversity: Balkanization. "Diversity in itself is neither a strength or weakness, per se. It is more about how diversity is managed" But in your video you said it was a problem for Africa and it was Europe's fault...but when the conversation shifts to diversity in Europe you prevaricate and walk it back and act like its not really bad per se...we just need to manage it better. lol CRT in action! You've spent a lot of time in Academia and have been highly "educated" on this topic. I can tell. Admitting what you know is true is the first step towards resolving the terrible issues our civilization faces. This is an existential crisis and you are afraid to even acknowledge the problem because you don't want to be called mean names by your fellow brainwashed "academics". There are groups of certain diverse populations marching through every city in the western world right now demanding that Jewish people be driven into the sea. They burn the flags of the nations that naively welcomed them as they do so. You are an absolute fool if you think that can be "managed". Grow up and accept reality. Stop denying truth in order to appease people who hate you.
Dont forget the ottaman empire
pro-west video. sigh. spoiled a good watch. after going on about the remnants of western colonialism being bad, the rest of the video is all about telling u, but its worse now cos the russian and chinese bogey man are helping lift africa out of poverty fairly.
Could you elaborate on "he rest of the video is all about telling u, but its worse now cos the russian and chinese bogey man are helping lift africa out of poverty fairly."
Brown people vs. The Universe.
Nah brown people vs other browns [egged on by the universe]
... skill issue
@@LadyBits2023honestly tho
"Come let us go down and confuse their language."
11:7
lmao no China flag on the thumbnail yet they are the only country actively trying to conquer Africa. There goes your credibility.
What makes you think that? What does "conquering" entail? And how are they doing it actively? Are there any countries that do it passively? As shown in the video, way more countries are involved in Africa than just China. All looking to protect their best interests
@@InsideAfrica.Debt-trap diplomacy and abusimg hostile political conditions. Anyways you thought it was more important to have multiple flags of Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Ireland than to include a single Russia or China flag, so it's already obvious this is just another anti-Western propaganda post.
Also Seretse Khama married a white woman from england those years. Theres no huge crimes in botswana and they got strict laws and death penalty. Very decent people that lives there I worked at a guesthouse in zeerust not far from there and met a few people from there.
Would love to hear more about your experiences over there!