This channel has technical videos on optics and electrical engineering topics that are targeted to undergraduate students or those who need fast reviews of undergraduate-level content. I create the videos for my classes and post them to KZread for anyone who might find them useful. I am a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Bucknell University in Pennsylvania, USA.
Пікірлер
thank you very much
Beautiful. λ is one of my favorite variables.
In which book one can study the formula for photon lifetime (05:09)
Beautiful
❤❤
thanks a thousand times!
wow
How to calculate Beam waist from the z scan data?
He speaks 70's.
Btw. Thanks!
Fantastic video, thank you for making these concepts intuitive. Your teaching in conjunction with the applets makes it very clear.
Wrong information provided.
How an electric field can pass a material?
I want to ask one question .If the phase angle is 180 degree this waves must be linear polarization ?
you think the robots are going to be racist?
A detailed discussion of polarizability is found in "Dielectric Matter", Ch. 6 of "Modern Electrodynamics" by Andrew Zangwill.
Very well taught Professor. I am glad to find this online. Thanks a lot.
5:46 But I didn't get it. There's still a non-symmetry on the sides of the material, but now vertically. The positive layer will appear on top and the negative at the bottom. And then apparently at 9:05 the incident and absorbed components would become collinear according to this. Doesn't make sense. I mean if we would only focus on mathematical aspects, then circle integral is 0, hence then incident tangential field = tangential absorbed, while normal components are scaled by epsilon from each side and due to that difference in scalars we have a "bending" of the absorbed field inside the material. Idk, however, what happens at the atomic level of things, but in a way it's presented at 5:46, the top and bottom layer of material will be out of pair to be cancelled, hence would induce some vertical field inside the material which would compensate incident field thus cancelling a "bending" of the field inside a material. Its something wrong about the diagram.
💚
Key idea(s): 1) Line Shape g(ν) = Convolution of Probability Density Function (PDF) of Electron State 0 and 1, P₀ * P₁ = P(E₀) * P(E₁). 2) Diagonal State Transitions - These are not possible in semiconductors because of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: - An electron being in either state with a defined energy (i.e., E₀ or E₁) means that there is a definite position (i.e., it's confined in space, maybe to an associated atom and/or because of the forces of other electrons/charges, etc.). In order for a wave (i.e., our electron) to be confined in space (i.e., position), you need an infinite number of waves, each with different frequencies ν, to superpose into the resultant wave function that places your electron at a specific location/position - think of the Fourier transform of the wave in the time domain, i.e., the frequency domain graph/function of the electron's wave function. - The momentum of an electron is given by p = hk = 2πh/λ = 2πνh/c (the de Broglie relation). So, if we require an infinite number of frequencies to confine our electron, we don't have just one value of k; we have an entire (infinite) range of k values. That is, k --> Δk = ∞. This gives us Δp = h Δk = h * ∞ = ∞, which is non-physical, i.e., unrealistic/impossible.
clearly. thank you
great intro to the MTF, thank you for a great explanation!.
Thank you very much !
Goid job using technical jargon without ever divulging further explanations to ensure only the prior educated can reap the tiniest benefit from this drivel
Can you explain ground loops?
Mathematical masterbation... That was funny😂
9:18 wish to see E and B plane waves both are present with any imagination, ok to plot them in extra boxes without overlapping, hope to see vectors in them
Thanks a lot
Muito bom
Physicist guess more often than you think. We even have a name for it: Ansatz :) Nice vid
amazing video thank you
🙏💐💐
thanks
💐🙏
Thanks a lot for the explenation, I was reading my notes without understanding anything and you saved me ☺
great video
I’ve been trying to get an intuition for this since I learned acoustics 2 years ago and I finally got it thank you bro
thanks for sharing
thanks for sharing
My Hero. Thank you!
omg, never thought that 4piR^2 associate with area of sphere. thanks shareing.
Clap your hand anytime he say “field”
Hmmm, circular electric field exists. Its called EMF and it appears in coild when magnetic field is changing. So, your explanation of "electric fields never swirling" might be in jeopardy?
What is the textbook you are using?
what is the name of that great professor?
GREAT VIDEO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks for helping me I'm from Morocco it take me time to understand how waves to be plane
SAME wonder that we make in >>>>how votage can be buildt across a coil it is just a wire then we learn that voltage is not because the resistevity of the wrie rather it is due to current struglle to build the megnatic field in the cam the same wonder bulit again how should current cross the cap while its an open circuit same solution the ekectric field is the media by which the current travels this is the most intuitive thing if you get the coil you get the cap
Thank you so much. I wish everyone teach this topic could teach like you. In your voice and explanation, one can really tell that you are passionate about teaching your students. This attitude is missing in a lot of professors today, especially here in America and yet students pay a lot tuition and other fees for University. But thank so much for passing on this wonderful knowledge. God bless you.
Question: If magnetic fields are the result of unequal relativistic contraction of charge densities as seen by a moving charge and only is a manifestation of the electric field in a moving frame, how do we explain the magnetic field produced by an isolated electron? There is an analogy of the spin of the electron having a magnetic field akin to the magnetic field produced by a wire loop. Classically (although we know quantum mechanically the electron is not a point charge), the electron's spin is like the current in the wire loop, but the magnetic field of the wire loop can be explained by bending the straight wire into a loop. All explanations of what causes the electron's own magnetic moment (ratio of magnetic field to mass) is that it is a fundamental property of the electron, which implies magnetic fields are a fundamental force. Are magnetic fields a fundamental force, like electric fields? (I know force is the result of a field acting on a body but I'm using the terms loosely. :-p )
What is the order of the videos? , it is confusing for a person who is just learning