The witness was mentally ill and paranoid, Alicia put her on the stand and planted the seed that she could plead the 5th to intentionally sway the jury that the witness might have been involved in the murder knowing she wasn't. Judge understands what's going on and tries to get clarification but Alicia shut it down. Smart but dirty.
@alexderick8619Ай бұрын
What episode?
@MaloWlulАй бұрын
Read the video description...
@TheOneTakeLiveCast2 ай бұрын
She just stood up to Humperdinck
@huaweshen81132 ай бұрын
Mr. Big is so hot!!
@jonwalton194 ай бұрын
So unrealistic. A real judge, at one who wanted to stay a judge, would never do this
@donnamack67975 ай бұрын
Chris Noth looks really hot!
@cherrygripe49616 ай бұрын
Everything about this scene is amazing. Alicia unsteady in her voice speaking back to a judge, Peters silent awe response, the writing, totally great.
@blurdreamer6 ай бұрын
Her husband is horny watching his wife being so bad ass in court 😂
@89five3five7 ай бұрын
I like her with the straight hair
@curtisbischof38127 ай бұрын
The comments below are hilarious. This is a TV show, not real life, not real law either.
@michaellorton80997 ай бұрын
SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment? I did not see this television show, so I do not know whose witness this young lady is or how extensively she had testified before this assertion of her Fifth Amendment rights. I am a lawyer and worked as a litigator as a younger man. There is a situation in which the judge would be correct in compelling her to testify-SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the right to remain silent. If this woman was called on direct in the defense case by Ms. Florek and testified extensively that she was innocent and had nothing to do with the crime, yet then asserted her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent only when direct testimony defense counsel (Florek) anticipated cross-examination and asked the line of questions most likely to discredit and impeach her, the judge would be fully correct in disallowing SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment. Every criminal defendant faces a dilemma: whether to testify in his or her own behalf but also face withering cross-examination by the prosecutor. Juries are not supposed to infer guilt when a defendant does not take the stand (and may be expressly instructed by the judge not to make that inference), but we all know that juries wonder why someone accused of a crime will not take the stand to deny it under oath. If defendants were allowed to selectively testify to their innocence, then take the Fifth Amendment about cross-examination type issues (even if anticipatorily posed on direct by their defense counsel), the prosecution would be denied the people’s right to show the defendant was lying or not credible. In the that instance, the judge would be fully within his authority to determine whether the defense was attempting to get away with SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment. If the judge determines there has been SELECTIVE ASSERTION, he can 1) compel the defendant to testify under threat of criminal contempt; 2) strike all of the defendant’s earlier denials; and/or 3) instruct the jury that defendant’s continued refusal to answer must be construed as an admission that her answers would have been very damaging to her defense. If the judge finds that defense counsel did this intentionally, it would be the defense lawyer that would be facing disciplinary proceedings.
@josephmassaro11 күн бұрын
I was hoping an actual lawyer would chime in. Legal and medical shows are fun and dramatic, but they tend to be all over the place when it comes to reality.
@gutar56757 ай бұрын
This would not happen hahahaha
@timothyfavasoli72247 ай бұрын
I can see why Susan left him.
@ktwashere56378 ай бұрын
Isn't Alicia's question also "piercing" the fifth amendment - she asks if the witness is worried about relating what happened. Is that not asking why you are pleading the fifth?
@rlopezaravena8 ай бұрын
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@jaybeardy21718 ай бұрын
Which season was this episode from?
@MaloWlul8 ай бұрын
Read the video description
@javierreyesg9 ай бұрын
Peter Florrick (and myself) got really turned on by Alicia's strong attitude towards the judge. Strong and firm character works better than makeup.
@mitchhamilton6410 ай бұрын
"Wait, what time tomorrow morning? 6 o'clock? 7 o'clock? 8 o'clock? 9 o'clock? 10 o'clock? would 11 o'clock still be in the morning? WHAT TIME?!"
@exdoode10 ай бұрын
Jeez! that put the fear of god in me, don't mess with her!!!
@yveslafrance280610 ай бұрын
I thought owning judges was limited to rich white men owning Supreme Court judges
@PV9610 ай бұрын
Love how proud her husband is. . . .
@Antebios10 ай бұрын
You think this is good? Wait until you see THE GOOD FIGHT!
@NVRAMboi11 ай бұрын
"TOO-SHAY"
@Heresheis081811 ай бұрын
Women should be held responsible and accountable
@imjosephvasta11 ай бұрын
She got him
@nickacelvn11 ай бұрын
Where do you get a lawyer like that?
@mikedoherty739811 ай бұрын
Take that, Humperdinck!
@pennsharon8098 Жыл бұрын
I won’t have able to not say “ no you shut up
@giordanotirelli6028 Жыл бұрын
Today julianna as alicia 57 years
@giordanotirelli6028 Жыл бұрын
Happy birthday julianna from italian boy live in rome and I m fan of the good wife
@AllGamingStarred Жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in the judicial committee, a fellow judge screams at this asshole.
@matthewschincariol4619 Жыл бұрын
Man, what happened to Jack Skellington?
@Alice-jz6ti Жыл бұрын
The way she keeps her cool and doesn’t blink at the end 🔥
@TheSsdd86 Жыл бұрын
there was a scene that the judge was changing the decision of the jury. But i could not find it on youtube. If you have it can you please post.
@Scott83016 Жыл бұрын
Season and episode anyone?
@MaloWlul Жыл бұрын
Read video description
@Pixie_x3 Жыл бұрын
What the hell is Ted’s dead Wife doing here lmao 😂
@godfreyniles155 Жыл бұрын
What season and episode was this.?
@MaloWlul Жыл бұрын
Read the video description
@Sarasdad91 Жыл бұрын
Just finished binge watching this show. Loved the story lines. Although I liked many of the characters, the 2 best characters IMO, Louis Canning (Michael J Fox) and Eli Gold (Alan Cumming) TBH I wasn't too crazy about the Title character, infact many times I flat out didn't like her at all. But the good stories kept me watching.
@theteutonking3306 Жыл бұрын
This judge violated so many constitutional rights in this episode.
@kiogoratimothy5925 Жыл бұрын
Where can I download
@vexxama Жыл бұрын
How did he really expect this to go? Even the fact that he attempted this and backed off would come back to haunt him
@susiebrown6646 Жыл бұрын
Great scene
@claverhouse1 Жыл бұрын
It's fiction but it is what happens when a corrupt nation institutes complete corruption of its legal system by electing judges, prosecutors and police
@katiecasey121 Жыл бұрын
BOOM! score one for the rule of law. . . what's left of it anyways in 2022.
@stevieg8934 Жыл бұрын
The Good Wife is just brilliant and I have watched all seven seasons 4 times and no doubt will watch it again
Пікірлер
A judge doesn't know laws more then lawyer 😑
Yas Queen 👑
The witness was mentally ill and paranoid, Alicia put her on the stand and planted the seed that she could plead the 5th to intentionally sway the jury that the witness might have been involved in the murder knowing she wasn't. Judge understands what's going on and tries to get clarification but Alicia shut it down. Smart but dirty.
What episode?
Read the video description...
She just stood up to Humperdinck
Mr. Big is so hot!!
So unrealistic. A real judge, at one who wanted to stay a judge, would never do this
Chris Noth looks really hot!
Everything about this scene is amazing. Alicia unsteady in her voice speaking back to a judge, Peters silent awe response, the writing, totally great.
Her husband is horny watching his wife being so bad ass in court 😂
I like her with the straight hair
The comments below are hilarious. This is a TV show, not real life, not real law either.
SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment? I did not see this television show, so I do not know whose witness this young lady is or how extensively she had testified before this assertion of her Fifth Amendment rights. I am a lawyer and worked as a litigator as a younger man. There is a situation in which the judge would be correct in compelling her to testify-SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the right to remain silent. If this woman was called on direct in the defense case by Ms. Florek and testified extensively that she was innocent and had nothing to do with the crime, yet then asserted her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent only when direct testimony defense counsel (Florek) anticipated cross-examination and asked the line of questions most likely to discredit and impeach her, the judge would be fully correct in disallowing SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment. Every criminal defendant faces a dilemma: whether to testify in his or her own behalf but also face withering cross-examination by the prosecutor. Juries are not supposed to infer guilt when a defendant does not take the stand (and may be expressly instructed by the judge not to make that inference), but we all know that juries wonder why someone accused of a crime will not take the stand to deny it under oath. If defendants were allowed to selectively testify to their innocence, then take the Fifth Amendment about cross-examination type issues (even if anticipatorily posed on direct by their defense counsel), the prosecution would be denied the people’s right to show the defendant was lying or not credible. In the that instance, the judge would be fully within his authority to determine whether the defense was attempting to get away with SELECTIVE ASSERTION of the Fifth Amendment. If the judge determines there has been SELECTIVE ASSERTION, he can 1) compel the defendant to testify under threat of criminal contempt; 2) strike all of the defendant’s earlier denials; and/or 3) instruct the jury that defendant’s continued refusal to answer must be construed as an admission that her answers would have been very damaging to her defense. If the judge finds that defense counsel did this intentionally, it would be the defense lawyer that would be facing disciplinary proceedings.
I was hoping an actual lawyer would chime in. Legal and medical shows are fun and dramatic, but they tend to be all over the place when it comes to reality.
This would not happen hahahaha
I can see why Susan left him.
Isn't Alicia's question also "piercing" the fifth amendment - she asks if the witness is worried about relating what happened. Is that not asking why you are pleading the fifth?
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Which season was this episode from?
Read the video description
Peter Florrick (and myself) got really turned on by Alicia's strong attitude towards the judge. Strong and firm character works better than makeup.
"Wait, what time tomorrow morning? 6 o'clock? 7 o'clock? 8 o'clock? 9 o'clock? 10 o'clock? would 11 o'clock still be in the morning? WHAT TIME?!"
Jeez! that put the fear of god in me, don't mess with her!!!
I thought owning judges was limited to rich white men owning Supreme Court judges
Love how proud her husband is. . . .
You think this is good? Wait until you see THE GOOD FIGHT!
"TOO-SHAY"
Women should be held responsible and accountable
She got him
Where do you get a lawyer like that?
Take that, Humperdinck!
I won’t have able to not say “ no you shut up
Today julianna as alicia 57 years
Happy birthday julianna from italian boy live in rome and I m fan of the good wife
Meanwhile in the judicial committee, a fellow judge screams at this asshole.
Man, what happened to Jack Skellington?
The way she keeps her cool and doesn’t blink at the end 🔥
there was a scene that the judge was changing the decision of the jury. But i could not find it on youtube. If you have it can you please post.
Season and episode anyone?
Read video description
What the hell is Ted’s dead Wife doing here lmao 😂
What season and episode was this.?
Read the video description
Just finished binge watching this show. Loved the story lines. Although I liked many of the characters, the 2 best characters IMO, Louis Canning (Michael J Fox) and Eli Gold (Alan Cumming) TBH I wasn't too crazy about the Title character, infact many times I flat out didn't like her at all. But the good stories kept me watching.
This judge violated so many constitutional rights in this episode.
Where can I download
How did he really expect this to go? Even the fact that he attempted this and backed off would come back to haunt him
Great scene
It's fiction but it is what happens when a corrupt nation institutes complete corruption of its legal system by electing judges, prosecutors and police
BOOM! score one for the rule of law. . . what's left of it anyways in 2022.
The Good Wife is just brilliant and I have watched all seven seasons 4 times and no doubt will watch it again
What episode is this?
It says in the description of the video.
Which episode is this
It says in the video's description
I have never seen this show, but now I want to