Physics is the science that explores the structure of our world. The mission of this channel is to explain physical phenomena in the simplest language possible, understandable to everyone without exception!
My favorite isomer is Bi-210m. It can be triggered easily by a deep UVC pulse, by incorporating it in a z-pinch array, by bombarding it with gamma rays. It can be burned as a clean fuel by exposing its salts to radio frequencies which accelerates its alpha decay. It would make the perfect military fuel for drones of all sorts. It can be made easily by putting normal bismuth into nuclear reactors, subject it to neutron bombardment, take it out, wait a few weeks so that the short lived elements have decayed away and chemically extract the Bi-210m. It could be loaded as a salt in a coaxial tube fed 2GHz and it would give off enough heat to power drones and equipment of all sorts.
@KhattaRapidus22 сағат бұрын
15:55 Now I want to imagine a Dyson ring around the sun make it rotate its way into being a time machine. ;)
@StephenBaylor-kl8wx23 сағат бұрын
If this fantasy was true you would make widespread destruction loss of life without the fallout great and when everyone has this thing aren't we even worse off I question your sanity
@EdHartouni23 сағат бұрын
you can read more about the controversy surrounding Hafnium at the Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_controversy The book written by Sharon Weinberger in 2006, "Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld" discusses this question. The issue of realizing a gamma-ray laser can also be found on Wikipedia (and the references therein). While the subject of intense research during the Strategic Defense Initiative, practical realizations do not exist yet, and the basic physics of whether they could ever exist remain unknown. Note, however, the x-ray lasers developed during this time do exist (but these do not use nuclear isomeric states).
@brandocomando79723 сағат бұрын
When is humanity going to learn from its past and stop trying to come up with new ways to kill itself and the planet.
@fitsodafun22 сағат бұрын
When the Andrew Tates of this world repent.
@rambultruesdell341223 сағат бұрын
Very interesting, really. As far as a 'super' weapon goes, it's the wholesale slaughter that keeps nuclear war from happening. Ask the Hiroshima crew.
@walkerig123 сағат бұрын
So what they will be looking at is resonant frequencies.
@ManuelPinner23 сағат бұрын
the US military already have these weapons and they also have antimatter bombs, but they do not want to use them on this planet!
@atanasgenov6950Күн бұрын
Great video and channel! Also first time seeing someone uses Cyrillic for units - 4:06 :) cool touch.
@noreply5461Күн бұрын
Ok, a million kilowatt hours is 1000 megawatt hours and the average annual energy consumption of a private home, as in a villa, is about 2 to 3 % of that. Or are you talking about kilowatt seconds?
@evilzarmy1Күн бұрын
Black holes are not real and are just another thing science can't explain, and only a fool shares theories as fact
@clydecox2108Күн бұрын
Very interesting.
@pauloneill9880Күн бұрын
Ps what about the nuclear winter? The dust thrown into upper atmosphere for years?
@pauloneill9880Күн бұрын
Like nukes without the drawback radiation? Well except millions of deaths. Err great? SMH
@attica7980Күн бұрын
Is this a video originally produced in Russia? The use of Cyrillic script (keV in Cyrillic) and the use of the decimal comma (2,22) would seem to indicate so.
@OceanusHeliosКүн бұрын
Isomers? Come on. Do you mean isotopes? That's the dumbest gaff imaginable if you understand even junior high level chemistry. Also, "without the radiation" is a lie. You can't have that. Not only will you have gamma radiation which is ionizing (it's the light coming off of the bomb)... But you will also still have flying neutrons...hitting non radioactive atoms in the line of fire....and smashing into them and turning them into now radioactive elements. This is absurd and dumb and ignores, well, all of physics. Can't even get the terminology right let alone understanding any of the underlying principles. I'm still watching. NO they are not called energy levels and sublevels. They are called shells and subshells. Good grief. This is one of the stupidest videos I've seen yet. But it has pretty pictures, kind of like Terence Howard. This isn't infotainment. This is disinformation.
@JohnMacFergus-oz5cpКүн бұрын
Great, another kind of bomb.
@user-vm8te7nt4vКүн бұрын
Jesus said "I do not bring peace, but a sword" Plot twist, he was talking about the bible, for it is a weapon that can destroy the evil in mens hearths.
@jumpingman8160Күн бұрын
Neutrinum bombs are better.
@dewdew2706Күн бұрын
Instead of physical destruction use a neutron bomb which just kills people with super gamma neutrons, and other radiation
@alanhilton7336caradventureКүн бұрын
I just hope that when we can reliably manufacture large amounts of antimatter it's used for space exploration not war...... It'll be war.
@user-kj7uy5lj2xКүн бұрын
WAR.
@hellenicculture8169Күн бұрын
εκανα λαθος ειδα ιντεαλ και το περασα για..ισραελ, σορρυ απλως μας κυνηγαει το φαντασμα αυτο, παντως το αφνιο εχει σχετικα φτωχο λεξαριθμο τιποτα φανσυ και εαν δουμε το Hf 72φαινεται για βραδυκαυστο υλικο και θα εχει φτωχα αποτελεσματα και ουτε καλη καυση θα εχει θα ειναι βρωμικων και φτωχων αποτελεσματων τιποτα ακαριαιο και θα χρειαστη μεγα καλυτερους πυροδοτητες και απο το πλουτωνιο που θα τους βρεις? εισαι αμερικανος?
@hellenicculture8169Күн бұрын
κουκου? τι κουκου?
@hellenicculture8169Күн бұрын
φτιαχνιουμ ε? πατατονε αναφτονε ρουφατονε? σε λιγο θα μας πεις οτι εφτιαξες την ποιο φονικη βομβα της ιστοριας απο διαβασμενα καρβουνακια!!! δεν βαζω στοιχημα κοροιδο δεν πιανομε εγω
@amanthatthinksКүн бұрын
9:58 you're just joking at this point or you're very bad at math. 2740 units of electricity in a day for a private home? Maybe a private factory you wanted to say....?
@ThisGuy-79Күн бұрын
Definitely read some comments before wasting your time...
@nonsequitorКүн бұрын
13:45 *"how about a hand grenade with a 100K kg TNT yield?"* - errr... no thank you 😳😳😳😂
@JohnPochintesta-tx3shКүн бұрын
The Supreme court ruled on Nuclear about policy and the policy is Nuclear only.
@stevenbliss989Күн бұрын
All very nice, but it all depends on practical directed intense gamma ray source, ....GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!
@truerthanyouknow9456Күн бұрын
The radioactive nature of nuclear weapons is an essential part of the deterrent preventing world war 3. If the fallout after use is so horrible that no one can use the nuked land for generations, then maybe we should simply not use them against each other.
@emperor002002Күн бұрын
Cobalt bomb, Thorium Bomb, Neutron Bomb, Quantum Bomb, Nova Bomb!
@Ruben-li4dtКүн бұрын
could there be a hafnium drive?
@EGR494Күн бұрын
Well this would be borderline useless as a weapon if you dont want to go the burned earth route. Also could you please give the sources for your video, pretty please
@user-jc2we4sn1iКүн бұрын
March 2004 "Popular Mechanics" on hafnium powered jet engines.
@user-jc2we4sn1iКүн бұрын
Dr. Mitchell Swartz of MIT says I should pursue x-rays on hafnium due to toxicology of beryllium alloys since without nuclear atomic energy we are stuck on one planet.
@aloha_penguinКүн бұрын
The world needs hafnium to keep rods cooled within nuclear power plants AND we're due to run out of it by 2030
@merpie1017Күн бұрын
How about we just like, stop making bombs. That'd be nice
@paulross225Күн бұрын
Yeah,but who's we?
@Mong-ClizzyКүн бұрын
Isomers? You mean isotopes?!... "Isomers" is an organic chemisty term.... whereby a molecule can have various forms (isomers) that differ in confomations due to arrangements and location of bonds....
@user-dx1vm4pb8qКүн бұрын
Whats the difference between Small and Massive ?
@TheNewPhysicsКүн бұрын
Propulsion by light is always a bad idea. Photons don't carry that much momentum.
@omsingharjitКүн бұрын
Antimatter bomb is king of All The maximum energy possibly release from any mass
@petertimp5416Күн бұрын
Great use for mining, etc.
@markkettlewell7441Күн бұрын
Hm. The narrator doesn’t know the difference between an isomer and an isotope. Very shoddy.
@harrymorgan4460Күн бұрын
Surely the no radioactive waste means they are more likely to actually get used? These are not a good thing
@carriersignalКүн бұрын
Our enemies would know this, which would be a deterrent in itself. They better behave themselves.
@fontendeКүн бұрын
weapons without radiation is a pure aggression weaponry which can be used only for evil-to take the leftovers from victims, this is antihumane in nature and Nuremberg tribunal after this makes no historical sense, victorious sides no better than defeated
@NickDoddTVКүн бұрын
I love science
@Yyff6f6fКүн бұрын
Make peace, not war.
@jerrywatt6813Күн бұрын
Solving the x ray problem ? DARPA probably has it in the bag !😊
@weirdsciencetv4999Күн бұрын
You would still have nuclear winter from burning cities
Пікірлер
My favorite isomer is Bi-210m. It can be triggered easily by a deep UVC pulse, by incorporating it in a z-pinch array, by bombarding it with gamma rays. It can be burned as a clean fuel by exposing its salts to radio frequencies which accelerates its alpha decay. It would make the perfect military fuel for drones of all sorts. It can be made easily by putting normal bismuth into nuclear reactors, subject it to neutron bombardment, take it out, wait a few weeks so that the short lived elements have decayed away and chemically extract the Bi-210m. It could be loaded as a salt in a coaxial tube fed 2GHz and it would give off enough heat to power drones and equipment of all sorts.
15:55 Now I want to imagine a Dyson ring around the sun make it rotate its way into being a time machine. ;)
If this fantasy was true you would make widespread destruction loss of life without the fallout great and when everyone has this thing aren't we even worse off I question your sanity
you can read more about the controversy surrounding Hafnium at the Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_controversy The book written by Sharon Weinberger in 2006, "Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld" discusses this question. The issue of realizing a gamma-ray laser can also be found on Wikipedia (and the references therein). While the subject of intense research during the Strategic Defense Initiative, practical realizations do not exist yet, and the basic physics of whether they could ever exist remain unknown. Note, however, the x-ray lasers developed during this time do exist (but these do not use nuclear isomeric states).
When is humanity going to learn from its past and stop trying to come up with new ways to kill itself and the planet.
When the Andrew Tates of this world repent.
Very interesting, really. As far as a 'super' weapon goes, it's the wholesale slaughter that keeps nuclear war from happening. Ask the Hiroshima crew.
So what they will be looking at is resonant frequencies.
the US military already have these weapons and they also have antimatter bombs, but they do not want to use them on this planet!
Great video and channel! Also first time seeing someone uses Cyrillic for units - 4:06 :) cool touch.
Ok, a million kilowatt hours is 1000 megawatt hours and the average annual energy consumption of a private home, as in a villa, is about 2 to 3 % of that. Or are you talking about kilowatt seconds?
Black holes are not real and are just another thing science can't explain, and only a fool shares theories as fact
Very interesting.
Ps what about the nuclear winter? The dust thrown into upper atmosphere for years?
Like nukes without the drawback radiation? Well except millions of deaths. Err great? SMH
Is this a video originally produced in Russia? The use of Cyrillic script (keV in Cyrillic) and the use of the decimal comma (2,22) would seem to indicate so.
Isomers? Come on. Do you mean isotopes? That's the dumbest gaff imaginable if you understand even junior high level chemistry. Also, "without the radiation" is a lie. You can't have that. Not only will you have gamma radiation which is ionizing (it's the light coming off of the bomb)... But you will also still have flying neutrons...hitting non radioactive atoms in the line of fire....and smashing into them and turning them into now radioactive elements. This is absurd and dumb and ignores, well, all of physics. Can't even get the terminology right let alone understanding any of the underlying principles. I'm still watching. NO they are not called energy levels and sublevels. They are called shells and subshells. Good grief. This is one of the stupidest videos I've seen yet. But it has pretty pictures, kind of like Terence Howard. This isn't infotainment. This is disinformation.
Great, another kind of bomb.
Jesus said "I do not bring peace, but a sword" Plot twist, he was talking about the bible, for it is a weapon that can destroy the evil in mens hearths.
Neutrinum bombs are better.
Instead of physical destruction use a neutron bomb which just kills people with super gamma neutrons, and other radiation
I just hope that when we can reliably manufacture large amounts of antimatter it's used for space exploration not war...... It'll be war.
WAR.
εκανα λαθος ειδα ιντεαλ και το περασα για..ισραελ, σορρυ απλως μας κυνηγαει το φαντασμα αυτο, παντως το αφνιο εχει σχετικα φτωχο λεξαριθμο τιποτα φανσυ και εαν δουμε το Hf 72φαινεται για βραδυκαυστο υλικο και θα εχει φτωχα αποτελεσματα και ουτε καλη καυση θα εχει θα ειναι βρωμικων και φτωχων αποτελεσματων τιποτα ακαριαιο και θα χρειαστη μεγα καλυτερους πυροδοτητες και απο το πλουτωνιο που θα τους βρεις? εισαι αμερικανος?
κουκου? τι κουκου?
φτιαχνιουμ ε? πατατονε αναφτονε ρουφατονε? σε λιγο θα μας πεις οτι εφτιαξες την ποιο φονικη βομβα της ιστοριας απο διαβασμενα καρβουνακια!!! δεν βαζω στοιχημα κοροιδο δεν πιανομε εγω
9:58 you're just joking at this point or you're very bad at math. 2740 units of electricity in a day for a private home? Maybe a private factory you wanted to say....?
Definitely read some comments before wasting your time...
13:45 *"how about a hand grenade with a 100K kg TNT yield?"* - errr... no thank you 😳😳😳😂
The Supreme court ruled on Nuclear about policy and the policy is Nuclear only.
All very nice, but it all depends on practical directed intense gamma ray source, ....GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!
The radioactive nature of nuclear weapons is an essential part of the deterrent preventing world war 3. If the fallout after use is so horrible that no one can use the nuked land for generations, then maybe we should simply not use them against each other.
Cobalt bomb, Thorium Bomb, Neutron Bomb, Quantum Bomb, Nova Bomb!
could there be a hafnium drive?
Well this would be borderline useless as a weapon if you dont want to go the burned earth route. Also could you please give the sources for your video, pretty please
March 2004 "Popular Mechanics" on hafnium powered jet engines.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz of MIT says I should pursue x-rays on hafnium due to toxicology of beryllium alloys since without nuclear atomic energy we are stuck on one planet.
The world needs hafnium to keep rods cooled within nuclear power plants AND we're due to run out of it by 2030
How about we just like, stop making bombs. That'd be nice
Yeah,but who's we?
Isomers? You mean isotopes?!... "Isomers" is an organic chemisty term.... whereby a molecule can have various forms (isomers) that differ in confomations due to arrangements and location of bonds....
Whats the difference between Small and Massive ?
Propulsion by light is always a bad idea. Photons don't carry that much momentum.
Antimatter bomb is king of All The maximum energy possibly release from any mass
Great use for mining, etc.
Hm. The narrator doesn’t know the difference between an isomer and an isotope. Very shoddy.
Surely the no radioactive waste means they are more likely to actually get used? These are not a good thing
Our enemies would know this, which would be a deterrent in itself. They better behave themselves.
weapons without radiation is a pure aggression weaponry which can be used only for evil-to take the leftovers from victims, this is antihumane in nature and Nuremberg tribunal after this makes no historical sense, victorious sides no better than defeated
I love science
Make peace, not war.
Solving the x ray problem ? DARPA probably has it in the bag !😊
You would still have nuclear winter from burning cities