Пікірлер

• 
  @AstonRBLX_LLD7Күн бұрын

  How to control the droneship

• 
  @Goddchen15 сағат бұрын

  Hey, I don't think you can actually control it. It is just there. If you look on the map, its position is indicated by a marker. It is a bit east, off the coast, of the normal launch site.

• 
  @jmr51252 күн бұрын

  Yeah, something was very, very wrong here. The rover isn't very fast, but it should handle *much* better than that. You (somehow) were using the wrong controls to drive the rover. It is supposed to use the normal pitch controls (W/A) for "move forward" and "move backward" while the normal yaw controls (S/D) are used for "turn left" / "turn right". If you tried to control the rover via the autopilot widget, for example, it wouldn't work properly. This seems unlikely, however.

• 
  @Goddchen2 күн бұрын

  yeah definitely. I found out in the next mission / video that this is most likely caused by parts being destroyed during the descend, caused by huge rotational g-forces that occured when the craft all of a sudden starts to spin rapidly. Some small parts of the rover got destroyed.

• 
  @DavidRamirez-lq2co2 күн бұрын

  Another tip by pressing ? or [ you can switch to nearby things, so you don't need to go to the menu screen

• 
  @Goddchen2 күн бұрын

  yeah, I know, thank you! What you see me doing there real quick is actually reassigning that key to some other keys, because, believe it or not, on a German keyboard layout, those default key bindings don't work 🙈

• 
  @parsaverv13 күн бұрын

  I do this and the gyro moves but the rocket doesn't

• 
  @Goddchen3 күн бұрын

  you mean the nav ball at the bottom center?

• 
  @jmr51258 күн бұрын

  Good job! Some notes: * You shouldn't have been awarded the milestones for achieving Mach 1 -- these are blocked if the crafts altitude has ever exceeded a small number (14 km, I think). When you quickloaded, however, the "forgot" how high you had been in the past and thus gave you the milestones. These are trivial to achieve even without planes by simply flying a very depressed trajectory, so no big deal. To unlock the next progression mission, you will need docking ports and RCS thrusters. This will unlock the space station assembly missions. You have unlocked the DSC small pad -- but you shouldn't use it, or you will quickly go broke. When you launch a craft, you have to pay for the craft (this is the cost shown in the designer) *and* you have to pay a fee to use the launch site. The later fee is *in addition* to the cost shown in the designer and is only calculated once you select the site you will use to deploy the craft. The cost is $X / kilogram of wet mass, and the DSC small pad costs *much* more than the Ali Pad. So, unless you really, really _need_ the extra height and width allowed by the DSC small pad, you should avoid using it. The Juno pad is even less expensive, but the height / width constraints are tight enough that it isn't feasible except for simple, unmanned, Droo orbital launched. Also, note that there is a second launch pad at DSC (the "Large" pad). If you want to unlock *that* pad, you will first need to unlock the DSC runway, and _that_ requires completing all the airplane progression missions. Frankly, I've never bothered (the DSC Small Pad is to expensive to justify using and the large pad is going to be worse), but it's a thing you can do.

• 
  @Goddchen8 күн бұрын

  Hey! Thanks! And thank you for that long explanation comment. Yeah, I sometimes notice strange things with milestones related to speed. But I never paid much attention to those. I have unlocked the space port contracts by now (look out for the next videos on this channel 😎). Yeah the cost is a big factor, but fortunately, I have never run into financial issues (yet).

• 
  @jmr512511 күн бұрын

  Fyi: I have a rocket available that solves raining rockets _automatically_ -- search for "ali to dsc drone ship" to find it. On the other hand, it is possible to solve this manually, but it requires luck and / or extensive use of quicksave / quickload.

• 
  @DavidRamirez-lq2co14 күн бұрын

  Next time link the fairing to the staging that gets out of the atmosphere, in space that mass will be useles, peak efficiency

• 
  @Goddchen14 күн бұрын

  Good point, will give it a try

• 
  @RoBuTunik15 күн бұрын

  I pronounce it BREE-GO, but I don't think there is any official way of saying the moon's name.

• 
  @Goddchen15 күн бұрын

  I have used both pronounciations in the past 🤦‍♂Would be nice to hear it in an official video from Jundroo or something...

• 
  @jmr512517 күн бұрын

  Im impressed that you managed to get a transfer to TT here. You will find it significantly easier to transfer to TT if you launch due West (heading = 270) rather than the default heading of due East (heading = 90). TT is in a retrograde orbit, so the difference in inclination will be smaller if you launch into a retrograde orbit yourself.

• 
  @Goddchen16 күн бұрын

  Are you kidding me?! That is really embarassing 🤣 I knew felt off, but I didn't think of a retrograde orbit 🤣 Thanks for the hint!

• 
  @JackOHaraEngineering17 күн бұрын

  It’s over…

• 
  @Goddchen17 күн бұрын

  Likely... But not guaranteed. I still have a very tiny bit of hope left.

• 
  @JackOHaraEngineering17 күн бұрын

  @@Goddchen I will choose to believe in your hope

• 
  @RoBuTunik17 күн бұрын

  The second egg has hatched. *Shall the space chickens reign supreme!*

• 
  @kurator19318 күн бұрын

  I hope removed pd launcher means that they are passing the game to another company... thats the only possible "good scenario" for ksp2

• 
  @Goddchen18 күн бұрын

  I don't think that is what is behind it. I think they will just shut down the servers that serve content to the launcher, so the launcher will stop working anyway.

• 
  @lazarpro303017 күн бұрын

  @@Goddchen laucher semi-works offline.

• 
  @Goddchen17 күн бұрын

  @@lazarpro3030 yeah you're right. You would still be able to actuall launch the game through the launcher ofc, but it won't receive any content to display anymore.

• 
  @5Andysalive17 күн бұрын

  fun fact, that they also screwed this annoying launcher into KSP1 as basically a KSP2 ad, was the main reason i never bought KSP2. I was so annoyed, i kicked it of my wishlist and ignored it. And they tried really hard to make it impossible to remove it or bypass it. So in a way, that saved me a lot of money and i should be kind of thankful?! But had i waited a few days, the launch trouble would have done the same. I expected T2 to ruin it with pay dlc and micro transactions, as they do, but not to just ...ill it.

• 
  @Goddchen16 күн бұрын

  @@5Andysalive yeah the launch time was a difficult time...

• 
  @notmyzticV18 күн бұрын

  So disappointed about this update. It also feels very… clinical. No personality at all behind the lines of text

• 
  @Goddchen18 күн бұрын

  yep, those were exactly my thoughts as well. In the past we got some nice smalltalk intro or whatevery, some images maybe. This time: nothing. Only variant that I can think of were could have put less efford in would be just to copy/paste their Git commit log 👿

• 
  @notmyzticV18 күн бұрын

  @@Goddchen it would’ve been nice if they at least brought out the colonies update since I heard it’s pretty much done. Or if they really wanted to make it right for the community: Mod API. Unfortunately we are talking about Take Two here

• 
  @aatishkhank4a44418 күн бұрын

  2 cooment BOIS WERE BACK TOGETHER

• 
  @RoBuTunik19 күн бұрын

  The engineers of that probe were probably just like: "Yo, what if we put an egg on this captured asteroid?" "DUDE, YOU'RE A GENIUS!"

• 
  @Goddchen18 күн бұрын

  Low gravity and many hills, what might be the best form we could use? GENIUS! 🤣

• 
  @RoBuTunik19 күн бұрын

  Bro, you are so underrated! Can't wait for the next video!

• 
  @Goddchen18 күн бұрын

  thanks man! Next video is already scheduled 😎

• 
  @Doofwarrior8819 күн бұрын

  First comment

• 
  @jmr512523 күн бұрын

  1:23 You can manually stage the fairing (during flight) by left clicking on the "Fairing base" part and clicking on "Activate". 2:58 If you are using "drop tanks" (as shown here), setting the "Fuel Cross Feed" to "Normal" at the interstage should suffice to ensure all fuel is drawn from the side tanks prior to any being drawn from the center stage. No need to fiddle with fuel priority. This behavior has changed recently -- as of the current 1.3.x beta the amount of fuel that can be cross-fed over an interstage is unlimited, so the drop tanks will always empty before the center stage loses any fuel. At some point in the recent past, however, there was a limit on how much fuel could flow across an interstage like this, so if the center stage wanted more than "X fuel / second" then some fuel would be drawn form the center stage in addition to fuel being drawn from the booster tanks. I have no idea when this changed, or even if this was an intentional change.

• 
  @Goddchen23 күн бұрын

  Ah, how can I not have thought of that! Of course, you do not have the fairing in a stage to deploy it, thanks! I'll definitely try the fuel cross feed settings again next time I use boosters, thanks! So this change is still only in the beta channel? Not the release one?

• 
  @jmr512523 күн бұрын

  @@GoddchenI don't know if the "Unlimited fuel flow through side interstage with 'Normal" cross-feed" was introduced in the 1.3.x beta or earlier. I'm using the 1.3 beta, and it either seems to be unlimited or much, much, increased, but I don't know exactly when this change was made. It could have been a 1.2, or perhaps even a 1.1 feature. I just know that in 1.0 (for sure) there was a limit on how much fuel could flow through a side interstage, which created annoying situations (if you made the engine size, say, 65% then all would be well -- but at 66%, a trickle of fuel would be drawn from the center stage).

• 
  @Goddchen23 күн бұрын

  @@jmr5125 Got it, will see next time I need boosters 👌

• 
  @republicspaceagency914124 күн бұрын

  Did you saw Starship Launcher

• 
  @Goddchen23 күн бұрын

  Indeed I did. Also saw someone over on Reddit who rebuilt it in JNO 🚀

• 
  @jmr512525 күн бұрын

  You may be aware of this, but just in case: There are a number of different payloads that can be deployed in the "Deliver a payload to Drool orbit," "Deliver a payload to lunar orbit," and "Land a payload on a moon." For "Deliver a payload to Drool orbit," the options are: * Cubesat * Smallsat * Comms Sat * Telescope * Radar Sat * GNSS Sat For "Deliver a payload to lunar orbit," the options are: * "Explorer" * "Observer" * "Surveyor" While there are three missions to land things on the surface of the moon, they are separate contracts (still with unique payloads). * "Impactor" -- deliver a payload to the surface of a moon at a speed below 100 m/s at impact. * "Lander" -- land a (pre-built) lander on the surface of a moon. * "Rover" -- land a (pre-built) rover on the surface of a moon. The _lander_ is not pre-built in this contract. All of these unlock by repeatedly completing the procedural contracts, so if you want to unlock "Smallsat" launches, you need to complete a number of "Cubesat" missions. Mission's completed is the parameter that is tracked -- if you use a single rocket to complete two "Cubesat" missions, that counts twice. On the other hand, number of payloads is irrelevant -- if you complete a single "Cubesat" mission to deliver 6 "Cubesat" to orbit, then that's one completion. For the lunar contracts, all the moons are considered a single "Contract," so delivering a "Explorer" satellite to Luna moves you closer to unlocking "Observer" satellites to "T.T." Whether these missions are worth showcasing in your Lets Play is up to you. While these missions have unique payloads that are animated (they "Deploy") no new techniques are used in the missions themselves. The challenge of these missions is the size of the payloads (later payloads are much larger), the awkward nature of the payloads (several payloads simply don't "stack" neatly), and the increasingly tight tolerances for orbital parameters. They do serve as a good way to "mine" milestones for research points -- for example, you receive additional research points after achieving Drool orbit 1 time (30 TP), 5 times (50 TP), 25 times (100 TP), 100 times (150 TP), 1000 times (200 TP). Obviously, you are not likely to achieve the "1000 times" milestone, but achieving the "25 times" is reasonable if you work through all of the above contracts. "Achieve a hyperbolic trajectory" is also mineable -- 1 time for 50 TP, 5 times for 100 TP, 10 times for 150 TP, 25 times for 200 TP. If you have enough delta-v, you can place your launch vehicle on a hyperbolic trajectory by simply thrusting prograde long enough, so its easy to accumulate these milestones while completing other missions. You can see what milestones are available and what they pay via the "Contracts" screen. Click on the compass icon (bottom left), then select a planet and the list of milestones will appear on the right. You can click on the individual milestones to receive more information (e.g. how many repetitions are required for the next milestone and how much research you will receive for achieving it).

• 
  @jmr512525 күн бұрын

  0:40 A reasonable person would _think_ that the fireworks contracts exist to earn money. They would be wrong -- the fireworks contracts generally pay less than the cost of the minimum launcher to complete them.

• 
  @Goddchen23 күн бұрын

  That's a good point! I meant it more in general, like, why there are contract that have a "Progression" label and some that do not.

• 
  @jmr512525 күн бұрын

  The problem in this video is rhe fins -- remove them and all will be well. Fins tend to force a rocket to move in the direction of the surface velocity vector. If you want or need to go inna different direction, then fins are counter productive.

• 
  @Goddchen24 күн бұрын

  Ah, that makes total sense, thank you!

• 
  @republicspaceagency914126 күн бұрын

  🫡 i decided to do my own story like the one you got on the game

• 
  @Goddchen26 күн бұрын

  sounds awesome. Are you going to upload it on KZread?

• 
  @republicspaceagency914126 күн бұрын

  @Goddchen Yes, and i got one here on my KZread page, and I'm looking forward to it. As you can see, my channel name is the company name of my storyline on the game .

• 
  @TimeMasterOG28 күн бұрын

  Where are some of your JNO vids?

• 
  @Goddchen28 күн бұрын

  What do you mean exactly? All 23 videos that I have done for JNO so far are in this playlist: kzread.info/head/PLHV2Ps17P85SKpURAZ7GlJOmyiDTS-mun

• 
  @TimeMasterOG28 күн бұрын

  @@Goddchen when I go to the playlist it says 9 unavailable videos are hidden

• 
  @Goddchen28 күн бұрын

  @@TimeMasterOG Ah yes, I don't know why KZread displays it like that. Those are the videos that I have already finished, uploaded and are scheduled to be automatically published here in the coming days. I have a schedule a 1 video / day and produce videos in advance and auto schedule them. But nice, now you know how many videos you can expect in the coming days already for sure 😎

• 
  @Cheetothecat8128 күн бұрын

  👍

• 
  @the.sapphire3Ай бұрын

  Can you do the 'Raining Rockets' too?

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Is "Raining Rockets" a contract name? If so, I haven't gotten that contract yet. From which contractor is it? I'll definitely do a video on it once I get it. What is so special about that contract?

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  @the.sapphire3 I did this mission today! Wow! That was by far the hardest mission I did in this game until now. The video is coming in the coming days here on this channel (still got some contract video queued before that). Watch out for it!

• 
  @the.sapphire326 күн бұрын

  @@Goddchen hey! looking forward to it. Thanks!

• 
  @Goddchen8 күн бұрын

  The video got published yesterday: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hXagu5tufsTbhMo.html

• 
  @Cornet1991Ай бұрын

  I'm surprise the lander was 200T... When i try to do it, it needs to be much bigger! :O how have you done it to be 200t...

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Yeah it is not that big. The "trick" is to simply bring fuel tanks that are filled with fuel...

• 
  @Cornet1991Ай бұрын

  Yeah and without burning this fuel i suppose.

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  @@Cornet1991 Yes exactly, the key is to design your vehicle in a way that you do not need the fuel that is stored in these tanks 👌

• 
  @Cheetothecat81Ай бұрын

  Short and nice. Like it. 👍

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Thanks ♥ I think the videos will become longer once the contracts become a little more complex.

• 
  @ItzCommanderPK117Ай бұрын

  Pls continue this series I liked and subscribed :D

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  will do! Glad you like it! There are already more videos of the series in queue and if you watched my last Twitch stream, you noticed that we are finally reaching the more interesting contracts 😎

• 
  @bratwurst8835Ай бұрын

  They’re dropping ksp 2

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Do you have any more information then all of us? If so, can you please point me to it?

• 
  @bratwurst8835Ай бұрын

  @@Goddchen no but like 70% of the ksp2 dev team was moved to work on other projects or got fired

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  @@bratwurst8835 I guess more then 70% are affected by that. But we still don't know how stuff will continue in the future. Until we know more, everything is pure speculation.

• 
  @bratwurst8835Ай бұрын

  @@Goddchen 👆🤓

• 
  @user-pr1qy3fs7gАй бұрын

  I love the way you made the voskhod replica!

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @tepaliergymeault7382Ай бұрын

  Absolut, ehrlich gesagt die beste Landung, die ich je gesehn hab. Butterweich wie man so schön sagt. Auf das Landermodell stehe ich nicht so, aber dafür steht das Modell umso besser vor'm Portal :D Grüße

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  haha, danke dir.

• 
  @SAIHTAM20YАй бұрын

  When is it gonna come out on PS5 i want it so much

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  For KSP 2 they did not even announce it for consoles yet. And with the latest news (just Google it), I doubt it is anywhere on the roadmap in the coming years. Sorry.

• 
  @SAIHTAM20YАй бұрын

  @@Goddchen I thought they confirmed it would come to PS5. I guess ill wait more years

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  @@SAIHTAM20Y iirc they that said that it will come eventuelly, at some point in the future, yes. But priority is the PC version and even that one now has an unforeseeable future 😢

• 
  @SAIHTAM20YАй бұрын

  @@Goddchen yeah sadly

• 
  @trevorcurrie4774Ай бұрын

  Well considering the studio got shut down last Monday id bet never. ​@@Goddchen

• 
  @ZSebastian999Ай бұрын

  Look at the impact on the kerbals neck!

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Yeah, maybe the landing did not meet all official health regulations 😉

• 
  @user-uk1tm2kf9pАй бұрын

  How do you reenter kerbin?

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  There is a transfer vehicle waiting in Mun orbit.

• 
  @sleeperlАй бұрын

  Cool dude

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @Legionofone41Ай бұрын

  Are you going to be continuing your ksp2 series in light of the news?

• 
  @GoddchenАй бұрын

  Even if KSP 2 is not developed any further, we still have what is there right now. I'm planing on finishing at least my project to have a video for every For Science! mission in the game, yes.

• 
  @Legionofone41Ай бұрын

  @Goddchen Finally someone being reasonable. Glad to hear it.

• 
  @Dudu-wc2fs2 ай бұрын

  You have a good PC.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  It's okay. I wouldn't call it a beast. It is a relatively old CPU by now and a RTX 3700.

• 
  @Dudu-wc2fs2 ай бұрын

  This game is going through a difficult situation... I hope that you get better

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  It really is. I hope so much that it will get through this somehow since I was just starting to build up this channel a month ago and it was/is going really well 🫰

• 
  @artsyguy2092 ай бұрын

  some of the slowest development ever.. they might go bankrupt at this point.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  I do agree on the first part, the second part I don't think is very likely.

• 
  @phalcon232 ай бұрын

  I was expecting it to be on par with KSP 1 upon release.... ya... I played like 5 hours... waste of money.

• 
  @artsyguy2092 ай бұрын

  @Goddchen I know but development is not easy. Think about how long it'll take just to get to version 1.0. It could cost millions of dollars especially with bad reviews

• 
  @phalcon232 ай бұрын

  Gonna be like windows... Skip over every version for the better one... KSP was so good, i never played any other game as long as it... 10 years or so. They had a perfect formula, how could they mess it up so badly?

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  @@artsyguy209 they already made a lot of money with KSP 2. My guess is that that money will last for a long time. And also there is still none coming in frequently. There will always be people outside the "hater bubble" that will be interested in the game and will buy it.

• 
  @raccoon6812 ай бұрын

  Ty that's what she said

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  😂😂😂😂

• 
  @randelux61852 ай бұрын

  try to fill the tanks in order to float

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  Did some more tests this evening and made it work. Filling them will not work though since it will add tons and tons of mass. So, my basic error was to that I used too small tanks. I now tried with the M sized tanks (empty) and then it floats fine! Maybe I'll upload another video some time.

• 
  @valentinparickiy10272 ай бұрын

  Too much fuel burn...

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  Can you explain what you mean exactly? Or which part of the mission you mean?

• 
  @valentinparickiy10272 ай бұрын

  I mean that I usually use lander stage and liftof stage. This mean light veight forr all parts.

• 
  @valentinparickiy10272 ай бұрын

  Whan your land decopler landing stage and lift off.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  @@valentinparickiy1027 Oh yeah, that makes total sense. You do not need to bring the mass of the landing stage with you to take off again. Good points. I'll remember it when I build my next lander 👌

• 
  @valentinparickiy10272 ай бұрын

  Why only one lander stage?

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  Do you usually use 2 or more stages for landers? The gravity is not as high, that's why I went with only a single stage.

• 
  @ShadedRiver6662 ай бұрын

  what game is this?

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  This is Kerbal Space Program 2. You can get it on Steam. It is still in Early Access but I had 200+ hours of fun with it already, so I'd say it was worth every Euro.

• 
  @user-jc4ej3ki9v2 ай бұрын

  Эту летаку пообещали Зеленскому 😊

• 
  @jeremy.klakson2 ай бұрын

  Some great content right here, subbed

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  Thanks, currently working on bringing a video for each of the For Science! missions live.

• 
  @jeremy.klakson2 ай бұрын

  @@Goddchen Can't wait

• 
  @wheatley1532 ай бұрын

  Danm I wish I had a good pc like yours to play ksp 2

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  It is not as bad as with the initial early access release version. They improved performance quite a bit. Do you meet the minimum required specs that are mentioned on Steam?

• 
  @jameshenry91122 ай бұрын

  Went from apogee to high speed re-entry, no stall what so ever. Hmmmmmm.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  What do you mean?

• 
  @jameshenry91122 ай бұрын

  @@Goddchen if the speed was so high on capsule ejection that it immediately experienced friction burn then the rocket had enough fuel to go much higher or was erroneously calculated for fuel and was wasted...poor planning and calculation.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  @@jameshenry9112 Ah, yes, you're right. Brought a bit too much fuel for the mission. Nice observation.

• 
  @michaelbayer58872 ай бұрын

  ... me know the Plasma Ball by Fingertouch.

• 
  @Goddchen2 ай бұрын

  Check out some of my other and mainly the upcoming videos, there will be some serious fireballs in there 😎