Welcome to the home of the Lynchpin™ design and concept. It is here that we will be sharing our discoveries, as well as yours, in relation to this fascinating geometry. It is the piece that creates all pieces, or as we often refer to it, the common factor of creation itself.
Пікірлер
if you do something 1 time, how many times do you do it?
The dude is sure that in his mother's womb he gave a name to one of his hands. What kind of evidence could he provide to us? 😂
It's not a fallacy It's called a FIXPOINT
If you know the arcsinus and the error of angle he has in that thing at the intersections then you know how horseshit that is
How is it made ? Parts and all ….
What’s the goal ?
Dude doesn’t understand irrational numbers and that’s where all his problems arise. Your calculator will round these long decimals so doing that multiple times will eventually lead to error. If you took a numerical analysis course they’d talk about splicing and you’d have a better understanding of how that error accumulates. Pythagorean theorem still results in the correct amount of dimensions regardless of you squaring the lengths of the sides because you’re also squaring the length of the hypotenuse. Changing the definition of a square root for a nonexistent problem at x=sqrt2 doesn’t make any sense
I genuinely think this is some elaborate scheme to prove his acting skills. There is no way he even wrote a this. He called Pythagorean a "they," laughs constantly, and cant pronounce like 7 words in the essay. Bro tried to read "quantum" as "kwantum" ive never heard someone make so many mistakes with something theyve written. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I mean, then again, i guess itd be the dude who thinks 1x1=2 that wouldnt proof read his work.
TERRENCE we believe in you don't let the hater stop you ....we need you and your knowledge
No we don't!!
Getting sacked from Ironman must have taken a toll on his reality.
Who is the nutjob with the throat punch tattoo?
Ok guys.. so 1*1= 1^2. There is a number two in the answer. It's there visually represented.. you all see it so it exists. Terrence is right.
The devil hides in fractal patterns Beyond singularity... He's waiting!
I wipe my arse with this...
Bro’s trying so hard to be like world-class mathematician Terrence Tao but fails miserably
If one, 1 is equal to 2, what stops one 2 from being 4, and on & on for infinity?
People aren't actually taking this seriously are they?
8:23 typo here. You wanted to do 1*3 or 1+1+1 not 1+1. I’ll leave it as an exercise for you to determine why that is the case given you’re familiar with exponent rules.
Replace the props with frequency emitters and use the EMF of the Earth as resistance. There are already Magnetic drives for boats, according to Bernoulli's principle air is just another fluid. If gravity is the contraction to the Earth's EMF, such a drive could be used in space using reverse modulation. Monorails already use EMF as a pseudo fluid of a sort. We have to use what we have. We cannot wait an eternity for super conductor technology to develop. The idea of super conductors is fascinating, but the more we learn about our true past the more we see that our ancestors accomplished more with less simply by following nature's lead, instead of trying to surpass them. René Descartes - "...the less powerful we suppose our author to be, the greater reason will we have for believing that we are not so perfect as that we may not be continually deceived."
I know some people who Terrence needs to meet asap.
Of course it stays the same. What does he expect?? The square root of 2 times itself equals 2. That's what squaring something means. And if you cube the square root of two, it's the same as multiplying the square root of two by two. And anything you multiply by two, when you then half it, you get the original number you started with. Why is he surprised it only works with the number two? Any other number wouldn't be reciprocal with one half. There's nothing unnatural about this. He's either tricky or ignorant.
actually terrence howard's idea of 1x1=2 holds a certain truth into it... but you can't deny that Mr Howard actually ignited a massive curiosity in mathematics by the new generation i mean just check out vsauce's video about " the proof that the square root of 2 is irrational" a surge in it's traffic views are from people who watched terrence howard.
I think there are two lynch pins flying....not two for one lol
Some naive questions: What are the advantages of this design compared to other drone designs (stability? maneuverability?)? How does the efficiency of this design compare to that of the more mainstream quadcopter configuration? Also, who originated this design? Is it patented?
The competition excluded any other concepts of drone design. No effort to compare to conventional technology (correct me if I'm wrong).
Also no one ever said in mathematics that multiplying means to make more. Thats the key flaw in that bs. I feel bad for all the ppl that aint just researching all this BS. You the reader if you believe Terrence and have a smart phone in you're hand. You are literally choosing to be ignorant with unlimited knowledge in your hand 👌
Mental illness being celebrated just cause he is a celebrity. Howard is full of shit and doesn't understand basic physics and basic math. yet wants ppl to believe he is smarter than Einstein. What a time to be alive. This kind of ignorance is contagious as you can clearly see.
So many words, yet very little substance.
Sooo.. what does it do??
Maybe the video quality would be better had we upgraded to the geometry of Helium.
The theory makes no sense. There is nothing wrong with the result. I show why in this simple video kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKSnmKmvf9OaoNY.htmlsi=iNL6gUDNKrj3DB_z
Right and 1X1=2
Terence you're awesome bro keep up The good work
Yall ever watch a video, but instead of walking with a feeling that you learned something, you feel dumber than you did before you watched the video? That's me after watching this video.
Cool drone but does not seem to be practical. Just my observation I'd like to see more
The square (round) root of 2 is 1 which is 1x1=(ing) 2.
How does ((root 2)^3)/2=root 2 prove that 1x1=2? I didn’t follow.
You put crap on a plate it's not gonna become gold later, but it's gonna smell bad!
This ninja doesn't understand basic multiplication. Mental gymnastics high on cocaine.
😂😂😂What a Drone joke! 😵Hi from Sweden
2 + 2 = 5 -Big Brother ♥
When you lose relevance and want it back. Turn Right wing, Christian or pseudo scientist even being known as stupid is better than not being known at all.
Howard is an actor. He's not a phycisist, he's not a scientist of any kind. He uses word salad to convince equally uneducated people who actually hang onto his every one of his totally bizarre ramblings. Neil degraded Tyson and Sabine Hossfender, both serious scientists have said he would not even pass a basic mathematics course.Anyone who puts on headphones over a hoddie is either looking for notice or should seek help Stick to real proven science. A first year science student could prove him wrong but he's unable to think rationally or accept any firm of criticism. He should join the GOP, as he'd fit right in with all the uneducated people they love.
Terrance Howard, meet Dunning Kruger.
Reply if you wanna build one of these ❤ 💯
No he is right. 1*1=2 Because he thinks he is in two Iron Man movies 💀
If you take the square of something and multiply it by itself that's called CUBING it. 2*2 = 4 (that's a square) 2*2*2 = 8 (that's a cube) So if you take the square root of a number, you have one unit, (for simplicity let's use a number that doesn't produce decimals when square rooted) If we look at the number 2 as a unit, then the square of 2 is 2*2, which would be 4. In contrast, if we take sqrt(4) we get 2. In addition, if the cube of 2 would be 2*2*2, which is 8. And in contrast to that the cube root of 8 would be 2. Now here's the fun part! If we take sqrt(4), which is 2, and we multiply it be 2, then we would have 4. That is because we are simply squaring the number again. However, if we take our sqrt(4) and multiply it by the square of it's result, we end up with 2*2*2, or 2 CUBED. THIS IS WHY YOUR "LOOP" ONLY WORKS FOR ONE THING. YOU ARE TAKING A SQUARE ROOT AND MULTIPLYING IT BY IT'S SQUARE, MEANING YOU GET A CUBE. THREE DIMENSIONS MAN, THREEEE DIMENSIONNSSSSS. 2*2*2 = 2^3 = 8 2^2*2 = 2^3 = 8 2^2*sqrt(4) = 2^3 = 8 4*sqrt(4) = 2^3 = 8 4*sqrt(4) = sqrt(4)^3 = 8 8 = 8 And just to show you with your own example 1.41*1.41*1.41 = 1.41^3 = 2.8 1.41^2*1.41 = 1.41^3 = 2.8 1.41^2*sqrt(2) = 1.41^3 = 2.8 2*sqrt(2) = 1.41^3 = 2.8 2*sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)^3 = 2.8 2.8 = 2.8 Good job everyone, we've now proven that numbers are equal to themselves!🎉
Sqrt(2) goes in, 2 x sqrt(2) comes out, you can’t explain that.
Fascinating! Absolutely facinating. Now, it's time to make a call to all experts in all fields to test out all the designs and create amazing application. Geologists, plate tectonic experts, physicists, engineers. I can't believe we're in this time and able to witness such profound changes. I wonder if Neil Degrassi will apologize to Terrance for his public, flippant dismissal and ask to help with writing and verifying.
Closed minds dont open any doors