Пікірлер

• 
  @user-hx3cf8ki7v11 күн бұрын

  Great video! Enjoyed that

• 
  @physicspartner10 күн бұрын

  Glad you enjoyed it!

• 
  @Shahzaipremierradiology1978..18 күн бұрын

  Not only useful it's very useful

• 
  @physicspartner18 күн бұрын

  Glad you think so!

• 
  @A1lucky724 күн бұрын

  Gravity motor

• 
  @physicspartner18 күн бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @fiztube1025 күн бұрын

  In an open can, the pressure equals the external pressure. A successful experiment requires that the can be filled with water vapor. When cooled and in contact with cold metal, the steam condenses and instantly turns into a liquid. At the same time, its volume decreases by approximately 1600 times!! The can is then nearly empty, as if vacuumed. This is why the pressure differential tends to crush the can. Let's estimate how much pressure was acting using equation of state. Let us assume that the temperature of the hot gas in the can is T₁ ≈ 370 K (97 ⁰C), and that the atmospheric pressure inside is p₁ ≈ 10⁵ Pa. By rapid cooling, let the temperature drop to T₂ ≈ 300 K (27 ⁰C). This means that with unchanged volume (isochoric change), the new pressure p₂ will be obtained from the constancy of the ratio of pressure and temperature: p₁/T₁ = p₂/T₂ ---> p₂ = p₁(T₂/T₁) If we include the assumed values, we will get the approximate amount of pressure after cooling: p₂ = 10⁵ (300/370) Pa ≈ 81000 Pa that is, the pressure differential between the outside and inside pressure is Δp ≈ 19000 Pa The calculation above applies only to gases that remain gaseous after cooling, such as air. However, when the water vapor cools, it condenses into a liquid condensate, which happens quickly. The air would cool slowly and its volume would be reduced only by one-fifth, not 1600 times. Assuming that all of the vapor in the can condenses, which is unlikely.

• 
  @physicspartner18 күн бұрын

  Thank you for your valuable feedback

• 
  @user-lr5tt8qn9tАй бұрын

  Hi

• 
  @physicspartner26 күн бұрын

  Hello, how can we help you?

• 
  @ZhanMorliАй бұрын

  With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

• 
  @fiztube10Ай бұрын

  The buoyant force is precisely equal to the ship's weight rather than greater. Because all forces are in balance, the ship is at rest on the surface and is not sinking or rising, in accordance with Newton's first law.

• 
  @physicspartnerАй бұрын

  It seems like you've raised an interesting point about the buoyant force and ship stability. While it's true that the ship is at rest on the surface when all forces are in balance, it's important to note that the buoyant force is indeed equal to the weight of the water displaced by the ship, as stated in Archimedes' principle. This equilibrium ensures that the ship remains afloat, in accordance with the principles of fluid mechanics and Newton's first law of motion.

• 
  @hrvojemesic7555Ай бұрын

  ​@@physicspartner This is exactly why you should not make the wrong claim in your video clip, I'm quoting you: "The hull of a ship is designed to displace a large volume of water, generating an upward buoyant force GREATER THAN THE WEIGHT OF THE SIP."

• 
  @johng5295Ай бұрын

  Awesome.

• 
  @physicspartnerАй бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @wanassaben8269Ай бұрын

  Merci

• 
  @physicspartnerАй бұрын

  You are welcome

• 
  @amillionfireflies0012 ай бұрын

  what is this horrible accent

• 
  @z.i.dzakariya90342 ай бұрын

  great work

• 
  @physicspartner2 ай бұрын

  Thank you! Cheers!

• 
  @jamesortolano39833 ай бұрын

  Fantastic explanation I have subscribed Looking into more nd screening previously issued posts Thankyou again

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Welcome on board... thanks for encouraging words

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Welcome aboard! Thanks a lot for your encouraging and kind words

• 
  @princeoftheblues3 ай бұрын

  Lenz's law ought to be about optics. It is most unfortunate, and maybe we could do something about a trade. Also, for diffusion... Brag's law seems egotistical. A bad name for a humble scientist. Boyles law and Charles law should be swapped also. Boyle should be about pressure.

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the nomenclature of scientific laws. It's interesting to consider the potential for a trade in the naming of these laws. However, it's important to remember that the naming of scientific laws often reflects the historical context in which they were discovered, rather than their specific applications. While Lenz's law does indeed pertain to electromagnetism, it's named after the physicist Heinrich Lenz, who made significant contributions to the study of electromagnetic induction. Similarly, Bragg's law, named after the father-and-son team of William Henry Bragg and William Lawrence Bragg, describes the diffraction of X-rays by crystals. The naming of these laws serves as a tribute to the scientists who made these important discoveries. As for Boyle's law and Charles's law, their current names also pay homage to the pioneering work of Robert Boyle and Jacques Charles in the field of gas laws. While the idea of swapping their names based on the properties they describe is intriguing, it's essential to recognize the historical significance associated with these scientific laws. Nevertheless, your perspective on the naming of scientific laws is thought-provoking, and it's always valuable to reevaluate the conventions in science. Perhaps this conversation will inspire new ways of thinking about the names and classifications of scientific principles in the future. Thank you for engaging in this discussion.

• 
  @princeoftheblues3 ай бұрын

  Well, as a reformer, I would say it's fine to name a law after its discoverer, but only if they stop naming people after things. Like 'Stone". It makes headlines to incomprehensible. So, from now forward, Plank's constant will be used to ensure that lumber is cut to standard dimensions. After all, he was Max Plank, maximum woodiness. And we need to remove duplicative units. Like the kilowatt hour. We have Joules. The electric companies just didn't like the sound of "jewels per second" on their bills.

• 
  @user-lp9on4zi7n3 ай бұрын

  Very nice 👍👍👍👍👍

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Many many thanks

• 
  @user-lp9on4zi7n3 ай бұрын

  😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @user-lp9on4zi7n3 ай бұрын

  Thanks😊😊😊😊😊

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Welcome 😊

• 
  @reynaldodizon65633 ай бұрын

  Force is equal to mass multiply by acceleration . F= ma.

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Correct

• 
  @AnthonyFrancisJones3 ай бұрын

  Great! I may not be correct but the Teltron tube was a specific series of tubes manufactured in the UK by Teltron probably from the early 1980s onwards. Are you confusing Teltron Tubes with vacuum tubes? I have done many demonstrations of the Teltron Tubes online - you may wish to have a look at one example here. Do get in touch if you need further information. kzread.info/dash/bejne/a4Whx6p8p5nWfpM.html

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the info!

• 
  @Chloe..33 ай бұрын

  Quality video friend

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thank you 👍 Appreciated

• 
  @kankipatisudarsankumar58773 ай бұрын

  Excellent service

• 
  @physicspartner3 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @N.P.RAMESH-tx8hf4 ай бұрын

  Good

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @mukisaedith46744 ай бұрын

  Wow❤❤😅😅😅🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much. Appreciated

• 
  @thequestion75504 ай бұрын

  Error at 0:45. Pressure at bottom of container filed with fluid does not depend on the shape of the container. (It has been shown/proven that there is no error. Disregard comment.

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  I think you missed the moment please recheck. Pressure at the Bottom of a Container Filled with Fluid and Its Dependence on Shape The pressure at the bottom of a container filled with fluid does not depend on the shape of the container. This is due to the fact that the pressure at a certain depth in a fluid is determined by the height of the fluid above that point and the density of the fluid, and not by the shape of the container. Here's a breakdown of the reasoning: Hydrostatic Pressure and Shape of the Container: The pressure at the bottom of a container filled with fluid is determined by the height of the fluid above that point and the density of the fluid, as described by the hydrostatic pressure formula. This means that the pressure at the bottom of the container is solely dependent on the vertical distance from the surface of the fluid to the bottom of the container, and not on the shape of the container . Uniform Pressure Distribution: For any given point in a fluid, the pressure is the same in all directions, even sideways or pointing up. So, for two points of equal depth, the pressure is the same, regardless of the shape of the container . Conservation of Mass and Weight: The pressure at the bottom of the container is not affected by the shape because the weight of the fluid above a certain point is the same regardless of the container's shape. The weight of the fluid is what determines the pressure at the bottom, and this weight is constant regardless of the container's shape . In summary, the pressure at the bottom of a container filled with fluid is determined by the height of the fluid above that point and the density of the fluid, and it is independent of the shape of the container. References www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-doesnt-pressure-depend-on-the-shape-of-the-container.978355/ physics.stackexchange.com/questions/563835/pressure-at-the-bottom-of-a-container byjus.com/question-answer/liquid-pressure-at-a-point-on-the-shape-and-size-of-the-container/

• 
  @thequestion75504 ай бұрын

  @@physicspartner , Is it not true that a pipe with a neck affects pressure as opposed to a straight pipe? Doesn't the inside of neck provide a force?

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  In the context of the hydrostatic paradox, the shape of the pipe does not affect the pressure at a certain horizontal level in the fluid. The pressure at a particular point is determined by the vertical distance to the surface of the fluid, regardless of the shape of the container or pipe. This means that the inside of a neck in a pipe does not provide an additional force that affects the pressure. The pressure at a certain horizontal level in the fluid is solely determined by the vertical distance to the surface of the fluid, as per the hydrostatic paradox . Reference: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/505003/understanding-the-hydrostatic-paradox-in-a-tilted-tube

• 
  @thequestion75504 ай бұрын

  @@physicspartner Fair enough, I stand corrected, thanks very much.

• 
  @aymaneoulahyane68034 ай бұрын

  Love your content so much

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much. Appreciated

• 
  @user-op6yb6qf7i4 ай бұрын

  Sun darating ang mga salita Na nanggagaling sa aming dalawa Kung lumisan ka wag naman sana Ika'y kumapit na nang di makawala Aking sinta ikaw na ang tahanan at mundo Sa pagbalik mananatili na sa piling mo Mundo’y magiging ikaw Wag mag-alala kung nahihirapan ka Halika na sumama ka Pagmasdan ang mga tala Aking sinta ikaw na ang tahanan at mundo Sa pagbalik mananatili na sa piling mo Mundo'y magiging ikaw Limutin na ang mundo Nang magkasama tayo Sunod sa bawat galaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Di na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Hindi na maliligaw Aking sinta ikaw na ang tahanan at mundo (mundo'y magiging ikaw) Sa pagbalik mananatili na sa piling mo(mundo'y magiging ikaw) Aking sinta (limutin na ang mundo) Ikaw na ang tahanan at mundo (nang magkasama tayo mundo'y magiging ikaw) Sa pagbalik (sunod sa bawat galaw) Mananatili na sa piling mo (hindi na maliligaw mundo'y magiging ikaw) Limutin na ang mundo Nang magkasama tayo Sunod sa bawat galaw Hindi na maliligaw Mundo'y magiging ikaw

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  Sorry we don't know why you have written it here! It looks irrelevant

• 
  @LukasTorquemada4 ай бұрын

  It's mono... Jesus Christ.

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  Elaborate please

• 
  @LukasTorquemada4 ай бұрын

  @@physicspartner I hear mono sound when you're talking. Intro is in stereo (how it should be).

• 
  @user-cb3cj4kz1l4 ай бұрын

  I don't know where to buy a model of the Foucault pendulum. If I swing my testicles at home for 24 hours, can it prove the Earth's rotation?

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  I appreciate your humor, but swinging your testicles at home for 24 hours might not be the most practical way to prove the Earth's rotation. However, if you're interested in demonstrating the Foucault pendulum effect, you can explore educational models or kits available online or at science supply stores. one model is here www.amazon.com/United-Scientific-FCPN01-Foucaults-Demonstration/dp/B00ES2PV1Y These models can provide a safe and accurate way to observe the Earth's rotation through the pendulum's behavior. If you have any other questions or need assistance in finding a model, feel free to ask!

• 
  @sissyfus61814 ай бұрын

  You need a big special hammer to set them in motion. I can sell you one.

• 
  @spectrumofscience5 ай бұрын

  Ok. I just posted Laws from a book @spectrumofscience

• 
  @physicspartner4 ай бұрын

  "Great to see you sharing knowledge from the book @spectrumofscience! Looking forward to diving into these laws and expanding our understanding. Keep the insightful posts coming!"

• 
  @nickmalone31435 ай бұрын

  Too bad we cant tap into that rotation for energy 😢

• 
  @markmcgoveran68115 ай бұрын

  I love this guy full call pendulum guy because I did this for my high school science fair project back in the seventies and we had like two or three months to work on stuff so me and my friend blew it off and drank beer and road motorcycles. The night before the science fair we sat down and Drew some pictures and I was the pitchman and we showed our research and where we had one that failed because our wire wasn't doing the torque and all sorts of weird explanations and then we drew one that should have been and we got an A. The guy on the football team did something on an oscilloscope and it turns out he was talking to a Navy guy that was the judge it could make that oscilloscope dance he only got a c. Physics is the science of simple machine complicated numbers and you better be alright and sling a spiel to be famous for

• 
  @physicspartner5 ай бұрын

  Wow, that's quite a story! It sounds like you had quite the adventure during your high school science fair project. It's amazing how things can come together at the last minute, and it's clear that you and your friend had a knack for improvising and coming out on top. It's fascinating how different projects can impress the judges in unexpected ways. Your experience certainly highlights the creativity and resourcefulness that can come into play in the world of science fairs. Thank you for sharing your memorable journey!

• 
  @markmcgoveran68115 ай бұрын

  @@physicspartner well there are several things that play here because I'm pretty slippery I'm not a leprechaun I'm just an irish-american. When my football friend that was kind of a jerk and look down at the rest of us for riding motorbikes and drinking beer and smoking cigarettes instead of being good high school students and getting injured on the football field, decided to pick that oscilloscope he made a bad mistake. He thought his football stuff would carry him and he didn't realize that he might run into a judge who was an oscilloscope expert. I on the other hand chose the phone faucalt pendulum because it was possible that I did build it and it was extremely unlikely they would have a pendulum expert there to see through my windy story if there was a hole in it somewhere.

• 
  @dominicestebanrice74605 ай бұрын

  Really EXCELLENT presentation. it would be great to see an equivalent presentation for the Stern-Gerlach experiment.

• 
  @physicspartner5 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your kind comment. Great suggestion! Surely

• 
  @Everythingsirish7 ай бұрын

  Nice one

• 
  @m.azimhossen7 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the informations ❤❤

• 
  @swatigoswami94788 ай бұрын

  Why iretarding potential is used in this experiment

• 
  @PolskiTesla28 ай бұрын

  FRESH DISCOVERY each 1kg giving 0,0006 kg reaction kzread.info/dash/bejne/dZiO2JinfdSrXdo.html

• 
  @PolskiTesla28 ай бұрын

  Marosz's pendulum drive Many years i tested very Simple engine One day i joust inveted what is happen why Left never will be the same what Right kzread.info/dash/bejne/opuKs9qdm7e_ado.htmlsi=xg4n9QDT7R-yCnlj P2 = 0 yes big mass speed up small pendulum slowing down !!! And reverse situation half rotation later big mass slowing small mass m accelerating kzread.info/dash/bejne/kZdsl9SxgKjSl7Q.htmlsi=1Ql_2sBnt7MKAYDx Please start pendulum inside Rocket kzread.info/dash/bejne/d6KKzahpfryblpc.htmlsi=21AANAKy6OMbgz-s What is happening when we converting linear motion to rotation ( more info about pendulum ) kzread.info/dash/bejne/kYOFxcSvZMu3oNo.htmlsi=1R9SYA69ddPszzgP More examples ( better drawings on PC ) kzread.info/dash/bejne/nW2OpMqAmt3FY7Q.htmlsi=WWHhERUnRl5X1LgE Einstein and pendulum kzread.info/dash/bejne/p4qV1dOnl7Kxeso.htmlsi=uAyEvs5YQXfFXnQV

• 
  @nguyen90148 ай бұрын

  Thanks for making this

• 
  @BijayaSahoo-iv5mv9 ай бұрын

  Not describe the band concept

• 
  @physicspartner6 ай бұрын

  The band concept in relation to the Franck-Hertz experiment refers to the observation of distinct energy bands in the experiment's results. When energetic electrons pass through a thin vapor of mercury atoms in the Franck-Hertz tube, they undergo elastic and inelastic collisions with the mercury atoms. According to the model for these collisions, there should be narrow bands of energy where the electrons experience inelastic collisions and lose a specific amount of kinetic energy . These energy bands correspond to the quantized energy levels of the mercury atoms. The experiment demonstrated that electrons can only lose or gain energy in discrete amounts, supporting the concept of energy quantization in atoms. The observation of these energy bands provided evidence for the quantum nature of atoms and confirmed the predictions of the Bohr model of the atom . In summary, the band concept in the Franck-Hertz experiment refers to the observation of distinct energy bands that correspond to the quantized energy levels of the mercury atoms, demonstrating the quantization of energy in atoms and supporting the quantum theory

• 
  @danielbaributsa70199 ай бұрын

  Contribution of Niels Bohr on atomic model is highly appreciated

• 
  @ritikarawat863210 ай бұрын

  Great examples!

• 
  @jordanw164311 ай бұрын

  There's a lake out the back of my house, and I can see for miles in every direction. Therefore, the world is covered up in only 15% water 🤪

• 
  @physicspartner11 ай бұрын

  😝

• 
  @quazikabirulislam13611 ай бұрын

  Very good presentation. Easy to understand

• 
  @wajiharauf9400 Жыл бұрын

  Extreme amazing and easy to learn. Thanks physics partner

• 
  @aarsikumari6120 Жыл бұрын

  Awesome thanks sir 🎉

• 
  @wajiharauf9400 Жыл бұрын

  Nice video..❤

• 
  @Saadvlogs1159 Жыл бұрын

  ❤

• 
  @lamisatasmin1495 Жыл бұрын

  In the 2023 syllabus for unit 1, it is less specific but like is there any chance the specified things from the previous syllabus will be tested?

• 
  @physicspartner6 ай бұрын

  please refer the following link for more details www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/595430-2023-2025-syllabus.pdf

• 
  @pragartiverma8290 Жыл бұрын

  informative video stay Connected #SajeelaElsa

• 
  @CheenuBaby-gp7is Жыл бұрын

  informative stay Connected #SajeelaElsa

• 
  @physicspartner6 ай бұрын

  Sure! Thanks for encouragement

• 
  @christianworld-ku8pu Жыл бұрын

  Nice .. such a useful video