Пікірлер

• 
  @KUSHALGOKHALE3 күн бұрын

  i came here to know what is intereacting and non interacting...good

• 
  @dharshinisatheesh3 күн бұрын

  absolutely amazing video , i understood the concept even better than the theoretical textbooks

• 
  @ruhi78563 күн бұрын

  Thank you sir

• 
  @vandnachaurasiya63914 күн бұрын

  Amazing 👍 I understood easily

• 
  @WhiteDevil477 күн бұрын

  Thanks a lot sir

• 
  @user-kz7ee1gc6c7 күн бұрын

  Super op😂❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

• 
  @philg41168 күн бұрын

  What language is being used here?

• 
  @ramharisharma59869 күн бұрын

  Rajasthani ❤❤❤

• 
  @abiramip507110 күн бұрын

  Even i don't know hindi , im able to understand the concepts well . I'm proud of myself 😂

• 
  @shivamkumar-nt3pt10 күн бұрын

  Amazing👍👍

• 
  @user-dq9pn8nd4k13 күн бұрын

  Thank you so much this was very helpful. U made the concept clear with so much of detailing. Tank you 🎉❤

• 
  @seemakhan971413 күн бұрын

  Nce

• 
  @muskaanshaikh59014 күн бұрын

  You're voice is so sweet 😊

• 
  @DeepakSharma-zg5ff15 күн бұрын

  Thankyou so much sir

• 
  @v_wilson16 күн бұрын

  I could not got 3rd example. Why there's z axis ♾️??

• 
  @shashitamrakar354116 күн бұрын

  Gud knowledge

• 
  @preetimalik114821 күн бұрын

  Nice explanation ❤ in simple language

• 
  @anshumansinghsingh410622 күн бұрын

  Nice explanation ❤❤

• 
  @TANUJKUMARPandey999922 күн бұрын

  Maja aa gaya bro 😍😍

• 
  @rahulkr107624 күн бұрын

  Leptop a lighter particle or heavier particle please explain

• 
  @aashibbaloch25 күн бұрын

  Nicely explained sir plz continue this good work

• 
  @hitenderyadav292926 күн бұрын

  Great graphics, good deal of efforts sir Thanks sir

• 
  @hitenderyadav292926 күн бұрын

  Thanks for your efforts sir.

• 
  @hitenderyadav292926 күн бұрын

  Superb 😊

• 
  @hitenderyadav292926 күн бұрын

  Superb 😊

• 
  @kunfupanda129429 күн бұрын

  best

• 
  @tuba402229 күн бұрын

  Joss

• 
  @GB-jp9ptАй бұрын

  Dude why does the title, description and everthing is in English but you speak another language...?

• 
  @HanshikaSaini-tn2dxАй бұрын

  I am only one watching in 2024😎😎

• 
  @shivadubey252516 күн бұрын

  Mai bhi hu 😂

• 
  @mdclassseАй бұрын

  Helpful video

• 
  @KishoreKumar-rt1eoАй бұрын

  Brother he used bs statistics not MB

• 
  @sukhwinderkaur8022Ай бұрын

  Great

• 
  @ayush-thatАй бұрын

  nice

• 
  @sukalyanMannaАй бұрын

  you earned a subscriber , excellent explanation with proper graph and animation ❤

• 
  @user-wc1ej4jr6uАй бұрын

  Nice 👍

• 
  @AirinAkter-dl2bcАй бұрын

  Waiting for next video

• 
  @AamirSohail-yx5ogАй бұрын

  appretiate

• 
  @naveenbhardwaj8358Ай бұрын

  Please make more videos on approximation method. The way explained with animation is fantastic. Please i am requesting you to make more videos on approximation method.

• 
  @NayanGhosh-kc3ijАй бұрын

  😮😮😮😮 t̊h̊ån̊k̊s̊ ❤❤❤❤

• 
  @silverspinАй бұрын

  Damn such a good video, so underrated TvT

• 
  @subhadipbanerjee4524Ай бұрын

  From Equipartition theorem for vibration motion we get KT (1/2KT for K.E.+1/2KT for P.E.) And 1/2 KT for Rotation motion And 1/2 KT for Translation motion Isn't it correct?

• 
  @chemicalVeeeАй бұрын

  Thats a really good explanation. Shows how the quantisation idea was a concept built on by Planck from Raleigh-Jean

• 
  @defencemanzil1750Ай бұрын

  Thanks a lot ❤

• 
  @mr.anonymous5603Ай бұрын

  Sir can you please share using which software you animated this video?

• 
  @whdaffer1Ай бұрын

  I would disagree that a scalar requires 0 basis 'vectors' / component. It requires 1 basis (the definition of the unit being used), but it's not a 'vector' per se, of if it is, it's a a 'degenerate' vector, having only 1 dimension.

• 
  @whdaffer1Ай бұрын

  Hmmm.... m^n components.... Temperature is clearly a 1-d space. I know that a scalar is considered a 0-degree tensor, but 1^0=1. There's clearly something I'm not understanding here.

• 
  @vdoraiburu1696Ай бұрын

  Are these under external or internal symmetry ?

• 
  @eithwephyo4246Ай бұрын

  The video is very clear so I understood it. Thanks

• 
  @vishwanathpratapphysics293Ай бұрын

  सुंदर

• 
  @khushboo135Ай бұрын

  Thank u for such great explanation sir❤

• 
  @thevegg3275Ай бұрын

  At 7:50 you start that the vector is a sub times the sub plus a sub two times E sub two, but you are ignoring the dual basis factors which give the covariant projection as a sub. One is super script one plus a sub two superscript two I’m wondering What you say true if you only consider the basis factors the sub one and the sub two and do not consider the dual basis factors the script one and the superscript two