BLAH BLAH big words and jingle phrases.... BORING and uninspired.
@cetocoquinto470411 күн бұрын
Exactly what we need here in philippines but we dont have the dough 😂. Lots of problems will be solved especially in mindanao island. Carbon from indonesia is now expensive not to mention the emissions. We have our old westinghouse reactor in the late 70's all wasted because of bad politics. Westinghouse please give us another shot! We can do this! Cheers american friends.
@cetocoquinto470411 күн бұрын
This is amazing! But we in the philippines cant afford it 😂
@shanedavidson45416 күн бұрын
Happy to be part of the eVinci team in Canada!
@beautifulgirl21918 күн бұрын
Extreme weather events and diseases are hampering harvests and driving up orange prices in Brazil and Florida, Axios reported. The outlet added that in Florida, citrus production has declined 3% on average annually since 2003 and that, according to the International Monetary Fund, the price of oranges globally rose from $2.76 in 2023 to $3.68 in April this year. Prof Andy Challinor, professor of climate impacts at the University of Leeds, told Carbon Brief that "climate change is outpacing us because it is interacting with our complex interrelated economic and food systems". Flooding in southern Brazil that started last month has caused $2.2bn in damages, including $680m in agricultural losses, according to Brazil Reports. The outlet added that “agribusiness is by far the most affected economic sector”, citing a study that found that the floods could cut agricultural GDP by up to 3.5%. Meanwhile, extreme weather in China is “raising concerns about food security” there, CNN reported. High temperatures and severe drought are impacting the northern part of the country while “heavy rains inundate the south”, the outlet said. It noted that the spring and summer planting seasons have been disrupted in key rice- and wheat-producing regions.
@user-zo1in2ew6e19 күн бұрын
Great video. Will there ever be an initial public offering (IPO) for Westinghouse? A goal in my life is to own shares of Westinghouse. However, it isn't a publicly traded corporation. I do own one share of Cameco. I'm just waiting for a possible IPO. My father worked for Westinghouse from 1950s to the 1980s. He was a union member and worked at the Westinghouse Steam Turbine Plant in Lester, PA. And I know Westinghouse is now a nuclear power company.
@deeeeeeps19 күн бұрын
They were public until Cameco and Brookfield bought them. They probably won't go public again but I have a big portion of my portfolio in Cameco and looking to buy more Brookfield "BEP" for the NYSE
@ericdanielski480219 күн бұрын
Nice video.
@russelldsyder134424 күн бұрын
In fact, they have an extremely vast experience in the field. Such small reactors don't need expensive security measures as they contain too little fuel. Compared to Chornobyl reactor, each of them is thousands times smaller unable to pollute larger territories. And technology is well proved and used in various military applications
@caloydeleon639726 күн бұрын
There is one in bataan
@Fish-ub3wnАй бұрын
nothing burger. what type? coolant? temp? fuel grade? output? even the visualistion sucks, looks like late 90's such a promising reactor, well established company, and this - video on par with crypto scams...
@rre9121Ай бұрын
I've been seeing stuff about micro reactors since I was a kid reading popular mechanics, until you guys get out the checkbook and start bribing enough politicians you'll never get regulations lifted enough to make them feasible beyond tech demonstrators and CGI KZread videos. I've been seeing the same crap for literally 20 years.
@KPreddiePWSP2Ай бұрын
Westinghouse will be a leader in deployed SMR capacity in no short order ;)
@user-gn1cl9ix7pАй бұрын
"Created with our customers in mind..." As opposed to *what*?
@nibiruresearch2 ай бұрын
Good news! I wish you all at Westinghouse a lot of success.
@nibiruresearch2 ай бұрын
Great! Every datacenter should be obliged to have its own Microreactor.
@MajorBunghole2 ай бұрын
Wish our backward boofhead politicians here in Australia would consider something like this but every time it's bought up they get shouted down and mad a mockery off. They are such wankers.
@gzpo2 ай бұрын
What is the energy expenditure for producing both initial and subsequent 8-year replacements?
@kaneshin21952 ай бұрын
昔AP600というのがあって…
@vlosa24392 ай бұрын
lovely, I wish Westinghouse was here with us today. he is the most amazing American industrialist whose company deserves to be here with us for a long time. I wonder if this company is the same company that Westinghouse built and is isn't being controlled or owned by another company. Westinghouse was one of my heroes. Im sad that we don't have industrialists like him around anymore.
@shanedavidson4542 ай бұрын
I am so impressed and excited! I have an interview to be a part of this! Wish me luck!
@Samooray3 ай бұрын
One on my backyard plz!❤
@AndrewLambert-wi8et3 ай бұрын
NOT ANYMORE. THEY HAVE PROBABLY MOVED TO JAPAN WHO NOW OWNS WESTING HOUSE. THE CHINESE CAN NOW MAKE AND SELL WESTINGHOUSE REACTORS AROUND THE WORLD. THE USA DIDNT WANT INDIA TO BUY USA REACTORS. LUCKLY RUSSIA SAID FRIEND COME I WILL GIVE YOU MY REACTORS CHEAPER THAN THE USA REACTORS. THEY DID THIS DESPITE INDIA HAVING ITS OWN HEAVY WATER REACTORS.
@rookiegamer-yt3 ай бұрын
give me one to take please
@survivingpoverty4 ай бұрын
What happens to the removed unit when removed? Only claim they will take it away. Imagine what that cost would be if it's hazardous waste.
@aquelarre0355 ай бұрын
wow
@efrainsalazar61085 ай бұрын
A mi no me deja poner netflix en mi teme quiero soluciones westinghous
@scottclaggett68515 ай бұрын
Can't wait to start working here!!
@FoxEco5 ай бұрын
What about Finland🙋🏼♂️ We need microreactor Can you send more info?
@ilyashick31785 ай бұрын
disfunction info
@FoxEco5 ай бұрын
WOW , is it possible to buy?
@HopeScreen6 ай бұрын
iS THERE ANY HAZARD OF APLHA INHALATION?
@paulanderson77965 ай бұрын
No. There's no dust in evidence.
@Meineself6 ай бұрын
Great job boys.
@stickynorth6 ай бұрын
Make it so!
@fiaadmin926 ай бұрын
yeaaaaahh! that's like a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator, ...soviet union built thousands of them in the 70's 🤣😂😅
@alainlecomte84796 ай бұрын
Rien sur le principe de fonctionnement, bravo !!!!!
@markgodin39696 ай бұрын
America is no good at making reactors only Russia. And this one by Western househoh go off like 5 nuclear bombs. So whoever lives around it. I'd be moving to another state.
@markgodin39696 ай бұрын
You mean the same one that dispersed all the radiation into the Walla Walla river? The contaminated half of Oregon and the Pacific Ocean never mind hundreds, maybe thousands of babies and humans. They killed and then covered it up with the government's help. Make a uranium 232 pellets..
@philipwong8956 ай бұрын
The 27.125 tons of spent fuel generated in one year by one 1110MW reactor can fuel 28 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year. 940 kg of natural thorium in a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) can generate 1 gigawatt (GW) of electricity for one year. The 205.972 tons of unused depleted uranium processed to obtain the 27.128 tons of enriched uranium can fuel 219 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year.
@MHjort93 ай бұрын
The food eaten by one horse can fuel 500 unicorns for a year. Molten salt reactors don't exist at scale.
@philipwong8956 ай бұрын
The 7.33 tons of spent fuel generated in one year by one 300MW reactor can fuel 7 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year. 940 kg of natural thorium in a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) can generate 1 gigawatt (GW) of electricity for one year. The 55.668 tons of unused depleted uranium processed to obtain the 7.332 tons of enriched uranium can fuel a further 59 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year.
@alien90005556 ай бұрын
No explican nada de cómo funciona.
@LutherBlissett1006 ай бұрын
I imagine spent fuel is shipped to…Finland’s nuke waste facility (?)
@Carlos-im3hnАй бұрын
or the re-started Yucca Mountain in Harry Reed's old district.
@viadronik6 ай бұрын
Wow I cant believe!!! WOOOOW!!🎉🎉🎉🎉😮😮😊😊
@JudahRichardson16 ай бұрын
These would be fantastic on the moon or Mars.
@hasanerdogan72376 ай бұрын
Uygulanabilirse harika bir teknoloji..
@hasanerdogan72376 ай бұрын
Çok güzel bir buluş..
@LengthyProcess6 ай бұрын
This is incredibly cool that you can make nuclear energy portable but what happens to the spent generators? Maybe recycled but what about the fuel? It reduces carbon waste but is the more dangerous for a longer duration nuclear waste really better? Wind, water, sunlight, and heat can all be found anywhere. Not all of them are in every location but pretty much anywhere you go theres at least one of them. What if we put turbines in water pipes in cities to recover some of the energy lost while pumping it? Or find a way to produce electricity from rain. Just think natural. People are always digging stuff up to make new fuels, destroying the planet from beginning to end. Mining destroys the beauty and serenity of the planet as well as natural habitats and the machines used create carbon waste then they ship it with carbon waste machines to factories that do the same and products and fuel become harmful waste and are not properly recycle when possible. If we found a use for the nuclear waste and put our brains together to mine an asteroid or uninhabited planet I'd be all for it. I understand humans have become materialistic but we should try to use what we have and turn the old into the new. Have yall seen a landfill? Perhaps not. Youre not allowed to film without permission cause its so bad. Trash including many many many things that could have been recycled and many that cant piled probably 30 feet high and half an acre wide being shoved into the ground shoved into the earth, our home and were all contributing but its all right because theres money to ve made. But i think you could make the same amount of money or more recycling old things than buying new materials. It would be WAAAAAY better for your great grandkinds thats for sure but at this rate its gonna end up like the Lorax seriously. Again, this machines really cool. but why does everyone think its bad to care for our place of creation? Just build clean.
@Carlos-im3hnАй бұрын
The new inherently safe TRISO fuel particles are "spent" internally. The volume of the ceramic coated TRISO particles does not change as the internal elments are "burned up". The small TRISO particles are used in a few ways, the most common are two ways: 1. TRISO embedded pellets vertically stacked in tubes, 2. TRISO particles combined in a 60mm diameter baseball sized "pebble". Whether TRISO embedded tubular pellets, or TRISO embedded 60mm baseball...they are all radioactive waste; however, the TRISO particles retain 99.999% of all Uranium (U) or Plutonium (Pt) generated, so the waste products are relatively safe to handle and transport, and long-term disposal. TRISO is what makes these new designs much safer and inherently safe. In USA they will probably re-start/re-open Yucca Mountain in Harry Reed's old district for long-term storage. Again, the TRISO ceramic coated particles are very safe and remain safe for many centuries or millenia (inherently safe).
@brianb-p65866 ай бұрын
So slick, with so little information.
@johnh6616 ай бұрын
not sure what they mean by any of this, this has been around since the 50's. RTG was invented in 1954. and they were mostly deployed to remote regions that needed power but was hard to get fuel there or things that needed to run with no interruption. stuff like light houses and remote radio towers. the US stopped using them because they were not safe at all. the USSR used em till they fell and all of there's are in disrepair. Lia radiological accident and here is the wiki link as well en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_radiological_accident this seems amazing but its a bunch of nothing and they will never be deployed on mass.
@Rubik436 ай бұрын
Maybe try to inform yourself before commenting, this is a solid state reactor, 4th gen, and is completely passive, 10 years of fuel with 0 people constantly monitoring it.
@mohammeddavidzhang-singh58466 ай бұрын
Price? Electric power? Market entry? Fuel type (enrichment level)? Nuclear waste handling? So many open issues. I recommend PV and wind turbines: available now!
Пікірлер
BLAH BLAH big words and jingle phrases.... BORING and uninspired.
Exactly what we need here in philippines but we dont have the dough 😂. Lots of problems will be solved especially in mindanao island. Carbon from indonesia is now expensive not to mention the emissions. We have our old westinghouse reactor in the late 70's all wasted because of bad politics. Westinghouse please give us another shot! We can do this! Cheers american friends.
This is amazing! But we in the philippines cant afford it 😂
Happy to be part of the eVinci team in Canada!
Extreme weather events and diseases are hampering harvests and driving up orange prices in Brazil and Florida, Axios reported. The outlet added that in Florida, citrus production has declined 3% on average annually since 2003 and that, according to the International Monetary Fund, the price of oranges globally rose from $2.76 in 2023 to $3.68 in April this year. Prof Andy Challinor, professor of climate impacts at the University of Leeds, told Carbon Brief that "climate change is outpacing us because it is interacting with our complex interrelated economic and food systems". Flooding in southern Brazil that started last month has caused $2.2bn in damages, including $680m in agricultural losses, according to Brazil Reports. The outlet added that “agribusiness is by far the most affected economic sector”, citing a study that found that the floods could cut agricultural GDP by up to 3.5%. Meanwhile, extreme weather in China is “raising concerns about food security” there, CNN reported. High temperatures and severe drought are impacting the northern part of the country while “heavy rains inundate the south”, the outlet said. It noted that the spring and summer planting seasons have been disrupted in key rice- and wheat-producing regions.
Great video. Will there ever be an initial public offering (IPO) for Westinghouse? A goal in my life is to own shares of Westinghouse. However, it isn't a publicly traded corporation. I do own one share of Cameco. I'm just waiting for a possible IPO. My father worked for Westinghouse from 1950s to the 1980s. He was a union member and worked at the Westinghouse Steam Turbine Plant in Lester, PA. And I know Westinghouse is now a nuclear power company.
They were public until Cameco and Brookfield bought them. They probably won't go public again but I have a big portion of my portfolio in Cameco and looking to buy more Brookfield "BEP" for the NYSE
Nice video.
In fact, they have an extremely vast experience in the field. Such small reactors don't need expensive security measures as they contain too little fuel. Compared to Chornobyl reactor, each of them is thousands times smaller unable to pollute larger territories. And technology is well proved and used in various military applications
There is one in bataan
nothing burger. what type? coolant? temp? fuel grade? output? even the visualistion sucks, looks like late 90's such a promising reactor, well established company, and this - video on par with crypto scams...
I've been seeing stuff about micro reactors since I was a kid reading popular mechanics, until you guys get out the checkbook and start bribing enough politicians you'll never get regulations lifted enough to make them feasible beyond tech demonstrators and CGI KZread videos. I've been seeing the same crap for literally 20 years.
Westinghouse will be a leader in deployed SMR capacity in no short order ;)
"Created with our customers in mind..." As opposed to *what*?
Good news! I wish you all at Westinghouse a lot of success.
Great! Every datacenter should be obliged to have its own Microreactor.
Wish our backward boofhead politicians here in Australia would consider something like this but every time it's bought up they get shouted down and mad a mockery off. They are such wankers.
What is the energy expenditure for producing both initial and subsequent 8-year replacements?
昔AP600というのがあって…
lovely, I wish Westinghouse was here with us today. he is the most amazing American industrialist whose company deserves to be here with us for a long time. I wonder if this company is the same company that Westinghouse built and is isn't being controlled or owned by another company. Westinghouse was one of my heroes. Im sad that we don't have industrialists like him around anymore.
I am so impressed and excited! I have an interview to be a part of this! Wish me luck!
One on my backyard plz!❤
NOT ANYMORE. THEY HAVE PROBABLY MOVED TO JAPAN WHO NOW OWNS WESTING HOUSE. THE CHINESE CAN NOW MAKE AND SELL WESTINGHOUSE REACTORS AROUND THE WORLD. THE USA DIDNT WANT INDIA TO BUY USA REACTORS. LUCKLY RUSSIA SAID FRIEND COME I WILL GIVE YOU MY REACTORS CHEAPER THAN THE USA REACTORS. THEY DID THIS DESPITE INDIA HAVING ITS OWN HEAVY WATER REACTORS.
give me one to take please
What happens to the removed unit when removed? Only claim they will take it away. Imagine what that cost would be if it's hazardous waste.
wow
A mi no me deja poner netflix en mi teme quiero soluciones westinghous
Can't wait to start working here!!
What about Finland🙋🏼♂️ We need microreactor Can you send more info?
disfunction info
WOW , is it possible to buy?
iS THERE ANY HAZARD OF APLHA INHALATION?
No. There's no dust in evidence.
Great job boys.
Make it so!
yeaaaaahh! that's like a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator, ...soviet union built thousands of them in the 70's 🤣😂😅
Rien sur le principe de fonctionnement, bravo !!!!!
America is no good at making reactors only Russia. And this one by Western househoh go off like 5 nuclear bombs. So whoever lives around it. I'd be moving to another state.
You mean the same one that dispersed all the radiation into the Walla Walla river? The contaminated half of Oregon and the Pacific Ocean never mind hundreds, maybe thousands of babies and humans. They killed and then covered it up with the government's help. Make a uranium 232 pellets..
The 27.125 tons of spent fuel generated in one year by one 1110MW reactor can fuel 28 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year. 940 kg of natural thorium in a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) can generate 1 gigawatt (GW) of electricity for one year. The 205.972 tons of unused depleted uranium processed to obtain the 27.128 tons of enriched uranium can fuel 219 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year.
The food eaten by one horse can fuel 500 unicorns for a year. Molten salt reactors don't exist at scale.
The 7.33 tons of spent fuel generated in one year by one 300MW reactor can fuel 7 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year. 940 kg of natural thorium in a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) can generate 1 gigawatt (GW) of electricity for one year. The 55.668 tons of unused depleted uranium processed to obtain the 7.332 tons of enriched uranium can fuel a further 59 1GW Molten Salt Reactors for one year.
No explican nada de cómo funciona.
I imagine spent fuel is shipped to…Finland’s nuke waste facility (?)
or the re-started Yucca Mountain in Harry Reed's old district.
Wow I cant believe!!! WOOOOW!!🎉🎉🎉🎉😮😮😊😊
These would be fantastic on the moon or Mars.
Uygulanabilirse harika bir teknoloji..
Çok güzel bir buluş..
This is incredibly cool that you can make nuclear energy portable but what happens to the spent generators? Maybe recycled but what about the fuel? It reduces carbon waste but is the more dangerous for a longer duration nuclear waste really better? Wind, water, sunlight, and heat can all be found anywhere. Not all of them are in every location but pretty much anywhere you go theres at least one of them. What if we put turbines in water pipes in cities to recover some of the energy lost while pumping it? Or find a way to produce electricity from rain. Just think natural. People are always digging stuff up to make new fuels, destroying the planet from beginning to end. Mining destroys the beauty and serenity of the planet as well as natural habitats and the machines used create carbon waste then they ship it with carbon waste machines to factories that do the same and products and fuel become harmful waste and are not properly recycle when possible. If we found a use for the nuclear waste and put our brains together to mine an asteroid or uninhabited planet I'd be all for it. I understand humans have become materialistic but we should try to use what we have and turn the old into the new. Have yall seen a landfill? Perhaps not. Youre not allowed to film without permission cause its so bad. Trash including many many many things that could have been recycled and many that cant piled probably 30 feet high and half an acre wide being shoved into the ground shoved into the earth, our home and were all contributing but its all right because theres money to ve made. But i think you could make the same amount of money or more recycling old things than buying new materials. It would be WAAAAAY better for your great grandkinds thats for sure but at this rate its gonna end up like the Lorax seriously. Again, this machines really cool. but why does everyone think its bad to care for our place of creation? Just build clean.
The new inherently safe TRISO fuel particles are "spent" internally. The volume of the ceramic coated TRISO particles does not change as the internal elments are "burned up". The small TRISO particles are used in a few ways, the most common are two ways: 1. TRISO embedded pellets vertically stacked in tubes, 2. TRISO particles combined in a 60mm diameter baseball sized "pebble". Whether TRISO embedded tubular pellets, or TRISO embedded 60mm baseball...they are all radioactive waste; however, the TRISO particles retain 99.999% of all Uranium (U) or Plutonium (Pt) generated, so the waste products are relatively safe to handle and transport, and long-term disposal. TRISO is what makes these new designs much safer and inherently safe. In USA they will probably re-start/re-open Yucca Mountain in Harry Reed's old district for long-term storage. Again, the TRISO ceramic coated particles are very safe and remain safe for many centuries or millenia (inherently safe).
So slick, with so little information.
not sure what they mean by any of this, this has been around since the 50's. RTG was invented in 1954. and they were mostly deployed to remote regions that needed power but was hard to get fuel there or things that needed to run with no interruption. stuff like light houses and remote radio towers. the US stopped using them because they were not safe at all. the USSR used em till they fell and all of there's are in disrepair. Lia radiological accident and here is the wiki link as well en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_radiological_accident this seems amazing but its a bunch of nothing and they will never be deployed on mass.
Maybe try to inform yourself before commenting, this is a solid state reactor, 4th gen, and is completely passive, 10 years of fuel with 0 people constantly monitoring it.
Price? Electric power? Market entry? Fuel type (enrichment level)? Nuclear waste handling? So many open issues. I recommend PV and wind turbines: available now!