Journal - History Documentaries

Journal - History Documentaries

Join us as we explore incredible stories and discoveries all throughout history. From ancient civilizations to modern revolutions, we will be sharing the stories of the past! As we delve into the past, exploring the triumphs, struggles, and pivotal moments that define the human legacy!

Пікірлер

  • @silviaarvayo7602
    @silviaarvayo760214 сағат бұрын

    She couldn’t not make it work her way . Walk over The Royal Family .

  • @taylorkiwis5332
    @taylorkiwis533218 сағат бұрын

    Wallis and Meghan are two identical women - two narcissists - separated in time. Wallis' letters are no different from modern-day narcissists (though nowadays you'll find the communication via telephone, emails and text messages), who, just like Wallis, continue to stay in touch with their exes. They do this just in case things don't work out with the new relationship, or even just for continued attention and validation. It's nothing new. Narcissists love to play the victim, and having an ex feel sorry for them is just another way of stringing them along. People's impressions of Wallis' letters are 100% incorrect. If the letters paint Wallis as a scapegoat, it's because that's exactly what Wallis wanted her ex to think. Anyone who thinks there's anything innocent about Wallis or Meghan, needs to do some research into narcissism. Prince Harry, another victim, is just as narcissistic. And, just so you know, it has nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created within the first years after birth. As Aristotle said, show me the 7-year old, and I'll show you the man. The same goes for Edward. Both Edward and Harry are (in Edward's case was) weak, narcissistic men who met narcissistic women much stronger, and way more cunning than them. Edward died sad and alone, while Wallis would've been secretly obsessed with how others viewed her until the day she died, privately unhappy and unfulfilled like narcissists are for life. Harry and Meghan's marriage won't last. Harry will remain an angry, bitter man for life, which is exactly what he is now. On the other hand, having achieved what she set out to achieve, Meghan is "happier" than Harry, but, like Wallis, will obsess over how others view her until the day she dies. Why? Because that's one thing a narcissist cannot control.

  • @marymarymillidweeb2661
    @marymarymillidweeb266119 сағат бұрын

    It's amazing how out of date this video is. Richard Kay talking about how they are friends with Oprah Winfrey; Oprah herself stated she and Meghan weren't friends, she wanted and interview with Meghan and wound up being invited to the wedding. They were not friends with the Clooney's, I believe Harry had met them but weren't friends but they too wound up with an invite to the wedding. For Richard Kay to say the Sussexes are making connections all over "tinsel town" is pretty laughable now. "Tinsel town" was not too impressed with Harry putting his family down in his tell all book and to still go on about it is becoming boring. Nothing new novel and interesting anymore with Harry and Meghan.

  • @orlybendavid2211
    @orlybendavid221121 сағат бұрын

    Maria and not miriam

  • @AKBABELP
    @AKBABELP21 сағат бұрын

    Don’t think the contents are what I expected …. A repetition of everything.

  • @melissajohnson9254
    @melissajohnson925421 сағат бұрын

    What people need to understand is her letters was automatically owned by the crown I wouldn’t be surprised if they re-wrote history to suit the narrative

  • @Shamshiro
    @ShamshiroКүн бұрын

    The internet is already in use by the general public for more than three decades, and we still have people using the term 'samurai sword' lol

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    How many kings were faithful??? George V & VI good chance!

  • @Ira88881
    @Ira8888118 сағат бұрын

    V was too busy with his stamps.

  • @MOV1983
    @MOV1983Күн бұрын

    How's Camilla a royal outcast? She is Queen of England!

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    Diana filled the bill of protocol, but incompatibility loomed!!

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    My goodness, the struggles of these two couples is quite striking! A great deal of turmoil caused by couples trying to navigate public opinion.

  • @suemcgregor9248
    @suemcgregor9248Күн бұрын

    Camilla is Queen, not an outcast. Who makes this rubbish? Wallis wasn't an outcast because she was never "in"

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    She was desired!!!!

  • @suemcgregor9248
    @suemcgregor9248Күн бұрын

    She had boyfriends yes but we hear nothing of the drunken one night stands that Princess Margaret had. Anne's first marriage ended because Mark Philips consistently played away and his second marriage ended for the same reason

  • @sandragoss48
    @sandragoss48Күн бұрын

    I have always said for the Royal Family it is only about each individual of the Firm to have what he/she wants & no one will stand in the way. I lost all respect for Queen Elizabeth II when she gave in to accept Camilla and gave her the Royal title Queen Consort. This is the woman who destroyed her son’s marriage to Princess Diana & gave Charles permission to lie about it.

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    Isn't the marriage of Charles and Diana doomed, complicated, and torturous due to societal mores???

  • @keetahbrough
    @keetahbroughКүн бұрын

    How they abused Wallis and Edward, for their love, is how they SHOULD be handling Charles and Camilla, because c&c are corrupted.

  • @mcmulcat
    @mcmulcatКүн бұрын

    Utter nonsense.

  • @honestea1828
    @honestea1828Күн бұрын

    Meghan is the better comparison to Wallace. Camilla was never outcast from the Royals. Quite the opposite in fact.

  • @keetahbrough
    @keetahbroughКүн бұрын

    camilla will ALWAYS BE the whore/mistress/homewrecker lol

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    Camilla fit in with Charles' social circle

  • @honestea1828
    @honestea1828Күн бұрын

    @@artn2950 And she fit in with the RF's mission.

  • @simon23
    @simon23Күн бұрын

    She was rude and arrogant when young and hasn't changed much since. She just hides it better.

  • @sandmedna3056
    @sandmedna3056Күн бұрын

    Secrets! The men made millions by talking about everything. He was not to be trusted

  • @sunnydavidson297
    @sunnydavidson297Күн бұрын

    Read that Ernest Simpson paid the insurance premiums for Wallis' jewelry; big theft in 1940? Read that Queen Mary was "wild" about all this. Never forgave her son for the abdication. Her daughter in law, Elizabeth, felt the abdication greatly shortened the life of King George, Elizabeth II's father.

  • @RianShafer
    @RianShaferКүн бұрын

    I think as I've aged my views on all "the other/or not" women has softened. History has proven that when the Royal men misbehave or go against the Royal "norms", the women they get involved with become the scapegoats. As long as the couples are truly in love, like most of us in loving relationships, I do feel everyone should step back & not judge too harshly. I am not a hard no on Harry & Meghan either but I do feel Harry sh*t on his family & I don't see how those relationships will mend. It's still possible because all but William have harmed their family relationships with their actions in the name of love & their own perceptions on what went wrong & who is truly the guiltiest parties. Harry should have been seeing a professional counselor young.

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    Maybe he did but Meghan Markle took over!!!

  • @arminiskanen4448
    @arminiskanen4448Күн бұрын

    Oli komea kuningas. Oli. Mitään ei ole periytynyt.

  • @corinnehernandez4549
    @corinnehernandez4549Күн бұрын

    I wouldn't consider Camilla the tramp an outcast! If anything she is the luckiest side-chick in history. 🤔

  • @seren8991
    @seren8991Күн бұрын

    When will Megan be added.

  • @marlenewolffe4613
    @marlenewolffe4613Күн бұрын

    Truest love story of the century in. Camilla and Charles

  • @keetahbrough
    @keetahbroughКүн бұрын

    camilla will ALWAYS BE the whore/mistress/homewrecker lol Diana was her own Royal force of Nature.. more famous than her husband. Camilla licked his boots so no doubt he preferred service to him(camilla) rather then duty to the Firm(diana).

  • @artn2950
    @artn2950Күн бұрын

    She is his completer.... not all couples have that????

  • @marlenewolffe4613
    @marlenewolffe4613Күн бұрын

    Camilla was maligned by the press! The truth is Camilla is a far better good fit for the King. She makes him happy. Wallis. Certainly does not need an apology. Edward was not handsome. How silly does these presenters look now that the truth is out. The letters now found proove she did not love him!!

  • @Muslimah369
    @Muslimah369Күн бұрын

    The outcasts wives of british royals 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @72_Nova
    @72_NovaКүн бұрын

    Wallis did not become Queen. Camilla is a SNAKE in Queens clothing 😂 Megan is a narcissist and all she wants is attention. So much changed because Dianna only thought of her own happiness. So sad that her boys were not enough to make her happy. Everything would have been so different now.

  • @wjohnson9233
    @wjohnson9233Күн бұрын

    Sad that Wallis always got the blame for the abdication. Equally sad that Meghan is blamed for her and Harry’s journey and departure from the royal family. Not so sure about Camilla’s innocence.

  • @taylorkiwis5332
    @taylorkiwis533218 сағат бұрын

    Uhm, Wallis IS the reason for Edward's abdication. And Meghan IS to blame for Harry leaving the British Royal Family. Both are narcissistic women who claim (ed) not to be narcissistic. That they were simply being victimized whilst, in fact, their husbands CHOSE to leave the BRF. Both Edward was, and Harry is, highly narcissistic, yet weak men, who ended up with narcissistic women MUCH stronger than them. Women who played them for their own gain, whilst all the while acting the victim in scenarios wholly created by themselves in order to bring about situations that would benefit them according to very specific plans - concocted by themselves - to obtain money, wealth, status, and fame. Narcissists are all the same. Know one, know them all. For all Harry's whining about wanting to just be a "normal" person, the reality is that he is nothing without his title and link to the royal family. Harry loves attention, just like his mother did. He loves his wealth and fame, and is an arrogant, entitled, spoilt brat. A narcissist. And it had nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created between birth and age 6. Harry was truly a brat by the time Diana died already, and his use of drugs and alcohol is symptomatic of his narcissism. Meghan created a scenario that forced Harry to leave his family, so that she could have total control over him. That's what narcissists commonly do. Wallis wanted to be the mistress of a King, not really the wife of a nobody. But she had to wield considerable control over him, because King Geoge couldn't stand her. She walked a tight rope of creating just enough distance between Edward and his parents to ensure that they did not manage to turn him against her, yet not so much that he would abdicate in order to marry her. This would've been extremely difficult for her to do, given that she needed to keep him under her spell. And, as it turned out, he was well and truly under her spell, as he didn't want to give her up. True to form, and like a typical narcissist, Wallis would continue to write to her ex-husband, complaining about how unhappy she was, how Edward would soon replace her with a younger model (yeah, right, not while she was ensuring he remained addicted to her!), and so on. This is what narcissists do. They keep in touch with exes, often stringing them along, for continued validation and attention. Not because they want them back. I have no problem with narcissists, other than the fact that they are disordered, and as a result are attention-seeking, greedy, selfish, jealous, vindictive, woe-is-me victims, liars, arrogant, entitled, etc. And in that mindset of theirs, anything goes. Anything can be justified. For example Harry and Meghan's treatment of Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth in their final years. Harry found in Meghan a kindred spirit, and someone who is as narcissistic as he is. Sadly, their fights behind closed doors in Montecito will be EPIC. Meghan has what she always wanted. Money, status, and fame. Harry, on the other hand, has lost everything. Sadly, that's his problem, but I can assure you their marriage won't last, and their two children will necessarily become dysfunctional adults. All children of narcissists do, unless they were blessed with a generous dose of empathy, and a good life partner. Like William. Edward would necessarily have been narcissistic too, given his upbringing, but he was a weak man ready for manipulation by a stronger, crafty, and clever woman. The rest, as they say, is history. 🤷‍♀️

  • @Coffee_n_Opera
    @Coffee_n_OperaКүн бұрын

    Man literally just sold me a bag of rocks… loved this ❤

  • @filizarzuozdemir7451
    @filizarzuozdemir7451Күн бұрын

    Charles tam bir narsist

  • @a.m.9474
    @a.m.9474Күн бұрын

    I KNOW. Poor her!! Sky’s the limit on wedding costs, not having to worry about getting time off for wedding and honeymoon, not worrying about where they’re going to live, no worries on the horizon about how/where to feed house and clothe potential future children. Ours just AWFUL!

  • @elizabethmoolman9892
    @elizabethmoolman9892Күн бұрын

    My God! U journalistas are a horrible lot..😬

  • @carolking6355
    @carolking6355Күн бұрын

    Very bad taste at this time.

  • @carolking6355
    @carolking6355Күн бұрын

    What a friend the lady in waiting turned out to be. You can do without friends like that.

  • @Nonameforyoudangit
    @NonameforyoudangitКүн бұрын

    Good for her.

  • @jenniferwood8944
    @jenniferwood8944Күн бұрын

    Sir Timothy is an absolute gentleman! Strong, there for his wife and family!

  • @user-fr6er3xf4j
    @user-fr6er3xf4jКүн бұрын

    Maghen was never a Hollywood actress and maghen lies about the way she met Harry, maghen met Harry at the so so house 🏠, better known as a whore house 🏠

  • @shortylucy
    @shortylucy2 күн бұрын

    Princess Anne is such a role model for women in general. I often speak to my teenage girl about her, and she understands what makes her great. ❤

  • @SoulCollagen
    @SoulCollagen2 күн бұрын

    Reaching a bit with that title aren't you?

  • @user-MetalAngel
    @user-MetalAngel2 күн бұрын

    More like dismissed from the bible. Asherah, a goddess in ancient Semitic religion, was removed from Hebrew scripture due to the monotheistic reforms of the Israelites. According to the biblical account, Asherah was the name of a fertility goddess and the wooden cult object dedicated to her. The Israelites were commanded not to worship idols or any other false gods, and Asherah was seen as a symbol of paganism. So, basically Yaweh took them out to the woodshed.

  • @julesmum9781
    @julesmum97812 күн бұрын

    Why was a 12 yr age gap too much for Anne and Richard Meade yet acceptable for Charles and Diana?

  • @shortylucy
    @shortylucy2 күн бұрын

    I'm not 100% here, so I may be very wrong, but IMO it's because back then, there was so much stupid emphasis on the future Queen to be a virgin upon marriage. Prince Charles was already older when pushed to marry, I don't know that many women virgins in their late 20s early 30s. Lessons were learned since then. It became very apparent that the old way doesn't work in the modern era. If, then, Prince Charles was allowed to marry Camila when they were dating and single, Princess Diana wouldnt have married him. But then, we wouldn't have Prince William, and the future of the monarchy cannot be in safer hands than those of him and the current Wales family.

  • @BrittanyF8908
    @BrittanyF8908Күн бұрын

    I’m sure Prince Phillip was more protective of his only daughter. I agree with you 100% tho

  • @DaniHMcV
    @DaniHMcV2 күн бұрын

    Smaller weddings are for the couple and those closest to them. From what I’ve seen in my almost 50 years, people who have smaller weddings have more successful marriages. Nothing is for show, it’s just for them and those who love them most. Big showy weddings often end in divorce down the line.

  • @joslynandcarltonramsubhag1836
    @joslynandcarltonramsubhag18362 күн бұрын

    Seems some resemblance to the younger prince.

  • @alidabotes6264
    @alidabotes62642 күн бұрын

    Only 7 what's the big deal?? I hate that the royals' love lives are so dissected. We should value how they've grown & what they do with their lives to enhance other's lives. This has been reported on so often that it's become boring. Admire her & appreciate who she is & what she does.

  • @lostcamper
    @lostcamper2 күн бұрын

    You hate that the royals' love lives are so dissected...yet here you are participating in the dissection of the royals' love lives. smh

  • @shortylucy
    @shortylucy2 күн бұрын

    Indeed, but for some possibly new RF supporters, this is new.

  • @annelie837
    @annelie8372 күн бұрын

    kzread.infoDe20gVrRIpw?si=UNTKFCSHyWWfjzyZ

  • @annelie837
    @annelie8372 күн бұрын

    Remind me so much of Harry ,same energi ,he is so Specially sweet and charming

  • @mountaingrannie4020
    @mountaingrannie40202 күн бұрын

    Princess Ann looks a lot like her👑

  • @cissiepierce664
    @cissiepierce6643 күн бұрын

    Ann was quite the wild child too, so that apple didn’t fall far from the tree!

  • @l.h.2543
    @l.h.25433 күн бұрын

    I find it hard to believe Katie Nichols has knowledge of private conversations that occurred between 2 people. The Middletons are notoriously tight lipped.

  • @TheGirlatthewindow
    @TheGirlatthewindow3 күн бұрын

    He's an absolute intruder, definitely not a keeper of secrets. And definitely no royal. He's made a living from dealing with press and riding on the fact that he worked for her.