Dr. Mike Jansen explores the latest chess games of Magnus Carlsen, Hans Niemann, Hikaru Nakamura, Gotham Chess, and more!
Curious about modern grandmaster opening preparation? Looking for detailed move-by-move explanations that are helpful for complete beginners and strong amateur chess players? Want to learn how the world's top players incorporate strategies developed by Alpha Zero and other revolutionary "neural network" chess engines?
I've got you covered!
Here you will find detailed commentary and insights on some of the most epic chess matches ever played!
In case you were curious, my current online rating on Lichess.org is 2,000.
I'm trying to learn from the latest grandmaster games myself, so these videos are designed for amateur players who are serious about improving their online rating. I hope you find my videos helpful AND entertaining!
One more thing - if you find my content valuable, please subscribe to my channel! It helps more than you know!
LET'S GOOOOO!!!
Пікірлер
Even against much lower-rated players, if a guy flat out leaves a major piece obviously hanging, when it could be defended, something might be horribly amiss. I’m honestly surprised he took the bait.
all your videos of your face are cut at each 5 or 10 seconds .... wtk! why???
are you on pills? like concerta or vicance??
wow. its amazing how one wrong move change the eval bar
alireza played really bad, another player would have won this
Alireza is not ready for Magnus.
Why is your board so laggy?
Please set move clicks down 6 db ,,, good podcast !
Terrible game
Crap analys
Overhype. All opening moves were brilliant?
blunderfest
Ill be... dangit... Magnus did use a "net & trident" (trident: 3 point spear) *i mentioned this previously... -I believe i also mentioned just about everything he's doing up till now (12:05)... -I did mismention +2 (oops, ment -2) & a few minor details incorrect... -controls F&G, then B & ends up winning with checkmate on H... using Queen & Rook... Holy heck, i called this 1... no edited comments & hopefully time stamps for my posts align with game play... within reasonable time span... I'll pat myself on my back...
Uggghhh... dang trash day, completely forgot... running outside barefoot, swinging arms to trash dude, stepoing in rocky dirt, dragging out 2 cans cauz i had to, hahahaha... crazy...
(7:05) white: Knight to E4 (u said a good idea, I disagree) *blk Bishop will come up -Queen will have angle support -rook slids over & -knight will move 2Xs (maybe) These moves will take 2 or 3 pieces, offsetting white positioning in center of board... (lets see what happens, haha)
(2:55) i think Mag is gonna pretend a switch sides for board control (the net)... He's gonna end up controlling 3 columns/Letters "F&G"... I'll guess "DorH" -show attack weak side, slice a sliver off the strong... ending in a +2 piece for Mag with threat to King & 2 other pieces... (before using "rook with queen" & 2 pawns with a knight)
That Alpha Zero attack as you call it is the good old minority attack, lol.
thinking that H4 so long before was the trick. What a bullshit. Magnus just got lucky that Alireza blundered by taking the pawn 12:13
Smith Morra looks deadly. I can watch Marc Esserman's videos for hours. Smith Morra in an arena would be super exciting.
Umm after all the shade thrown at Hikaru.
I think Bobby Fisher would be very pleased to see this type of play. Throwing opening theory out the window and just forcing a game of pure chess. Beautiful.
3… c6 can’t be a new move. Use that many times in the past and have won some games with that.
o my goodness
The tune is so silent.
The name is Alireza not Alireshja. The opening is also called Blockade on the white squares and played in the early '70's. See 'The Modern Defence'.
stop cutting the pauses FCS
Chess new ideas with engine move 😅
Never heard alireza being called alirejža
After the knight sacrifice you asked a rhetorical question: "what was the idea?" My idea was to just look at eval bar, and it was equal. Wow!
thriftstore gothamchess.
You’re comparing lil old me to the king of chess KZread? Well that’s the best compliment I’ve gotten so far! Thank you brother!! 👍
@@drmikechess Well played. The last thing youtube needs is one gothamchess, never mind two.
nice
Thank you! 🙏
Good commentary it just sounded his voice is monotonous. Maybe just me. I get bored easily on this analysis.
I’ll work on it, thanks for the feedback! 🙏
1:10 who does Magnus think he is? Magnus Carlsen?
🤣🤣🤣
4:22 Queen is not hitting the knight bishop has the knight protected
Good catch! 🙏
who does Magnus think he is, Magnus Carlsen? 🤣hahahahahh
🤣🤣🤣
I think a book has been published on this a few years ago.
Yes! This game was from 2018, I just found it very interesting, so I wanted to cover it to give you guys a new weapon against my favorite Najdorf Sicilian!
At 6:36 is pawn to g4 to fork Magnus' 2 kns. goofy?
Maybe, can someone else help this brother out?
Magnus "Robot memory" vs WeiYi "High IQ"
👍
1:54 bye bye. Click bait
See you next time!
What's new about this?I saw it many times,it's rare but not new
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4, then novelty na6, swinging knight a6 to g7, is very new brother, never played in history of chess 😉
There is nothing one can invent in a game with fix rules
@Nickname_42 well yes you can because invent means come up with an idea people haven't played/thought of before
@@eyeofhorus1301 Its not possible to prove it. How could one know what xy played in 1854 i.e.
By that logic, one cannot invent anything in real life, as the laws of physics are fixed We have to agree to disagree on this one brother!!
@@drmikechess Thought about that as well and in some way one can discover, but not invent.
@@Nickname_42 Same thing whoever was the first person who ever made a wheel is who invented it but no one can ever invent it again
Who does Magnus Carlsen think he is? Magnus Carlsen? 😅
Haha only reason I like the video is cause of this comment hahaha
🤣🤣🤣
Invents?? This is simply common in bullet games, why would this be considered new in any way?
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4 locking kingside, then novelty na6 connected with knight transfer to g7, is an entirely new concept, so by definition it’s new 😉
A new opening????? Gurgenidze system . Your chess culture is rather low.
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4 to lock kingside, then novelty na6 connected with knight transfer to g7 is new opening concept brother!! 😉
Invents new opening? Seriously?!? Ahemm ... this is known for at least fice decades unter the name 'Gurgenidze System'! And Magnus´ way of playing with ...h5 is the old fashioned line (and obviously he played it pretty bad, if i watch your vid and the evaluation bar! :-/); more modern is ...f6 instead as evaluated on an opening-dvd by GM Victor Boilogan
But his idea h5-h4 then novelty na6 intending transfer to g7 is new concept brother, hence the title 😉
This is just adaptive play..
You’re a mind reader? You know Magnus wasn’t deliberately playing this to throw Alireza off? Well I’m not a psychic, I’ll defer to your mind reading abilities on this one 😉
Seriously, I see this opening pawn structure (a7 b7 c6 d5 e7 f7 g6 h5) in 20% of my 600 Elo games. And I lost to all of them.
🤣 carlsens idea of h5-h4 then na6 intending route to g7 is new in my database
@@drmikechessThat’s really cool. In another perspective, I think this is why GMs deserve the respect: They don’t care if it’s a Bongcloud or a 600 Elo pawn storm opening or a midgame blunder, and can still win creatively with whatever disadvantage they are at.
Thanks for the upload.
Thank you! 🙏
I love the lower volume and the way you comment. Pure information without being annoying. Thank you.
Thank you!! 🙏
Gurgenidze invented this. I've been playing it for 50 years
Carlsens adaptation with h5-h4 then na6 intending ng7 is the novelty 😉