Life of Faith Ministry / Pentecostal Universalist
Life of Faith Ministry / Pentecostal Universalist
A message of Hope, from the Heart of the Middle East, preaching the message of Universal Reconciliation and word of faith to the ends of the world.
On Spotify: Life of Faith With Tarek
On Facebook: Pentecostal Universalist /life of Faith
Пікірлер
Can you help me understand something? Are you implying that there was no forgiveness to man prior to Christ saying father forgive them for they know not what they do, while dying on the cross? Or, are you implying that all souls rested sheol until a Spiritual transaction of the cross occurred? Like a ressurection of souls.? Thanks for your help
Either we believe in Jesus now and our independent egos begin to wane in our transformation to the wholsome image of God/Jesus or...we shall believe at death's door at the judgement when we meet LOVE face to face. And hell? Love's refining/cleansing of everything in our past lives that was not of God/Love. Yes ALL knees will bow to the name of Jesus for reconciliation and final restoration of ALL things. Hallelujah!
The story of the Rich man and Lazarus isint a parable but indeed true in my opinion. Let me give you something to think about first Jesus uses an actual historical person to fulfill his story unlike other stories that had no historical person example the man that builds his house on sand and the prodigal son. Notice that these stories are meant to be parables to fulfill his point because there's no focus on an actual historical person, But instead he focuses on the circumstances. Now we go back to the rich man and Lazarus, Abraham is mentioned and not only mentioned but he was having an interaction with the rich man why would Jesus use an actual person and put words in his mouth when he never said it in the first place just to make it a parable, whenever Jesus mentions an Old testament figure it's always consistent with the scriptures He never adds words other than what the scripture says. Jesus is perfect and he will not falsify Abraham by putting him in a story and making up words to fit his parable unless it was true and we know Jesus is truth, so his representation of Abraham has to be true and not made up. This is consistent of it being a true story. Just like the other stories that I mentioned Jesus does not mention a particular person so he's able to carry on the story and put words in individual's mouths because there not real. But since the interaction were from a real person he cant do that unless he's a liar. Jesus cannot lie about a person by falsy adding words in his mouth, the story has to be true there's no way around it in my opinion. Sheol/hades is a realm with two divisions-a place of blessing and a place of judgment (Matthew 11:23; 16:18; Luke 10:15; 16:23; Acts 2:27-31). The abodes of the saved and the lost are both generally called “hades” in the Bible. The abode of the saved is also called “Abraham’s bosom” (KJV) or “Abraham’s side” (NIV) in Luke 16:22 and “paradise” in Luke 23:43. The abodes of the saved and the lost are separated by a “great chasm” (Luke 16:26). When Jesus died, He went to the blessed side of sheol, or paradise. (Some believe, based on a particular interpretation of Ephesians 4:8-10, that Jesus took believers with Him from sheol to another place of bliss that we now call heaven. More likely, Ephesians 4 refers to the ascension of Christ.) All the unbelieving dead go to the cursed side of hades to await the final judgment. All the believing dead go to the blessed side of hades to await the resurrection. Did Jesus go to sheol/hades? Yes, according to Jesus’ own words, He went to the blessed region of sheol. So the story of Lazarus and the rich man and Abrahams boosom is consistent in we're Jesus went after his crucifixion, hense the story is true
Don't leave out Purgatory( which could last a long time!)
If one wanted to be flip, one could define Universalism as "Protestantism Plus Purgatory!" 1950s religious televangelist and Catholic Bishop Fulton J. Sheen was once asked what he thought about Hell; he answered that, because of the justice of God, he believed in Hell, but because of the love of God, he believed it was empty.
I'm so glad to hear you not give up on God. You know the heart of God. I have something to show you on my channel. I made a video called The Two Witnesses. It will give you more ammunition than what individual verses can. It will show you God's logic in His approach to man, how we have always been loved by God. I hope you come and see it. I like your argument. You can add this one to it. How could Jesus forgive the paralytic when He hadn't yet died for his sins? He could forgive him, as He showed, because the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. Because God is not bound by any sort of thing that needs to be satisfied in order for Him to have compassion and forgive whenever He wants. Sin cannot stand between you and God, nor can it stand between you and His forgiveness.
I fully thought this was a video of DJ Khalid explaining universalism for a second
It’s a lie , God is not going to save everyone.
If you want to think that I feel sorry for you
@26:00...........what I hear you saying is that we are not responsible. ROMANS chapter 1 disagrees. Nobody has perfect knowledge. BUT WE ARE STILL responsible because the wrath of God has been revealed to all the unrighteous manifested, shown, clearly made known. You are saying the conclusion is that nobody's responsible for their sin. That is NOT taught in scripture.
Yes, God is love. Yes God forgives. But why does God forgive? How is God's love expressed. I am more than halfway through your teaching and I have not yet heard the word Holy Spirit. I have not yet heard the name of Jesus spoken. It is through Jesus Christ that we are forgiven. How do we enter back into right standing with God through Jesus Christ? We must believe on Jesus Christ. Of course, you can bet your bottom dollar that on judgment day every single person will know and have a thorough understanding of who God is, what Jesus did and why. But the Bible tells us that God is going to say, "I never knew you" even to those who did works in his name. If he's gonna say "I never knew you ", to those people, then you can be assured that he will definitely say, "I never knew you" to someone like Hitler or to anyone who in their rebellion refused to FREELY place their belief on Jesus Christ and repent from a life of worldly living. You believe that God's justice being fulfilled by eternally punishing those who denied Jesus Christ in their living physical life somehow is not love . God will not be pleased that people will be cast into hell fire because they denied Jesus Christ But God will cast people into hell because they denied Jesus Christ because the Bible tells us that if we deny Jesus, God will deny us. I do not read in scripture any exceptions to this. I do not see the word, "BUT" only until…… The wages of sin is death. THE BIBLE doesn't say the wages of sin is death until they've been adequately punished. The Bible does not say the wages of is death for only a period of time. THE BIBLE DOES NOT SAY THAT. THE BIBLE DOES NOT INDICATE THAT ANYWHERE IN SCRIPTURE. This is where Universalism comes up against a big brick wall. Verses must be provided that say ......only until, or ......for a period of time, or something of that nature. The Bible does not indicate this anywhere.
I love watching delusional christians try to prove their nonsense about jesus (no proof he existed) while trying to deny everyone's beliefs. Belief in a sky daddy is the definition of infantalism
❤❤❤
It's too hard for Many That Jesus Christ himself Is both God aboved and below before anything else The doubting Thomas said show us the Father and everything is enough but He Responded Those who saw Him see The Father already
We also have to undo the programming ,lies and trauma caused by the wrong things we go through until we reach enlightenment, the truth. Even then , the truth comes to us in bits and pieces, it has to be understood and integrated into our lives which is difficult , a struggle and surrounded by dangers to body and soul. Our minds are being controlled , our lives are controlled , so we are not our true selves until we understand what we need to know to about cause and effect, about our choices and what influences us.
All WILL be saved whether they want to or not. THAT'S the the real beauty of it. HALLELUJAH! 🙌🏿
In the words do matter so the word that's translated to saved a lot of times in the Greek also meant healed or made well. At this point it's semantics. You can enjoy the kingdom of God now or you will be faced with it after death and then come to the knowledge of God and then realize how much you wasted with your time here on earth.
Thank you. I agree with that but I’m not sure where the refining process comes in relation to the final judgement where you said when we all meet Christ we will have full knowledge and be changed . I am recently looking very positively at Universal Salvation Certainly it is alarming to think that God could punish people for eternity in hell and is completely out of character for our God of love . . only love in fact as Catholic Bishop Barron states. Bishop Barron’s view is also that we have a reasonable hope that all will be saved. I’m beginning to think that we are mistaken in grouping ourselves into different doctrinal categories eg Catholic / Protestant and am beginning to see it is more of an individual relationship we have to God perhaps expressed in the context of belonging to a certain fellowship / denomination. Perhaps someone can answer my query about the time/place of refining presumably in what is called hell albeit I could not believe that hell was as was presented to us in - as I now see - in a largely misunderstood and possibly mistranslated tradition
This is deeper than the ocean or space...BRAVO! 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿✝️
Who wrote new testament 85% paul right ? Where did jesus say about trinity in old testament ,paul created it not jesus , why are yiu guyz fooling people since 2000 years ? Jesus says very clearly clearly thst he has come not to destroy the laws but to fulfill them and says very clearly again who ever shall even a dot or title shall be. Changed will be consider the least in the kingdom of heaven So why dont u gyyz follow the teachings of jesus not paul Read the bible completely dont just taje few verses read to public read with the context ok
So The main focus is pointing to The Name Jesus Christ Acts 4:12
What about Mark 3:29? The Critical Text says people who blaspheme against the Spirit are guilty of "eternal sin". What is "eternal sin"?
Absolutely heavenly! I remember you singing this in Essex when we were young. Your wonderful gift blesses so many.
St. Isaac of Ninevah would be proud of you 🎉
Thank you for your diligent study on our behalf.🙏🌿🌞
Bless you and your work, my friend!
Since I Became a Christian I find that he Lords Prayer is the Perfect Prayer. Not only God tell us exactly what we need to doand also how he want us to do it. IT is an incredible thing. Sin for me have a strong seen since I was an atheist I implaned them in my body and i have a hard time to win or even try. I attend confesions in the church, In evening Prayers. I will add someting that my Priest told me. He explained to me that we need to understans why we do set sin and ask God to help us, forgive us. Fighting with Sins is a long battle, but we must always get up and never stay down. Our Walk is long and hard, but we dont go alone and that is why we will win in the end
I am a very sceptical person. I have found a lot of vipers. but you Sir are not a viper. Also even when Jesus told how to babtise he stated clearly to do so in the name of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit. God Bless your Ministry and see you in your nex video
The doctrine of the Trinity is encapsulated in Matthew 28:19, where Jesus instructs the apostles: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” The parallelism of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit is not unique to Matthew’s Gospel, but appears elsewhere in the New Testament (e.g., 2 Cor. 13:14, Heb. 9:14), as well as in the writings of the earliest Christians, who clearly understood them in the sense that we do today-that the Father, the Son, and the Spirit are three divine persons who are one divine being (God). Here are examples of what early Christian writers had to say on the subject of the Trinity: The Didache “After the foregoing instructions, baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living [running] water. . . . If you have neither, pour water three times on the head, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (Didache 7:1 [A.D. 70]). Ignatius of Antioch “[T]o the Church at Ephesus in Asia . . . chosen through true suffering by the will of the Father in Jesus Christ our God” (Letter to the Ephesians 1 [A.D. 110]). “For our God, Jesus Christ, was conceived by Mary in accord with God’s plan: of the seed of David, it is true, but also of the Holy Spirit” (ibid., 18:2). Justin Martyr “We will prove that we worship him reasonably; for we have learned that he is the Son of the true God himself, that he holds a second place, and the Spirit of prophecy a third. For this they accuse us of madness, saying that we attribute to a crucified man a place second to the unchangeable and eternal God, the Creator of all things; but they are ignorant of the mystery which lies therein” (First Apology 13:5-6 [A.D. 151]). Theophilus of Antioch “It is the attribute of God, of the most high and almighty and of the living God, not only to be everywhere, but also to see and hear all; for he can in no way be contained in a place. . . . The three days before the luminaries were created are types of the Trinity: God, his Word, and his Wisdom” (To Autolycus 2:15 [A.D. 181]). Irenaeus “For the Church, although dispersed throughout the whole world even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and from their disciples the faith in one God, the Father Almighty . . . and in one Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became flesh for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit” (Against Heresies 1:10:1 [A.D. 189]). Tertullian “We do indeed believe that there is only one God, but we believe that under this dispensation, or, as we say, oikonomia, there is also a Son of this one only God, his Word, who proceeded from him and through whom all things were made and without whom nothing was made. . . . We believe he was sent down by the Father, in accord with his own promise, the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, the sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father and the Son, and in the Holy Spirit” (Against Praxeas 2 [A.D. 216]). “And at the same time the mystery of the oikonomia is safeguarded, for the unity is distributed in a Trinity. Placed in order, the three are the Father, Son, and Spirit. They are three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in being, but in form; not in power, but in kind; of one being, however, and one condition and one power, because he is one God of whom degrees and forms and kinds are taken into account in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (ibid.). “Keep always in mind the rule of faith which I profess and by which I bear witness that the Father and the Son and the Spirit are inseparable from each other, and then you will understand what is meant by it. Observe now that I say the Father is other [distinct], the Son is other, and the Spirit is other. This statement is wrongly understood by every uneducated or perversely disposed individual, as if it meant diversity and implied by that diversity a separation of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” (ibid., 9). “Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent persons, who are yet distinct one from another. These three are, one essence, not one person, as it is said, ‘I and my Father are one’ [John 10:30], in respect of unity of being not singularity of number” (ibid., 25). Origen “For we do not hold that which the heretics imagine: that some part of the being of God was converted into the Son, or that the Son was procreated by the Father from non-existent substances, that is, from a being outside himself, so that there was a time when he [the Son] did not exist” (The Fundamental Doctrines 4:4:1 [A.D. 225]). “For it is the Trinity alone which exceeds every sense in which not only temporal but even eternal may be understood. It is all other things, indeed, which are outside the Trinity, which are to be measured by time and ages” (ibid.). Hippolytus “The Word alone of this God is from God himself, wherefore also the Word is God, being the being of God” (Refutation of All Heresies 10:29 [A.D. 228]). Pope Dionysius “Next, then, I may properly turn to those who divide and cut apart and destroy the most sacred proclamation of the Church of God, making of it [the Trinity], as it were, three powers, distinct substances, and three godheads. . . . [Some heretics] proclaim that there are in some way three gods, when they divide the sacred unity into three substances foreign to each other and completely separate” (Letter to Dionysius of Alexandria 1 [A.D. 262]). “Therefore, the divine Trinity must be gathered up and brought together in one, a summit, as it were, I mean the omnipotent God of the universe. . . . It is blasphemy, then, and not a common one but the worst, to say that the Son is in any way a handiwork [creature]. . . . But if the Son came into being [was created], there was a time when these attributes did not exist; and, consequently, there was a time when God was without them, which is utterly absurd” (ibid., 1-2). “Neither, then, may we divide into three godheads the wonderful and divine unity. . . . Rather, we must believe in God, the Father Almighty; and in Christ Jesus, his Son; and in the Holy Spirit; and that the Word is united to the God of the universe. ‘For,’ he says, ‘The Father and I are one,’ and ‘I am in the Father, and the Father in me’” (ibid., 3). Gregory the Wonderworker “There is one God. . . . There is a perfect Trinity, in glory and eternity and sovereignty, neither divided nor estranged. Wherefore there is nothing either created or in servitude in the Trinity; nor anything superinduced, as if at some former period it was non-existent, and at some later period it was introduced. And thus neither was the Son ever wanting to the Father, nor the Spirit to the Son; but without variation and without change, the same Trinity abides ever” (Declaration of Faith [A.D. 265]). Sechnall of Ireland “Hymns, with Revelation and the Psalms of God [Patrick] sings, and does expound the same for the edifying of God’s people. This law he holds in the Trinity of the sacred Name and teaches one being in three persons” (Hymn in Praise of St. Patrick 22 [A.D. 444]). Patrick of Ireland “I bind to myself today the strong power of an invocation of the Trinity-the faith of the Trinity in unity, the Creator of the universe” (The Breastplate of St. Patrick 1 [A.D. 447]). “[T]here is no other God, nor has there been heretofore, nor will there be hereafter, except God the Father unbegotten, without beginning, from whom is all beginning, upholding all things, as we say, and his Son Jesus Christ, whom we likewise to confess to have always been with the Father-before the world’s beginning. . . . Jesus Christ is the Lord and God in whom we believe . . . and who has poured out on us abundantly the Holy Spirit . . . whom we confess and adore as one God in the Trinity of the sacred Name” (Confession of St. Patrick 4 [A.D. 452]). Augustine “All the Catholic interpreters of the divine books of the Old and New Testaments whom I have been able to read, who wrote before me about the Trinity, which is God, intended to teach in accord with the Scriptures that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are of one and the same substance constituting a divine unity with an inseparable equality; and therefore there are not three gods but one God, although the Father begot the Son, and therefore he who is the Son is not the Father; and the Holy Spirit is neither the Father nor the Son but only the Spirit of the Father and of the Son, himself, too, coequal to the Father and to the Son and belonging to the unity of the Trinity” (The Trinity1:4:7 [A.D. 408]). Fulgence of Ruspe “See, in short you have it that the Father is one, the Son another, and the Holy Spirit another; in Person, each is other, but in nature they are not other. In this regard he says: ‘The Father and I, we are one’ (John 10:30). He teaches us that one refers to their nature, and we are to their Persons. In like manner it is said: ‘There are three who bear witness in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Spirit; and these three are one’ (1 John 5:7)” (The Trinity 4:1-2 [c. A.D. 515]). “But in the one true God and Trinity it is naturally true not only that God is one but also that he is a Trinity, for the reason that the true God himself is a Trinity of Persons and one in nature. Through this natural unity the whole Father is in the Son and in the Holy Spirit, and the whole Holy Spirit, too, is in the Father and in the Son. None of these is outside any of the others; because no one of them precedes any other of them in eternity or exceeds any other in greatness, or is superior to any other in power” (The Rule of Faith 4 [c. A.D. 523).
Many people were crucified for religious and non religious reasons. Its the not crucifixion that's important! It's what happens after. Talking of real history and mentioning Christianity and the bible is a contradiction. You can't even prove jesus was real.
That's not the opinion of scholars, that's the opinion of people who take their degrees from social media.
@@lifeoffaithlebanon What's not the opinion of scholars? Many were crucified? The important bit is resurrection? You can't even prove jesus was real? I think you'll find all that fact backed by the majority of scholarship. Most biblical scholars admit the bible is full of contractions and most historians know it's historically incorrect. It's accepted by most Christians and Jews and non religious it's scientifically wrong. No Adam no world flood no exedus etc. It's a known fact we are evolved apes and not created, accepted by most Christians and Jews and non religious and all of science. I'm an archeologist of 25 years plus, to become an archaeologist I had to do a degree in ancient history and archaeology. I've focused on archeology that alone supports nothing in the bible outside a few place names buildings usually out of context. Biblical history isn't real history, it's a historic book but just not true.
@@lifeoffaithlebanon No it's the opinion of the majority of scholarship and academia. My PhD comes from a world leading university in archaeology famous for finding a king in a car park. My PhD in ancient history and archaeology, I'm an archeologist of 25 years plus. People being crucified was normal and means nothing, it's the nonsense claims that follow that are in question. You and no scholar or whatever can even prove jesus was real. Just claims in a book that's historically scientifically and morally wrong.
@@lifeoffaithlebanonwho care what scholars think. The purpose of their job is to make shit up 😂
@Lacuna1122 yeah, you are the "only" person who is honest with themselves and everyone else is a liar, so what you say is sacred, even though it contradicts facts, and historical evidence. Go get some real education dear. Even skeptics who investigated the facts agree that Jesus is a historical figure, and that his disciples as early as the same year He died, claimed that He rose from the dead.
How do you know Christ was crucified???
There are different types of proofs. Some are: 1. His friends said it. 2. His enemies said it. 3. Historians .mentioned it. 4. The Old Testament prophecied it. 5. People died for proclaiming it (along with the resurrection story...
@@lifeoffaithlebanon there is no evidence of this happening in the historical record of that time,the Bible is not a viable account because there is no original account it also is full of cotridictions none of the 4 gospels agree on the crucification and even if ALL of this were true how does it mean that this individual was the son of God??
@RupertMay "historical Record"?! There were several records of Christ and his death in many secular records. If you are not informed, it is your obligation to search before claiming this false statement.
@@RupertMay www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died some articles...
@@lifeoffaithlebanon name one!!!
Without lies Islam dies.
That applies to all religions.
@@jameswright... Proof it.
@@PoyongViana You have to lie about Adam being real, lie about the fact we are apes. You have to lie about flying horses and the moon being split. You have to lie it is fair and factual when it's racist homophobic and sexist. You have to lie about child brides. Where to stop? You have to lie that Islam has never changed and lie about the Qur'an being unaltered. You have to lie about floods. You have to lie about magic spells from a non factual god. You want more? Islam is based on the myths and fables of the Abrahamic man made immoral god. The god of Abraham is not real and to say otherwise is lying.
@@PoyongViana Well Adam never existed proven by genetics. To say otherwise according to islam is wrong, that's lying! To say the moon was split is lying, we know it never was. Flying horses are not real! Islam's practice has changed and the Qur'an has been altered, to say otherwise is lying. The Abrahamic god is man made immoral nonsense. Anything attached to it is made lies!
@@PoyongViana KZread! Why do you keep deleting my post? They are not bigoted, no hate speech, all factually correct. No personal attacks! Just facts!
Jesus Christ is my lord and saviour. Amen.
It's a bit hard to follow you there brother. The intervention of faith brings salvation, but it is not what saves us, least the cross be not needed Scripture is clear that we are saved by his mercy/blood, and that all have been handed over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all. It just seems like you are splitting hairs with your terminology It appears presupposed at the cross that everyone shall be saved obviously. Father forgive them for they know not what they do. Why does God still blame us for who can resist his will? Shall the clay say to the potter, why did you make me like this.😮 (The case of Judas) 4But when the kindness of God our Savior and His love for mankind appeared, 5He saved us,(past tense, done)not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth. Titus3: 3-6 (born again) We are saved from sin from Adam(no choice) Look here is the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. All mankind and creation was born again at the cross obviously, this is why Christ was going to the cross when he told Nicodemus you must be born again. Absolutely nothing to do with the choice of man. The Wrath of God is to end evil not his beloved creation (noun) Jesus does not save us from God😊 But agree some seem to make the banquet and some don't, however this is under God's control because he has mercy on him he wants to have mercy. However, it is specifically clear that the absence of mercy does not quantify the absence of love. And that's were a lot of us get confused thinking there's two Gods one of judgement and one of love, a grave mistake. Judgement all through the scripture appears as a prerequisite to the following act of mercy Although it's a mystery and I have studied and looked at this topic for years It is obvious that love wins in the end. Ironically it is explicitly clear that every knee and tongue shall bow and confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the father. It would seem that the scripture is correct when it states that "no one is cast off by the Lord forever Though he brings grief, he will show compassion, so great is his unfailing love. For he does not willingly bring affliction or grief to anyone.
Brother, I agree with something like 90% of your statements. except the part that disregards human will to accept or reject God's grace in this life.
@@lifeoffaithlebanonI agree we have the free will to choose who we will serve on this side of life as to the experiencing a measure of salvation and grace. But I don't agree this choice has anything to do with pertaining to a point of salvation, as that point was obviously made by God at the cross for all. 1 Timothy 4:10 As I'm sure you are aware of states along this line "That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe"
@brianbrodie8331 that's the part where we have to split hairs. What is the measure of salvation that we decide on in this life? Even when we agree that eventually all will.be restored and all will be well by the grace or God.
But the problem is you still seem to have the point of salvation subject to the choice of man not the work or obedience of Christ. It completely negates the cross and therefore I find it impossible to hold such a position. I mean what was the purpose of the cross? What actually happened at the cross? You haven't really explained or given your account of this. The scripture says not just you but you and your household will be saved ....wait on a minute, the others got saved by someone else's intention/choice 😮? that's where it gets a little more tricky. At what point has a man conjured up enough faith or belief to announce 'I believe' and be saved? I'm aware of the scriptures and in simple English it would literally look like what you are saying must be obviously correct , but on the other hand it also appears totally flawed. And this is the very dilemma where we of course get the main theologies of Arminianism, Calvinism, Universalism and Ultimate reconciliation etc. But I think we both agree because of the fact that salvation belongs to the Lord that He will in the end will save and reconcile all mankind and creation according to His will. I mean either way who's going to stop Him😊
@brianbrodie8331 Not me, it is the Bible, it is the new testament terminology. CALVINISM has spoiled the mind of Christians towards the meaning of Grace. SALVATION is always linked to human response in the New Testament, I can provide 10 scriptures from the Top of my head that confirms that.
❤❤❤
Today Modern pastor are deceiving thier victims
In parallel The Canaanite Woman with Jesus Christ
Amen Brother thank you.
Do you know Rodney Belieau? Your teachings are similar but with some minor difference.
any link??? I am interested to check him out.
Ditto that. Excellent teaching. Have wondered about the kingdom of heaven is in you. Could you please explain your insights on that more?
Caiaphas is greed
It's all about Priesthood
❤❤❤
Most Evangelical stumbled on This Parable Caiaphas and Jesus Christ pointing on that situation
What are you talking about? The Bible blatantly and irrefutably says you are saved by faith alone, not of works lest any man should boast. It explicitly says works are not counted towards salvation.
Putting your trust in Jesus is works? Dear, modern Christians are not able to understand Paul, because they do not understand that Paul, when talking about works, is talking about the works of the Law, not any action of responding to God in general. a hundred times the Bible speaks of us giving an account for the works we do, but when Paul compares Grace with Works, he is referring to the Works of the Law.. The law of Moses... Also, an act of responding to God's gift is NOT works, and does not contradict the principle of Grace, this is a modern hype resulting from centuries of Calvinistic influence.
I agree that we should get away from the terminology of universal salvation. Salvation meant different things in scripture. We must also come to scripture rightly dividing and understanding that Christ fulfilled the Law of Moses, the prophets and Psalms. We are looking at scripture some 200 years years after the can closed. We are left with God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself. Rhe Kingdom goapel is one of peace and grace and walking by the Spirit of God. There is a judgement when we leave this earthly life, however that occurred. It is fair and righteous and restorative.
Thank you for that life giving fresh bread, Tarek!
It's so important to make these considerations on terms. Following from Brazil . Where are you from?
Thank you so much for this teaching 🙏💖
This is a wonderful clear teaching! Thank you for your faithful teaching.🌿🙏
"They that are Christs'" is speaking of everyone. And all the people that are using the clobber passages to disprove universal reconciliation are swearing by eternity in spirit. They are of the wrong spirit. Example; Jesus said not to fear ppl that kill but fear God after he kills to throw both body and soul into hell. Swear by eternity, you get eternal torment. Read it with the right spirit, you get burning in "fire" on this earth because you are scared of ppl that kill.
apologies, but I do not approve you interpretation as it is against the context of the passage interpreted. you can't simply take a paragraph in Matthew, for example, and use it as a context for Paul's writings, unless there is a clear indication of that reference. if you read the Corinthians passage, it is clear what Paul means by "Christ's"... Greetings with love.
The original language of the New Testament confirms the truth is Universal Salvation, 1 Timothy 4:10 shows “savior of all men, especially of believers” this means we receive salvation from judgment in Jesus if we are born again and worthy, but everyone else will be saved and live forever as well, God reconciles them through the judgment, the reason the lake of fire is called that is because God called the slavery in Egypt an “iron smelting furnace” and it actually means pool of fire, like a crucible for refining gold, this is the fate of all mankind, if they are not born again and walking straight into life, they need to be refined but no one is lost forever, God said He will be all in all, and there is a New Heaven and a New Earth on the outside of the New Jerusalem, there are cities of people, Jesus speaks about giving someone 3 cities in the scriptures, and another 5 and 10, of course we want to go His way it will be more rewarding, but again everyone lives forever, as in adam all die so as in Christ all will be made alive, there is no forever separation from God, in large a big misunderstanding came from the Greek word “Aionon” it means an age for punishment and was never supposed to be understood as forever with punishment, and God’s punishment’s are always rooted in His nature of love and goodness they are also seen on the “Outside” of the Kingdom after the lake of fire, God is Love.
The Apostles were all Praeterist and wrote about the second coming in year generation. Revelation was written before AD70 but John's gospel was written after as witness to his return.
Nothing in your comment is proven historically.