Oxford University Scientific Society

@eliebouroufail71073 ай бұрын

Thank you... thou art my light in darkness at the moment... <3

@Jirnyak3 ай бұрын

Dear Professor Davis, how is the progress with "Sugar PCR" project? Any interesting results?)

@user-rh5xj6lc1p5 ай бұрын

Highly informative! Very clear studies, and their results, that explain some of the previous theories, and experiments, and repercussions for future thinking of weight loss..

@cassandrabraxton12768 ай бұрын

Halfway through the sound was interfered with. yikes

@justdewit9 ай бұрын

Very well versed presenter

@publiccake9 ай бұрын

Would it be permissible for you to provide a link to the codebase?

@seanhewitt6039 ай бұрын

So, within the volume occupied by the universe, we see stars and blackholes colliding galaxies, clusters of galaxies colliding too, what is the possibility of bubble universes forming so close together, that as inflation and expansion occur, they get absorbed into one another, could this explain these concentric rings present in the cmb?

@raysalmon656611 ай бұрын

he has been drinking too much again

@june8117 Жыл бұрын

Would u let me know wade allison`s email address ??

@bruhman8005 Жыл бұрын

Didn’t know they allowed cannons in the lecture hall 🤣

@enderezjaroldadrian6865 Жыл бұрын

👶🍎

@rezahasani1617 Жыл бұрын

excellent . There are undiscovered treasures on KZread. which are discovered and suggested by artificial intelligence today. This is one of them.

@quietismyjam Жыл бұрын

quantum niche 💕⚕️

@weichen219 Жыл бұрын

"The Big Bang theory is the extremely strong restriction suppressing the gravitational degrees of freedom." said Dr. Penrose.

@anava84 Жыл бұрын

💰

@englishforsrilanka2535 Жыл бұрын

Joe Rogan anyone? I bet the leprechaun is sitting front row protecting the pot of gold.

@jessicalv6442 Жыл бұрын

Why carry on anaerobic respiration will cause increasing oxidative oxygen species? Is it because the oxygen that ought to receive the electron from the electron transport chain if it doesn't receive the electron, it is too reactive that it will damage the cells?

@gyro5d Жыл бұрын

Correct, Inflation was before the Grand Expand. Inflation of Dielectric energy, terminate to terminate. Then, Dielectric energy crystallized into Dielectric voidence field/Magnetism. This is why the Universe is homogeneous. The Scalable Aether Universe was expanded after the grand expand of Dielectric energy.

@gyro5d Жыл бұрын

You mean the "Grand Expand". When Dielectric energy Inflates and becomes Dielectric voidence field/Magnetism crystallizes into gamma rays matter. "Scalable Aether Universe"

@saliexplore3094 Жыл бұрын

Great talk, thanks for sharing.

@abcde_fz Жыл бұрын

I think this is definitely one of the better CCC talks. Dr. Penrose, (IMO), has a tendency to speak in ways where sometimes, it's a little hard to follow the 'phrases and sentences' in his spoken 'paragraphs', and taken together with his habit of sometimes switching slides back and forth quickly as he speaks 'off the cuff', he can be hard to follow. THIS talk, (IMO), he really 'hits his stride', and aside from a little problem with showing slides toward the very end, the entire talk is VERY well paced, and well served by his transparencies and other graphics.

@MARYJOEBETHELBALDUR2 жыл бұрын

Right hand path awakening

@infinitelystoned58122 жыл бұрын

Seems like my pheromones only attract land whales

@cloudofsign2 жыл бұрын

The most important Good News and Truth everyone should know in this life on earth or anywhere in or outside the universe is The Gospel of Jesus Christ: kzread.info/dash/bejne/lJdoqpVuhczZndY.html From the Bible John (The Gospel of John) Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Joh 1:2 He was in the beginning with God. Joh 1:3 All things were made through Him, and without Him was not any thing made that was made. Joh 1:4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. Joh 1:5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. Joh 1:6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. Joh 1:7 He came as a witness, to bear witness about the light, that all might believe through him. Joh 1:8 He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the light. Joh 1:9 The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, yet the world did not know Him. Joh 1:11 He came to His own, and His own people did not receive Him. Joh 1:12 But to all who did receive Him, who believed in His name, He gave the right to become children of God. Joh 1:13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. Joh 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen His glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. From the Bible Colossians Col 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, Col 1:2 To the saints and faithful brothers in Christ at Colossae: Grace to you and peace from God our Father. Col 1:3 We always thank God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we pray for you, Col 1:4 since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love that you have for all the saints, Col 1:5 because of the hope laid up for you in heaven. Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, Col 1:6 which has come to you, as indeed in the whole world it is bearing fruit and growing- as it also does among you, since the day you heard it and understood the grace of God in truth, Col 1:7 just as you learned it from Epaphras our beloved fellow servant. He is a faithful minister of Christ on your behalf Col 1:8 and has made known to us your love in the Spirit. Col 1:9 And so, from the day we heard, we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, Col 1:10 so as to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to Him, bearing fruit in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God. Col 1:11 May you be strengthened with all power, according to His glorious might, for all endurance and patience with joy, Col 1:12 giving thanks to the Father, Who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in light. Col 1:13 He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, Col 1:14 in Whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the Firstborn of all creation. Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities- all things were created through Him and for Him. Col 1:17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. Col 1:18 And He is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the Firstborn from the dead, that in everything He might be preeminent. Col 1:19 For in Him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, Col 1:20 and through Him to reconcile to Himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of His cross. Psalm 8:1-10 Psalm 19:2 (from king David) Psalm 33:1-14 Psalm 104 Philippians 2:5-11 How great Thou art kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZqaJpNN7YpjNY6w.html

@bernicegrundy50682 жыл бұрын

This is heavy going, not because of any complexity in the content of ideas but because Dr Sandberg has not learnt how to speak English like an educated English person. Is he aware of this? Has anyone pointed this out to him before? What effort has he made to learn to communicate more fluently? Does he want to? Perhaps he doesn't. I suggest that he turns his attention to studying why his mind is not open to the possibility of adopting the speech patterns of English.

@williammoody19112 жыл бұрын

Inspiring work. I am now doing my 2nd year Mathematics project on complexity in financial systems!!

@continentalgin2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful lecture. I need to learn more about the crossover threshold and the inverse which triggers or ignites another big bang. I don't have a physics background, so it's hard for me to understand. I'll watch more talks by Sir Roger on KZread and I'm sure to get a better understanding. I love the fact that his CCC does not point to a singular point. I also really like the explanation for the circular patterns found being clumping resulting from supermassive black hole collisions, if I've got that right.

@lepidoptera93372 жыл бұрын

The laws of nature were invented by man to explain observations. Beyond that there is a more technical answer along the lines of "geometry + relativity + a quantization condition = pretty much everything we see", but that argument gets highly technical once we get into the field quantization part. To understand it you will have to study five to eight years of physics full time. :-)

@bjharvey30212 жыл бұрын

Halton Arp found a lot of evidence that red-shift is not caused simply by the doppler effect. Some observations of quasars also imply that red-shift can be intrinsic to young star formation. Imagine that! If we misunderstand red-shift then there could be profound consequences for all of big-bang cosmology. Look it up, folks. Have fun getting your mind around it.

@lepidoptera93372 жыл бұрын

How much did Halton Arp have to drink before he grabbed his telescope? ;-)

@userumbleandgettr4freespee5012 жыл бұрын

I can run circles around half the clowns at Oxford. Interesting how half of the things people call conspiracy theories are shown to be true in some form within short order. You should look at yourself and correct your own thinking before pre judging others for not following the fake news. I’d say it takes more intelligence to think for one’s self than to listen to institutions these days

@sagarsingh23422 жыл бұрын

The main reason why we still have no idea how big the universe is.....we are making this more difficult then it already is...

@lepidoptera93372 жыл бұрын

We have a very good idea how big the visible universe is and beyond we don't have to care. :-)

@continentalgin2 жыл бұрын

@@lepidoptera9337 The beyond is known as the bulk.

@badlydrawnturtle84842 жыл бұрын

Imagine someone comes up to you and proposes that there's this undiscovered species in a nearby forest. "Clearly," they say, "if we can show that the droppings of this species exist, we can conclude that this species must exist." You ask them what those droppings should be expected to look like. "It's not important what precisely they look like," they admonish, "only whether they can be found to exist in the first place." Still trying to figure out how to help with this search, you press on and ask what sort of animal this new species is, hoping to at least narrow down where to look for the droppings. "I admit I don't really know what sort of animal it is, but that can be looked into after we've established that it exists." At this point, you likely walk away in frustration, but if you stay, this person will only continue to reiterate how important it is to find evidence of this species while consistently dancing around any attempt to discern what such evidence would actually look like. This is a metaphor. You are the actual experimental physicists looking for quantum gravity, and the wanna-be biologist is Dr. Marletto. Of course, it's not just one mystery species being conjectured, but an entire way of thinking about how discovering new species should work, and how amazing this new way of thinking is, and surely it will do better than the methods currently in use. In short, I'm disappointed that so many people are falling for this, and I think it makes a good illustration of how esoteric physics has become that people equate "I'm not sure I understand what you just said" with "that must be high level physics". Sometimes you don't understand what was said because what was said actually was just nonsense.

@sebastianaguiarbrunemeier91922 жыл бұрын

OUSS: you should clip the first 5 minutes of technical errors from this video.

@salmanuel40532 жыл бұрын

This is a speech with varied highlights. To hear spacetime curvature and black holes discussed by a luminary of these theoretical concepts is one. On a more earthly scale, it is engaging when he describes the biosphere by ticking off such elements as the sun, thermonuclear reactions, photosynthesis, plants, animals and us, concluding "And that's how it all works."

@continentalgin2 жыл бұрын

I enjoyed that, too. Like skimming over Darwin in a heartbeat.

@ramchandradey40593 жыл бұрын

Thanks Prof Penrose , Great intellect indeed . Im quite hopeful of coming somebody to explain in a more simple way of your complex mathematical explanation . Reg signal i may like to say that ancient indian fourfold yoga system is a contribution of the past Aeon to ourvpresent one and practicebofvyoga can directly or indirectly shall be helpful in distingishingvthecsigmal from the noise from various similar or different sources

@WorthlessWinner3 жыл бұрын

starts at 8:40

@viviennemakepeace66663 жыл бұрын

Study to find yourself approved. Talking proves you have not studied.

@matiasss5503 жыл бұрын

Can Quantum Computational Supremacy affect crypto currency?

@musajaved98623 жыл бұрын

I love Oxford and I love science, I hope to study at this great institution of Britain one day. Inshallah.

@boobalanmariasusai36023 жыл бұрын

Awesome Presentation Prof. Thank you a lot...

@susannerack85413 жыл бұрын

I liked this a lot! I've been trying to search for a KZread video like yours that explains the topics in this vid! 👨‍⚕️ 👍Your video reminds me of the channel from Doctor Ethan. His videos are helpful and he really helped me a lot on my exams. He is a great health enthusiast! You should watch his page out and give Dr Ethan a subscribe! 👉 #DrEthanAdvice

@therealsheikh3 жыл бұрын

Something from nothing is always nothing. 🎤 ⬇️

@Bogusgal2 жыл бұрын

And when nothing is in your brain, you cannot understand science.

@therealsheikh2 жыл бұрын

@@Bogusgal that's an excellent illogical and emotionally driven response. Clearly shows how much is in your brain 🤣

@Bogusgal2 жыл бұрын

@@therealsheikh No emotion behind it. Just pointing out that you do not understand what Prof. Atkins is talking about.

@user-vq6xc6zj5z7 ай бұрын

Prof. Atkins is setting as an axiom that something can come from nothing. Philospophical there is no real difference between an axiom and a religious dogma. In both cases one is not allowed to ask why that is possible. What worries me more is that he says one can divide zero into parts. Because "seperation" means nothing more than division. I wonder what my math teacher would have said if I wrote down something like "0 divided by x equals..." Normally if you divide stuff into parts each part should be less than what it was made from. So everything we see in this universe should be in reality less than nothing if it was made from nothing ... but don't wonder how this is possible, because sometimes physics is counterintuitive but atheism is by definition always sane!

@therealsheikh7 ай бұрын

@@user-vq6xc6zj5z regardless of how much you divide or subtract on nothing, it'll still be nothing. Prof. Atkins is trying to find something in nothing and it's just not going to happen. He will find the answer which his human brain cannot comprehend when he stands in front of his lord in another realm.