Пікірлер

• 
  @dejal.360659 минут бұрын

  'Like' is not the appropriated word, I think it is depend on Data Measurement Scale.

• 
  @Abzarad2 сағат бұрын

  Great video. Many thanks.

• 
  @seeratsajjad32242 күн бұрын

  Sir not able to run the dea.boot.Function not available.Kindly help

• 
  @andremendonca1125 күн бұрын

  thank you!

• 
  @haneihashemloo956 күн бұрын

  What a useful video ...Please introduce the app you make this questionnaire

• 
  @ani9676 күн бұрын

  Please make a video for me philosophy of science and classic in ethics

• 
  @RESEARCHHUB6 күн бұрын

  @@ani967 here on philosophy of science kzread.info/dash/bejne/oGx2l5KBetWnppM.htmlsi=Zhg3mBtT6rCLEHAU

• 
  @hajarzakzouk74587 күн бұрын

  Very good explanation.. I have a question if you please, if I have an independent variable containing only two groups how can I get the subset for them ?

• 
  @sanjulaksithajayaratna72137 күн бұрын

  Thanks Lot

• 
  @dharmeshkumarpatelbalubhai268812 күн бұрын

  Thanks for the detailed overview of Scopus and informative video.

• 
  @mohammedalnour31812 күн бұрын

  Thanks for the wonderful presentation. I may ask how to covert any data to weekly data?

• 
  @MataiKiel.D13 күн бұрын

  thank you.......crystal clear sir

• 
  @darshan148015 күн бұрын

  In my study, I have control variables in the form of statements (Latent variable). So in this case, where should I connect it? To the dependent one only or should I connect to the mediating and moderating variable too?

• 
  @Wooj178916 күн бұрын

  For your naive forecast, you say today's fcst is the same as yesterday, but why do you offset naive fcst by 1 qtr? Is yesterdays fcst = previous qtr fcst? This is the part I'm not quite understanding.. hm

• 
  @tuji-tube17 күн бұрын

  thank you dear. how about wiley journals

• 
  @MaGIS_Techno17 күн бұрын

  Thank you indeed for wonderful introduction about converted Thesis paper to Journey Article. hopefully, this introduction Mean a lot for those who desire to covert their Thesis to Article. thank you one again.

• 
  @RESEARCHHUB13 күн бұрын

  We have now developed a course on master thesis, check it out at researchhub.org/p/master-thesis-writing-from-start-to-finish

• 
  @alisahlan401419 күн бұрын

  very nice explanation

• 
  @HarshDadhaniya-s1r19 күн бұрын

  Sir, First, thank you so much for making this informative video about ANN. Sir, could you make a video on the ANN genetic algorithm ?

• 
  @HarshDadhaniya-s1r19 күн бұрын

  Sir, Firstly, thank you so much for making this informative video about ANN. I have one request, Sir. Could you make a video on ANN genetic algorithm ?

• 
  @mowahedeconomicslectures894119 күн бұрын

  Hello sir, I have a question. I want to forecast panel data for more than 100 countries. My data is yearly data and I want to forecast CO2 based on GDP Growth for the mentioned sample. Which Econometrics Models can accurately work in this situation?

• 
  @quangvinh470126 күн бұрын

  Hi Sir, could you please share the research paper (pdf file) with us for studying in details? Many thank you for your useful explanation.

• 
  @somanujdey29 күн бұрын

  I want a lewk😂 on co-occurance - keywords chart.. where can I find that ??

• 
  @amanlake100Ай бұрын

  dear sir why is the R-squared of random effect is .z?

• 
  @user-kp3db1wu4wАй бұрын

  All this is a post facto hand waving for people in the humanities, of no value whatsoever for people actually engaged in research.

• 
  @RESEARCHHUBАй бұрын

  Unfortunately you have no idea about research!

• 
  @user-kp3db1wu4wАй бұрын

  ⁠I led a research group in molecular genetics for thirty years, so do have some idea. Philosophy of science is about as much use in the lab as ornithology is to birds. Descriptively, Feuerabend is the closest to what actually happens, but he is far too anarchistic.

• 
  @RESEARCHHUBАй бұрын

  @@user-kp3db1wu4w there is no science without philosophy of science. some people know it, some don't. some don't know that they know

• 
  @user-kp3db1wu4wАй бұрын

  Maybe, in the same trivial sense that there is no life without a philosophy of life. Certainly many great physicists have arrived at philosophical positions, but as a consequence of their work rather than as its methodological basis. As a discipline, philosophy hasn’t been able to contribute anything, unless you want to call all of science philosophy - we do after all get PhDs.

• 
  @mr.rahulrai9111Ай бұрын

  Sir share this copy

• 
  @sumankumardas4126Ай бұрын

  Then why you dont choose the most imporatnt one , such as if Style is more important then price . Then the best criteria should be Style.

• 
  @vrimashukla2837Ай бұрын

  Thank u sir

• 
  @mengsdok8747Ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @KollysmanАй бұрын

  Thank you so much for this. It's indeed helpful sir.. I'll greatly appreciate your idea on how to choose a training algorithm apart from the ones on the available options. Best regards

• 
  @kajalmakwana1057Ай бұрын

  Helpful video

• 
  @jigarjoshi6708Ай бұрын

  Thanks so much..

• 
  @DespiSteffiАй бұрын

  I'd like to know what was the purpose saving the unstandardized predicted values. I didn't see them used in the second regression so, what should we do with them? Could anyone help me with this information? thank you

• 
  @ntebomoela8443Ай бұрын

  How reliable and valid are the questionnaires? Do I use the rated questions and just find alpha value?

• 
  @jamalnumanАй бұрын

  But we didn't understand what the heteroskedasticity indicate for! for example, if we have a model that make a prediction for the house price based on the three variables: area, age, location. then what does it mean to have heteroskedasticity?

• 
  @ashvinpatel3391Ай бұрын

  Good presentation

• 
  @ViBuZoneАй бұрын

  How to use free matlab please add matlb link here

• 
  @zaimonmateoАй бұрын

  Can we use maximum likelihood even if the variables are not normaly distributed?

• 
  @ishitakothari1088Ай бұрын

  not able to download the dataset from the above link page not found is coming

• 
  @AjitKumarSahiАй бұрын

  can i get ppt used and excel sheet computation done

• 
  @bavaliyaganapat5577Ай бұрын

  Nicely explained

• 
  @bhavyaradadiya8805Ай бұрын

  Very well explained

• 
  @anita7021Ай бұрын

  If text data exists in input data then we have to convert it into numerical value??... what should we do in that type of case?

• 
  @RESEARCHHUBАй бұрын

  better code it into categories. this video might help kzread.info/dash/bejne/rJ521byLn7SpgZs.htmlsi=2_16UNWySfnQb3Vs

• 
  @molecular_mystiqueАй бұрын

  Thank you.

• 
  @user-yy8kj2st8jАй бұрын

  Bro you saved me!! Thanks a lot! 💪

• 
  @ilanalonUSAАй бұрын

  This video is about how to conduct a literature review and what the most valuable part of a literature review is. The speaker argues that simply presenting descriptive statistics and correlation tables is not enough for a literature review. A good literature review should synthesize the information from the literature and develop a new framework or research agenda. The most valuable part of a literature review is the ability to transform these descriptive statistics into a new framework or research agenda. The speaker suggests four possible outcomes of a literature review: a taxonomy, a research agenda, a conceptual framework, or a meta-theory. A taxonomy is a classification system that can be used to group related articles together. A research agenda is a plan for future research. A conceptual framework is a model that shows how different concepts are related to each other. A meta-theory is a theory that integrates different theoretical domains. The speaker concludes by saying that the worst thing a student can do in a literature review is to simply present descriptive statistics. The most important part of a literature review is to synthesize the information from the literature and develop a new framework or research agenda. Follow or connect with the speaker Prof. Ilan Alon on linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ilanalon

• 
  @ilanalonUSAАй бұрын

  According to the video, entering and contributing to a scientific field involves listening and learning about the field before you can start introducing your own ideas. The speaker uses a party analogy to illustrate his point. Imagine being at a party where there are groups of people already talking amongst themselves. If you just walk in and start talking about yourself, people will likely ignore you. The same is true in science. Newcomers need to listen and learn about the field before they can start introducing their own ideas. The speaker suggests that the first thing newcomers should do is listen to the conversations that are already happening. This can be done by reading the scientific literature in the field. Once you have a good understanding of the field, you can start to build on the work of others. This is how science progresses: by building on the shoulders of giants. The speaker concludes by saying that he often receives submissions from people who have not read any of the papers in his journal. These people are like the person who walks into a party and starts talking without listening to anyone else. They are not part of the scientific conversation, and their work is not likely to be well-received. Follow or connect with Alon on linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ilanalon

• 
  @JyotiRaju-sz5wlАй бұрын

  can we load the bibliometrix file and process for analytics?

• 
  @RESEARCHHUBАй бұрын

  yes

• 
  @sureshchaudhari7459Ай бұрын

  very helpful to find the journal which indexed in scopus or not

• 
  @marinaproenca1744Ай бұрын

  Hi. How did you do that selection for the best and the worst one in google forms? That personalised field.

• 
  @RESEARCHHUBАй бұрын

  We have given you access to the course where you have all details, researchhub.org/.

• 
  @accountantsohanakhanpathan71102 ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @ishqms2 ай бұрын

  Good one