Пікірлер

• 
  @user-rn5qy6qr4vКүн бұрын

  Good video

• 
  @adieleogemdi24916 күн бұрын

  Thanks Professor!

• 
  @lindaeidem1407 күн бұрын

  I've been taking Ivermectin since 2020 3 times a week, and I am still alive. I also drink and make my own pine needle tea along with mullein tea made from lambs ear plants

• 
  @MarySmith-bb7rc9 күн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @ChemSurvival8 күн бұрын

  glad you liked the video! it was one of my first "fun chemistry" vids. Please check out the rest of the channel.

• 
  @ahmadmilzam591910 күн бұрын

  thanks Prof Davis. u are a great animator Please dont stop making great videos like this

• 
  @dr.satyabratasahoo564413 күн бұрын

  Nice

• 
  @ChemSurvival12 күн бұрын

  Thanks 😎

• 
  @j.gordonleishman640122 күн бұрын

  This has nothing to do with the physics of effusion. Effusion is the molecular movement of gas through a porous media or through tiny openings of the order of the mean free path of the molecules. This demonstration with balloons is caused by gas escaping through a large opening similar to a nozzle on a rocket motor. Thermodynamics tells us that the exhaust rate of a gas through a nozzle (i.e., the opening on the balloon in this case) at a constant temperature will be inversely proportional to the square root of its relative molar mass. You remember that helium has a relative molar mass of about 4, and air has a relative molecular mass of about 28. Therefore, helium will exhaust approximately 2.65 times faster than air because of its lower relative molecular mass. Yes, it is the same result, but it is due to the wrong physical reasoning. This demonstration has nothing to do with Graham's law of effusion.

• 
  @gasserhegazy126723 күн бұрын

  this is short version of my previous comment regarding khan Academy comment: During beta-minus decay, a down quark changes into an up quark, turning the neutron into a proton. (The opposite happens in beta-plus decay.) This process is a result of the weak force. The weak force is mediated by particles called bosons. A down quark changes into an up quark through the emission of a weak boson. That boson then decays into an electron and an antineutrino, which are emitted from the nucleus. A similar process occurs during beta-plus decay.

• 
  @gasserhegazy126723 күн бұрын

  This was a comment explaining it on Khan Academy: A neutron is not composed of a proton and an electron. Similarly, a proton is not composed of a neutron and a positron. Neutrons and protons are composed of particles called quarks, which come in different flavors. A neutron is made of one up quark and two down quarks. A proton is made of two up quarks and one down quark. During beta-minus decay, a down quark changes into an up quark, turning the neutron into a proton. (The opposite happens in beta-plus decay.) This process is a result of the weak force. The weak force is mediated by particles called bosons. A down quark changes into an up quark through the emission of a weak boson. That boson then decays into an electron and an antineutrino, which are emitted from the nucleus. A similar process occurs during beta-plus decay. As for the mass difference, this is related to energy. The higher energy state a system is in, the more massive it is. For example, a free neutron is unstable. It beta-minus decays into a proton (a H-1 nucleus). Energy is released during the decay. If you were to compare the mass of the parent neutron to the combined mass of the daughter proton, the beta particle, and the antineutrino, there would be a small difference in the mass. That difference in mass corresponds to the energy released during the decay by E=mc^2. The free proton is stable, so it does not decay back into a neutron by beta-plus decay. However, some nuclei contain a certain number of protons and neutrons bound together that would be more stable if a proton became neutron. Those are the cases when beta-plus decay occurs. Again, there is a small decrease in mass from the parent nucleus to the decay products corresponding to the energy released.

• 
  @francescoriina249824 күн бұрын

  numero uno, bravo continua cosi diahane

• 
  @Nancy2420s27 күн бұрын

  Ivermectin in pill or the paste and where do I get it from?

• 
  @Ranveer_Singh_Kahani29 күн бұрын

  It kills from inside😭😭😭

• 
  @mckayla.9282Ай бұрын

  ?rrppe😊p

• 
  @user-tc2to6su2oАй бұрын

  Your voice is so lovely

• 
  @kathrynkiffmann7833Ай бұрын

  It won the nobel prize for its poteniality to cure 2 of the worst deforming parasite infections. There’s been peer reviewed research on it for over a decade. How the media cancelled it as horse medicine is hilarious. Ignorance is the real virus.

• 
  @etiennemeiring8057Ай бұрын

  It seems to me that ivermectin can do a lot for a lot of different illnesses but big Parma will discredit it because they can't make the money of it as the can on the other crap they want feed all of us

• 
  @alexpenner2396Ай бұрын

  Used it propylactically, 0.2 mg per kg at the beginning of the C word epidemic. I followed Dr. Paul Marik’s protocol. I am an old guy with multiple lung issues.when I did get the C word, it didn’t last 48 hrs. My physician thought I was going to die. Also tried it on my chondrites=dermatitis nodularis is helisis. After 15 years of pain, multiple attempts at freezing it off to no avail, Ivermectin got rid of it in about a month. Used the liquid form twice a day.. Bought the liquid form at a tack shop. 10 bucks.

• 
  @goldenremnant2610Ай бұрын

  I guess COVID was a parasite… which makes perfect sense given it was a “designer” bioweapon.

• 
  @dinukachandrasena148Ай бұрын

  Simple but excellent explanation.Thank You so much😊

• 
  @suheshraj2677Ай бұрын

  Badiya hai mere pass😊

• 
  @WendyJones-zx7isАй бұрын

  Come on people the bible tells us whats great for parasites , worms ? Scabie mites ? Its called brimston SULFER you can purchase as soap and ointments ? Got shut of scabies outbreal last year ! You talk about itchy skin so used ivermectin BUT washed with sulfer soap gone completely after few weeks brimstone without the fire LOL x

• 
  @WendyJones-zx7isАй бұрын

  We are really all walking chemistry sets x

• 
  @JohnSims-su8tnАй бұрын

  And ... For the record fusion is clearly where it's at 🎉

• 
  @ChemSurvivalАй бұрын

  true 😎 , but without a fission stage, the fusion reaction would be a no-go!

• 
  @JohnSims-su8tnАй бұрын

  This one needs a lobotomy

• 
  @JohnSims-su8tnАй бұрын

  Love should be the answer

• 
  @arthurvanbilsen3758Ай бұрын

  Beautiful graphics!

• 
  @michaelbattista1334Ай бұрын

  Cool stuff

• 
  @MichaelJensen-dn7fcАй бұрын

  At 8:30 we see in the database that 99.33 % of decays are "epsilon" which is then explained to be "high-energy positrons", i.e. a beta+ decay. However, epsilon implies a mix of electron capture and beta+ and the database used in the video informs us that the branching ratio is 0.0013 % for beta-plus and the vast majority is EC (www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/DecayRadiationServlet?nuc=204Po&unc=NDS). Now, in EC no positrons are released from the nucleus, instead the nucleus captures an inner shell electron and emits only a neutrino, so no positrons. Or am I misinterpreting something?

• 
  @xylosfurnitureАй бұрын

  How about "green fairy"? 70% methanol and it's all natural

• 
  @jasonbourne5142Ай бұрын

  Thanks, I wish someone had explained this to me in high school smh

• 
  @Mochi-pk2vcАй бұрын

  thank you!! this was confusing me so much but you explained it so simply ❤

• 
  @ChemSurvivalАй бұрын

  Glad it helped... that's why I make the videos B-)

• 
  @reindeerchai1286Ай бұрын

  Thank you so much💛

• 
  @ChemSurvivalАй бұрын

  Glad you liked the video!

• 
  @StrxngCheeseFNАй бұрын

  Are you my teacher

• 
  @louannad1Ай бұрын

  How much do you take?

• 
  @PondPlace-dc1fgАй бұрын

  Africa uses ivermectin ....very few covid deaths in Africa

• 
  @21MillionАй бұрын

  Excellent explanation. thanks

• 
  @keithrosenberg5486Ай бұрын

  Gun type bombs are not made today. They are too wasteful of U235. U235 is used in implosion bombs. U235 is less radioactive than Pu239. They have also tested bomb cores of both U235 and Pu239.

• 
  @saiaditya47872 ай бұрын

  nitaigaur

• 
  @ChemSurvival2 ай бұрын

  XieXie pengyou (sorry... don't know how to do intonations on a cell phone!)

• 
  @srnia02 ай бұрын

  Hadir tanda support

• 
  @JetJ3212 ай бұрын

  Is this man saying ivermectin is not good for humans? It is used all the time for years in humans.

• 
  @mmendoza11902 ай бұрын

  I've been losing muscle because of parasites. will taking Ivermectin help??

• 
  @coder-fullstack5 күн бұрын

  Yes. Ask doctors

• 
  @mmendoza11905 күн бұрын

  @@coder-fullstack I did. they are clueless

• 
  @sasaha90762 ай бұрын

  Someone has NOT DONE THEIR RESEARCH. Ivermectin was developed to heal for river blindness IN HUMANS. AND the people who developed ivermectin won a novel peace prize. PEOPLE have been taking this for 40 YEARS !! So why are you saying it's just for animals ????? Ivermectin works for animals AND humans, equally as well. Some countries have their people take ivermectin twice a year because of the large problem with parasites. This is a good drug that works, for people and animals.

• 
  @JohnQPublic3452 ай бұрын

  Should i....err i mean my dog, take it with or wothout food?

• 
  @ijazulhaq75582 ай бұрын

  very well explained Sir

• 
  @bw63292 ай бұрын

  Daveeee

• 
  @shashankmore4482 ай бұрын

  How can we calculate the height for any 2 such products?

• 
  @whitwat2 ай бұрын

  I don’t usually find this for most educational videos, but your explanation is so clear. Everything makes perfect sense. Thank you!

• 
  @ChemSurvival2 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the kind words. I'm so glad you liked the presentation!

• 
  @princessnae18892 ай бұрын

  Omg thank you so much😭🙏

• 
  @channalmath86282 ай бұрын

  huh??? if they separate when cold, why not just chill the mixture and use a sep. funnel??

• 
  @orangeinfotainment6202 ай бұрын

  thank you mannn

• 
  @ChemSurvival2 ай бұрын

  My pleasure. Glad you liked the video.