Support for your entire AV and IT ecosystem:
Frame • Network Infrastructure
Amplify • Audio Visual
Support • IT
Protect • Security
#BeBright
Find the Brightengale service that's right for you:
www.brightengale.com/what-we-do
FOLLOW @Brightengale
Brightengale Instagram: instagram.com/brightengale/
Brightengale Facebook:
facebook.com/brightengale/
Brightengale LinkedIn:
www.linkedin.com/company/brightengale/
Brightengale | Tech on a High Note
Based out of Houston, TX
Пікірлер
I hope in the next update in the eq barr can more colouring,,like x32 ,,😢😢
I have used the Audio-Technica for quite a while with absolutely no problems.
Do you by chance know what Rack Case preferably a small one would be perfect for this mixer?
Funy... they are wearing mics but the audio is poop
does my phone have to stay within 100 feet of the transitters after I have attached them?
Is the Shure GLXD4 rated below What you’ve covered here?
Yes - that unit is Bluetooth not UHF
@Brightengale Great comparison both mixing consoles. I always hear that Behringer X32 is more advanced, and Yamaha TF is for beginers. I have two questions: 1. What can Behringer do and Yamaha can't? 2. I saw presets in Yamaha mixing consoles? There is much more presets that i have in Yamaha TF-1. Are this presets manualy added - like sond technician, or where can i download this presets (i have last update softweare? Thans guys
what about the Allen heath
Comparison of distance ranges would be helpful
HI, MY NAME IS OBENSON. I WANT TO BUY A CONSOLE FOR MY CHURCH BUT I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHICH ONE TO PICK BETWEEN THE BEHRINGER WING AND YAMAHA TF5. CAN YOU HELP ME OUT PLEASE?
How well does the TF series mixers work with Pro Tools for multitrack recording?
UPDATE: It works perfectly. Ran plugins for effects while multitracking all at once.
When in poly mode with TC8 in the same room can i share content wireless ly or not second will it show the participants and screen share on same time on a single screen in standard mode for zoom and can i change the layouts like side by side or others
Good review, talks about all the relevant topics and doesn't dive into irrelevant details. 👍👍 I think two aspects should be highlighted though: 1. As others have already commented, an EW-D system can definitely be set up without the app, and the two EW-D systems that I have did work out of the box. Having said that, the app isn't too bad and can be useful. 2. I do quite a bit open air/outdoor live sound, and in that specific setting the fact that EW-D uses Bluetooth instead of infrared for syncing transmitters and receivers can be a lifesaver - in sunlight infrared is often totally useless and you need to do funny magic movements to shield the infrared link from the sun😅
TF5 or QU32?
TF5 or QU32?
More faders + Fully customizable layer + DAW-like touchscreen operation + Built-in Dante protocol = Totally kills X/M32 into hell The only disadvantage is about the limited capacity of cue recall system. Not quite adequate for theatrical application
0qp😊😊Iqq0
Unique selling proposition of the EW-D in the UK is that it operates on channel 70 which is one of the few license exempt frequencies.
get the SQ5/6/7
I live In south Florida where getting a clear channel is the worst the 2.4 frequency. can you explain the difference between and analog and digital system and which is better for me
Does it work with Google Meet ?
Which is better shure or sennheiser?
I personally have invested in the Sennheiser EW-D systems they are super reliable on the RF side and very easy to use.
Shure SLXD-SHURE is amazing!! but now I want to taste a sennheiser EW-D
Good review. Thanks
Sennheiser ew d to skrócona, zubożała wersja EW D g4. Mikrofon, nadajnik bez wyświetlacza, ograniczony odbiornik. Senn 500 ma sens tylko wtedy, gdy jest to stary produkt. Na razie więc wygrywa Shure SLXD.
Oh why?
Nie istnieie coś takiego jak "EW D G4"... G4 są tylko analogowe. Może chodziło Ci o "EW-DX"?
EW-D has several major advantages over the other two. First it does not suffer from RF intermodulation. Both the AT and the Shure system have to use coordinated frequencies. So even if you have 25khz steps between freqs in most cases you need to space channels out around 250khz in order to avoid intermod. The Sennheiser EWD can use equal spaced frequencies at 25khz so you can pack many more channels into each band. Secondly The dynamic range of EWD is way higher than both the AT and the Shure systems. The AT system has to company the signal to transmit the audio. The companding degrades audio signal significantly. This is true of any analog system. The full bandwidth non-companded Shure and Sennheiser systems don’t need to do this. Lastly the Sennheiser system is the most modern of the bunch. It can operate stand alone without the app. You can use the app to control a bunch of channels and is compatible on a component level with all of the accessories and capsules with any other evolution wireless system.
You can use the EW-D completely without the app. I don’t even have the app, I prefer using the unit itself. The EW-D absolutely walks all over the other two, no question
Tf5❤
I was able to use the Sennheiser EW-D right out of the box!
thanks for such a clear demo
what does the rear of the receivers look like? what accessories come in the kit for rack mounting?
All of these companies have websites that have pretty exhaustive information on the wireless mics. I’m specifying 8 Shure SLX-D into a school auditorium currently. Normally I would specify the ULX-D, but this project does not have the budget. The ULX-D is has Dante built in, offers dual and quad channel receivers, etc. I have never had issues with them even in crowded frequency areas. I’m hoping the SLX-D will perform similarly. The back of a receiver is going to have 2 BNC connectors for A & B antennas,and XLR and/or TRS (1/4”) audio output connector(s). Shure usually has all rack kits in the box.
Excellent assessment. I concur.
Sennheiser #AllDayEveryDay...
#sennheiseralltheway
One thing I don’t understand is why is it called 22 channel mixer??
I just bought 2 JBL eon compact one speakers to use for acoustic gigs. When you link both speakers can you also use the other channels from the other JBL eon one speaker to plug in other mics or instruments? Cause I know that it has 2 or 3 channels for each speaker. Does that make like 4 or 6 channels if you use both speakers?
Thank you for this video! How were you able to actually record and edit the video files shot with the canon PTZ cameras? The free canon camera control application doesn't seem to support it any longer, and all the info on these cameras is for live streaming, not recording and having video files for future editing. Any help is greatly appreciated!
What's your go-to brand for professional audio gear?
shure, i have both slx analog and slx-d both with beta87 capsule also have wired beta58 and beta 57
Isso é covardia, a tf perde em tudo pra wing, hahah
Hey, can you just use it as a normal tv? Picked one up from a closing business and just curious! Thanks.
Same here.. I been trying to screen mirror my iPhone to it but won’t let me . I’m thinking of just hooking up my PS4 to it that way I can watch Netflix on it.
@@Da818-SP it can work as a normal tv apparently. Good luck!
Can i use other power amps for it. Maybe a cheaper yamaha vs the nexo.
You missed couple things. Mainly the difference on touch screen. Wing have one of the best touch screen. So reliable and responsible. On the other hand, like dlive, doesn't. (Okay, I have used only one but oh boy how horrible it was. And it have been calibrated but still wont work well). And even seems that TF5 touch screen is lagging. I have used that console (wing) about 4 years and never had a single problem. I know many places where is a wing and same thing. Zero problems. So I can't agree on reliable point. The workflow is only bad thing but only at start. When you get used to it, it is fast and so plesent to work with. And thirf thing is the feeling. Wing is smooth and it just feels great. Compared to TF5 it is superior. Again today I justtested TF5 and it feels horrible. Faders motors are slow and not reliable. I haven't used TF5 that much so I can't have strong opinion about it but one thing is sure, it is overpriced. PS. I apologize my english grammar. I am not fluent and will not be😅
Liked the way Yamaha designers put all the inputs at the back of the slanted display, saving space in a very clever manner. My only complaint is the missing individual channel endless rotary encoders to control pans, EQs and DAW soft synth/plugins.
What’s the password for the network ?
Yamaha 💯% better than Behringer
Wow wow wow very very good good I Love you broooooo super super 😍😍😍😍😍😍🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗✌️✌️👌👌👌🤜🤛👊👊👊👍👍👍👍
Why couldn't they include stand alone multitrack recording like the Presonus StudioLive have.
Learning about that in my college class and this video really opened my mind and helped. Ty guys :) Really nice
Quick question, is this a Plug and Play solution or a Poly License is required to use MS Teams for example?
N500 has 15x zoom, not 20x as you stated
The x32 was released in 2012 and several years later, the x32 has no rival in the market to beat its resilience, flexibility, ease of use, options, networking capabilities, amazing sound at its price range so much the Behringer peoples have run out of spare parts to fix broken x32 mixers which customers prefer holding onto and getting fixed, rather than venturing into the new Wing. If you want to upgrade your X32 for whatever reason, get the Midas M32... which is a premium version of the X32 and will easily intergrate with your current hardware be it the P16s, S32 or DL32s, SD16, etc...
Please i want to know if the TF5 is compatible with the behringer p-16 in ear monitor system??
Will it power In-ear monitors without headphone amp?