Hi, welcome to my channel
My name is Andy (member of a Calvary Chapel), I'm also a preacher of the Gospel on the streets. The purpose of my channel is to help lay Christians fulfill The Great Commission by first training, equipping, and encouraging Christians to defend and preach the gospel mainly through open air preaching, but other methods will be presented. Second to disciple believers into maturity. The content on this channel comes from a layman who has experience in the field of evangelism and not from the academic world of seminaries and bible colleges.
Statement of Faith
-KJV only
-The Trinity
-Universal church and local church
-Believer's baptism and the Lord's supper
-Justification by faith (I reject Lordship Salvation)
-All spiritual gifts continue on today
-Baptism with the Holy Ghost
-Eternal security
-Laying on of hands
-Divine healing
-Dispensationalism
-Pre - Tribulation Rapture
-Premillenialism
Пікірлер
i AM A Christian A seventh DAY Adventist BUT MANY NEED TO SPREAD THE Gospel. We TEACH THAT. “We recognize those agencies that lift up Christ before men as a part of the divine plan for evangelization of the world, and we hold in high esteem Christian men and women in other communions who are engaged in winning souls to Christ.” (General Conference Working Policy, 075) Wow what a lie. As you can see from an official teaching of the SDA church So I have two choices. i can say you are lying. But there is another option. There are offshoots and far right SDA who do say those words. But they are not the Body of the SDA church. So the reason you do not give the source is you are hiding information from those you are talking to. OTHER denominations HAVE THE SAME VIEW.
As Adventist, we believe what the Bible teaches for our own salvation and we don't want to be mislead by any intelligent human interpretation of the Bible.
As a former SDA, I agree with you that the denomination is completely out of step with the scriptures which they have interpreted to suit themselves. However, although I also agree that the book of Revelation is not eschatological, the introduction of the book states that it was written to the seven churches that were located in Asia Minor in the first century. Therefore, it stands to reason that the messages were written to those first century believers who were under severe persecution by the Roman Emperors at that time. It is interesting to note that Ellen White, their prophet did claim that William Miller (the architect of the dismal 1844 disappointment) preached the first two of the three angels messages, something that the church has totally overlooked. I’m going to get the information and get back to you. Thanks for your effort to enlighten, Adventism is a dark world that’s in need of enlightenment. They are steeped in their cultish beliefs and are usually unwilling to listen, but nothing is impossible with God. Blessings!!
@@georgelayne9860 I never denied that the book of Revelation is a prophetic book. It certainly is. And yes, the first 3 chapters were written to those seven literal churches but also written to us. Those 7 churches represent also the church age.
I don't think you hate Adventists; you only exposed your ignorance of scripture and how unskilled you are in the word. the 144000 are not only jews. the Jews are the descendants of Judah and Benjamin. the other ten tribes are not Jews. now the revelation is the revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto him. the revelation is about Jesus Christ, so it is the gospel of Christ.
@@peterstanislaus1784 Go read those chapters again. You said it's not only Jews, I have no idea what bible you're reading but my KJV clearly says Jews. It says 12,000 out of each tribe, so the scriptures are clear that it is saved Jews, nobody else is indicated. You're simply giving verbal gymnastics to those verses. Most of the book of Revelation is dealing during the seven year tribulation period which hasn't taken place yet. The church is raptured by chapter 4. Yes I would agree that the book of Revelation is about Jesus Christ and yes the everlasting gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Just listening to you trying to explain what you're reading it's clear you're not very intelligent and you have a comprehension deficit. 🤣
If you are saved there is much required of you. There is a cost. Free on the front end but there are many dues you will pay. For eternal of peace vs hell its worth it.
Yes discipleship is costly, I agree. But salvation is absolutely free (John 3:16). What John MacArthur wants is for people to work for their salvation continually until they reach heaven. He is 100% wrong. The Bible clearly says eternal life is a free gift (Romans 6:23, Ephesians 2:8-9).
Free monitarily. But also you are told you will sufffer so to me that's a cost.
@@bradleylove8606how have you suffered?
@@Over-for-now I see you are not a Christian. If you even decide to give your life to the Lord you will find out.
@@bradleylove8606 God is NOT pleased with your " religious" attitude because HE wants you to make SURE YOU ARE SAVED. Learn from Paul's gospel given to him by Jesus himself It was a MYSTERY NOT known before
boy, you have no idea what you are talking about.John is a devoted and wonderful messenger and only tells what is in the Bible.after all, if you have something against him, then tell him, at least that's what the Bible teaches us
I don't know about the claims of this video, but if you think that about Mac, I have real concerns for you.
Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness. We are to seek. We are to put on Christ. How does someone know who is saved. By their fruit. Not buy their fruit. That's how you know false teachers.
We are not to look to our fruit to determine whether we are saved. Otherwise it will cause constant doubt in our salvation because we will never know if we have done enough. The only way we are assured of our salvation is by resting in the promises of God in His word that we have been saved the moment we placed our faith in Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31).
I want to encourage you to keep preaching the Gospel according to the Scriptures. I too am an evangelist serving with Calvary Chapels in Northern California, although primarily serving in the Monterey Bay, I do take occasional trips to Sacramento and Yuba City. I’d love to do some recon next time I’m in Davis to help you find a location where people will be able to listen.
That's awesome to hear brother. I grew up in Davis, it's a small college town. The only two areas where you will find lots of people is downtown and the university campus. I also distribute gospel tracts and leave gospel tracts in car parking lots and neighborhoods. Our Calvary Chapel Church also has an evangelism ministry where we reach our community with the gospel. Yeah if you're ever in the area, contact me [email protected] I also have my website where I provide free Gospel Tracts www.alwaysgoodnews.org
Brother please read James 2:17-26.
Keep reading friend and I pray that God will draw you to Jesus.
If you're trying to smear John Macarthur, you fail. If you listen to his sermons you'll know he does not preach that you must work for salvation. You can't take something he said in.part of a book and make an argument. You're lying.
I'm quoting his exact words from his book, I'm not lying. Yes, he does preach a false gospel. He says one must "repent of sins, surrender to the Lordship of Christ, etc." to be saved. That's not salvation according to the Holy Bible, John MacArthur's gospel leads to hell. The Bible says salvation is a free gift and not of works (Romans 4:5, Ephesians 2:8-9). John MacArthur is confusing justification with sanctification, they must be kept separate and in the correct order.
@@robertchappell5364 You've been bewitched by a false gospel of works. Sanctification must not be mixed in with salvation, they must be kept in their proper order. First is salvation by grace through faith, then comes works (Ephesians 2:8-10), that is the divine order. You can't be saved by your works, it is only by faith in Christ that we are saved period! (John 3:16, Acts 16:31). Please go read Paul's Epistle to the Galatians, it was written to folks like you who believe you can be saved by law keeping (works).
If you listen to his sermons and can't see the signs of smugness, you aren't listening.
@@robertchappell5364 Please don't say that we are saved by faith alone because you clearly don't believe that. You believe we are saved by works. The reason you are so confused is because you keep mixing into salvation sanctification. You must understand the two must not be mixed and kept separate in their proper order. Paul made it very clear we are either saved by grace or by works, the two must not be mixed in (Romans 11:6). If you are looking continually to your works, you're going to constantly be doubting your salvation. This is why we only have assurance of salvation when we know that we have believed in Jesus Christ who died for our sins and rose again, it's that simple. Jesus Christ did all the work for us. When you start to understand that, then you'll see God's grace. The problem is that John MacArthur preaches a false gospel of works that continually leads to one doubting their salvation. He's getting people away from Christ's finished work on the cross to getting people to work for their salvation. He sounds exactly like a Roman Catholic just under an evangelical name. I'm an ex Catholic and he sounds very similar to what they teach. Don't be fooled by MacArthur's false gospel. I recommend you first to read and study the Epistles to Galatians and I recommend you read a great book called "salvation" by Lewis Sperry Chafer.
Although your intent to encourage assurance of salvation is good, I don't think you are coming at it completely the right way. There is assurance of salvation, but you need to be careful not to undermine the challenges of the Christian life. It's not as easy as just believing Jesus died for you. That belief needs to be acted upon for there to be an impact.
You said "it's not as easy as just believing Jesus died for you" You're wrong here. The Bible says over and over that all a person has to do to receive the free gift of eternal life is faith in Christ (John 3:16, 3:36, Romans 4:5, Acts 16:31). I never undermined the Christian life as you claim. But they must be in their proper order. Salvation comes first by grace through faith in Christ, then works should follow (Ephesians 2:8-10). Works should never be looked upon for any assurance, faith in Christ is our assurance for salvation.
Do you know that Jesus rebuked several people who said they wanted to follow Him, because they were not willing to make the sacrifice? Jesus makes it clear that believing in Him is eternal life. But he also explains that there is a cost to following him.
Eternal life is a free gift received by faith in Jesus (Acts 16:31), discipleship is costly. You're misunderstanding Jesus words on discipleship and using them as salvation passages, which they are not.
God wants us to hear Paul's gospel given to him by Jesus himself It was a MYSTERY NOT known before. The FINISHED work Jesus accomplished for salvation is the only way God will accept for entrance into heaven
Have you read the book of James? Where he warns against faith without works. Do you know the difference between rebirth and salvation? Peter explains that salvation happens at the end of one's faith. The Christian life is a journey that requires not only belief, but sanctification, which requires personal sacrifice, submitting your desires to the lordship of chirst.
Yes the Christian life is very important after one has been saved, but keep it in that order and don't bring discipleship into God's plan of salvation. The issue in salvation is not turning a new leaf over, reforming your life, or turning from millions of sins, the issue is Jesus Christ and are you going to believe in Him to save you (Acts 16:31, John 3:16, Romans 1:16, 3:24-26, 4:5).
I believe that Jesus saved me. If you've known the sins I've done after salvation and now the regret, remorse and shame it has brought to my testimony, but much worse to His name, then victory in those habitual sins that have caused me great pain and waisted years of my life. To Him be the glory. My gratefulness is to be obedient to Him. And that my friend takes work.
@@manycolours100 Yes as believers we all still sin, because of the two natures within us the flesh and the spirit that war one with another (Galatians 5).
Good review. Does it have the Psalm title headings?
Thank you. I'm not sure if it has the Psalm titles. I did hear recently that Holman publishers has removed the Psalm titles from their KJV bibles, which is why I no longer buy Bibles from them.
@@NorCalGospelHerald I agree with you. The Psalm titles are actually scripture. I have a new release one that has the Psalm titles. It is the Holman KJV Personal Size Giant Print. Amazing readability with this Bible. I bought several colors of the Holman Large Print Compact Reference Bible and all of them were missing the Psalm titles except for the Olive green one. The Olive Green one has the Psalm Titles and the exact same pagination as the Giant Print Personal Size and the Large Print Personal Size. Love the readability of the Large Print Compact Reference for its small size. I plant on rebinding the Olive Green one in a nice premium leather.
@@snowpuppy77 That's great to hear. I'm sure you can find Holman KJV bibles still with Psalm titles if you weed them out. One thing I do like about Holman KJV bibles is the large bold font they use which is comfortable to read. Lately I've been buying KJV bibles from Christian Art Publishers.
i have a question. in the bible in John 8:11 Jesus says, "She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more." it says sin no more tho
You have to understand the context of that verse. Jesus told the adulteress woman not to sin, in other words, not to commit adultery again. The works salvationists will twist that verse out of context to support their "go and sin no more" to be saved or teach their false doctrine of sinless perfection. I have a question for you, have you stopped sinning?
@@NorCalGospelHerald this one church i have seen, they talk about the go and sin no more. but they admit that only one have and ever will be perfect though. can i get your opinion?
Except that your version -Calvinism/Gnosticism/Reformed ultimately makes God the author of evil. Because even babies, if they are not 'elect' are sent to hell. Since free will is denied in augustinian/calvinistic gnosticism, it creates a much more horrible and depraved theology. God created a world of free creatures yet he remains sovereign over all. Get away from the cultic beliefs of augustine/washer/macarthur/piper. Reformed theology is the gateway drug to atheism because it cannot address the problem of evil. The answer is free will. God loved us enough to give us a choice. God bless you.
Sounds excellent
Oneness is truth
What do you mean?
Do u know about the 2300 day prophecy???? Do u know about eat the scroll it will be sweet in ur mouth but bitter in ur belly??? The great disappointment????? U just keep saying am am am
Your SDA church has lied to you. Nothing in the book of Revelation talks about the SDA movement. Chapters 1-3 is church age and chapters 4-19 is the tribulation, chapters 20-22 is about Jesus earthly millennial kingdom and then the great white throne judgment and new heavens and new earth. The church is raptured before the great tribulation, which is why you can't find the church after chapter 4
Only foolish ppl with taken in this crap.. seven day Adventist is the truest church.....
You should check out the book "Divine Mercy in My Soul".
So which church should we be attending?
An evangelical bible believing church, not a cult. I recommend a few tips to look for in a local church. 1) look for a non-denominational church (denominational churches will interpret scripture based on their denomination, which I don't recommend) 2) The church should teach verse by verse (expository) rather than topical only 3) They recognize a distinction between Israel and the church 4) They are grace focused and not legalistic
God Bless you!
Thank you, I hope my website will be a blessing to you
Agree with you, bro.
You are way off base on this one. John R. Rice did not teach a false gospel. He was a great man of God who got multiple thousands saved. He always said salvation was a free gift of God’s grace and mercy, undeserved and unmerited. He said if you go to hell you pay your own way and if you go to heaven you go on a free pass. In the tract he said you just come to Jesus as a lost sinner and let him save you. He said to put all your trust in Christ is as easy as putting your money in the bank or going to the doctor. Just because he used the phrase repent of your sins and turn from your sin doesn’t mean he meant you have to quit sinning to get saved. He’s not like John MacArthur or Ray Comfort. Those are the bad guys you should go after, not John R. Rice. I read many of John R.’s books for years. He always said it costs nothing to get saved, but it does cost something to be a disciple. John MacArthur is the bad guy who says you have to forsake all and commit to always following and obeying Christ as lord of your life in order to be saved. Now that’s a false gospel. I know John R. Rice had his flaws, but he certainly did not teach a false gospel.
Yes I would agree that John MacArthur preaches a false gospel, but so did John R. Rice by adding "repentance from sins". Why should John R. Rice be left off the hook? I would not categorize John R. Rice as a Lordship salvationist, but him saying that one has to "turn from sins" or "repent of sins" and believe on Christ is another gospel according to Paul (Galatians 1:6-8). The one condition to receive everlasting life is faith, plus nothing (John 3:16, 3:36, Acts 16:31, Romans 1:16, 4:5, Ephesians 2:8-9).
no wonder he was a mason...
More like non intellectual.
Please give an example
Unapologetically a dispensationalist
Awesome, so am I
Good message brother. Hyper-dispensationalism surely needs to be rejected. I'm sure, as you already know, it creates lazy Christians. A lot of of hyper-D are very divisive. It's like they try to indoctrinate you with their false teaching and when you don't fall for it, they get mean and nasty. They're prominent on Twitter. I've had "duscussions" with many of them, and when I have showed them the error with their theology, they just jump to another verse as if what I shared didn't matter. I didn't know Bullinger was a hyper-Calvinist, that's interesting. I liked the part you shared from Chuck Smith's book, if Jesus taught it, and it was practiced in Acts and taught in the epistles It's likely for us. That's good. Well brother, thanks for sharing this. God bless.
No. 1 Takeaway: "It's concise."
Yes, all of them are concise and I highly recommend them.
I have go e yeara with just the bible. And am proudly SDA.
No my friend , you cannot be a proud SDA and not believe in the spirit of prophecy (the writings of Ellen White). You actually made a vow at your baptism to do so. And if you’re reading your bible as you are claiming, then you need to revisit the first chapter of Revelation and you’ll notice that the book was written to the seven churches that were in Asia during the time of the Roman Emperors who were persecuting the Churches. SDA has willfully interpreted scripture to suit themselves to erase the dismal 1844 debacle. As a former SDA, I am deeply indebted to God for allowing me to see what the true gospel which I have accepted and I am enjoying the freedom that it has brought me. It is my hope that you too will see the light before it’s too late. Blessings!!
Brother you are not right about it. Book of revelation talked a message was given by Jesus is the full gospel of god because now what we have is not full knowledge of the gospel , wha t I mean is that there may be add new information in the words of god or may not I don’t know but must have some thing new tha t we don’t know as we are Cause Jesus said he have more want to tell us but because we are not ready to know to understand it . That is why pual said even prophet and apostle don’t know all. Until second coming of lord all explain to us. If u say message we have now is full gospel it not accurate as it will have new message come to review all truth that Jesus want to tell but did not tell when he was on earth
You said a lot and I understood nothing what you said
What other religion preach the 3 angels message. ?? U are ignorant
The new Treasury of Scripture Knowledge is also a good resource. But I also like the Thompson Chain Study Bible. But other resources would be good to look at is the Dictionary of Bible Themes. Many great resources out there to use if you seek. Each resource helps us in a different way.
Yes I agree that there are many resources out there to choose from.
The author of this Dispensational chart "John G. Hall" does not believe in {once saved always saved"}. He doesn't believe that once your full of chicken your always full of chicken, he believes if you want to be full of chicken you have to stay full of chicken. Just don't want people to think that John G. Hall was a Baptist, he was 100% PENTECOSTAL !
Not everyone who says “repent of their sins” means stop sinning, they mean acknowledge they are a sinner. I think it is bad terminology and is wrong but it doesn’t mean that they are not saved
Scripture says to "believe" (John 316, 3:36, Acts 16:31, Romans 1:16, 4:5, Ephesians 2:8,9), not "repent of sins."
@@NorCalGospelHerald amen! I agree it’s just believing in Jesus that saves you, but my point is not everyone that says that you need to repent of your sins actually means it, they are just repeating things that they have heard, I’m not condoning it but it’s just reality
@@micahwood1999 Yes true, but there's no need to make the gospel confusing to unbelievers by adding "repent of sins". I get what you're saying but it still should be pointed out as wrong.
Who goes to "SHEOL -HADES ?
The King James Version uses the word "Hell" instead of Sheol or Hades. So I use the word Hell instead. Unbelievers go to hell (those that rejected Jesus Christ as their Savior). They are held there temporarily until they await their final sentencing in the lake of fire from the great white throne judgment (Revelation 20:15).
If I don't confess my sins and turn away from them and still believe on Jesus, will I still be a christian and not go to Hell ? Thanks
@@biblequestionsanswered6572 If you have believed in Jesus Christ who died for your sins and rose again you are forever saved and can never lose your salvation (Romans 8:38,39, Ephesians 1:13, 4:30). We confess our sins in order to be in fellowship with God (I John 1:9), when we have sinned. Yes we should be repenting of our sins daily as Christians, but not for salvation but for our walk with God.
"Ephesians 4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption". "Grieve Not" by doing any of these forbidden things of Ephesians 4: 17- through 5:18. "Ye are fallen from Grace". I don't see how a believer can have any Salvation after reading all the scriptures above. "The wages of sin is death' First also; John 15:6 We must walk in the light, not in darkness. The Devil also believes in Jesus, but he trembles. "If you have believed in Jesus Christ who died for your sins and rose again you are forever saved and can never lose your salvation". It would be better to believe the word of God if you want genuine "Salvation my friend "
@@biblequestionsanswered6572 You completely glossed over Ephesians 4:30 where it says "whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption." In the same epistle in chapter verse 13 Paul again says that a believer is sealed by believing in Jesus and His gospel. The sealing is the promise and indwelling of the Holy Ghost, but it also is the eternal security of all born again believers. When we sin we grieve the Holy Ghost, but the passages don't say we lose salvation, it says the opposite and that's what you glossed over. To fall from grace does not mean losing salvation, you're taking Paul's words out of context. Falling from grace according to the Epistles of Romans and Galatians it is continuing in sin and being ensnared in a works system, yet both Epistles were written to saved Christians. James 2:19 is not a salvation passage. The context is that James is talking to saved Christians (2:1) to do good works because they are saved. Verse 19 of chapter two it only says that the devils believe and tremble because of their knowledge of God. The Bible is very clear that we are saved by faith in Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31, John 3:16, Romans 4:5). The Bible clearly teaches the eternal security of every believer, it doesn't look like you believe the Bible friend. I suggest you abandon your false views and stop twisting scriptures to suit yourself.
Hi there young man, thanks for this overview of "John G.Hall ". 2.Tim 2:15
To my friend NorCal please read Hebrews 8 verse 28. Then read Matthew Henry's commentary on the whole Bible complete and unabridged for not my interpretation but the standard interpretation of this verse and others that stood for hundreds of yearys by all prodenstant denominations. Truly i prayed you will for it opened my eyes.and it has nothing to do with SDA doctrines...well God bless you and your family as you sounded so calm and sincere in your presentation.
The three angels message are the last day message to the planet earth ..[restudy] those verses ..its dealing with the plagues that will fall upon the wicked and so much more ...
We're not told to proclaim the three angels message. The only gospel we are to preach to lost souls is the first angel's message the "everlasting gospel" which is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ (I Corinthians 15:3,4).
where is it found that these 3 angels message dont fit together ???
@@deborahboggs6040 The three angels are preaching their messages to the people during the great tribulation. The church is raptured chapter 4. The majority of the book of Revelation is dealing with the Jews, gentiles, and the great tribulation. This is where your SDA church gets it wrong because of their faulty interpretation.
Is Dr. Walker any different than the Mid-Acts position? I find him to be a Mid-Acts adherent, clearly.
No he's not Mid-Acts, he believes in the birth of the church happened in Acts 2 which I also hold to. I would say that his big heresy is holding to the view that Old Testament saints were justified by works along with tribulation saints justified by works. His dispensational system comes from Peter S. Ruckman. For the most part their system seems to be normative, rejecting hyper dispensationalism. But they do hold to some heretical doctrines and in other areas bad theology.
@@NorCalGospelHerald the question is, is he a consistent Early-Acts dispensationalist or a inconsistent Mid-Acts dispensationalist? For example, Walker says Acts 2:38 is not the gospel of grace. If that is so, how in the world does the body begin at Acts 2 without the gospel to get into the body of Christ (Eph. 3.6)? Dr. Ruckman most definitely taught there was such a thing as "Simon Peter’s “gospel” in Acts 2:38 or Acts 3:19-20" which was different than Paul's gospel which was first preached by the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8. Ruckman also said and Walker would completely agree: “This is a gospel revealed to Paul (Gal. 1); he sometimes calls it “my gospel” for that reason (Rom. 2:16)… it was not preached in Acts 1-7.” (Peter S. Ruckman, “THE TEN GOSPELS,” Bible Believers’ Bulletin 25 (November 2001): 5.) “The shortest shortcut to Hell is good works (Rom. 4:5).” (Peter S. Ruckman, The Book of Proverbs (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 1972, 2019 reprint.) 187.) Dr. Ruckman taught “eight dispensations: Edenic (Gen. 1-3), Adamic (Gen.4-9), Noahic (Gen. 9-12), Abrahamic (Gen. 12-Exod. 19), and Mosaic (Exod. 19-Matt. 26); these are followed by a transitional period between Matthew 27 and Acts 7 and the Church Age (Acts 7- Philemon) and the Tribulation (Hebrews-Revelation 20). Eternity begins in Revelation 20.” “STRICTLY PERSONAL February 1984” Notice he says "Acts 7-Philemon." Now look at what he says concerning the epistles after Philemon: “This set of epistles (Hebrews-Revelation) could more properly (and more Scripturally) be called “Hebrew-Christian” Epistles or “Tribulation” Epistles or even Transition Epistles. None of them are aimed directly and doctrinally to the Body of Christ in the Church Age, although local churches are addressed in some of the passages that were in that era.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The General Epistles Vol. 2 (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 2004, 2008 Reprint) vii). “If James and Peter (James 2:21-26 and 2 Pet. 2:20-22) have something else in mind, they will have to stand in line until Paul gets through.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The Books of Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 1997, 2009, 2017) 396). “You see, it is exactly as we have said: when you try to reconcile all of 1 John with the Pauline epistles you attempt to shave yourself with a banana.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The General Epistles Vol. 2 (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 2004, 2008 Reprint) 105-6). "look out for people who go to Matthew and 1 John for FOUNDATION TRUTHS instead of sideline applications. The foundation truths for Christians are in the Pauline Epistles-at least for the Body of Christ in this age” (Peter S. Ruckman, “The Judaizers” Bible Believers’ Bulletin 9 (June 1985): 3.) “You’ll find (in Eph. 3) that the church was a mystery “hid in God,” not revealed, and the whole Old Testament could have been fulfilled coming through Acts 7, without contradicting one verse from Genesis to Malachi. The church was not a revealed truth in the Old Testament; it was a truth revealed to the Apostle Paul in Ephesians 3. Peter, James, and John knew no more about it in Acts 2 than a three year old Eskimo knows about nuclear physics.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The Book of Revelation (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 1970, 2012 Reprint) 310). “The light God gave on Dispensationalism, He gave through Larkin, Pember, Scofield, and Stam.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The Book of Job (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 1978, Revised 1993) 614). “If this division is not properly observed and kept (and there will be thousands of people who will object to this, but God will straighten you out at the Judgment Seat of Christ), then you have to begin taking passages and going to the Greek and the Hebrew to change the passages to make them fit your theology. That is why there has been no advanced revelation from the Holy Spirit from 1909 until the present time. The last thing the Holy Spirit ever revealed, along Biblical lines, was revealed to Bullinger, J. C. O’Hare, Arthur W. Pink, Clarence Larkin, and C. I. Scofield-more than fifty years ago! The reason there has been no revelation from the Holy Spirit since then is that fifty years ago the conservative, orthodox, evangelical, Bible believing people threw the King James Bible out the window, and took in its place the American Standard Version (1901). When they did this, God junked their theology and enlightenment, and revealed absolutely nothing to them.” (Peter S. Ruckman, The Book of Revelation (Pensacola: BB Bookstore, 1970, 2012 Reprint) 715-6). “I am the first to confess that 75% of anything I know or do is borrowed. If it may edify the reader, I will fay out the following pieces of information: 1. My knowledge of the word of God and its contents is 25% the work of a converted Episcopalian draftsman named Clarence Larkin; his work on Dispensational Truth gave me the basis for a solid Bible-believing approach to "rightly dividing the word of truth". It is 25% the work of the Scofield Board of Editors, whose notes in the OLD Scofield Reference Bible gave me an overall grasp of the main doctrines of the Bible. It is 25% the work of Ethelbert Bullinger, who was helpful in straightening out much of the material found in Matthew and Acts. The remaining 25% is my own; it is what God, the Holy Spirit, gave me while reading through the Bible 101 times "on my own”.” (Peter S. Ruckman, “Strictly Personal” Bible Believers’ Bulletin 9 (November 1985): 2.)
My friend Babylonian wine had spoiled you...
In what way?
John 3:16. John 6:28-29. Works of God. John 6:40. Will of God.
Yes, it is faith that saves under all dispensations, by one gospel (Acts 10:43, John 3:16).
The main implication I see is the potential to lead the living astray while talking about the dead's salvation. Salvation is hope of the living. The dead have no use of hope. They do not have to deliberate what the truth is because in their current state, they now know the Truth; whether that brings them joy or despair, they still know it. Concerning the Truth, God is very clear. We are saved through the Lord Jesus Christ by faith. Full stop. The thief on the cross, hours from death, able to perform no physical work, repented of his sin, confessed Jesus Christ as Lord and asked Him to remember His servant when He came into His kingdom. "I tell you truly, today you shall join me in paradise". That being said, Jesus kept the whole Law. He fulfilled the whole Law. If we love Him, we also, should desire to keep His commandments. We do so knowing we are not able to keep it but that is not what saves us and merely shows our love for Him. He said, "A new commandment I give you, that you love your neighbor as yourself". There is something, some fruit, that should be produced in us as a result of our being born again, a new creation. I think this is sometimes where we get crossways with the faith/works debate. "Faith without works is dead". We are told by God that the world will know our state (children of God) by our love for one another. Paul writes about striving to run our race. We are given the parable of the servants and the talents. We are not inanimate. If we live and breathe, we produce actions. Those actions should be producing "Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self control". The fruit of the Spirit that dwells in us. Concerning the OT faithful, Hebrews 11 should have ended the struggle this author had before he chose to write his "epistle". Books teach. What they teach, we must be very careful with. God's Word says in James 3:1, "My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment." Be blessed. I appreciated your video.
Thank you for your reply. Yes, this teacher is definitely in heresy. He's a disciple of heretic Peter S. Ruckman. Just remember brother/sister that "repenting of sins" is a work and should not be included in the gospel message. It is faith in Jesus that saves (John 3:16, Acts 16:31, John 3:36).
You should read the Catholic catechism.. it is a real eye opener.
I would rather read The Bible. I'm an excatholic, there is no salvation in Roman Catholicism, but in Jesus alone (Acts 4:12, John 14:6).
Ruckman taught a lot of bizarre stuff...
I don't know too much of what Ruckman taught, but yes I would agree that some of his views were strange and some heretical. His view that Old Testament saints were saved by works and those in the great tribulation are going to be saved by works is completely heretical. You can see his followers parroting the same heresies.
Hell whole or Heaven lamed Jesus said, Do you believe Jesus or Paul
I don't understand your question
@@NorCalGospelHerald Jesus asked the question, I don't have the verse in front of me Jesus and Paul disagree on salvation among other things, check out Jesus'Words Only on KZread he is the scholar
What?
I suggest you look up Jesus'Words Only on KZread for this is the confusion we're supposed to come out of Babylon
Show us where it says Jesus said that?
The gospel of the Kingdom required signs. The Jew requires a sign. (1 Cor. 1:22) The gospel of the grace of God (1 Cor. 15:1-4, Romans 3:20-28) cannot be the same as the "gospel of the Kingdom". The gospel of the Kingdom was to the Jew only (Matt. 10:5-8) while the gospel of the grace of God was to BOTH Jew and gentile. Luke 18:31-34 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. 32For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: 33And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. *34And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.* Mark 9:31-32 For he taught his disciples, and said unto them, The Son of man is delivered into the hands of men, and they shall kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day. *32But they understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him.* Mark 8:31 And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. 32And he spake that saying openly. *And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.* 33But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men. Luke 9:44-45 Let these sayings sink down into your ears: for the Son of man shall be delivered into the hands of men. *45But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.* The Apostles did not understand anything about the death, burial and resurrection, let alone that it would cover sins. Paul states that the gospel he was given was not known before: Galatians1:11-12 But I certify you, brethren, that the *gospel which was preached of me is not after man.* *12For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.* Ephesians 3:2-6 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: *3How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery;* (as I wrote afore in few words, 4Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5Which in other ages was *not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;* 6That the *Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:* Romans 16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to *my gospel,* and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the *revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began* Here are SEVEN witnesses (4 in the gospels, 3 in Paul's epistles) of scripture that state that the Apostles did not understand the crucifixion, that the saying was HID from them, were afraid to ask Him what it meant, and it was rejected by Peter, which the Lord rebuked; and Paul stating that he did not learn the gospel from man, was not known to the sons of men, was a mystery revealed by Jesus Christ and kept secret.
I understand that the gospel of the kingdom and gospel of grace are two different Gospels. The gospel of the kingdom was exclusively to the Jews while the gospel of Jesus was to both Jews and gentiles. But scripture does teach that there is one gospel under all dispensations for men to be saved and that is salvation in Christ.
@@NorCalGospelHerald Are you understand the Despensationalism study or not? if you really study Despensationalism you shouldn't be so confused like this friend...Jews and gentiles has two different salvation plans...
@@kiimahndonah No, there is only one gospel by which all men are saved under all dispensations and that is by the death of Christ. Even Old Testament prophets spoke salvation by faith in Christ (Acts 10:43). Your multiple gospel view is unscriptural. Under our present dispensation the gospel of Christ has been fully revealed and Jews and gentiles are saved exactly the same by faith in Jesus and his finished work on the cross (John 3:16, Romans 1:16, I Corinthians 15:3,4).