Пікірлер

• 
  @aj-uo3uhАй бұрын

  This is gold! Trying to read Elasticity and Geometry (Audoly, Pomeau), but this part they explain very sloppy and can cost you days to figure it out.

• 
  @_6666-Ай бұрын

  WHERE ARE THE INTERESTS FROM THE PAYBACK OTHER THAN ( SHELL CORPORATION THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ) U S GOVT 60-DAY PLUS BAN WHEN THE PRIVATE OIL & GAS SECTOR IS ACCOUNTING FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TREASURY'S LOSS OF 2024 LEASE CHECKS IN THE RED !

• 
  @extraclass6503 ай бұрын

  how do you fit this curve... varying m using excel

• 
  @likekiralike56303 ай бұрын

  Sir, what is aim to perform XLOT instead of LOT?

• 
  @luk45ful10 ай бұрын

  Why is X2 = -X3? Not sure what I'm missing there

• 
  @nguyenhoang-vf8le Жыл бұрын

  it is difficult to understand. Thanks for sharing

• 
  @obinnaosuagwu3685 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks a lot

• 
  @samardas9079 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks sir but sir please increased sound quality.

• 
  @anubhavgupta9381 Жыл бұрын

  HOEK I HAVE VISITED YOU SOME WHERE ELSE You ARE TOO GOOD HOEK

• 
  @franksaruhan Жыл бұрын

  Matlab does not consider the direction of stress vector depending on its compressive or tensile behavior.

• 
  @mikeguidry2577 Жыл бұрын

  Sorry but this isn't good instructions. It explains 0 what flow rate means on x axis. Flow rate of what? The well? The injection of fluid during fracking? Also it says pressure at perforation 8,622 psi when the y axis doesn't even go that high. It makes me unsure if the y axis pressure is perforation pressure or what because 8622 isn't even on the scale. The Y axis says pressure. Again, specificity is always needed. Pressure of what? Well flowing pressure? Reservoir pressure? Wellhead pressure? This is just a lazy graph.

• 
  @immes682 Жыл бұрын

  18:50 Should you not have T(n)*n*dA - T(e1)*n1*dA -.... instead of T(n)*dA - T(e1)*n1*dA - .... ?

• 
  @himanshushukla2194 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks ❤

• 
  @user-di1iy6vk2c Жыл бұрын

  After calculting two principal effective stress respectivey, What values to be compared to these two values for rock failure assessment?? Rock compressive strength?

• 
  @joaocosta3506 Жыл бұрын

  why is alpha-beta = 2Exy?

• 
  @siddharthgupta2757 Жыл бұрын

  GSP real id se aao

• 
  @abdallaaziz1172 Жыл бұрын

  Need to improve the voice quality

• 
  @sauravsrivastwa5332 жыл бұрын

  What is U

• 
  @mahathirscolorworld68182 жыл бұрын

  soundless lecture is very disgusting

• 
  @user-gx2wy3ot3h2 жыл бұрын

  very good

• 
  @user-gx2wy3ot3h2 жыл бұрын

  Hello, how are you? I am a petroleum engineer from Iraq. I want to get to know you, and I hope you will reply to me

• 
  @AndreasMichael2 жыл бұрын

  I think the σ_rθ equation should end with ...- 3a^4/r^4)*sinθ instead of ...) - sinθ

• 
  @jospina65 Жыл бұрын

  You are right: *sin(2* 3a^4/r^4)*sin(2θ)

• 
  @JosueA_4552 жыл бұрын

  Are Kirsch solutions suitable for horizontal displacements?

• 
  @password69752 жыл бұрын

  Thank you sir

• 
  @doseur54703 жыл бұрын

  thank u a lot teacher

• 
  @oufjosselin51593 жыл бұрын

  How can we test only the skeleton (grain) part of a rock considering the material is still porous at tiny scale ? Ks seems to be tricky to get...

• 
  @b.y.76463 жыл бұрын

  hi thanks for this video, just one question : why the critical state line always crosses the origin? the cohesion of the soil is not taken into account with this model? thanks

• 
  @Shubham-ph2ww3 жыл бұрын

  Incorrect solution

• 
  @Ale-kc9pq2 жыл бұрын

  Why bro?

• 
  @jackdodson39 Жыл бұрын

  @@Ale-kc9pq -1 not -2

• 
  @jcnot9712 Жыл бұрын

  @@jackdodson39 Thanks. D**k move of op to comment that and not provide the correct answer.

• 
  @asaadabdulsada77013 жыл бұрын

  Can you please explain me what is mean by pore pressure gradient

• 
  @mouradzid83433 жыл бұрын

  Hello can you help me to realized a mini project Thank you

• 
  @mazenomar72793 жыл бұрын

  Dear sir how to conact with you for some quiz?

• 
  @areteees3 жыл бұрын

  Thanks for uploading, very helpful

• 
  @MEBJMANOJKUMAR3 жыл бұрын

  excellent video but increased volume quality can make it much better

• 
  @so_cht3 жыл бұрын

  Can it be any slower?

• 
  @mohammadtariq2483 жыл бұрын

  Good Learning from insightful explanation through wonderful diagram. Thanks for it.

• 
  @chandanadeeksha8843 жыл бұрын

  Wow.. such an amazing video. You explain the concept effortlessly for even a newbie like me to understand. Hats-off! P.s. I am not an engineer, I am a Mathematics student who randomly came across the term creep and got curious as to how that could happen, i.e., how and why time could effect the strain.

• 
  @er.pravinkadam11174 жыл бұрын

  Sir, sorry to say you but due to small and cutting of voice we can't understand it clearly. But thank you for your help and effort for this vedio. Keep it up.

• 
  @isnardyjosetorofonseca39264 жыл бұрын

  How do you calculate radial stress and shear stress near the wellbore region based on elastic mechanics theory

• 
  @KJAS_JU_IITM4 жыл бұрын

  Do you have the lecture on UBCSAND Constitutive mode?

• 
  @KJAS_JU_IITM4 жыл бұрын

  Sir it is a nice lecture. Do you give me the complete playlist LINK on Constitutive Modelling?

• 
  @chellalhichemaymenkatib46454 жыл бұрын

  i want to know what is the procedure for measuring Shmin in reverse faulting regimes.since the lot or xlot measure the least principle stress which is not Shmin in the reverse faulting regime . I would really apreciate your help thanks in advance

• 
  @DeanCulver174 жыл бұрын

  The definition of shear strain here is misleading. From your diagram at 12:13, you define the deformed differential element acute angle as twice the shear strain, which implies that if shear strain is zero, the element collapses onto a line, and an un-sheared element has a shear strain of 45 degrees.

• 
  @euginiafebrina57454 жыл бұрын

  Well explained, Sir. Thank you for the explanation. I had trouble listening to the voice since it's very small even though I have my biggest volume on. Apart from that, everything is good.

• 
  @ammarsohail76864 жыл бұрын

  Does most of the change in void ratio occur along the failure shear band for heavily overconsolidated clays?

• 
  @hichemsevran4 жыл бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @Poskma4 жыл бұрын

  Thank you for helping me sir! i can learn many knowledges~

• 
  @AndreasMichael4 жыл бұрын

  The Kirsch solution published in 1898 (not 1896) did not assume biaxial stress loading, nor pore or wellbore pressures. Therefore, the figure shown at 1:17 is not from the original Kirsch paper. Kirsch only considered single stress concentration, "σ" around a hole, that is not pressurized (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsch_equations). Somebody else (whom I don't know), sometime between 1898 and 1957 must have modified the original Kirsch solution to incorporate biaxial stress loading, before Hubbert and Willis (1957) incorporated the pore and wellbore pressure terms. Thus, the equations shown on the slide at 2:43 should not be referred to as the "Kirsch Solutions" as they are colloquially known, but Hubbert and Willi' modified version of Kirsch. Haimson and Fairhurst (1967) further modified Hubbert and Willis' equations considering fluid infiltration from the wellbore using Biot's theory. Nevertheless, very nice and informative piece.

• 
  @Dark-tk9xu4 жыл бұрын

  The delivery could be better.

• 
  @dota2gameplays9914 жыл бұрын

  thanks sir

• 
  @jimmystanton95044 жыл бұрын

  good video! thank you sir!