Пікірлер

• 
  @Wize_ManingsАй бұрын

  "Winged Whosars" It's Winged Hussars not Whosars

• 
  @nathankim99063 ай бұрын

  tanks did not look like that ww1

• 
  @user-vw7vr6ux7rАй бұрын

  That's just the ai

• 
  @soap157429 күн бұрын

  Silly stupid ai, at least they got the hands somewhat right

• 
  @vampireknight58215 ай бұрын

  Lets not forget that Scipio lost MULTIPLE TIMES against Hannibal before this (Scipio got TRASHED in many of them)

• 
  @walravensrudi2723 ай бұрын

  This was not Scipio Africanus but his father and maybe his uncle.

• 
  @wannabelyx24965 ай бұрын

  Skip-yo 😢

• 
  @yigitbulut49725 ай бұрын

  Let's not forget Hannibal's unmatched dominance of Roman lands, which lasted for many years. He repeatedly raised armies that outmatched the Romans in skill, crushing their ranks. His masterful diplomacy and battlefield leadership persuaded Roman tribes to join his cause. His ingenious tactic of hiding troops in an open field to ambush the Roman army is legendary. Hannibal's victories were so numerous that Roman armies came to believe he was invincible, they avoided a full-scale battle at all costs. So great was his reputation that Roman armies dared not face him, burning their own fields in a futile attempt to starve his forces. Yet, in the end, it was his own homeland that dealt the fatal blow. A man can only last so long with daggers in his back.

• 
  @BudlightdisenjoyerАй бұрын

  Everyone glazes Hannibal endlessly but how about Scipio? Greatest general in history imo. Never lost a battle, practically built Rome's empire, beat Hannibal with a force 2/3rds his size, and left a legacy so powerful Roman's always assigned someone from his lineage command over armies in Africa because it was believed only a Scipio could win there

• 
  @Gam1812 күн бұрын

  The Gauls were warriors u have white n black unification the Gauls jus need a commander and team to help defeat the Roman’s, chatiginan greed cause Hannibal at Rome n at zama they didn wana fund or pay for shit, n if only Haninal save his elephants and Scorpio copied hiss stately using his enemies against him , Hannibal was to anxious to fight rome nstesd of waiting it was a lot of traders that sold cartigianIan out for money also, most Gauls went bak home n only soem went to Africa

• 
  @ritmoypoema5 ай бұрын

  Anibal lost cuz the lack of support of his own faction. The cartaginian elite.

• 
  @sabeeles10355 ай бұрын

  Suicide is not heroism it's cowardness

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Agreed

• 
  @johannesb44955 ай бұрын

  Why his hair sticking out his helmet?

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Its part of his helmet

• 
  @petermullaney64385 ай бұрын

  Jews taken the easy way out ...

• 
  @malcolmclayton66515 ай бұрын

  Alex employed 4 personalities . The watcher , the thinker, the communicator , action person. This strategy gave the army the advantage .

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Thanks for sharing, where did you get your information from?

• 
  @neuromechanica2565 ай бұрын

  im so tired of ai generated sludge content

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Why, doesn't it give you value?

• 
  @pjackson66885 ай бұрын

  Sugarcoating the Zulu victory. If the British offices had listen to their South African advisors, they would have won the first battle. The fact is the Zulu empire used a tactic called the bulls horns They would pin the enemy with a front line attack and the veterans would strike from the sides once the enemy army was unable to disengage

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Interesting perspective! Do you think adopting local military tactics would have significantly altered the course of the entire Anglo-Zulu War?

• 
  @pjackson66885 ай бұрын

  @@AncientBattles33 no the problem of the British 🇬🇧 is that they ignored the bore advisors with the army You know the Bore who had lived and fought the Zulu before The fact is unlike the USA that try’s to understand the enemy’s strategy the British “ said to themselves we have guns and they have spares” that type of short term thinking leads one into over confidence which in turns leads to things like general clusters last stand, the Afghan retreat, the Zulu over running the British army. Etc

• 
  @user-sk1ef4gi6f5 ай бұрын

  Good vid, continue the push

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Thanks Bro Really Appreciate it 🙏⚔️

• 
  @scrappydoo64665 ай бұрын

  Hmmm, Ukraine take notice!!

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  ⚔️

• 
  @vladimirlenin8435 ай бұрын

  Owed not old You stupid AI channel Stop farming content with low effory copy pasting AI

• 
  @HendrikPlukaard6 ай бұрын

  Better remember what the Russians do when put under extreme pressure. The West seems to have a short memory.

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  Interesting point! Can you share examples of how you've seen this play out historically?

• 
  @HendrikPlukaard5 ай бұрын

  @@AncientBattles33 Napoleon managed to have a hard time, and Hitler didn't fare any better. Your alias suggests that you are stuck before these guys.

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  @@HendrikPlukaard Definitely, history has some stark examples. How do you think those historical scenarios compare to the present geopolitical climate?

• 
  @HendrikPlukaard5 ай бұрын

  @AncientBattles33 It's far more dangerous now. Back in the days, the flow of information was hampered due to lack of technology, the lesser sense of nationality, and the feudalism of society. Now, there is an unprecedented sense of nationality and support for the Russian leadership. The number of volunteers to enlist is huge and isn't limited to the male population. There is absolutely no shortage of Russians and e.g. Chechens to join the army. Compare that to the Western society and the social unrest and dissatisfaction amongst the population with their leadership and the disconnect between the Western politicians and the people, the first ones almost longing for a direct confrontation with Russia. Of course, the Anglo-Saxons need the confrontation, as in war-time, the people are more likely to support the sitting president/prime minister, and Trump doesn't support going to war and is not supportive of Nato. Look at the pro-war propaganda and the ignition of multiple hotbeds being fuelled by the same. It is typical of a system that is in decline.

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  That's a profound analysis, highlighting the complexities of modern geopolitics. Given these differences in societal structure and technology, how do you think the outcome of any potential conflict might differ from those historical examples?​

• 
  @ThatGuyJames-fq4oj6 ай бұрын

  Love Ancient Greece

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  Yeh, Me Too

• 
  @sinbadthesailor876 ай бұрын

  Lol terrible and inaccurate summary of what went wrong for Napoleon at Waterloo. But okay.

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  Tell Me Your Version?

• 
  @ivanminieiev26736 ай бұрын

  lol. west interpretation of history )))

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  Yeh, lol

• 
  @readmylisp6 ай бұрын

  Blucher

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  WDYM?

• 
  @DrLili-DrawnByTheDevil6 ай бұрын

  Lol, the shitty ai videos are becoming ridiculous 😂

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  What Do You Mean?

• 
  @CuriousMisterG6 ай бұрын

  80 years ain't ancient. But it's a good story to be told

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  Thanks lol, Do you think I should do more videos like this? (EX: WWI and WWII)

• 
  @David-pi9rl6 ай бұрын

  Hoo spooky

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  WDYM?

• 
  @OfficialRHPLAYZ6 ай бұрын

  Hello nice video

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the support ❤

• 
  @jacktheripper27716 ай бұрын

  Imagine if this was a video game

• 
  @AncientBattles336 ай бұрын

  That Would Be Pretty Cool, Do You Agree?

• 
  @jacktheripper27716 ай бұрын

  Yes I do

• 
  @AnDrEi_aLeXaNdRu6 ай бұрын

  Interesthing

• 
  @IgorPrototype907 ай бұрын

  *Liberation

• 
  @nurikkulanbaev36284 күн бұрын

  *Massacre

• 
  @LordIvor67 ай бұрын

  Yeah they weren't saints lol, the whole reason the Pope was in France wasn't to call a crusade by to try to end the infighting in France that saw a lot of churces burned and looted and clergy killed. Not to mention the Normans that were picked up on route and you have literally an army of savages. The Normans are a particularly curious addition given that Bohemond with his father have been raiding/ at war with the Byzantium for years (and came damn close to taking the city if not for the Germans. TLDR, most of the participants had damn good reason for seeking the clemency offered by participating in the Crusades as they were savage sinners.

• 
  @AncientBattles337 ай бұрын

  Where did you get your information from in curious?

• 
  @LordIvor67 ай бұрын

  @@AncientBattles33 Regarding the Normans: Alexiad - biography of Emperor Alexius Comnenus written by his eldest daughter Anna Comnenus (it's before her time though, but it's great to see how the Empire's villains are portrayed a generation down, Alexius was alive at the time and so was her husband) Got the excerpt from Van Haut's 'Normans in Europe' p.250. Geoffrey of Malattara is a great read too (my fav IIRC) "The Deeds of Count Roger of Calabria & Sicily & of Duke Robert Guiscard his brother", Geoffrey Malaterra, trans. by Graham A. Loud . So the Norman story in southern Italy and the attempted conquest of the Eastern Roman Empire feeds into the story of the crusades. As for the Crusades themselves, I'm at a loss for sources atm, but the Council of Clermont was not to call a 'crusade', it's fundamental purpose was to help restore peace in France (i think any search will support that basic premise). I did once make the argument that the call for an armed pilgrimage served to put France's trouble makers to use against the enemies of Christendom. Yeah Alexius asked for help (but according to Anna, he asked for 80 knights and retinue?) which isn't much lol, instead he got 30 thousand peasants (the "popular crusade/peasant's crusade led by Peter the Hermit'), and then some time later 60 thousand strong crusader force shows up at the gates of Constantinople with 20 thousand Normans at their vanguard (from Thessaly). Led by the villainous Bohemond (son of Robert Guiscard that have raided and assaulted the Roman Empire since arriving in Italy (the Eastern Empire and holdings in southern Italy before the Normans wrested it from them). When put into context suddenly the events at Edessa, the cannibalism near Antioch and the sack of Jerusalem do not seem so out of character.

• 
  @AncientBattles337 ай бұрын

  Thank You @@LordIvor6

• 
  @richardspence66727 ай бұрын

  Seems when it comes to religion Christians are fare game but all other religions are deemed faultless..

• 
  @johannesbrahms95287 ай бұрын

  Nope, the Muslims had their crusades too. Christianity isn't fucking special and your persecution complex is a disgusting attempt to deflect responsibility. But that's what your whole religion is about, isn't it! Escaping responsibility.

• 
  @bobdole88307 ай бұрын

  That's the current political agenda, bashing Christiantiy is cultured and woke but critising any other religion is discrimination, despite the fact, that christianity is the only religion that went through an episode of major reforms and enlightenment. Good luck trying to be openly gay in other parts of the world XD

• 
  @peteroates99217 ай бұрын

  30 years after the Norman conquest of Britain

• 
  @AncientBattles335 ай бұрын

  💯

• 
  @johannesbrahms95287 ай бұрын

  Ah, Christian love.

• 
  @DegeneratesLikeYou7 ай бұрын

  Ah, atheist lust.

• 
  @Mayu-261587 ай бұрын

  @@bobdole8830 They did kill the civilians.....

• 
  @johannesbrahms95287 ай бұрын

  @@bobdole8830 So these weren't Christians on the crusades? It wasn't led by the Christian church, with Christian motivations? Please enlighten me.

• 
  @johannesbrahms95287 ай бұрын

  @@DegeneratesLikeYou Ah, Christian ignorance and deflection. You're trying to virtue signal by ignoring a literal holocaust. 🤔 It would only be pathetic if it wasn't so disgusting.

• 
  @johannesbrahms95287 ай бұрын

  @@bobdole8830 If you want a distance yourself from these atrocities, here's a pro tip: denounce them. Don't sit there and point the finger and pretend like it's some misunderstanding or that it's somehow justified. By doing so, you're only making your death cult look worse.

• 
  @antonio40557 ай бұрын

  After hearing si-tees I left

• 
  @AncientBattles337 ай бұрын

  Bruv