This is a fantastic video, great job simplifying these concepts while presenting enough detail to be informative. Keep it up!
@r.d.l72364 ай бұрын
Now that's how to explain the sensor and how it collects the natural lights
@Prens15 ай бұрын
One of the best channels on KZread! I wish you would produce more videos. What a useful work you do. It's really incredible.
@Tensor_75 ай бұрын
brilliant video
@user-bl3oz1bc4v6 ай бұрын
Very good in-depth video on this topic, where there isn't much info scattered around the internet, quite a lifesaver thanks!
@elianaposada7 ай бұрын
Great video!
@g12345387 ай бұрын
This video was brilliantly made! I loved the animations and your detail for each step! One question I have, I am a bit confused by what you said at 5:10. As far as I know, Lippmann emulsions are photographic emulsions for use in Lippmann photography, a technique invented by Gabriel Lippmann. They were just very thick emulsions of ULTRA fine silver halides so that the interference patterns light made could be captured as a dyeless form of color photography. Is this just something else entirely?
@ritvikedoliya35327 ай бұрын
On 9:48 how are there 5 bonded carbon in the rings?
@user-fu2ob2zu9c7 ай бұрын
so useful! thank you
@briancowan5288 ай бұрын
excellent video.
@demondays73349 ай бұрын
This video explaining such a complex process is absolutely amazing. You have satisfied my childlike wonder and awe about Film. Thank you!
@thecinenetwork64778 ай бұрын
Aw very welcome ;)
@waynepayne8649 ай бұрын
this is the best video on this. hands down, i also couldnt find info, the best and top result was like a high school girls homework. its been 2 years since you posted this and you probably dont think about the video that much, but i want to remind you you did a great job.
@thecinenetwork64779 ай бұрын
Thank you Wayne!!! I really appreciate the comment. I do consider picking up the channel and making more videos for it, I've got a couple ideas so hopefully in the near future you'll see some more posts :)
@corneliustitiu87399 ай бұрын
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
@yellowcrescent9 ай бұрын
Great job with the visuals and explanation. Thanks!
@Watchmaker_Gereon-Schloesser11 ай бұрын
THANK you! And now, to become even more "insane" explain us Kodachrome... Woooow. Even more steps... Super well done!
@andrewdewar815911 ай бұрын
Awesome !
@johnjay370 Жыл бұрын
I prefer to use T stop as it is more uniform across lens sets.
@elifseflu5550 Жыл бұрын
İt is sooooo nice lovid tha video
@MichaelB-wm5cg Жыл бұрын
What does the number 0.3ND in front of the neutral density letters mean?
@custodianfile Жыл бұрын
thank you
@markgalura2891 Жыл бұрын
I now understand my rangefinder a little more after watching this video
@dilushanaynkaran6274 Жыл бұрын
This channel need more subscriber ...Underrated channel ...❤ I really love the way they explain..very hard work
@thecinenetwork64778 ай бұрын
Thank youuuu
@dilushanaynkaran62748 ай бұрын
Please.post more
@Oceansta Жыл бұрын
Good video. What's the difference between 16mm and Super 16mm?
@Sanatas66623 Жыл бұрын
horizontal size
@jakewestbrook3214 Жыл бұрын
even though I know most of this, things like the perf system and the difference between 35 and super 35 were new to me.
@jack-cv9rq Жыл бұрын
The Cine Network
@jangrzybek3036 Жыл бұрын
That is amazing and unique video! Thank you!
@NathalyPinheiroo Жыл бұрын
I love these videos!!
@shayaxelrod7691 Жыл бұрын
So to answer the question: ISO vs ND-Filters for a long-exposure image. They both darken the image but ISO introduces noises and ND_Filters don't. Right?
@James_BAlert Жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on stabilising pictures both pre & post processing with gimbals & other gizmos......tripods, tracking, aerial shots(helicopters etc)... Also how to deal with an image that has a sudden increase of light such as a rocket launch! I Really enjoy your informative animations!😊
@FYGOKENTROSS Жыл бұрын
GREAT VIDEO!
@d2wmedia Жыл бұрын
Amazing in depth explanation! I wanted to ask, what software do you use to make these visually pleasing infographics that are easy to understand? Thanks!
@thecinenetwork6477 Жыл бұрын
Adobe Animate
@garrydolley2 жыл бұрын
Great video! But, why is it "typical" that the shutter speed should be the inverse of twice the frame rate? I'm new to this...
@JaydenLawson Жыл бұрын
Apparantly, when the 180º rule is implemented, it best mimics how your eye perceives the world - with a little motion blur. If you wave your hand in front of your face, your fingers aren't all that sharp - they're a little blurry. 180º mimics this, and will add a little motion blur to the frame. If you used a 360º shutter angle (for example, a shutter speed of 1/25, and the frame rate is 25 frames per second), then you'll have a lot more motion blur than what you see in real life. If you use a 90º angle, or less (for a frame rate of 25 frames per second, this would be a shutter speed of 1/100), this would capture less motion blur, and the result comes out a little jittery.
@garrydolley Жыл бұрын
@@JaydenLawson thanks for the explanation!
@desistars70896 ай бұрын
@@JaydenLawsonbrother can you tell me is that interlaced scanning or rolling shutter is same
@kconrad58932 жыл бұрын
Magenta and yellow makes RED, not orange. 🙄
@MaganmashFlutefighter2 жыл бұрын
Jeff sent me!
@Scrizati2 жыл бұрын
How do this channel and video have so little exposure (pun intended)! They're brilliant
@thecinenetwork64772 жыл бұрын
I think it's because the channel is still developing... (pun also intended) :D
@markgalura2891 Жыл бұрын
Missing some key words big ones being film and photography
@aminesmaeilistudio2 жыл бұрын
Hi your video is very helpful and amazing i hope continue and create new training video 🙏🙏
@mirageleung15752 жыл бұрын
Underrated channel. Thank you! Could you explain demosaicing as well in how the 4 pixels are interpolated to become a single pixel?
@ThongNguyen-fl9jp2 жыл бұрын
So many people will understand the process more because of this video! Thank you!
@Red-Ox-Films3 жыл бұрын
Color negative motion picture film is processed with ECN-2 chemistry, not with C-41. If you process cine stock with C-41, you will get an unwanted color shift. Cross-processing in production environment is rarely done, as it delivers unpredictable results.
@bobmastronardi47023 жыл бұрын
Complex emulsion technology suspended inside a strip of film no thicker than a strand of human hair. Now that’s what I call cool technology!
@janjasiewicz9851 Жыл бұрын
Developed over a century ago...no computers...!
@z.a.s.56153 жыл бұрын
I really love this channel!
@tlatosmd3 жыл бұрын
360fps is the highest speed of many prosumer video camcorders nowadays. Already by the 1950s or 1960s, there were special high-speed *FILM* cameras for scientific purposes that could exceed 1 million frames per second.
@tlatosmd3 жыл бұрын
You could've added that the split diopters where invented (or first used in movie films) by Orson Welles for "Citizen Kane".
@tlatosmd3 жыл бұрын
I'm just starting to watch your videos, but you should do one about the difference between minimum frame rate required for the illusion of movement (16fps, as introduced as the standard silent framerate in something like 1909) and the lower brightness-flicker threshold (48 Hz), and how that interacts with camera, projection, soundfilm, and TV technology, and why we have arrived at a vast number of different framerates. They've even got it wrong on Wikipedia (because people keep confusing the framerate issue with the bightness-flicker issue), but here's a rough guide on it in the bottom section on this talkpage: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Flicker_fusion_threshold#Still_needs_revision And you should also do a video about the difference between effective resolution vs. interpolated resolution (both pixel resolution *AND* color resolution per channel, where the latter is how many different shades between pure black and pure white can be registered) due to things such as color subsampling (YUV and its digital equivalents as color spaces, that is mainly in relation to color subsampling, not as blue-luminance and red-luminance difference signals) and de-bayering in sensors, and how that leads to the lower quality of DSLRs vs. true RGB flatbed scanners (such as those with light-splitting prisms and three different CCDs inside, for example). Which also explains the difference between how fast you can make a photo (of actually poorer quality) with a DSLR or cellphone vs. how long it takes to make a scan with an actual scanner, because the scan has much more effective pixel and color resolution than the DSLR photo. And this video could explain how all that leads to the fact that the effective resolution of 99% of DSLRs and 100% of cellphones is only 33% of official specs as for pixel resolution, and similarly with color resolution per channel (where the green channel has 100% color resolution as for relative to maximum color resolution within the color-subsampled colorspace, whereas the blue channel only has 88% color resolution, and the red channel only has 49%). And how none of that changes just because a DSLR has a CMOS instead of a CCD (because they're all mostly Bayer-pattern sensors or use some other forms of color-subsampling patterns, after all), or just because a DSLR has the ability to store a crap interpolated image inside the RAW format (which is like putting a tiny teaspoon of flour into a 1-gallon sac).
@jonnoMoto3 жыл бұрын
Very clear and good graphics although you did miss the re-exposure step for reversal.
@runinair123 жыл бұрын
A truly excellent video! The only thing I might add is, that there is no single silver halide as a material but different silver halides, as the halides are the salts of silver and in films, a combination of different silver halides is used, and their size is influenced by the process of ripening the emulsion (Ostwald ripening). But aside from that, a truly fantastic video!
@miafrigieri-baldwin93793 жыл бұрын
Hi Ludwig! Thank you for the message you sent me, I can't seem to reply to your email it keeps bouncing back at me. If you're able to send me another email (in a private message) I'll try replying again :D -Mia
@bibhuranjandutta4703 жыл бұрын
Thank you mam😀😃😄can you make video on how to use light meter
@DethronerX3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@antoniorasura35543 жыл бұрын
A wonderful presentation detailing the complex and technically advanced structure of FILM - made easy to follow and understand.
@ellastella87263 жыл бұрын
Thanks for helping me better understand a format I love and work with daily
@freckles96xx3 жыл бұрын
Holy moly! So much detail and new information, this is really well explained and broken down - thanks Cine Network!
Пікірлер
This is a fantastic video, great job simplifying these concepts while presenting enough detail to be informative. Keep it up!
Now that's how to explain the sensor and how it collects the natural lights
One of the best channels on KZread! I wish you would produce more videos. What a useful work you do. It's really incredible.
brilliant video
Very good in-depth video on this topic, where there isn't much info scattered around the internet, quite a lifesaver thanks!
Great video!
This video was brilliantly made! I loved the animations and your detail for each step! One question I have, I am a bit confused by what you said at 5:10. As far as I know, Lippmann emulsions are photographic emulsions for use in Lippmann photography, a technique invented by Gabriel Lippmann. They were just very thick emulsions of ULTRA fine silver halides so that the interference patterns light made could be captured as a dyeless form of color photography. Is this just something else entirely?
On 9:48 how are there 5 bonded carbon in the rings?
so useful! thank you
excellent video.
This video explaining such a complex process is absolutely amazing. You have satisfied my childlike wonder and awe about Film. Thank you!
Aw very welcome ;)
this is the best video on this. hands down, i also couldnt find info, the best and top result was like a high school girls homework. its been 2 years since you posted this and you probably dont think about the video that much, but i want to remind you you did a great job.
Thank you Wayne!!! I really appreciate the comment. I do consider picking up the channel and making more videos for it, I've got a couple ideas so hopefully in the near future you'll see some more posts :)
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Great job with the visuals and explanation. Thanks!
THANK you! And now, to become even more "insane" explain us Kodachrome... Woooow. Even more steps... Super well done!
Awesome !
I prefer to use T stop as it is more uniform across lens sets.
İt is sooooo nice lovid tha video
What does the number 0.3ND in front of the neutral density letters mean?
thank you
I now understand my rangefinder a little more after watching this video
This channel need more subscriber ...Underrated channel ...❤ I really love the way they explain..very hard work
Thank youuuu
Please.post more
Good video. What's the difference between 16mm and Super 16mm?
horizontal size
even though I know most of this, things like the perf system and the difference between 35 and super 35 were new to me.
The Cine Network
That is amazing and unique video! Thank you!
I love these videos!!
So to answer the question: ISO vs ND-Filters for a long-exposure image. They both darken the image but ISO introduces noises and ND_Filters don't. Right?
Could you do a video on stabilising pictures both pre & post processing with gimbals & other gizmos......tripods, tracking, aerial shots(helicopters etc)... Also how to deal with an image that has a sudden increase of light such as a rocket launch! I Really enjoy your informative animations!😊
GREAT VIDEO!
Amazing in depth explanation! I wanted to ask, what software do you use to make these visually pleasing infographics that are easy to understand? Thanks!
Adobe Animate
Great video! But, why is it "typical" that the shutter speed should be the inverse of twice the frame rate? I'm new to this...
Apparantly, when the 180º rule is implemented, it best mimics how your eye perceives the world - with a little motion blur. If you wave your hand in front of your face, your fingers aren't all that sharp - they're a little blurry. 180º mimics this, and will add a little motion blur to the frame. If you used a 360º shutter angle (for example, a shutter speed of 1/25, and the frame rate is 25 frames per second), then you'll have a lot more motion blur than what you see in real life. If you use a 90º angle, or less (for a frame rate of 25 frames per second, this would be a shutter speed of 1/100), this would capture less motion blur, and the result comes out a little jittery.
@@JaydenLawson thanks for the explanation!
@@JaydenLawsonbrother can you tell me is that interlaced scanning or rolling shutter is same
Magenta and yellow makes RED, not orange. 🙄
Jeff sent me!
How do this channel and video have so little exposure (pun intended)! They're brilliant
I think it's because the channel is still developing... (pun also intended) :D
Missing some key words big ones being film and photography
Hi your video is very helpful and amazing i hope continue and create new training video 🙏🙏
Underrated channel. Thank you! Could you explain demosaicing as well in how the 4 pixels are interpolated to become a single pixel?
So many people will understand the process more because of this video! Thank you!
Color negative motion picture film is processed with ECN-2 chemistry, not with C-41. If you process cine stock with C-41, you will get an unwanted color shift. Cross-processing in production environment is rarely done, as it delivers unpredictable results.
Complex emulsion technology suspended inside a strip of film no thicker than a strand of human hair. Now that’s what I call cool technology!
Developed over a century ago...no computers...!
I really love this channel!
360fps is the highest speed of many prosumer video camcorders nowadays. Already by the 1950s or 1960s, there were special high-speed *FILM* cameras for scientific purposes that could exceed 1 million frames per second.
You could've added that the split diopters where invented (or first used in movie films) by Orson Welles for "Citizen Kane".
I'm just starting to watch your videos, but you should do one about the difference between minimum frame rate required for the illusion of movement (16fps, as introduced as the standard silent framerate in something like 1909) and the lower brightness-flicker threshold (48 Hz), and how that interacts with camera, projection, soundfilm, and TV technology, and why we have arrived at a vast number of different framerates. They've even got it wrong on Wikipedia (because people keep confusing the framerate issue with the bightness-flicker issue), but here's a rough guide on it in the bottom section on this talkpage: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Flicker_fusion_threshold#Still_needs_revision And you should also do a video about the difference between effective resolution vs. interpolated resolution (both pixel resolution *AND* color resolution per channel, where the latter is how many different shades between pure black and pure white can be registered) due to things such as color subsampling (YUV and its digital equivalents as color spaces, that is mainly in relation to color subsampling, not as blue-luminance and red-luminance difference signals) and de-bayering in sensors, and how that leads to the lower quality of DSLRs vs. true RGB flatbed scanners (such as those with light-splitting prisms and three different CCDs inside, for example). Which also explains the difference between how fast you can make a photo (of actually poorer quality) with a DSLR or cellphone vs. how long it takes to make a scan with an actual scanner, because the scan has much more effective pixel and color resolution than the DSLR photo. And this video could explain how all that leads to the fact that the effective resolution of 99% of DSLRs and 100% of cellphones is only 33% of official specs as for pixel resolution, and similarly with color resolution per channel (where the green channel has 100% color resolution as for relative to maximum color resolution within the color-subsampled colorspace, whereas the blue channel only has 88% color resolution, and the red channel only has 49%). And how none of that changes just because a DSLR has a CMOS instead of a CCD (because they're all mostly Bayer-pattern sensors or use some other forms of color-subsampling patterns, after all), or just because a DSLR has the ability to store a crap interpolated image inside the RAW format (which is like putting a tiny teaspoon of flour into a 1-gallon sac).
Very clear and good graphics although you did miss the re-exposure step for reversal.
A truly excellent video! The only thing I might add is, that there is no single silver halide as a material but different silver halides, as the halides are the salts of silver and in films, a combination of different silver halides is used, and their size is influenced by the process of ripening the emulsion (Ostwald ripening). But aside from that, a truly fantastic video!
Hi Ludwig! Thank you for the message you sent me, I can't seem to reply to your email it keeps bouncing back at me. If you're able to send me another email (in a private message) I'll try replying again :D -Mia
Thank you mam😀😃😄can you make video on how to use light meter
Thank you!!
A wonderful presentation detailing the complex and technically advanced structure of FILM - made easy to follow and understand.
Thanks for helping me better understand a format I love and work with daily
Holy moly! So much detail and new information, this is really well explained and broken down - thanks Cine Network!