Пікірлер

• 
  @fire_tower11 сағат бұрын

  How do you not do the reading on the second day of class?

• 
  @itstiam26264 күн бұрын

  Good to mention that the US embassy was occupied by the revolutionary extremists and the government was unable to control them due to the lack of will and management.

• 
  @peggyfisher974314 күн бұрын

  Listening to this was a great deal and if fun!

• 
  @itstiam262616 күн бұрын

  Thanks for sharing your classes🌺

• 
  @itstiam262620 күн бұрын

  Great class

• 
  @sarahpamula778Ай бұрын

  I will prove that What you are allowing on TV, comments about God directed at a person IS medical malpractice. I do not provide for the State. Or the State of Florida. As a provider.

• 
  @davidpeek2154Ай бұрын

  Take a moment and consider how useless mike Gallagher is

• 
  @talknchetАй бұрын

  @1:31:44 "I was just saying they were racist" was hilarious. Mitchell MVP.

• 
  @kathyjones2742 ай бұрын

  Now you know why merrick Garland didn't do anything about Donald's and magas criminality for over a year.

• 
  @charlesdavis20513 ай бұрын

  Did Harlan's newfound precedent of the 'presumption of constitutionality' to an extent abdicate the role of the Judiciary?

• 
  @souradeepsarkar48913 ай бұрын

  Meyers v. US Morrison v. Olson 1789 Senate Adams President Humphrey's Executors Nickson v. US, Watergate crisis Recess appointment powers.

• 
  @mouikafa-qn1gn3 ай бұрын

  Lincoln's quotes does not belong to him originally though

• 
  @asdfkljlkjdfkg22903 ай бұрын

  Thank you for the playlist

• 
  @tomjames34853 ай бұрын

  Hi Josh, What are your thoughts on land grant patents? Thank you

• 
  @frankcommatobe80094 ай бұрын

  My brother in Christ, this video is worth like 1,500$ in tuition. Thank you!

• 
  @CarnivoreCurin4 ай бұрын

  What book are we using? What is the ISBN number? Can I get it on Amazon ?

• 
  @Wyrmwould4 ай бұрын

  The closed captioning spells the Seila case incorrectly. If you are searching for the case, it is Seila Law LLC vs Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020). Also, they were right to bring up Presidential impeachment in the context of the independent counsel controversy because it implies a problem I have always had with Scalia's dissent. I think he is correct in his assessment of the separation of powers, but impeachment would change that calculation in a significant way. If the House of Representatives does explore articles of impeachment, surely the formal accusation would be preceded by a formal investigation. If the independent counsel is part of this investigation, then it would not make sense for the President to be able to interfere with that investigation by firiing the counsel at will. The House must be able to investigate the President in preparation for articles of impeachment in such a way that the President cannot simply destroy the investigation.

• 
  @Wyrmwould4 ай бұрын

  It's a shame that the Eleventh Amendment had to be skipped because it drives me crazy. Because of Hans v Louisiana, people repeatedly claim that the amendment prevents citizens from suing states in federal court. But the plain text of the amendment only forbids citizens from other states from suing; it does not forbid citizens from suing their own state. Of course, Justice Kennedy would later claim that states are protected from lawsuits because of their inherent sovereignty without relying on the Eleventh Amendment at all. I really wish there could have been a discussion on this important amendment and how it has been misinterpreted and misapplied.

• 
  @dropcapapp4 ай бұрын

  The following semester, he fell behind the syllabus

• 
  @Wyrmwould4 ай бұрын

  At 19:08 the professor gives the answer he asked earlier about how the Judicial Branch could be described as the least dangerous branch since they seem to have the last word on these questions. Without Congress and President Eisenhower's actions, the Supreme Court's decision would not have been effective.

• 
  @CarnivoreCurin4 ай бұрын

  King George offered a compromise, but it was too late. Secondly, parliament is who refused representation.

• 
  @MikeHaduck4 ай бұрын

  I am almost 70 years old, Vietnam Era and middle east war vet, I alway wanted to go to law school. ,took a college course last semester,, torts and wasn't prepared but got a A, so I started to watch your videos so I would be more ready next time , and bought your book, can't get into the videos through the code, also listened to the oral arguments on the trump Colorado deal and was understanding what they were saying ,because of what i learned so far in your course,also seen you on C span , so thanks for turning us on to a real law school experience. I enjoy it very much and learning, Mike Haduck

• 
  @supriseimblack4 ай бұрын

  How did these students graduate from high school? Question: Why does 1st Amendment protect more than just freedom of soeech?: Wjy does it protect freedom to hear objectionable speech. Answer: The entire theme of the 1st Amendment is “Freedom of Conscious” and freedom to lawfully exercise/express your belief system. 1st Amendment orotects your right to “LISTEN” and congregate and network wint ANTI-VAXXERSS if you want...

• 
  @josephsmyth8325 ай бұрын

  Thank you for providing this material to the general public as well. It’s very enlightening actively listening to what is being said and understanding the game better.

• 
  @user-ms1or7yk7c7 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much for making these videos. Professor Blackman. It helps me a lot understand the rules and cases.

• 
  @user-ms1or7yk7c7 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much. It helps so much to learn with your own understanding and words. Some online law classes are so boring!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you! Professor Blackman.

• 
  @stevenmartin30447 ай бұрын

  Mr. Blackman, thank you so much. Awesome understanding of our constitution. Would love to sit in and observe sometime.

• 
  @sanagirlqueen9 ай бұрын

  Extremely nice lecture sir i want to be an american girl

• 
  @cparks10000009 ай бұрын

  This class looks well-run. I'm looking forward to it.

• 
  @shariecebrewster59629 ай бұрын

  Good afternoon and i am new on there's

• 
  @shariecebrewster59629 ай бұрын

  I am there's

• 
  @Jenamphetam1ne10 ай бұрын

  You make my job mopping floors much more tolerable and way more educational

• 
  @g.gsgeekchannel777910 ай бұрын

  This was a really good class! Thank you so much for it. I've learned a lot.

• 
  @TheDoeSmith10 ай бұрын

  This dude is a idiot,and that is free speech

• 
  @Lafons-sj6qi10 ай бұрын

  Advance Jewish Ideology.

• 
  @ii.cc.11 ай бұрын

  Prof. Josh, you saw Javier Muñoz, the sexy Hamilton. be thankful. you got a real treat

• 
  @jhjdia11 ай бұрын

  Mr. Blackman, thanks for sharing.

• 
  @jeromegarcia5396 Жыл бұрын

  Next time I buy a house I'm going to fart on the agent and say there's your twiggleberry 🤣🤣🤣

• 
  @jameszeris5418 Жыл бұрын

  She JFK speech 1963 at the Waldorf Astoria signed an executive order to get rid of the Federal Reserve Josh if you have time look into how much that would save the taxpayers from the private bank would we still need a lot of income tax? I’m curious what the numbers come out to be?

• 
  @runtoth3abyss7 ай бұрын

  The federal reserve is self funded from the interest rates. It costs tax payers zero dollars to run

• 
  @distilledwatur Жыл бұрын

  So do I wait to ask a question in comments until after I finish the lecture? I fear even if I did I wouldn't get my answer😢

• 
  @supriseimblack Жыл бұрын

  19:30 I really hope Law School is, indeed, this easy... 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

• 
  @supriseimblack Жыл бұрын

  1:38:54 Racism is so funny?

• 
  @supriseimblack Жыл бұрын

  Thank you so much for making this available! You explained this better than Justia, Quora, and even the esteemed Cornell Law’s Encyclopedic Online Resources Page ! 🎉 ⭐You were BORN to teach!! “Substantive Due Process” was eating away at my soul. Everybody that tries to explain it only uses one example (i.e., Abortion) Most of the information out there is people's (hyper•polarized) OPINIONS on ‘SDP’ rather than a measured, collegial, unbiased, honest explanation of the issue. I now feel like I can explain it someone else. It's definitely a--somewhat oxymoronic--misnomer of a term. But for future students, what REALLY helped me was when you were wrapping everything up and rounding the corners: YOU LOGICALLY AND RATIONALLY MADE SURE TO DRAW THE CONNECTION BETWEEN HOW SEEMINGLY DISCRETE LEGAL TERMS MAKE MORE SENSE THROUGH THE LENS OF TWO PAIRS OR RELATED GROUPINGS OF LARGER IDEAS 💡 👇🏾 •|| »» FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS »» STRICT SCRUNITY » ENDS vs MEANS»» = NO 🚫 (reasonable) 🚫alternative but to infringe on the F-Right with direct linear not circuitous causality (i.e., Pedophilia/Consensual Procreation-->Police Power to Save Children) 👇🏾💡 •|| »» RATIONAL BASIS »» “DEEMED” NON-FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (i.e. right to healthcare) »» NO JUDICIAL SCRUTINY »||• *The Crux is, just like in 1937, the court can shorten or increase list of ‘F-Rights’ 🎯🤷🏾‍♂️ ---» THE TWO-PRONG TEST ----» 👆🏾 The concept is unintelligible without understanding the concepts of “F-Rights” <<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>> Anyways, I'm off to Law School next year but still retaking the LSAT. Hopefully, Antonin Scalia School of Law GOD BLESS !

• 
  @Eternal_Hoop Жыл бұрын

  I wish they would teach with a freemasonry influence like it truly is

• 
  @raymurphy1504 Жыл бұрын

  Why is this video marked for being "upsetting"

• 
  @BecomeAWebDev Жыл бұрын

  greetings from Colombia ...good job on foxnews...nice dog video as well

• 
  @gerbilkicker Жыл бұрын

  Too much background noise

• 
  @goplease5769 Жыл бұрын

  Then what day you about social media crime and cyber crimes it's no real common laws on them...so you're saying Americans harmed by this shouldn't be compensated? Then Shame on the 3 branches of government

• 
  @goplease5769 Жыл бұрын

  Mr. Black Man...why did you become a lawyer... you love the thrill of debate as well as your country...and the Money...My reason is war...even that has ethics and laws...which is why the military is separate from civilian court... Tyranny is by far the worst war crime...and if you take a man 2nd amendment rights away...We might as well go back to the 1770s or 1860s...it's 2023 defend your country Men against tyranny please God willing...

• 
  @darrellritter269 Жыл бұрын

  So the US Constitution nor the government works for me, so how do I go about demolishing it and rebuilding it or reconstruction it