Randy Neil, MD

Randy Neil, MD

Psychiatrist, Teacher, & Educational Coach
Former Chief Resident
www.coastalmdlive.com

The best part of becoming MD was the journey... almost anti-climactic. I believe 'we should help the next guy in line'... I hope these videos help you through the process. Everything I learned was taught to me by someone else and it's my turn to pass it along.

Пікірлер

  • @fegoredegbo8455
    @fegoredegbo845515 сағат бұрын

    Thank you so much🙏. It was so helpful

  • @mirzamabroorahmad222
    @mirzamabroorahmad222Күн бұрын

    Thank you so much sir! I have my step 1 in around 10 days and watching your videos has really helped allot with revision of these hard topics. Hope you continue to make more awesome content just like this

  • @Obion408
    @Obion408Күн бұрын

    what are your thoughts on a high value test vs a low value test. amboss defines high value as tumor marker, and low value as like hyponatremia cutoff for example. from what i understand on a basic level, they are saying low value test is the opposite of how you are explaining things.

  • @moura2682
    @moura2682Күн бұрын

    Dr Randy really "NEILED" it !!! ❤

  • @Allinonechannel-ur8tf
    @Allinonechannel-ur8tf2 күн бұрын

    Ekg

  • @carolinegu749
    @carolinegu7492 күн бұрын

    for some reason the sheets in the end made me cry 😇

  • @ilianetgarcia3456
    @ilianetgarcia34563 күн бұрын

    Thanks

  • @PablodeSarasate-fd5oj
    @PablodeSarasate-fd5oj3 күн бұрын

    Fear really hurts my performance. If I take an NBME practice test and I get a below-expectations score, I'll be anxious all day, brood about how I've done things wrong/cheated myself and procrastinated etc and how that has come back to bite me, but I've noticed that if I let go of that cloying suffocating sense of guilt while taking a practice test, I tend to do better. By better I mean slightly above average, by bad I mean below average. It's tricky, because truth is, this one test WILL determine our future..

  • @nimianteran3071
    @nimianteran30714 күн бұрын

    Hi Dr. Randy, It would be very nice if you could make a video explaining sympathomimetics; I am struggling with this topic. Even though I watched Sketchy, I still needed to correct things. Thank you; I appreciate it.

  • @datgirl1135
    @datgirl11355 күн бұрын

    Am confused they were not categorized accordingly to risk factor either so how can we b sure it’s cohort?and also thank you for all you do seriously it’s soooo helpful

  • @ammarabdalla5433
    @ammarabdalla54335 күн бұрын

    thank you so much for this video

  • @tessatoney5666
    @tessatoney56666 күн бұрын

    I just found your KZread on reddit and I am so impressed. I actually understand what is going on. I'll keep sharing with my classmates because this video is gold !!!

  • @JaedaMattis-pj1rc
    @JaedaMattis-pj1rc6 күн бұрын

    I have COMLEX-1 tomorrow and just shed a tear - this reminded me why I am here in the first place. My current reality is a result of previous thoughts and beliefs. I want to be a psychiatrist. I'm so glad I found you today. Thank you!

  • @RandyNeilMD
    @RandyNeilMD5 күн бұрын

    Believe and it will work out Perfectly. Keep me posted on your progress.

  • @Pxrdunk
    @Pxrdunk6 күн бұрын

    You are the biggest of the biggest man I adore you

  • @Nidhi15-16
    @Nidhi15-167 күн бұрын

    I so needed to hear this, failing is extremely personal and no one can really help you except yourself. Thank you for motivating words Dr Neil😊

  • @hamyeltahir3432
    @hamyeltahir34327 күн бұрын

    can someone explain confidence interval part tl me?

  • @mirzamabroorahmad222
    @mirzamabroorahmad2227 күн бұрын

    Really nice video sir! I just have one question. You solved this question by assuming both parents are carriers, what if we don't know whether the parents are carriers or not? What will the probability be in that case? I saw a question about this floating around and I still don't know the rationale behind it. Please help, Thank you

  • @HZ_007
    @HZ_0077 күн бұрын

    Question 1 - first they picked 300 males , then checked their serum PSA , 100 were found to have > 5 . They let the remaining 200 males go and isolated these 100 for biopsy to confirm Dx. 90/100 had positive biopsy findings for cancer ( TP ) . 5/100 had prostatitis findings ( FN ) . B seems right . D is wrong because only those men underwent biopsy whose PSA was GREATER than 5 ( not equal or less )

  • @srutarshighosh
    @srutarshighosh7 күн бұрын

    I keep coming back to this page, which I found out through Reddit recommendations for Biostats, but this guy is worth so much more. Your life lesson videos are absolute gems. Thank you for everything you do.

  • @usmanwisa3386
    @usmanwisa33867 күн бұрын

    The second question answer is oligodendroglioma

  • @ЭндокринологЭлбекМаматкулов
    @ЭндокринологЭлбекМаматкулов8 күн бұрын

    Thank you very much for your time and teaching!

  • @mariya1158
    @mariya11589 күн бұрын

    Shouldn’t we put hair loss/ no hair loss on top of the chart and tx/no tx aside in NNT question? Thank you.

  • @wannadoitallnow
    @wannadoitallnow9 күн бұрын

    But why does this say this is the SECOND video - I can’t find the first anywhere

  • @mohammedkhalafalla6534
    @mohammedkhalafalla653410 күн бұрын

    Hi Dr.Neil .. I'm very thankful for your informative content i've nearly watched all your biostat vids and found em very useful and impactful in my preparation .. in this particular question why we go to a d value of 0.2 directly? i think when there is no sufficient or enough data to support a certain effect size we should answer with an equivocal value as 0.5!! i think that answers like 0.0-0.2 or 0.7-0.9 are slightly extreme or radical .. is there a general role to solve it or it'll be clear in the exam vignette ?

  • @tal8871
    @tal887111 күн бұрын

    I wonder if this might change in the coming years since step 1 is now p/f. so those who pass may have passed narrowly or with flying colors, but from the standpoint of a program director, the difference in knowledge between someone who passed on their first attempt vs second attempt is much harder to quantify. Except if you look at step 2 and 3 scores.

  • @kennethdarlington682
    @kennethdarlington68211 күн бұрын

    ‘‘I am not only happy am alive but also glad that "#DrMadida" was able treat and cure me with his herbal medication of my parosmia, Meniere disease and Parkinson disease (PD) 🦠🦠with their herbal treatment. My smile is so bright because I am happy 😊😊..’’

  • @Grace-q3n
    @Grace-q3n11 күн бұрын

    Where can we get the sheets???

  • @khudijanayab4893
    @khudijanayab489311 күн бұрын

    Your amazing! If you dont mind, can you make a small video on DALY and QALY? I cant seem to understand that. I will truly appreciate it

  • @preethi7751
    @preethi775112 күн бұрын

    Thank you Dr. Neil!!! Do you have videos on calculating incidence and prevalence?

  • @OmgitzEcchi
    @OmgitzEcchi12 күн бұрын

    Best explanation I have ever seen on G proteins. Awesome stuff, thank you

  • @alvinscharles498
    @alvinscharles49813 күн бұрын

    My STEP 1 exam is tomorrow

  • @AndriiTumachok
    @AndriiTumachok13 күн бұрын

    Excellent thanks 👍

  • @colemcdonald2719
    @colemcdonald271914 күн бұрын

    the statement that correlation coefficient is based on slope is incorrect. It is how tight the line is (how "correlated" 2 things are even if the slope is weak). (around 25:50)

  • @user-on8xj6te8j
    @user-on8xj6te8j14 күн бұрын

    Thank you sir

  • @sanaqazi281
    @sanaqazi28114 күн бұрын

    Please put one video up for Hardy weinberg Law along with practise questions!

  • @weaslerocks
    @weaslerocks16 күн бұрын

    The vancomycin example is not correct because half-life is 6 hours while the frequency of dosing is 12 hours. So two half-lifes occur with one dose given. If 1000mg is given, 12 hours later, 250mg is present (2 half-lives have occurred), then another 1000mg is given (1250mg goes through two half lives), it will be 312.5 -> Another 1000 would be 1312.5, and after two half-lives, it will be 328.15. It would take much more than 36 hours to reach steady state at this dosing frequency. Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but 24 hours (option D) only holds true if the dosing frequency and half-life are the same duration.

  • @zakarya943
    @zakarya94317 күн бұрын

    I thought its CNS cause of berry anurysm

  • @kakossniper
    @kakossniper17 күн бұрын

    You’re the real MVP

  • @NoorjahanJaganath
    @NoorjahanJaganath18 күн бұрын

    I am 60 years old. I completed basic sciences and failed NBME comp with 54 percentage. I was so disappointed and was in shock. God has showed me this video to pick myself back. I really feel like crying to watch this video. You inspired me. I was already quit the study. Thank you so much Dr Neil. Love you sir

  • @Abiro84
    @Abiro8418 күн бұрын

    Hello Dr. Neil, thank you for your videos, just a question regarding AIS, does the patient develop male internal genitalia?

  • @mindsrelief2872
    @mindsrelief287218 күн бұрын

    Great❤

  • @mindsrelief2872
    @mindsrelief287218 күн бұрын

    Totally related ❤ Nice one🎉

  • @sabicashahzad4916
    @sabicashahzad491618 күн бұрын

    DR.Randy can i have your email add.thanx

  • @La123x
    @La123x18 күн бұрын

    How can we work the last problem with the equation for ARR

  • @sabicashahzad4916
    @sabicashahzad491619 күн бұрын

    DR.RANDY can i please have your email ad ,thanx

  • @rohnegi
    @rohnegi19 күн бұрын

    Go grateful!! thanks

  • @user-ck3hz7dp3g
    @user-ck3hz7dp3g19 күн бұрын

    Randy they think I know Psychiatry. I don't say a word in medicine in your presence. I sit like a student and take notes!!!!

  • @user-ck3hz7dp3g
    @user-ck3hz7dp3g19 күн бұрын

    Goodness Randy!!! Uhm Dr. Neil - former med school classmate and your former student here - Silile. I lost your email with all the notes you made easy for the team. I still haven't taken my boards but looking into doing a hospital in Victoria Falls (Zimbabwe.) I will reach out to the school and ask them to find you when I am ready. I need your help with the missionary hospital Randy. God bless you for all your humble service. You're a true inspiration!!!! Do an update video on what you been up to lately. Still Chief of Psychiatry? Infinite congrats to you Prof. Neil

  • @konst_a6670
    @konst_a667019 күн бұрын

    How do I identify the Outcome and Exposure? Bc it could be possible that they change these too, dont they ?

  • @shaynadavidovhansonrealtor
    @shaynadavidovhansonrealtor20 күн бұрын

    Need help finding a “Dopamine Agonist” that doesn’t have the side effects like C/L. What else is out there to stimulate Dopamine - without the mania, constipation and nightmares? Mucuna and B1 ( maybe not taking enough) don’t seem to be doing enough and the C/L causes other awful, debilitating ( nightmares, etc) side effects in my HWP.. But w/o the Dopamine Agonist, they aren’t as active and not wanting to do as much.. Anyone have experience w / Selegiline? Doing Mucuna, L-Dopa, L- Theanine and B1- but not making a dent yet. Am I not giving right iteration or dosage? Thanks in advance🙏🏽