Пікірлер

• 
  @trapper0359Сағат бұрын

  1st

• 
  @simonconte729921 сағат бұрын

  While it's a step in the right direction, my concern is they've made it so unnecessarily complicated that when the law of unintended consequences rears it's head they'll just revert to the old (current) approach.

• 
  @matthewcasady6276Күн бұрын

  This sounds like it has the potential to be a very big buff for torpedo DD's.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  True, I imagine Torpedo DDs will have better ability getting around the map. At least in practice with the changes that would appear to be the case. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @UNSINKABLEIIКүн бұрын

  This is a crock and will be an absolute mess. How easy to implement with minimap spotting only! I have such a bad feeling about this.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Simple is not a word that exist in WG's dictionary or spreadsheets 🙈 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @AllAhabNoMobyКүн бұрын

  PQ did a test with Hakuryu last night. It gets 15km range with the Harugumo guns, but with slower reload. Also it seemed like the ballistics weren't as good as with Harugumo.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Yeah they nerfed the accuracy of the manual secondaries compared to the accuracy Destroyers get here in World of Warships. I watched a Haku using its guns against a Zao at 14-15km during a Twitch Stream the other day, looked odd 😂 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @AllAhabNoMobyКүн бұрын

  The CV problem would be solved in a week or two if the top 50 streamers/CC's got together and called for a total general strike until WG promised to simply implement minimap spotting.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Yeah I am really curious to know what WG will announce in terms of their findings and plans going forward following these test. Can you help my memory here mate, does WoWs with Lesta Studios now have only CV Mini-Map spotting? I was thinking they did, but so confused in my memory with all the conversations, different studios and etc. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @AllAhabNoMoby22 сағат бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray Can't say for sure but I don't think so, I think spotting mechanics are still the same as WeeGee's.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray20 сағат бұрын

  @@AllAhabNoMoby Thanks o7 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @trapper0359Күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @simonconte7299Күн бұрын

  Is the the test part of the 13.7 public test or something different? (I did sign up for the aircraft rework test and already have the public test server installed, but when I launch it up it takes me to the 13.7 test.)

• 
  @RoachkhanКүн бұрын

  it looks like it needs a different install from base game and test server. so if you have both then this would be a 3rd client install

• 
  @simonconte7299Күн бұрын

  @@Roachkhan Eeesh. Thanks.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Yeah kind of odd that they just did not do it on the Public Test Server. Guessing the changes they are making in the coding are quite drastic and they do not know whether these changes will stick or not, so perhaps too much to make all the changes and then revert the PTS back the way it was before the test. Thus, easier to just make a different client oddly enough 😅 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @calicojackrackham9233Күн бұрын

  I have a question. How do I tell what mode a flight of planes are in to determine if I should use my defAA skill? If I can't tell, then I end up wasting my consumable since they do not take damage in travel mode. So they are protecting the most damaged planes. As if CVs needed that. Am I misunderstanding or does this seem like mostly CV buffs? Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Well, I think that was pointed out by a Twitch WoWs Streamer the other day. Seems it can be a little difficult to tell, I am not participating in the test so I am not sure how much clarity I can add here. I would advise interacting on a Twitch WoWs Streamer channel and asking if it is while they are on the Test Client. It is perhaps too early to tell if is a buff or nerf so to speak, but we know it is rather complicated with how they are changing the game mechanics. The current test (being their 2nd test) is quite flawed in my opinion due to the MatchMaking. It is 6 vs. 6 with 2 aircraft carriers per team leaving 4 surface ships per team remaining. People are going to spec into AA more so here on the Test Client vs. Main Servers. When you have just 4 surface ships, it is a bit of herd mentality so then a Midway dive bombers have a hard time attacking 3 ships close together being 2 Worcester's with Manual and Automatic AA active and 1 Montana giving the appearance that CV planes are now weaker as the attacking planes are destroyed. Then CVs spotting will be higher in the Test Client because "herd mentality" vs. having players spread across the map in a 12 vs. 12. Not to mention you only have a couple of options in terms of CVs, Battleships, Cruisers and Destroyers to take into battle. The next test will need to be much more comprehensive. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @waffle3632Күн бұрын

  Being that I just played this rework on the test server, I can say with absolutely certainty it is the worst concept I have every seen implemented. The biggest takeaways I have as to why is 1. There is no way to tell what altitude enemy planes are flying at so you will be confused when to reinforce your manual AA. 2. Carriers planes are very fast, now flying at their boosted speed permanently. 3. AA does almost nothing since enemy carriers will swap to attack mode right on top of you then go back to travel mode right after, where your AA cannot hit them. I just don't see why wargaming felt they had to reinvent the wheel here and make it square. They could have just implemented mini map spotting for carriers and also added the plane fuel system that is on wows legends.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Thanks for sharing this, much appreciated 🙌 Planes only fly at their boosted speed permanently in Travel Mode right? Not also in Attack and Recon Mode if I read correctly 🤔 Did you find it still easy to do damage while playing a CV in general or no? Perhaps some oddities exist I recon if you have herd mentality and only 4 normal surface ships to target 😅 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @waffle3632Күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray as a CV, it's kinda weird, because if someone activates DFAA before you are in their AA radius (which is 7km with DFAA active) you are blinded and can take quite a bit of damage even in travel mode When there is surface ship spotting your targets, yes it's easy to do damage because you can line up your shots without getting blinded and spending excessive time in their AA, however any planes shot down during the attack reduces the armament sent to your target. With midway torp planes for example, if 1 plane is shot down during the attack run you lose 2 torps out of your usual 6. There is also a way to gimp the system by setting down a fighter plane, then go to travel mode to line up your shots since your fighters are spotting for you. Kinda negating the reason for this rework. Lastly you have very long range secondaries so you can damage farm in a CV, which I found to be funny.

• 
  @matthewcasady6276Күн бұрын

  This all sounds very complicated, but I'm hoping it makes a lot more sense when I see it in action. I'm still wondering what is going to happen at the end of game when there are hardly any ships left. How is the cv supposed to attack when there's on one around to do any spotting?

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Hopefully so. Guessing the CV will just take the planes at Low Altitude to fly around the map to spot. Sure perhaps more difficult if Recon Mode only has 60 seconds, but it recharges fast once you re-enter Travel Mode. I am not a 100% whether you can just fly around in Attack Mode before initiating an attack or not, would have to have someone else speak here on this. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @jameslane2326Күн бұрын

  24:45 this does not appear to be the case in my testing. The planes basically have 2 different attack time cool downs to get through now, for example with Hakuryu torpedo planes, when in travel mode and you left click to go to attack mode there is a 6 second count down and once that is complete there is another 3 second count down before you can actually drop the torps. I find this leads to losing planes much faster than in the live version

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Interesting, thanks for the feedback. Could it be someone activating "Manual AA" perhaps just as go in for the attack as an example 🤔 Thus more damage dealt if they are activating it just as you drop out of Travel Mode. Maybe not so accurate, but just a thought since the testing is just 6 vs. 6 and 2/6 are CVs so the surface ships do not have much to do or distract them. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @jameslane2326Күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray I dont think thats it, the 2 timers are pretty consistent everytime you drop, you can avoid the first 6 second one by being in recon mode, but going from recon mode to attack mode has a weird lag to it.

• 
  @subodhsrinivasamurthy6866Күн бұрын

  My only worry is that when you give noobs(like me) a tier 10 ship to test the changes in randoms, it's going to be hard for us to do anything because of the lack of everything(understanding of fundamentals of the games,etc aren't known to us yet). I don't know what to do, i don't want to piss my teammates. Any suggestions?

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  Well, I mean for now the testing is open, but you had to register in advance for it as it is not on the Main Servers, but on a Test Client. They will likely do a test on the main servers in a separate Battle Type later on after the review the results of the current testing. Typically players under perform as no one tries as hard since it is a "throw away game mode" per say if they do this testing on the main servers in a separate battle type. Usually if someone says something, you can just say you are new at the game and figuring out. Most players will back off or try to help generally speaking, but not always. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @subodhsrinivasamurthy6866Күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray ohh ok, now I feel brave to play in the new server thanks for helping 👍

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTrayКүн бұрын

  @@subodhsrinivasamurthy6866 Welcome. Have fun and enjoy o7 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @trapper0359Күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @trapper03594 күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @53nb4 күн бұрын

  The whole line are literally island huggers made for killing island huggers

• 
  @reginald91834 күн бұрын

  Im from wot f2p and im planning to try AW. Is it a f2p friendly? Is the grind not too hard? Is game still lives this year?

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray4 күн бұрын

  Yes I think generally it is f2p friendly. Yes still alive, just a small player base. From what I have seen and played, it doesn't appear to be as hard as WoT in terms of the grinding, but I have never played WoT so I could be mistaken. Just from what I have seen of QuickyBaby. It does not take much time going through low tiers, Tier IX takes a while to grind through, but there are special ops and etc that help you grind much faster like Heroics. You get a lot of things/rewards from the Battle Path, which just started a week or two ago that last for 4 months. I think it is around 10 euros maybe? But in my opinion it is very much worth it as there is so many things you can pick up via the Battle Path that easily makes it worth the money. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @reginald91834 күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray tnx im gonna try it... is the ping ok? I'm from ph

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray2 күн бұрын

  @@reginald9183 Where are you saying you are at "ph"? Then will know how to better answer your question. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @subodhsrinivasamurthy68665 күн бұрын

  I mainly want this ship for its AA. It's AA is soo powerfull. I will get this ship after I am good at cruiser play.

• 
  @trapper03595 күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @RichieKeane5 күн бұрын

  This series should be mandatory, would have saved me 12mons of pain.. and now 500 perfect games for recovery :(

• 
  @RichieKeane5 күн бұрын

  How come your service costs are so low for the Tx? Anytime I play my T10 or * the service cost is 150-200k? Your clan? I don't play them as on a terrible streak and loosing credits?

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray5 күн бұрын

  I would have to verify, but if I recall correctly, Cruisers and Destroyers have less cost than Battleships as an example. Premium ships have a smaller service cost than tech tree ships. You can read more here o7 wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:The_Economics_of_Battle#Service_cost Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @RichieKeane5 күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray ​​⁠yeah 360k base for my Annapolis. That’s why it’s on blocks in the shed

• 
  @RichieKeane5 күн бұрын

  Should be 300% bonus for play like that.... brilliant

• 
  @RichieKeane5 күн бұрын

  Nice film, i tried this for first mons after coming over from xbox, if team is not with you u get fckd.. but stats are terrible will take years to recover from all the deaths. now cant stop moving and my play is worse..

• 
  @tonyko_u1s15 күн бұрын

  commander build sequence is what ???

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray5 күн бұрын

  Been over two years since this video mate, what are you meaning by saying "Commander build sequence is what?" 🤔 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @migachevalex55706 күн бұрын

  but we left Dasha if she was on the account

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray5 күн бұрын

  Yes, WG is not pulling her from the accounts of those who already have her, just availability for sale o7 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @migachevalex55704 күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray and today the news came that Dasha will definitely not return to the project, neither WG nor LG

• 
  @MidnightPhoenix077 күн бұрын

  10:09 “if he wants to get some torps off” Torps on a Worcester? Where’d you manage to find those hidden Doom? I’d like some on my Worcester too.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray6 күн бұрын

  Oi, I meant Guns 🤣 He does have the big torp though 👀 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @MidnightPhoenix077 күн бұрын

  Regarding the economic rewards of spotting damage, WG hasn’t (and won’t) give specifics. We know it’s treated the same as “regular” direct damage for base xp and credit earnings, and then modified by the ship type you’re in (for example, a destroyer will earn more than a battleship for the same spotting damage). There may also be other modifiers based on relative tiers just like there are for direct damage, but the exact numbers and calculations have never been revealed though.

• 
  @matthewcasady62767 күн бұрын

  The calculation for base XP has always been a black box. Wargaming can do whatever they want and no one can ever prove different.

• 
  @TNKHART7 күн бұрын

  Very insightful. Much appreciated.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray7 күн бұрын

  Welcome o7 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @trapper03597 күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @mikealpha26118 күн бұрын

  force reload is C I really like this tank did not play it till I had it maxed and it is real nice for t5 and just fun.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray6 күн бұрын

  👍 Sometimes the mid-tiers and low tiers can be the funnest 🙌 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @GRIGGINS18 күн бұрын

  I started out in randoms. But as of late the game keeps putting my Alabama in tier 10 matches where I get yeeted down by a Yammy. Or my team dies around me leaving me as the next to last ship. So for the past few days I have been playing Coop. And getting my objectives done faster.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray6 күн бұрын

  Yeah 😅 Understandable and it is nicer to just chill in Co-op in at times over Randoms. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @GRIGGINS15 күн бұрын

  @@FlimsyLunchTray Yes it is. And with 99% less toxic players.

• 
  @trapper03598 күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @danuke14898 күн бұрын

  The battle path or battle pass for this game is a mess. You should never had to pay gold to access it in the first place when other mmo games have the battle pass or season pass for free to begin with for free to play players. That is one of the reasons I hate armored warfare I did post this as a question for the ceo so we will see what happens

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray6 күн бұрын

  That is a good point, it is a nice welcome to new players to incentivize them into playing/purchasing the Battle Pass after receiving it for the first time for free. As a player I would welcome this and would be nice to see if they work towards regrowing their player base. I wonder if they "feel" they are in a financial position to do so given how small their player base currently is. The focus may be to make as much financial gains as possible and just publicize a lot of information about the Battle Path without making it for free. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @C0W0B0Y9 күн бұрын

  I started playing just 2 months ago, so I don't have a lvl 21 Capt. I have Cunningham on my Duncan on lvl15. Should I switch Cunningham to the StV or not?

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray6 күн бұрын

  Ideally, if you are grinding a commander to be 21 points (which feels like it takes forever for new players, especially after they bumped commanders up from being 19 pointers to 21 pointers), you want to train commander for a ship line you are grinding up as an example. So if you start grinding for Conqueror as an example and you are at Queen Elizabeth, I would put Cunningham on QE and then continue to taking him up the line as you obtain each new ship. Specifically regarding your question, if you are playing St. Vincent a lot, then I would just place Cunningham on St. Vincent and grind him that way. Then you are not paying retraining cost as you grind up a ship line as an example. Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @simonconte729910 күн бұрын

  Dang it. Trapper wins.

• 
  @nacholegui234611 күн бұрын

  The new Unique Commander is Joaquin Marques Lisboa (has improved brisk for BBs, 12.5% extra speed instead of 8%) and has 3 unique skills. Upon 175 main battery hits and secondary it gets improved reload on secondaries (-15%), main battery (-5%) and torps (can't remember). Getting high caliber gives you an extra charge of consumables, 20% extra of consumable action time and +8% speed. Activating 2 combat instructions grants you a minimum of 20% combat instructions when it reloads, so it's faster to get the combat instructions back, considering you get them by getting main battery hits and potential DMG.

• 
  @10kchallengewith0video11 күн бұрын

  2nd

• 
  @trapper035911 күн бұрын

  1st

• 
  @calicojackrackham923311 күн бұрын

  Hey, Flimsy. Liked/Subbed. That is one dangerous ship. I'm glad it's dockyard and not just in the payshop although players can still just throw money at WG and get her.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray11 күн бұрын

  Great, thanks! o7 WG: "Hold my beer, we will sell this ship outright 1-2 years from now to make more money." Honestly I wouldn't be surprised, once they get New Jersey into the game they will probably do some type of Armory Event where you can pick up all four of the Iowa Class Battleships for the low price being a part of your soul 🙈😂 Best Regards. FLT

• 
  @adventurecapitalismbedbuil852011 күн бұрын

  This was insanely helpful. Thank you. And then you mentioned later about taking longer to be intentional about good advice. Man I appreciate you. Thank you.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray11 күн бұрын

  Great to hear and you are most welcome! Glad it helped 😄 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @dewannee11 күн бұрын

  ☑ Straight Line ☑ Stray Outside the Smoke ☑ Wide Spread Only

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray11 күн бұрын

  So eloquently spoken 😂😂😂 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @mornbar112 күн бұрын

  Poor Yoshino. Also; I haven't seen a DD that straightlinus oblivious since I potted one with Spee torps ages ago.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray11 күн бұрын

  Hmmm, in a Graf Spee, thinking the DD did something incredibly wrong in addition to straightlinus 😂 Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @simonconte729912 күн бұрын

  First?!

• 
  @trapper035912 күн бұрын

  Damn it lol

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray11 күн бұрын

  You slipping Trapper 😂 Joking Best Regards, FLT

• 
  @UNSINKABLEII13 күн бұрын

  Looks pretty interesting, at least mode shuffle introduces brawling, as long as players don't play it like a random.

• 
  @FlimsyLunchTray13 күн бұрын

  The Mighty Jingles - World of Warships - Suffering For Your Entertainment kzread.info/dash/bejne/dZWKs7WkgrzKorA.htmlsi=jA-5LGNE5pp9x9tB New ships - Closed Test 13.6 blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/539 Best Regards, FLT