I read both Metabolical and FAT Chance..two great, educational books by Dr. Lustig. Must read if you are trying to reverse insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, on ketogenic lifestyle, and Intermittent fasting. Thank you Dr. Lustig, you are saving lives. 😊
@mollygirl9613 күн бұрын
Sound sucks.
@5ty71716 күн бұрын
Petrochemical lobbyists success
@brett475616 күн бұрын
Standing ovation. ❤
@user-jv5yt2ck1p20 күн бұрын
Love Dr. Lustig's energy and courage in facing down the industrial food industry- he has taught me so much. But I hope Dr. Lustig will begin to include data on hormone deficiencies in women to describe the fat shift from subcutaneous to visceral in women with the loss of estrogen through ovarian senescence from a physiologically healthy level to zero. Sleep, bone, brain deprivation equals severe stress to the body.
@EvgeniiaDolinenko25 күн бұрын
4:01 start❤
@EvgeniiaDolinenko25 күн бұрын
I've watched almost all videos with Dr Lustig. This one is very interesting. ❤
@billmee4628Ай бұрын
OK, it has been 8 years, so where are we now?
@reimaravalk7679Ай бұрын
what a great webinar! a powerful narrative by Prof.dr. lustig on how damaging upf is! thank you, Dr. Lustig for sharing your knowledge and insights with the worldwide public. kind regards, miss Reimara
@mebhisntatownie2 ай бұрын
well, we recently achieved fusion energy
@reneotter2 ай бұрын
useless sound
@jamesmorton78812 ай бұрын
Ha Ha Ha . . . . . . 😂😂. The end of cheap oil is over first. ❤❤
@user-jc2we4sn1i3 ай бұрын
Deuterium is still restricted
@aivkara3 ай бұрын
Well, after watching, I'm surprised i'm first. I'm a carnivore, but I research widely. Dr Lustig is a fount of knowledge.
@daytime122 ай бұрын
I agree!... quitting meat is much easier than quitting sugar!!
@aivkara2 ай бұрын
@@daytime12 I'm not sure I follow you. There are many good reasons to quit sugar, but I don't see any good reasons to quit meat?
@daytime122 ай бұрын
@@aivkara pardons! I'll clarify. I agree with your comment about Lustig being a fount of knowledge. Me, cutting out sugar for 3 weeks caused my waist to decrease an inch or more and possibly other health benefits, I'll have to see. I found that quitting sugar was much more difficult than quitting meat ( to my surprise) I quit meat to see if it would give me a competitive edge in cycling. I quit meet for 7 years while cycling 125 miles a week and in the weight room doing 3 10 or 15 reps of 650 lbs on the leg press, also managed a 45.6 mph cycling sprint, on a Los Angeles highway all while not eating meat... None! Today I sparingly eat meat and fish... But when I did not eat meat I noticed 3 things. 1. No big difference in athletic output. 2. My bowel movement smell was much more mild. 3. My food bill for the month decreased.
@aivkara2 ай бұрын
I'm nowhere near as active as you are, granted, but think about the mechanisms involved here. If quitting a substance is difficult, that probably means it is addictive, at least that's how I view it. Are you in ketosis?, at least partially, while doing this level of exercise?
@aivkara2 ай бұрын
Check out an interview with Dr. Anthony Chafeee and a guy who did five marathons on five consecutive days, while in a fasting state. I will find the name shortly and post it, but consider what he is saying
@eclecticcyclist3 ай бұрын
Sound quality is atrocious, for an insitute of technology you should be ashamed. Even a first year student sholud do better than this!s
@harryemerson74393 ай бұрын
🎶 *promosm*
@user-um9sl1kj6u3 ай бұрын
Dennis, I realize it sounds insane, but would it be possible to use several Huge flywheels in an O’Neill Cylinder at either end (with the Cylinder Itself Moving Fast) and brake at the right time to get that much Mass moving, and then course correct either using the other fly wheels/braking or one nuclear drive once you got to the perfect speed/orbital path/ orientation? Keep in mind, you would have water, oil, and other elements at the edges tied down for added weight, possibly in just one spot/band to give you added mass/advantage This is assuming everyone is kept tethered magnetically to the central spine gyroscopically/individually kept as neutral as possible and allowing for said G-Forces/slowing the shock along it. The idea is to just get that much mass moving/ moment of inertia/ Brake in the right direction because using chemical rockets to move it at a cold start is near impossible/uses too much fuel. You basically use the Earth, your orbit, the Cylinder’s momentum, flywheels/orientation and flightpath like a slingshot/throw it like a stick. Once you get it moving and oriented right, people could literally just climb down, have their atmosphere, and build their homes/farms/shops/etc on the way there in comfort. Essentially, turn it into an orbiting asteroid. The trick is to get the flywheels and cylinder moving Fast Enough so that when you brake at the spot and angle, it should be like a gravity exist, but you’re moving super fast and putting that much energy into a course correction- without breaking everything. Using Your Material Strength and Mass to store angular momentum and release it at the right time like a steerable asteroid with everybody magnetically/gyroscopically stabilized at the central axis and using its length to absorb the G-forces going forward (that’s 50,000 feet of force absorbed while your gyroscope keeps you steady), Keeping in mind you have HUGE Metal Matrix Graphene/Carbon Nanotube Composite Flywheels spinning Angrily and a Steel Tube Bigger Than a Town That’s Rotating so fast that Watching it is enough to scare the pants off you! This should be able to scale up. On the small end you could use a 6,000 X 48,000 X 900 Ft Cylinder, and you should be able to scale it up to 30 or even 40,000 feet using Metal Matrix graphene/carbon nanotubes. - you Should Be Able to do this with the other planets gaining overall Forward momentum/using Fission drive /fusion and Braking without Destroying everything. Like Spin Launch for the Planets, just watch how fast your orbit is and your flight path.
@bushelfoot4 ай бұрын
It would be much easier to put more effort into cleaning up fossil fuel ..
@ravenken4 ай бұрын
This is a very interesting presentation to listen to in 2024. A lot of the graphs would look comical in how conservative they were. Anyway, I wish Professor Emanuel had presented some of the info based on CO2e. Well, this was a pretty good presentation save the 'solutions'.
4 ай бұрын
7 years ago not true, and still not
@FlameofDemocracy4 ай бұрын
Have salt and sand batteries back the grid, in the regenerative grid theory concept. That way, costs drop for electricity across the board, and hydrogen becomes a more easily recognized best option as curves adjust.
@FlameofDemocracy4 ай бұрын
Metal powders as fuels, sand batteries, brick batteries, along with nuclear power, could provide the thermal energy streams for solid oxide hydrogen production, as well. Let's experiment a bit.
@FlameofDemocracy4 ай бұрын
Use wider pipes for hydrogen. 1 ton per pipeline kilometer per day, is the basic heuristic for profitability. Everything has been figured out elsewhere. This isn't really all that hard. Cash in.
@micsca4 ай бұрын
Why don’t people his multiple lies? He is funded to keep promoting scare tactics. He leaves out the evidence that co2 does not drive climate change
@SolvingTornadoes4 ай бұрын
This is silly propaganda. There is no such thing as a "greenhouse" gas. All gasses are part of atmospheric warming/cooling.
@eclecticcyclist4 ай бұрын
Get your levels sorted, it's not a good advertisement for an institute of technology to have such poor technical standards. Some of the speakers are far too quiet and I' on 100% volume already
@truthseek30174 ай бұрын
Disgusting filth
@Makesensa15305 ай бұрын
This is crazy
@TrueNorth3335 ай бұрын
this is not proper research - Research the works of any of the professors Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, Don Easterbrook, Andy Knoll, John Christy, William Happer, Patrick Moore, Richard Muller, Murray Salsby, Richard Lindzen, Robert Carter, Ivar Giæver, John Clauser and 20 000 others with PhD and engineering degrees in relevant sciences ( and any of the more than 20 Norwegian professors PhD doctors and professionals in all the relevant fields - ( people that I have either met, read or conversed with online.)
@johnpeterson72645 ай бұрын
You know you’re at a climate conference not a science conference when: -they introduce the speaker mentioning his political party affiliation -the only experimental (as opposed to correlational) data that the speaker has to show is hard proof that all of his fellow climatologists agree with him -the speaker thinks that physics and physicists have nothing to contribute to the study of a physical system like climate.
@teresabarrett86765 ай бұрын
Corruption is eating us.
@teresabarrett86765 ай бұрын
Most of our allies and partners are dependents.
@teresabarrett86765 ай бұрын
China and india supply our medicines with China providing 80 eighty-percent of active ingredients is that being mitigated?
@teresabarrett86765 ай бұрын
Open borders are securing our homeland?
@coreyivy89235 ай бұрын
Winds a joke
@Daguerreotypiste5 ай бұрын
According to the measures taken by Exxon Mobile and other companies, CO2 emissions have fallen dramatically but temperature is still rising. It's the sun that's causing global warming!
@user-jc2we4sn1i5 ай бұрын
Do you know my MIT affiliated colleague Ruby Carat of Eureka, CA. who posted my MIT invite only presentation on muon catalyzed fusion propulsion online?
@eddyimpanis6 ай бұрын
Relative safety of LFTR ?
@eddyimpanis6 ай бұрын
Tony Heller on CO2
@Dr.Cosmar6 ай бұрын
Can't use ocean water for industrial machines.
@justinsnelling80536 ай бұрын
Excellent overview of the basics of the science - well done and well presented. He gets the main point across that the underlying Maths and Physics is really incredibly simple and easily understood while the detailed modelling of all the more nuanced regional complexity patterns are so incredibly complex and challenging - but in a manner that really does little to change the simplistic overview of the problems. He did not get into the weeds of the Red Herring whataboutisms so artfully used by the paid propagandists who keep trying to hoodwink the general populae into believing it is all a nothingburger - other to suggest that it is a problem of posychology and neuroscience (one of beliefs) and not one of actual climate science or the models. I notice some comments still trying to push the arguments made and the basics outlined off into the weeds - but I hope few people get dstracted by such easily debunked "complexification and obscurantist" myths? The CO2 is good for you thingy being one of the tricks being used and trying to devallue the simple Greenhouse Gas effect results merely another attempt to distract and displace attention. Professor Kerry did a good kob stating quite simply that increasing CO2 - from a crop yield perspective - is a rather mixed blessing. Yes - increased atmospheric CO@ leads to greening - unfortunately greening alone is a mixed bag as it comes with hugely amplifying the growth and spread of noxious and invasive weeds as well as hugely amplifying the severity and ubiquity of toxic algal blooms in rivers, lakes and estuaries globally leading to eutrophication of our most productive hydrological ecosystems - which I really do not need to point out as a huge detrimental effect on ecosystem health. There are pluses and minuses in all things that change - but no one is served when the Machiavellian only point to the few pluses while ignoring the many serious minuses... He did a great job here however i feel the perennial unbelievers out there will be reluctant to let go of their Magical Thinking (consciously adopted of subconsciously acquired?) even when such a bright flashlight has been shone on the simple basics and fundamentals.
@peceed6 ай бұрын
"Model constructed from data matches data beautifully"... What a surprise!
@eclecticcyclist6 ай бұрын
Osmand needs to educate himself about cholesterol, he could start by watching this video: 'Understand Your CHOLESTEROL PANEL & Metabolic Health Tests - The ULTIMATE Guide | Dr. Robert Lustig'
@asken51397 ай бұрын
LOL they call OpenAI a research organisation. Today they call it a company. It tells you all you need to know about OpenAI and their mission,... it has been abandoned.
@ago72127 ай бұрын
The whole point for these guys and their financial backers is to make gobs of $$ gain power. The fact these guys are so socially awkward is scary if they at some point wield life altering power over others.
@eclecticcyclist7 ай бұрын
What about the inflammatory effect of high carb and high refined sedd oils in processed foods as a cause as described in Dr Chris Palmer's book 'Brain Energy'?
@maxlautenbacher78887 ай бұрын
A simple mind coming up with the simple solution that everything can be solved with simple solutions. 😂
Пікірлер
You guys need to fix the sound
I read both Metabolical and FAT Chance..two great, educational books by Dr. Lustig. Must read if you are trying to reverse insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, on ketogenic lifestyle, and Intermittent fasting. Thank you Dr. Lustig, you are saving lives. 😊
Sound sucks.
Petrochemical lobbyists success
Standing ovation. ❤
Love Dr. Lustig's energy and courage in facing down the industrial food industry- he has taught me so much. But I hope Dr. Lustig will begin to include data on hormone deficiencies in women to describe the fat shift from subcutaneous to visceral in women with the loss of estrogen through ovarian senescence from a physiologically healthy level to zero. Sleep, bone, brain deprivation equals severe stress to the body.
4:01 start❤
I've watched almost all videos with Dr Lustig. This one is very interesting. ❤
OK, it has been 8 years, so where are we now?
what a great webinar! a powerful narrative by Prof.dr. lustig on how damaging upf is! thank you, Dr. Lustig for sharing your knowledge and insights with the worldwide public. kind regards, miss Reimara
well, we recently achieved fusion energy
useless sound
Ha Ha Ha . . . . . . 😂😂. The end of cheap oil is over first. ❤❤
Deuterium is still restricted
Well, after watching, I'm surprised i'm first. I'm a carnivore, but I research widely. Dr Lustig is a fount of knowledge.
I agree!... quitting meat is much easier than quitting sugar!!
@@daytime12 I'm not sure I follow you. There are many good reasons to quit sugar, but I don't see any good reasons to quit meat?
@@aivkara pardons! I'll clarify. I agree with your comment about Lustig being a fount of knowledge. Me, cutting out sugar for 3 weeks caused my waist to decrease an inch or more and possibly other health benefits, I'll have to see. I found that quitting sugar was much more difficult than quitting meat ( to my surprise) I quit meat to see if it would give me a competitive edge in cycling. I quit meet for 7 years while cycling 125 miles a week and in the weight room doing 3 10 or 15 reps of 650 lbs on the leg press, also managed a 45.6 mph cycling sprint, on a Los Angeles highway all while not eating meat... None! Today I sparingly eat meat and fish... But when I did not eat meat I noticed 3 things. 1. No big difference in athletic output. 2. My bowel movement smell was much more mild. 3. My food bill for the month decreased.
I'm nowhere near as active as you are, granted, but think about the mechanisms involved here. If quitting a substance is difficult, that probably means it is addictive, at least that's how I view it. Are you in ketosis?, at least partially, while doing this level of exercise?
Check out an interview with Dr. Anthony Chafeee and a guy who did five marathons on five consecutive days, while in a fasting state. I will find the name shortly and post it, but consider what he is saying
Sound quality is atrocious, for an insitute of technology you should be ashamed. Even a first year student sholud do better than this!s
🎶 *promosm*
Dennis, I realize it sounds insane, but would it be possible to use several Huge flywheels in an O’Neill Cylinder at either end (with the Cylinder Itself Moving Fast) and brake at the right time to get that much Mass moving, and then course correct either using the other fly wheels/braking or one nuclear drive once you got to the perfect speed/orbital path/ orientation? Keep in mind, you would have water, oil, and other elements at the edges tied down for added weight, possibly in just one spot/band to give you added mass/advantage This is assuming everyone is kept tethered magnetically to the central spine gyroscopically/individually kept as neutral as possible and allowing for said G-Forces/slowing the shock along it. The idea is to just get that much mass moving/ moment of inertia/ Brake in the right direction because using chemical rockets to move it at a cold start is near impossible/uses too much fuel. You basically use the Earth, your orbit, the Cylinder’s momentum, flywheels/orientation and flightpath like a slingshot/throw it like a stick. Once you get it moving and oriented right, people could literally just climb down, have their atmosphere, and build their homes/farms/shops/etc on the way there in comfort. Essentially, turn it into an orbiting asteroid. The trick is to get the flywheels and cylinder moving Fast Enough so that when you brake at the spot and angle, it should be like a gravity exist, but you’re moving super fast and putting that much energy into a course correction- without breaking everything. Using Your Material Strength and Mass to store angular momentum and release it at the right time like a steerable asteroid with everybody magnetically/gyroscopically stabilized at the central axis and using its length to absorb the G-forces going forward (that’s 50,000 feet of force absorbed while your gyroscope keeps you steady), Keeping in mind you have HUGE Metal Matrix Graphene/Carbon Nanotube Composite Flywheels spinning Angrily and a Steel Tube Bigger Than a Town That’s Rotating so fast that Watching it is enough to scare the pants off you! This should be able to scale up. On the small end you could use a 6,000 X 48,000 X 900 Ft Cylinder, and you should be able to scale it up to 30 or even 40,000 feet using Metal Matrix graphene/carbon nanotubes. - you Should Be Able to do this with the other planets gaining overall Forward momentum/using Fission drive /fusion and Braking without Destroying everything. Like Spin Launch for the Planets, just watch how fast your orbit is and your flight path.
It would be much easier to put more effort into cleaning up fossil fuel ..
This is a very interesting presentation to listen to in 2024. A lot of the graphs would look comical in how conservative they were. Anyway, I wish Professor Emanuel had presented some of the info based on CO2e. Well, this was a pretty good presentation save the 'solutions'.
7 years ago not true, and still not
Have salt and sand batteries back the grid, in the regenerative grid theory concept. That way, costs drop for electricity across the board, and hydrogen becomes a more easily recognized best option as curves adjust.
Metal powders as fuels, sand batteries, brick batteries, along with nuclear power, could provide the thermal energy streams for solid oxide hydrogen production, as well. Let's experiment a bit.
Use wider pipes for hydrogen. 1 ton per pipeline kilometer per day, is the basic heuristic for profitability. Everything has been figured out elsewhere. This isn't really all that hard. Cash in.
Why don’t people his multiple lies? He is funded to keep promoting scare tactics. He leaves out the evidence that co2 does not drive climate change
This is silly propaganda. There is no such thing as a "greenhouse" gas. All gasses are part of atmospheric warming/cooling.
Get your levels sorted, it's not a good advertisement for an institute of technology to have such poor technical standards. Some of the speakers are far too quiet and I' on 100% volume already
Disgusting filth
This is crazy
this is not proper research - Research the works of any of the professors Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, Don Easterbrook, Andy Knoll, John Christy, William Happer, Patrick Moore, Richard Muller, Murray Salsby, Richard Lindzen, Robert Carter, Ivar Giæver, John Clauser and 20 000 others with PhD and engineering degrees in relevant sciences ( and any of the more than 20 Norwegian professors PhD doctors and professionals in all the relevant fields - ( people that I have either met, read or conversed with online.)
You know you’re at a climate conference not a science conference when: -they introduce the speaker mentioning his political party affiliation -the only experimental (as opposed to correlational) data that the speaker has to show is hard proof that all of his fellow climatologists agree with him -the speaker thinks that physics and physicists have nothing to contribute to the study of a physical system like climate.
Corruption is eating us.
Most of our allies and partners are dependents.
China and india supply our medicines with China providing 80 eighty-percent of active ingredients is that being mitigated?
Open borders are securing our homeland?
Winds a joke
According to the measures taken by Exxon Mobile and other companies, CO2 emissions have fallen dramatically but temperature is still rising. It's the sun that's causing global warming!
Do you know my MIT affiliated colleague Ruby Carat of Eureka, CA. who posted my MIT invite only presentation on muon catalyzed fusion propulsion online?
Relative safety of LFTR ?
Tony Heller on CO2
Can't use ocean water for industrial machines.
Excellent overview of the basics of the science - well done and well presented. He gets the main point across that the underlying Maths and Physics is really incredibly simple and easily understood while the detailed modelling of all the more nuanced regional complexity patterns are so incredibly complex and challenging - but in a manner that really does little to change the simplistic overview of the problems. He did not get into the weeds of the Red Herring whataboutisms so artfully used by the paid propagandists who keep trying to hoodwink the general populae into believing it is all a nothingburger - other to suggest that it is a problem of posychology and neuroscience (one of beliefs) and not one of actual climate science or the models. I notice some comments still trying to push the arguments made and the basics outlined off into the weeds - but I hope few people get dstracted by such easily debunked "complexification and obscurantist" myths? The CO2 is good for you thingy being one of the tricks being used and trying to devallue the simple Greenhouse Gas effect results merely another attempt to distract and displace attention. Professor Kerry did a good kob stating quite simply that increasing CO2 - from a crop yield perspective - is a rather mixed blessing. Yes - increased atmospheric CO@ leads to greening - unfortunately greening alone is a mixed bag as it comes with hugely amplifying the growth and spread of noxious and invasive weeds as well as hugely amplifying the severity and ubiquity of toxic algal blooms in rivers, lakes and estuaries globally leading to eutrophication of our most productive hydrological ecosystems - which I really do not need to point out as a huge detrimental effect on ecosystem health. There are pluses and minuses in all things that change - but no one is served when the Machiavellian only point to the few pluses while ignoring the many serious minuses... He did a great job here however i feel the perennial unbelievers out there will be reluctant to let go of their Magical Thinking (consciously adopted of subconsciously acquired?) even when such a bright flashlight has been shone on the simple basics and fundamentals.
"Model constructed from data matches data beautifully"... What a surprise!
Osmand needs to educate himself about cholesterol, he could start by watching this video: 'Understand Your CHOLESTEROL PANEL & Metabolic Health Tests - The ULTIMATE Guide | Dr. Robert Lustig'
LOL they call OpenAI a research organisation. Today they call it a company. It tells you all you need to know about OpenAI and their mission,... it has been abandoned.
The whole point for these guys and their financial backers is to make gobs of $$ gain power. The fact these guys are so socially awkward is scary if they at some point wield life altering power over others.
What about the inflammatory effect of high carb and high refined sedd oils in processed foods as a cause as described in Dr Chris Palmer's book 'Brain Energy'?
A simple mind coming up with the simple solution that everything can be solved with simple solutions. 😂
Ah, so this is Sam's arch-nemesis!
Pure evil