Thanks for the video clip. But how do i exactly get its orientation of the camera ? Appreciate it if you can help. Thanks.
@robertomaemoto2545 Жыл бұрын
Saludos de Perú... Mi bisabuelo llegó a Perú hace muchos años y no conocía a nadie en Japón con el mismo apellido hasta hoy que intento saber más de mi familia
@samanesfahani22803 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this comparison. Have you ever tried realsense cam for detection of transparent objects such as pet bottle or glass?
@johndcoutho89623 жыл бұрын
Great work, it looks flawless compared to other mapping systems. How did you anchor the digital content to the real world?
@JamestsaiTW3 жыл бұрын
Hello! Could you share your iBeacon Device Model? Or Where could buy it?
@SATOSHIMAEMOTO3 жыл бұрын
Hello! I'm using mbed TY51822r3 ( www.switch-science.com/catalog/2574/ )
@JamestsaiTW3 жыл бұрын
@@SATOSHIMAEMOTO Thanks!
@EricLancer143 жыл бұрын
なんとっ! 透明なスクリーンですか！ 素晴らしいです！
@user-gm5vq8cj5p3 жыл бұрын
can the camera follow one moving point in the room and get information about it?
@phischtv44973 жыл бұрын
another "3D-camera" that despite the laser still suffers from noise?
@mattizzle814 жыл бұрын
What would your opinion be on this vs Azure Kinect? At first glance it looks to be lower quality, more noise, limited range, etc than the Kinect V4.
@chordnight62484 жыл бұрын
How many Kinects are used ？
@daslolo4 жыл бұрын
it looses tracking as soon as you move fast better suited for dialogue
@angelotrujillo99374 жыл бұрын
Esa cámara funciona también en xbox one?
@superbiennico4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. Very helpful! You label two parts of the video NFOV Unbinned and did not have any shot of NFOV Binned -- is this correct?
@user-ws1ju2bb8j4 жыл бұрын
I don't know which is which
@engagevr4 жыл бұрын
Cool do you know if the body tracking includes hand tracking of individual fingers/gestures?
@engagevr4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting thank you for sharing, have you tried with multiple people in view?
@SATOSHIMAEMOTO4 жыл бұрын
I haven't tried it yet. seems interesting. I'll try.
@KaioStudio4 жыл бұрын
ありがとうございました。
@tehseenhaider35835 жыл бұрын
please share the email
@harrivayrynen5 жыл бұрын
Please checkout the titlebar. Cameras are swapped. Bad test. And Why left camera is so blurry. Is the lens greasy.
@MrZhaoguang5 жыл бұрын
pas mal
@uykusuzdev5 жыл бұрын
i want some tutorial to do this pls.
@Zettaffx5 жыл бұрын
good!
@Zettaffx5 жыл бұрын
cooool
@yotslcee5 жыл бұрын
Hi Satoshi, I have a D415 camera and I want to buy a D435 because the Intel web site said D435 is better for fast motion tracking. But according to your video, I find D415 performs better. Do you feel the same? I need your advice to decide to buy a D435 or not. Thanks!
@chew33d5 жыл бұрын
Maybe i'm wrong... but those intel realsense sensors are REALLY BAD
@erenyldz94655 жыл бұрын
can any of these perceive gaps with 3-4 mm depth from its minimum distance?
@Jaeboy6 жыл бұрын
the D435 is pretty poor!
@sorenerichsen45196 жыл бұрын
From his point of few, D435 is standing on the left side and D415 on the right (1:24). This could support the hint of Kazuyuki that he actually swooped image streams. You can see the difference in the position of the ceiling lamps. On the left image they are more centered and on the right they are a little bit shifted to the left. So the video on the right is probably the D435 and not the D415...
@richardkircheis78096 жыл бұрын
Naa, I disagree. At 1:24 you can see, that the D415 (from his point of view on the right) is actually tilted a bit more towards the ceiling. Also the D415 has a narrower field of view, which results in objects of same distance appearing to be closer to the camera compared to the D435. If you compare the camera footage, this leads to the conclusion that the image stream on the right is actually the D415. (Like the titles of the image stream windows say D414 on the right and D435 on the left). So in terms of RGB video quality and sharpness, the D415 (rolling shutter) seems to be better than the D435 (global shutter).
@110010011101006 жыл бұрын
Are you all stupid? It tells you which camera the stream belongs to in their individual title bars right above the videos.
@igorpozdeev43526 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@nerv41706 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely weird, D415 actually seems to be more capable than D435.
@Filmthechannel6 жыл бұрын
wow, thank you.
@annosadam6 жыл бұрын
D415の方が綺麗に見えるのは面白いですね！ 野外で使えるというのがどの程度使えるのか、知りたいです！（届くのは数ヶ月後になりそうなので･･･） It is interesting that D415 looks better than D435. I would like to see an outdoor test. ;)
@ron3nightshade6 жыл бұрын
Hello Satoshi, Nice video to get an idea of their depth stream. Are you running default settings on both cameras, in the SDK depth viewer tool ? Could you give an estimate of how close and far (the distance in meters) you were pacing with respect to the camera? The D415 seems to do slightly better in near range even though D435 is supposed to have a slightly better range. Your response would be really helpful!
@LukeVilent6 жыл бұрын
So, basically, they now use a different raster than R200 did. Frankly, after some disappointing experience with previous models, I wouldn't invest in the D series either.
@eliriggs39326 жыл бұрын
Which cameras would you recommend? And what was disappointing? Thanks
@LukeVilent6 жыл бұрын
I am out of computer vision for now, so I cannot really give any meaningful advice. Disappointing was a high noise grade which gradually increased over time and usage. The camera was not really fit for real-life conditions.
@syedfawaz20026 жыл бұрын
How come 415 output seems better than 435?
@boulabiar5 жыл бұрын
it's not, if you speak about the RGB maybe the lens is not cleaned, a simple finger touch above the lens can do that. (435 is the left camera)
@semicolonaddict82635 жыл бұрын
It is because the 435 prioritises FOV over accuracy. realsense.intel.com/compare/ I am noticing that the 435 seems to have less noise in this video than the 415 though. Which is odd because intel states that the 435 typically has twice the noise that the 415 does. "The Intel RealSense D435 depth camera has more depth noise (>2x) at any given range compared to the Intel RealSense D415 depth camera, and it does have a smaller minimum operation distance (~0.5x) at the same resolution"
@LukeWelles5 жыл бұрын
@@semicolonaddict8263 There are a number of points at that link that favor the 415.
@NoBodysGamer5 жыл бұрын
@@LukeWelles Strange since its cheaper. Which one is recommended for Windows Hello use and maybe some kinect like gesture control if there are any programs that do it. I wonder if one of these can be installed below big 43inch monitor or 55inch TV, facing towards TV and somehow use it to detect touches and turning TVs into big touch screen
@mohammedarixx6 жыл бұрын
D435 has wider FOV comparing to D415, so I believe the left video is from D435.
@stevemartin35085 жыл бұрын
Are you stupid? It is fucking written on top of each video which camera it is
@frenchtouchfactory6 жыл бұрын
Hello, Please make the same video in 3D mode
@onitsuka23886 жыл бұрын
Satoshi, D415 looks better and more robust, isn't it?
@alfredanil6 жыл бұрын
magnification from D435 is causing distortion and low resolution.
@1HololensfansOfNaruto6 жыл бұрын
you have made your own hologram app;")
@1HololensfansOfNaruto6 жыл бұрын
cool menu layout;")
@Suro_One7 жыл бұрын
wat
@PowerPsydian7 жыл бұрын
Just wondering if I can upload this to somewhere else in China saying this is your fantasy work, and a url linked to here though most of them can't get here. I know it would be better to just have a link to here but most of them can't visit KZread. I've already put the link on the largest Chinese social website weibo.com . No commercial use, I promise. If you are not going to give the permit, I totally understand.
Пікірлер
I dont have that external mode
Like it-yo uploaded stunning picture,goodbye! :)
thanks for sharing
0:46 物を投げるアプリwものw
Thanks for the video clip. But how do i exactly get its orientation of the camera ? Appreciate it if you can help. Thanks.
Saludos de Perú... Mi bisabuelo llegó a Perú hace muchos años y no conocía a nadie en Japón con el mismo apellido hasta hoy que intento saber más de mi familia
Thanks for this comparison. Have you ever tried realsense cam for detection of transparent objects such as pet bottle or glass?
Great work, it looks flawless compared to other mapping systems. How did you anchor the digital content to the real world?
Hello! Could you share your iBeacon Device Model? Or Where could buy it?
Hello! I'm using mbed TY51822r3 ( www.switch-science.com/catalog/2574/ )
@@SATOSHIMAEMOTO Thanks!
なんとっ! 透明なスクリーンですか！ 素晴らしいです！
can the camera follow one moving point in the room and get information about it?
another "3D-camera" that despite the laser still suffers from noise?
What would your opinion be on this vs Azure Kinect? At first glance it looks to be lower quality, more noise, limited range, etc than the Kinect V4.
How many Kinects are used ？
it looses tracking as soon as you move fast better suited for dialogue
Esa cámara funciona también en xbox one?
Thank you for the video. Very helpful! You label two parts of the video NFOV Unbinned and did not have any shot of NFOV Binned -- is this correct?
I don't know which is which
Cool do you know if the body tracking includes hand tracking of individual fingers/gestures?
Very interesting thank you for sharing, have you tried with multiple people in view?
I haven't tried it yet. seems interesting. I'll try.
ありがとうございました。
please share the email
Please checkout the titlebar. Cameras are swapped. Bad test. And Why left camera is so blurry. Is the lens greasy.
pas mal
i want some tutorial to do this pls.
good!
cooool
Hi Satoshi, I have a D415 camera and I want to buy a D435 because the Intel web site said D435 is better for fast motion tracking. But according to your video, I find D415 performs better. Do you feel the same? I need your advice to decide to buy a D435 or not. Thanks!
Maybe i'm wrong... but those intel realsense sensors are REALLY BAD
can any of these perceive gaps with 3-4 mm depth from its minimum distance?
the D435 is pretty poor!
From his point of few, D435 is standing on the left side and D415 on the right (1:24). This could support the hint of Kazuyuki that he actually swooped image streams. You can see the difference in the position of the ceiling lamps. On the left image they are more centered and on the right they are a little bit shifted to the left. So the video on the right is probably the D435 and not the D415...
Naa, I disagree. At 1:24 you can see, that the D415 (from his point of view on the right) is actually tilted a bit more towards the ceiling. Also the D415 has a narrower field of view, which results in objects of same distance appearing to be closer to the camera compared to the D435. If you compare the camera footage, this leads to the conclusion that the image stream on the right is actually the D415. (Like the titles of the image stream windows say D414 on the right and D435 on the left). So in terms of RGB video quality and sharpness, the D415 (rolling shutter) seems to be better than the D435 (global shutter).
Are you all stupid? It tells you which camera the stream belongs to in their individual title bars right above the videos.
Thank you!
This is absolutely weird, D415 actually seems to be more capable than D435.
wow, thank you.
D415の方が綺麗に見えるのは面白いですね！ 野外で使えるというのがどの程度使えるのか、知りたいです！（届くのは数ヶ月後になりそうなので･･･） It is interesting that D415 looks better than D435. I would like to see an outdoor test. ;)
Hello Satoshi, Nice video to get an idea of their depth stream. Are you running default settings on both cameras, in the SDK depth viewer tool ? Could you give an estimate of how close and far (the distance in meters) you were pacing with respect to the camera? The D415 seems to do slightly better in near range even though D435 is supposed to have a slightly better range. Your response would be really helpful!
So, basically, they now use a different raster than R200 did. Frankly, after some disappointing experience with previous models, I wouldn't invest in the D series either.
Which cameras would you recommend? And what was disappointing? Thanks
I am out of computer vision for now, so I cannot really give any meaningful advice. Disappointing was a high noise grade which gradually increased over time and usage. The camera was not really fit for real-life conditions.
How come 415 output seems better than 435?
it's not, if you speak about the RGB maybe the lens is not cleaned, a simple finger touch above the lens can do that. (435 is the left camera)
It is because the 435 prioritises FOV over accuracy. realsense.intel.com/compare/ I am noticing that the 435 seems to have less noise in this video than the 415 though. Which is odd because intel states that the 435 typically has twice the noise that the 415 does. "The Intel RealSense D435 depth camera has more depth noise (>2x) at any given range compared to the Intel RealSense D415 depth camera, and it does have a smaller minimum operation distance (~0.5x) at the same resolution"
@@semicolonaddict8263 There are a number of points at that link that favor the 415.
@@LukeWelles Strange since its cheaper. Which one is recommended for Windows Hello use and maybe some kinect like gesture control if there are any programs that do it. I wonder if one of these can be installed below big 43inch monitor or 55inch TV, facing towards TV and somehow use it to detect touches and turning TVs into big touch screen
D435 has wider FOV comparing to D415, so I believe the left video is from D435.
Are you stupid? It is fucking written on top of each video which camera it is
Hello, Please make the same video in 3D mode
Satoshi, D415 looks better and more robust, isn't it?
magnification from D435 is causing distortion and low resolution.
you have made your own hologram app;")
cool menu layout;")
wat
Just wondering if I can upload this to somewhere else in China saying this is your fantasy work, and a url linked to here though most of them can't get here. I know it would be better to just have a link to here but most of them can't visit KZread. I've already put the link on the largest Chinese social website weibo.com . No commercial use, I promise. If you are not going to give the permit, I totally understand.
Hahaha! Very funny!
Googleさんがほんとうまくまとめてくれた表参道ヒルズ、DUVETICA 10周年記念イベントの動画。