Пікірлер

• 
  @adamaleman34874 күн бұрын

  I wonder how this scenario would be from a passengers point of view. The pilots did not inform about anything as far as I could understand. Would just the "fasten seatbelts" signs go on and oxygen masks fall out and the flight attendants would say something generic like "technical issues, please stay calm" until they have landed?

• 
  @user-jg9no9us9n4 күн бұрын

  Amazing but i prefer airbus

• 
  @Besir3558 күн бұрын

  Wunderball, super??? I understna instructor is real German;))

• 
  @Besir3558 күн бұрын

  Pm talking way too much; nit good according to crm skills

• 
  @Besir3558 күн бұрын

  Mr Instructor why u speak Deutch all time--Gents dont forget Fly-Navigate first; if instructor not help u; u almost forget fly and navigate--Lufthansa Lufthansa-- u spoke 10 terms half were Lufthansa-us should not say many times ur callsign may be better say Mayday Aircraft

• 
  @Besir3558 күн бұрын

  Everybody is Pm in A350 aircraft; aircraft itself is Pf-May be we should change to Commanders relationship

• 
  @ukraineball95313 күн бұрын

  4:22 the plane starts insulting the pilots lmao

• 
  @autumna427023 күн бұрын

  Captain, I’ve just shit in my pants and theirs nothing anyone can do about it !

• 
  @holobolo166127 күн бұрын

  4:16 is he regretting choosing the NDB approach

• 
  @holobolo166128 күн бұрын

  Al Pacino in the right seat

• 
  @user-gh7qn2zz1q29 күн бұрын

  thank you for a great video. I live in England and have not been on an A350 so far and I am 82 and last year took a trip from LHR to SEZ, vvia DBX. the journey on the A380 WAS SO GREAT. I had to go on an Boeing 777 to Seychelles, since SEZ airport is right net to the sea. and I was pleased to get off the B777 to go again on the A380, which is the best plaane in the wworld as far as I think. cheers to both pilots for allowing a video at landing at Boston

• 
  @asafnavon75Ай бұрын

  Nothing like Lufthansa. great pilots great attitude. all the best from Israel.

• 
  @bentleybrabecАй бұрын

  10:05 Buttered that landing

• 
  @spinosaurus20012 ай бұрын

  I like the alert sounds even if they can be scary

• 
  @AmimanTravels2 ай бұрын

  LBA has 2250 metre runway not 1800

• 
  @AviationFanOfBoeingAndAirbus2 ай бұрын

  Id rather have this simulator than having an computer that costs 4,500 pounds.

• 
  @Supreme_MJ3 ай бұрын

  At the end of the video he said don’t touch the aircraft

• 
  @Besir3553 ай бұрын

  U said heading we saw left turn, procedures missing and overjumped, atc com wrong, time management, rush landing etc etc

• 
  @Besir3553 ай бұрын

  Devil say My favorite sin is Over Self Proud

• 
  @GameCity6783 ай бұрын

  What if the copilot was flying it😂

• 
  @bosnianaviation55314 ай бұрын

  Well done guys ❤

• 
  @mindseye49144 ай бұрын

  Can a pilot please chime in and let me know what happens if a dual failure on a ETOPS certified plane happens over the middle of the ocean? What are the possible options then?

• 
  @SirKober2 ай бұрын

  Try everything to get at least one engine back running or prepare two swim. But seriously, dual/all engine failures in the recent past did not occur coincidentally. They resulted from either fuel contamination or unrecognized fuel leakage. Or in one famous incident due to flying through volcanic ashes. So the best strategy is to avoid getting into this situation in first place.

• 
  @philipval35004 ай бұрын

  Excellent video! Hey MS: winter in Detroit but fall in NY?

• 
  @user-ki4lp8ou7g4 ай бұрын

  Wir sind selbst dort gelandet und konnten vom Zimmer aus Landung und Start beobachten. Echt große Leistung 😊

• 
  @phantomopera55254 ай бұрын

  OMG, I love that they miss the exit, just like me on the highway!

• 
  @DrCripz4 ай бұрын

  And this is just so beautiful!

• 
  @theroyalcam5 ай бұрын

  shame the camera used was a gopro, what a piece of shit camera with garbage sound

• 
  @b57iu4h5 ай бұрын

  What i liked is that the Captain with all his experience estimated a landing distance about 2100m but the computer told him 1900m. At the end they missed exit romeo. He was just right.

• 
  @MrSchwabentier3 ай бұрын

  No, the plane was right. The „missed“ exit wasn’t a real miss as the pilots never intended to use that exit in the first place. The miscalculation here was on the ATC that expected the plane to stop faster.

• 
  @MrChopemup6 ай бұрын

  I live just near the airport. I can tell what time of day it is by which plane is taking off.. once every two weeks, or so ,they have to land and takeoff from the other direction of the airport. Because of winds .

• 
  @Arabian-W6 ай бұрын

  Ngl there runways are messed up I play on vatsim

• 
  @user-ki4lp8ou7g6 ай бұрын

  Wir beobachten seit zwei Wochen,das Landen und starten der Flugzeuge. Ist echt toll. Wie

• 
  @bc44476 ай бұрын

  So in this simulation they were able to get a engine restarted but would they have still made it without? Would the run be loaded to included the engine restart or is it something someone has control over? So many questions

• 
  @peteconrad20776 ай бұрын

  The instructor can decide ether an engine relights. If the instructor wants it to, you sim it cancel the failure and it will happily restart if the crew performs a restart attempt.

• 
  @eliotmansfield6 ай бұрын

  so in real life, what scenario would lead to a double engine failure but also allow the engine to relight ? (apart from the volcanic ash incident)

• 
  @peteconrad20776 ай бұрын

  Could be extreme turbulence or extreme precipitation. Unlikely but possible.

• 
  @camptube76216 ай бұрын

  Amazing. How the airbus computers give them instructions is brilliant.

• 
  @oscarvelay6 ай бұрын

  its a miracle that nose didn't poke a hole in the fuselage

• 
  @garypugh11536 ай бұрын

  Why would 2 engines " flameout" at all. Volcano dust, out of gas ? 😢

• 
  @tomstravels5206 ай бұрын

  Flying into a flock of geese shortly after takeoff

• 
  @KingMoronProductions6 ай бұрын

  The first thing they did was get on the radio to speak to ATC, would it not be wise to tackle the immediate issue first, then communicate once you've got a bit of a handle on things? I'm just an average person that doesn't know how things should be done though, haha.

• 
  @tomstravels5206 ай бұрын

  First thing they did was get the plane in a descent to maintain speed at green dot, so they flew the plane (autopilot is still on) then they had no reason to suddenly change heading or anything so they have now done the navigate part (and would get obstructions from ATC)

• 
  @andor_sa6 ай бұрын

  Exciting video! The impression was that the board was constantly drifting to the side and the girl was adjusting the position of the plane by pressing hard on the joystick handle. At the moment of touching the runway, I subconsciously pressed myself into a my office chair. The job is done, the plane is carefully landed on the runway. My respect to the members of the heavenly profession!!!

• 
  @aviationkid12867 ай бұрын

  What if the engine did not restart at all.? It would have been interesting to see that procedure as well.

• 
  @twiff3rino287 ай бұрын

  The sound of those 1995 era engines.

• 
  @der.Schtefan7 ай бұрын

  Pitty the BTV did not help them to vacate at R(omeo)

• 
  @tomstravels5206 ай бұрын

  What are you on about? ATC told them after they had already landed to take RW33R exit but the crew programmed BTV to slow down for Romeo and were doing 70 knots passing 33R. Taxiway Romeo is after RW33R so they did not have time to slow down suddenly to vacate RW33R, BTV did exactly what it was programmed to do.

• 
  @applehelpproductions7 ай бұрын

  Haha "Oh, zis is not good"

• 
  @harryhirsch67857 ай бұрын

  Unser Pilot hat noch eine Kurve geflogen damit wir die Spiegeleier sehen konnten

• 
  @ZRHTrainspotter7 ай бұрын

  I always think this is Madeira’s copycat 😂

• 
  @Saa428087 ай бұрын

  …..But they are convinced that they are safe.

• 
  @hanspeterx7 ай бұрын

  this is why i still would prefer a 4 engine Aircraft, and not an ETOPS 2 engine Airplane for Atlantic Crossing. YES i know that the Charles Lindberg´s Spirit of St Louis had Single Engine, Powered by a Wright Whirlwind J-5C 223-hp radial engine from 1923 (!)

• 
  @tomstravels5206 ай бұрын

  4 engines planes have also suffered from all engine flameout due to volcanic debris and fuel starvation. So why is it actually safer? Having 4 engines means are twice as likely to have an engine fail than a twin engined plane

• 
  @peteconrad20776 ай бұрын

  The evidence categorically shows that more engines is no defence whatsoever.

• 
  @Southernswag82837 ай бұрын

  Pilot - What are we doing today? Other pilot - Take off and then turn around and land on the runway. Me - Isn’t the whole point of these to test the pilots and not give them any hint to what type of failure they will have??

• 
  @Pereux07 ай бұрын

  If the checklist requires oxygen masks, I'm curious why its not the first thing on the checklist? If oxygen was a concern then surely it should be the first thing you take care of no?

• 
  @tomstravels5207 ай бұрын

  The cabin does not depressurise rapidly when the engines fail. The priority is to try and attempt an engine restart until the cabin altitude exceeds 10,000ft. Then oxygen becomes a concern

• 
  @Pereux07 ай бұрын

  @@tomstravels520 Makes sense thanks

• 
  @TheGnarTube7 ай бұрын

  That is the biggest nose ive ever seen

• 
  @af-inthesky74277 ай бұрын

  i controllori italiani in frequenza 😂😂