Пікірлер

• 
  @araldjean-charles39244 күн бұрын

  Great explanation. Has anyone ever thought of using these ideas for a language model? It could have continuous learning built in, due to the Bayesian Approach.

• 
  @rabiarasheed60738 күн бұрын

  Excellent. Do you have a video for latent variable means comparison please?

• 
  @alemg.mariam636121 күн бұрын

  Thanks for your very educative talks. I found very helpful.

• 
  @pratikshya201022 күн бұрын

  General comment Prof. , @9.07, the real part id the natural frequency and wi is the growth rate of the eigenvalue problem. Thats the general convention.

• 
  @AndreaNing-gh3sg2 ай бұрын

  Excellent teaching, thank you very much

• 
  @KaushalSoni22052 ай бұрын

  Provide simulation with macine learning matlab etc

• 
  @fotter95673 ай бұрын

  The first half was really great as an introduction to the topic. The second half is absolutely useless. Filling your slides with formulas and switching back and forth between slides is no way to teach a topic.

• 
  @samsonoketch7333 ай бұрын

  Definitely, the best R tutorial I have ever come across on KZread! Good stuff!

• 
  @chrisdonoghue3110Ай бұрын

  100% This video is great

• 
  @aaronmackay40214 ай бұрын

  Thank you for such a detailed introduction to SEM. I have a question - at 46:18 the model is called a "saturated model" because the df = 0. However I have been reading that a "saturated model" occurs when there are the same number of parameters as there are data points. In this case, the model has 5 parameters and 500 data points. Is it still a saturated model then?

• 
  @aduus2524 ай бұрын

  very insightful, I would wish to know how to use these commands after doing missing imputation with MICE

• 
  @hilariomolinaii3554 ай бұрын

  I have learned so much, gracias!

• 
  @charlotteveizs82374 ай бұрын

  how do we get the value of the latent ? not the variance but the value

• 
  @edgarhuk4 ай бұрын

  Thanks a lot! Greetings from University of Adelaide.

• 
  @ninadkorgaonkar51344 ай бұрын

  Fabulous Lecture

• 
  @brendatriumph41324 ай бұрын

  YOUR THE BEST, YOU JUST SIMPLIFIED EVERYTHING THANKYOU SO MUCH PROFESSOR

• 
  @will74lsn5 ай бұрын

  great video! Thanks. What do you think of using the estimation method DWLS instead of ML for ordinal items (such as those in the video "strongly disagree to strongly agree")? I have just read a paper (Reimann et al. 2024) where they used DWLS in a 2-factor CFA and got a great RMSEA (0.01). Their rationale was that the responses are ordinal and not continuous. Interestingly, I could run the same data set with ML and got an RMSEA = 0.13. Obviously a big difference. In papers, authors often do not even mention their estimation method.

• 
  @KN-tx7sd5 ай бұрын

  Wow, this is outstanding! Will it be possible to do similar in R program

• 
  @corecode44915 ай бұрын

  Wow..what a tutorial Thank you so much❤❤

• 
  @lindalarsen91025 ай бұрын

  For a complete novice to Mplus this was a great introductory tutorial. Thank you.

• 
  @y.n.z.81596 ай бұрын

  I am in an intermediate statistics and research course for my doctoral program. I began reading Hayes and found myself dissociating with glazed stares. This workshop has provided an informative path to at least begin to consume the material with some understanding. Your assistance with downloading the PROCESS macro was also very helpful. I hope to find moderation and conditional process analysis workshops from this source as well. Thank you very much!!

• 
  @Zane_Zaminsky6 ай бұрын

  Matlab? Mathematica? Maple? Python? R? Thanks.

• 
  @juliuskimani67266 ай бұрын

  Once I save the folium html, after two days, the interactive visualization stops to display. What could be the problem?

• 
  @TheJammed6 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much. Very helpful!

• 
  @andrewnguyen33127 ай бұрын

  Great video thank you!

• 
  @CanDoSo_org7 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the great tutorial. At 1:51:35, is the wt.loss also by the time of beginning the study (treatment), like the age variable? Thanks.

• 
  @barjesh7 ай бұрын

  My rmse is more than 0.8

• 
  @barjesh7 ай бұрын

  My cfi is 1 and rmse NA

• 
  @mustafanasiri62478 ай бұрын

  Thank you very much for an excellent lecture on CFA. Just a small comment/correction on the very final exercise: the Test statistic for the User Model, is 554.191. In your solution, it is 562.790. and the Degree of Freedom is 20, not 21. By putting these numbers in the formula, we get the correct CFI, which is 0.871 (rounded).

• 
  @user-nb9fx2ew3x8 ай бұрын

  The 'li' syntax didn't work for me. It returned errors

• 
  @sixzero74458 ай бұрын

  Still can't believe this is free to watch for everyone. Thank you so much.

• 
  @Lancedin3218 ай бұрын

  So much rambling in this presentation. The content gets lost in it.

• 
  @datawithstata9 ай бұрын

  Great video! Great delivery and insights!

• 
  @RRL04029 ай бұрын

  This is the resource I needed for my Dissertation. As someone with no strong stat and R background, this really helped me. Thank you very much Dr. Lin!

• 
  @RayRay-yt5pe9 ай бұрын

  I swear to god, this is the least technical intro I've ever seen in a stat course. It speaks volumes of the teachin style. Amazing job.

• 
  @aliabasnezhad78729 ай бұрын

  this is so bad!

• 
  @AlexB-tn1ec9 ай бұрын

  this is the worst tutorial ever, this person cannot even speak English properly. why UCLA does not ask someone to teach this material who can actually speak English? waste of resources and time!

• 
  @xuyang277610 ай бұрын

  Hello, Author. Could you tell me how to get the residual vairances of a MSE by lavaan()? Thanks

• 
  @haraldurkarlsson114710 ай бұрын

  The HR for wt.loss in the lung data has a p value in excess of 0.05. Thus it is not statistically significant.

• 
  @haraldurkarlsson114710 ай бұрын

  I am not really seeing the difference between informative and formative censoring. I am also struggling with the comparison with NAs. NAs missing at random is easy to spot but not so sure about the censoring.

• 
  @haraldurkarlsson114710 ай бұрын

  This is a very informative presentation and clearly laid out. However, in terms of earthquakes I don't think it is safe to say that the hazard is constant. Hazard along the San Andreas fault should clearly vary depending on the region next to the fault (rock types vary, last time there was earthquake and so on).

• 
  @rohitdhankar36010 ай бұрын

  Excellent , thanks for sharing -- Best Regards

• 
  @muhammadumarakbar8946 Жыл бұрын

  Great workshop, Can I found any advance level course of the instructor?

• 
  @welcometomathy Жыл бұрын

  very good analysis. well done

• 
  @hannesbecher5628 Жыл бұрын

  Animated plots from 1:01:40

• 
  @hannesbecher5628 Жыл бұрын

  Recipes start at 47:52

• 
  @fatematuzzahrasaqui2732 Жыл бұрын

  Dr. Lin, is there any video on your seminar on EFA?

• 
  @user-ub9wr6vo3m Жыл бұрын

  These videos are fantastic. Thank you!

• 
  @DrSamsHealth Жыл бұрын

  Was the .DAT file mystery ever resolved?

• 
  @simwaneh1685 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks, is there a way to get the ppts including your r commands??

• 
  @johanvanzyl5609 Жыл бұрын

  Excellent video! I had absolutely no knowledge of STATA before, but now I have to use it for my research, and this video really helped me get going. Thanks!