Пікірлер

• 
  @AmnaMizam-po1kqКүн бұрын

  Fantastic

• 
  @The_CGA3 күн бұрын

  The “more detailed information” that you call “classified” is now bouncing around the internet, it turns out having the info be open source helps the public unders how close or far places like Iran and North Korea are from making their own. See Scott Manley’s series on nukes for an examplr

• 
  @ognjenrad49055 күн бұрын

  Thank you! I like the way you drew the diagram. Other diagrams were only irritating to me

• 
  @annaoaulinovna7 күн бұрын

  plutonium spark plug is made by using plutonium foam.

• 
  @ChimpFromSpace10 күн бұрын

  Just the explosive lens itself is an insane feat of engineering. Using geometry, and chemicals with different combustion speeds to turn outwardly expanding explosions into an inwardly collapsing implosion. Even mechanics of the neutron source at the center of the imploding core is also fascinating, and genius. For better or for worse, the people who worked on the original Manhattan Project were very very smart, to say the least.

• 
  @CRSolarice11 күн бұрын

  THANK YOU. Most videos about this topic try to push the belief that FUSION is the destructive force in a thermonuclear weapon by hyping it into some sort of mythological event. This almost always causes people to misunderstand what is happening in a thermonuclear weapon. Its all about the fission, fusion isn't what causes the damage (directly). The fusion reaction cause a release of extra neutrons which cause many more fission reactions before the nuclear fuel material is thrown apart by the explosion. People are wrongly believing that fusion is some sort of ultimate explosive force but it isn't, at least not in thermonuclear weapons. To be certain fusion is an energetic event but in our weapons the energy created by fusion is dwarfed, mightily, by the energy released from the fission component(s). One curious note about the fusion fuel that you touched upon is that it first undergoes the process of fission and then the resulting elements undergo fusion. Its a "two for one" burst of neutrons and extra energy from the same source. I do appreciate your video for being clear and accurate. Skipping the mythological, hype and dumb down parts really "does it" for me. The credit needs to be given.

• 
  @80sandretrogubbins2511 күн бұрын

  How are you able to more concretely define "dwarfed"? In the video I watched called "C.7 Calculating energy released in nuclear reactions (HL)" by Mike Sugiyama Jones, it seems that mole-for-mole, fission produces 10x more energy then fusion, but fusion still releases huge quantities of energy. For fusion to be "dwarfed" by fission in a hydrogen bomb, I would infer that there has to be a lot more fissile material than fusionable material present. I get that more neutrons become available for the fission to occur, but is that the only factor?

• 
  @Ally-io7mp11 күн бұрын

  This actually really helped! Thank you :)

• 
  @stephenmolo768115 күн бұрын

  triangle of fire

• 
  @phantomblindsight90725 күн бұрын

  we should do the same thing for fusion power. and a tokamak

• 
  @cassidaymoriarity25 күн бұрын

  Where can I get a copy of this table to help with determining solubility?

• 
  @TimRobertsenАй бұрын

  Awesome video!

• 
  @TimRobertsenАй бұрын

  Great video!:)

• 
  @danichang2700Ай бұрын

  Oh Mein Gott, thank you so much! It's so funny, I'm studying a chemistry in German right now and you've said nein-polar jsjsjssjssjsjsj xD

• 
  @ataberktamis9079Ай бұрын

  thank you so much it was very hepful

• 
  @ChihurumnanyaHezekiah-np5wl2 ай бұрын

  Hi

• 
  @MrThelovechannel2 ай бұрын

  Thank you, this helped a lot! After watching your video, I found that an easier way for me to remember polar AA are that they have a polar atom at the end of the side chain and nonpolar side chains are composed almost entirely of C/H atoms and any polar atoms they might have are within the side chain.

• 
  @forensix782 ай бұрын

  Real Chemistry, Thank you for making these videos. I’m sorry that the KZread algorithm has not been kind to you. But I personally appreciate your knowledge and effort. Take care.

• 
  @vespera1062 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the video, it was really helpful. I just have a question - why is the triplet excited state lower in energy than the singlet excited state?

• 
  @donutsdonuts3702 ай бұрын

  Looked at so many videos and this one helped the most! Thank you

• 
  @oogabooga52953 ай бұрын

  Wooow you killed this king

• 
  @tvan48543 ай бұрын

  Always wondered how the 2nd stage did not get physically blown up prior to criticality. Then, someone described how the rays travel at the speed and "outran" the physical force of the first stage. Hopefully, that was not an oversimplification.

• 
  @martystu9003 ай бұрын

  I should've watched this 7 years ago 😢

• 
  @samuelofosu20513 ай бұрын

  I believe you made a mistake in you calculation in regards to the time frame 9:21 where you used the EMF value for the Ni. Aren’t you supposed to reverse the equation in the table since in the table it’s observing a reduction. And reversing it should cause a change in sign of the E value for Ni making it have 0.257 instead of -0.257??

• 
  @RealChemistryVideos5 күн бұрын

  Good observation! The negative sign in the equation takes care of this. Notice 0.151-(-0.257) becomes 0.151 + 0.257.

• 
  @lawo20413 ай бұрын

  i have a question

• 
  @chrisparsons44743 ай бұрын

  Thank you for such a lucid explanation.

• 
  @aishabebemohamedtahir14153 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much sir, straight to the point and easy to understand.

• 
  @selin47003 ай бұрын

  best explanation

• 
  @joaquinfabrega3 ай бұрын

  I got lost, why is called Hydrogen bomb? I did not see that element inside the bomb.

• 
  @BC-wj8fxАй бұрын

  deuterium and tritium are hydrogens

• 
  @user-xz8nc5hn3c3 ай бұрын

  very helpful

• 
  @HazelVsTheWrld3 ай бұрын

  You're telling me that hydrogen bombs uses a similar chain reaction that the sun uses.💀

• 
  @BC-wj8fxАй бұрын

  The sun has fusion occurring, like the bomb, but unlike fission it is not really a chain reaction. Not a nuclear chain reaction anyway, like fission is.

• 
  @moiraatkinson4 ай бұрын

  But of a misnomer calling it a hydrogen bomb …. seems from this that hydrogen plays just a small part. Thermonuclear describes it better.

• 
  @ashdos72054 ай бұрын

  thank you

• 
  @kemia12464 ай бұрын

  Thanks. This was very helpful

• 
  @cg18684 ай бұрын

  So simplified and easy to understand. Thank you

• 
  @aalsaad74524 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your explanation .But I have a question what about proline it doesn’t have an O and it’s polar and histidine it doesn’t have a charge but it’s in the positively charged category

• 
  @oonniiigg4 ай бұрын

  excellent teaching better than my professor

• 
  @santoshchhajed56964 ай бұрын

  Identification of alcohol kzread.info/dash/bejne/immp0tOee7PgnKw.htmlsi=C51-3ipI-QL64L_G

• 
  @santoshchhajed56964 ай бұрын

  kzread.info/dash/bejne/immp0tOee7PgnKw.htmlsi=C51-3ipI-QL64L_G

• 
  @rohinikayal44404 ай бұрын

  Exactly what I needed, thanks!

• 
  @jaybae80564 ай бұрын

  and i had to pay to sit thru hours of lectures? seriously, i learned more in less than 11 minutes than a week of lecture. plus this cost me absolutely nothing.

• 
  @dotytanner5 ай бұрын

  Why is the last answer not 8.37 for sig fig

• 
  @kingnotail38385 ай бұрын

  The fusion fuel is lithium deuteride, not lithium

• 
  @Hotepsekhemwe5 ай бұрын

  Thank you! I was a physics major and this is the clearest, BEST explanation I've EVER heard. Some people just like to totally nerd out and try to impress you with their knowledge RATHER than teach you!

• 
  @MishaCoolDude5 ай бұрын

  Nice!

• 
  @thebigww91085 ай бұрын

  0 comments bro what's going on

• 
  @RealChemistryVideos5 ай бұрын

  Haha, not anymore. Apparently this isn't the best lesson.

• 
  @ishita_045 ай бұрын

  what if there is a bicyclic compound where both have aromaticity hoe is that polar?

• 
  @emmanuelmassela71065 ай бұрын

  I appreciate you bro!

• 
  @RMalai5 ай бұрын

  Finally I came across a second person that I agree with and do correctly with SFs. Including the conversion factor 273.15 instead of 273. Thank you.

• 
  @didisalloum5 ай бұрын

  does the values come as an given or we have to memorize them ?

• 
  @emerson1435 ай бұрын

  thank you so much for this!