More about the funnel seal ring. Is it tapered or just stretched to the funnel's cone. I prefer to ask a human and get a real answer, even a relatively simple one. Just never seen those, it is usually the glass frit or ceramic filters that are a quarter the size. Have reservations about the fritt actually being clean after use. Tossng a cotton ball away sounds simpler.
@orophilia13 сағат бұрын
I bought the rubber seal rings as a set on Amazon. you get 6 or 7 different nesting sizes. They are very handy. I think the funnel with cotton is way better than the glass frit type for this work
@napalmholocaust909313 сағат бұрын
Upwind does not guarantee anything. You make a low pressure zone on the downwind side (the Lee) of your body. Right kinda breeze and distance, you'll get a face full of it. Like campfire smoke, it reaches out for ya. You're alright enough with what you are doing, but if it was something insanely poisonous, ya better not. You'll be haunting people afterwards, not ideal.
@orophilia13 сағат бұрын
you are right. it’s always better to wear good protection than to take a chance with these nasty vapors.
@MikeSpien15 сағат бұрын
What about a strong base opposed to an acid? I believe that dirt is quartz sodium hydroxide
@orophilia13 сағат бұрын
can you recommend a method?
@gsmera18 сағат бұрын
Over $100,000 in gold per MT? Absolutely incredible! Can I get just one 10 yard dump truck of it? I would be rich!
@orophilia13 сағат бұрын
yeah, incredible. I’d enjoy trying to extract it!
@wayneneher636220 сағат бұрын
Sreetips, Chief, I think you have a bit of competition here.
@JoSeeFussКүн бұрын
Smelting the Iron out would be the easiest way to go. The inquart the gold with silver, cornflake it. Then use nitric acid to separate all the wastes from the gold. Aqua Regia to start purification of the gold. Lot of steps but you want pure gold, you do what is easiest. Don't understand why no SMB to drop the gold.
@mikesherman8590Күн бұрын
Great job on that table
@rockbutcherКүн бұрын
Geochemist of 35 years here. This is a tough one given all of the iron present in the sample. 1. Trust your fire assay. 2. As another commenter here said, you might consider (getting a taller beaker) and adding additional HCl and Nitric as required in the first go to try to get everything into solution the first time. The trick is to get the iron out of the way. I've never worked at a mine where this was a problem, so I can't definitively point the way. One thing you might try is to soak a small sample (50g?) in oxalic acid until it cleans up, rinse it well and then run it with AR. Oxalic will reduce the Fe2O3 to FeO with some Fe staying in solution so you will still have some Fe to deal with, but not as much and with a weaker bond. 3. You need to filter and wash the slimes left over from filtering the AR solution. I suspect that you will find 'coarse' gold in there. By the way, when you did your math...I could have sworn that was a 250g sample, not a 350g one as you calculated. You are still short at 1039g/t so something is going on. I suspect it's the iron. Overall, a great video and your friend is going to be a happy man if his mine runs that grade for a while! *EDIT: In the beginning, when you did your HCl boil? Replace that with a nitric boil. That should remove the iron, but the nitric MUST be dilute, try 4 parts distilled water and one part of your 30 something percent nitric.
@orophiliaКүн бұрын
Great comment. Thanks
@debcamp2359Күн бұрын
Nice experiment. We like that u like Jason.😊
@corveramoenglish7275Күн бұрын
In your position, for the chemical extraction I would first roast the ore to keep only the oxides, treat with HCl to remove non precious metals, decant and proceed with AR (this to keep all the precious metals for an all encompassing assay), or treat the ore with Nitric for a gold content only assay before I touch the AR. All the other metals will drop the gold from solution so its imperative to remove those first, then your process can continue as it was done in the video. BTW, great Flux recipe!
@orophiliaКүн бұрын
thanks for the excellent comment
@mokhtarahmedyemeni380Күн бұрын
You will see the gold you have concentrated?
@orophiliaКүн бұрын
yes, eventually
@joewebster9032 күн бұрын
You need a ore splitter to obtain a statistically representative sample based on my years of chemical analysis of ore
@orophilia2 күн бұрын
have you tried the method that I used in the video?
@paulmoore96792 күн бұрын
This guy is fantastic, careful process: kzread.info/dash/bejne/enlptKaCnrPTZ8Y.htmlsi=6xHcbWbafZEeDLrs
@paulmoore96792 күн бұрын
BTW, he intentionally en quarts silver when recovering gold from cheap jewelry. Silver never stops him from achieving four 9’s
@kyledurning2 күн бұрын
That is a lot. Try adding more distilled water, as medium for the gold to dissolve into.
@TerribleShmeltingAccident2 күн бұрын
wasnt the reverse true with the last vid? with fire vs chem assay?
@orophilia2 күн бұрын
I always get more Au from a fire assay as long as I have well mixed and well divided material
@paulmoore96792 күн бұрын
#Sreetips
@orophilia2 күн бұрын
yep
@Timeparadox1012 күн бұрын
a paint brush and dust pan do wonders. love ur expertise though😊
@1kreature2 күн бұрын
Dry off the leftovers from the chemical extraction and do a fire assay on it to prove the gold is still there and was not dissolved?
@M0DiFiEDZ2 күн бұрын
I would like to see the concentration result from running through a simple sluice or maybe a good panning then examining under magnification to see the texture coarseness. With chemical extraction on ore I would roast the fine powder then pour the hot powder into a beaker of ice water which will cause the particulate to crack even finer to release more gold dust.
@orophilia2 күн бұрын
the ice bath shock sounds interesting. thanks
@Jatslo2 күн бұрын
With such a high yield of gold per metric ton, it's possible that the sample contains minerals with significant gold content, including tellurides such as calaverite (AuTe₂), krennerite (Au₈Te₆), sylvanite ((Au,Ag)Te₂), and other gold-bearing minerals. Tellurides are a group of minerals where gold is combined with tellurium. These minerals can contain significant amounts of gold, sometimes in very high concentrations. For example, Calaverite: AuTe₂, typically contains about 44% gold. Testing for tellurium in ore samples can be done using various analytical techniques. Sylvanite ((Au,Ag)Te₂) can be ruled out due to the absence of silver, if that is a true conclusion.
@orophilia2 күн бұрын
Thanks, Jatslo.
@waynoswaynos2 күн бұрын
Losses in the iron removed by magnet and perhaps in the cotton wool. And, what if the bead was heavier than gold because it contained something heavier than gold? Platinum maybe. Wasn't a very golden bead on my screen. And Thank you. Great lessons here. Some insightful comments also.
@gsmera18 сағат бұрын
It did look very pale yellow on my screen to but the process looked perfect, Platinum would be my guess also.
@rodparker65303 күн бұрын
6:47 This my friend is the difference. I put a magnet in my pan I can see gold come up with the iron. Yes, it’s a real thing.( @BiggestKev1960 ) Try a fire assay (or other) on the iron that came off the difference. If you do, call it part two. I want to revisit this story. Much appreciation, Geraldton, Western Australia
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Yes, I still have that magnetic material saved. I'll test it.
@bjvoorhies3 күн бұрын
What filter medium are you using?
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
I use regular lab filters and I use cotton for very fine filtration of colloidal gold.
@Jatslo3 күн бұрын
It seems like you're dealing with a significant discrepancy between fire assay results and chemical assay results in the context of gold recovery, possibly due to differences in sample preparation processes. Here's a more detailed look at the potential issue: Roasting Before Fire Assay: If you roasted the sample before conducting the fire assay, the roasting process likely helped to break down complex compounds that might otherwise retain the gold, thereby making it more accessible for the assay process. Roasting can convert sulfides and other compounds into oxides, which are easier to deal with in the fire assay. No Roasting Before Leaching: If you did not roast the sample before leaching, the gold might still be locked within these complex compounds, preventing it from being dissolved and recovered during the leaching process. This could lead to significantly lower gold recovery rates. Possible Causes for Discrepancy: - Presence of Sulfides or Other Refractory Materials: The presence of sulfides or other refractory materials in the ore can trap gold and prevent it from being leached effectively unless these materials are broken down by roasting. - Complex Gold Compounds: Gold can form complexes with other elements that are stable under normal leaching conditions but break down upon roasting, releasing the gold. - Inadequate Leaching Conditions: If the leaching conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, reagent concentrations) are not optimized, the gold might not be fully extracted, leading to lower assay values. Recommendations: 1. Roast Samples Before Both Fire Assay and Leaching: To ensure consistency and more accurate comparisons, roast the samples before both the fire assay and the leaching process. This will help to break down any refractory compounds and release the gold. 2. Conduct Diagnostic Leaching Tests: Perform a series of diagnostic leaching tests to identify the specific reasons for the low recovery. This could include varying the roasting conditions, changing leaching reagents, or adjusting other parameters to see what maximizes gold recovery. 3. Characterize the Ore: Use techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), or energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to analyze the mineral composition of the ore. Understanding the specific minerals present can help in tailoring the roasting and leaching processes. 4. Optimize Leaching Parameters: Ensure that the leaching conditions are optimized for the specific type of ore you are dealing with. This might involve adjusting the concentration of the leaching agent, temperature, or other parameters. By identifying and addressing the specific factors that are causing the gold loss during the leaching process, you can improve the overall recovery and reduce the discrepancy between fire assay and chemical assay results. The behavior of gold in natural environments and its implications for assay and leaching processes. Here's a more detailed explanation and some additional considerations: Natural Formation of Gold Complexes In nature, the interaction of acidic gold-bearing fluids with alkaline solutions can lead to the formation of water-soluble gold complexes. The pH of the environment plays a crucial role in determining the solubility and stability of these complexes. Acidic Conditions: Under acidic conditions (low pH), gold can form complexes with chloride ions (e.g., AuCl₄⁻) or other ligands that keep it in solution. Alkaline Conditions: When these acidic solutions encounter alkaline conditions (high pH), the chemistry changes, potentially leading to the precipitation of gold complexes. For example, if the pH reaches around 8, certain gold complexes might precipitate out of solution. Resistance to Aqua Regia Some gold complexes that precipitate out under alkaline conditions can become resistant to dissolution by aqua regia. Aqua regia, a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid, is typically very effective at dissolving gold, but certain complexes might resist this treatment due to their chemical stability. Practical Implications for Assay and Leaching Preserve Leach Solutions: Do not discard your leach solutions prematurely. Since gold can form soluble complexes, especially in the presence of varying pH levels, it is essential to process these solutions thoroughly to recover as much gold as possible. pH Control: Monitor and control the pH of your leaching solutions carefully. Ensure that the pH is optimized to prevent the formation of resistant gold complexes and to maximize gold dissolution. Sequential Leaching: Consider using sequential leaching techniques to break down different gold complexes. This might involve using different leaching agents or adjusting the pH in stages to ensure complete recovery of gold. Advanced Analytical Techniques: Use advanced analytical techniques to understand the nature of gold complexes in your solutions. Techniques such as mass spectrometry, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can provide insights into the speciation of gold in different environments. Pre-treatment Methods: If you suspect that certain gold complexes are resistant to aqua regia, explore pre-treatment methods that might break down these complexes. This could involve oxidative roasting, pressure oxidation, or other methods to convert resistant complexes into forms that are more amenable to leaching. By understanding the chemistry of gold in different pH environments and taking appropriate steps to manage the leaching process, you can improve gold recovery and reduce losses. Tellurides, such as gold telluride (calaverite) and other gold-tellurium compounds, can be resistant to aqua regia. These compounds often require special treatment to break down the telluride matrix and release the gold for effective recovery. Here are some key points and strategies for dealing with gold tellurides: Characteristics of Gold Tellurides Resistance to Aqua Regia: Gold tellurides are known to be resistant to dissolution by aqua regia due to the strong bond between gold and tellurium. Refractory Nature: These minerals are considered refractory because they do not easily yield gold through conventional leaching or cyanidation processes. Strategies for Processing Gold Tellurides Roasting: Roasting gold tellurides at high temperatures can oxidize the tellurium, converting it into a form that is more easily separated from the gold. This process typically involves heating the ore in the presence of oxygen to break down the telluride matrix. Pressure Oxidation (Autoclaving): This method involves treating the ore under high pressure and temperature with oxygen or air, often in an autoclave. This can effectively oxidize the tellurides and liberate the gold for subsequent recovery by leaching. Alkaline Leaching: Some tellurides may be amenable to alkaline leaching, using reagents such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to break down the telluride structure and release gold. Bio-oxidation: Using certain bacteria that can oxidize sulfides and tellurides, bio-oxidation can be a viable method for treating refractory gold telluride ores. Thiosulfate Leaching: An alternative to cyanide, thiosulfate leaching can be effective for some refractory ores, including those containing tellurides. This method uses ammonium thiosulfate as a leaching agent in the presence of a copper catalyst and an ammonia buffer. Ultrafine Grinding: Reducing the particle size of the ore through ultrafine grinding can increase the surface area and make the tellurides more accessible to leaching reagents. This can be combined with other pre-treatment methods to enhance gold recovery. Process Workflow Example Crushing and Grinding: Reduce the ore to a fine particle size to expose the gold tellurides. Roasting: Heat the ground ore to high temperatures in the presence of oxygen to oxidize the tellurium and other sulfides. Leaching: Use a suitable leaching agent, such as cyanide or thiosulfate, to dissolve the gold. Recovery: Recover the dissolved gold from the leach solution through methods such as activated carbon adsorption or electrowinning. Tailings Treatment: Treat the tailings to ensure that any residual gold or harmful byproducts are managed appropriately. Conclusion Processing gold tellurides requires specialized techniques to overcome their refractory nature. By employing methods like roasting, pressure oxidation, or alternative leaching reagents, you can effectively break down the telluride matrix and recover the gold. It's essential to carefully select and optimize these methods based on the specific characteristics of the ore you are dealing with. ~ CHEERS P.S. You should remove your free gold first, but not spend a lot of time doing that. This is because you will lose gold down the line; there is no perfect process. It is paramount to remove the gold in the very earliest stages, and thanks for taking time out of your day to educate the rest of us. 😎
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Thanks, Jatslo! As usual, a very useful comment. At least one experiment will include roasting.
@Jatslo3 күн бұрын
@@orophilia Ensuring comprehensive recovery of gold from refractory ores, such as gold complexes, involves careful management of all phases of the process, including gas emissions and residual liquids. Gold is a solid, liquid, gas and plasma just like all matter.
@waynoswaynos2 күн бұрын
@@Jatslo Really interesting and insightful comments, thank you Jatsio. I try to boil acids in a distillation setup so I can recover acids that would otherwise vent to atmosphere. I have noticed an odd smell that is in these weaker distilled acids that are not present in fresh acids. Makes sense that this could be some sort of gas or plasma. If so, are their any techniques you might suggest that can fix these volatile aspects to increase my yield? Depending, I often add these to the next boil and they eventually end up being cemented out with Copper, then Iron metal, before I eventually recover my nitrates. Developing some sort of semi-closed-system seems prudent tome. Waste not, want not, and all of that.
@Jatslo2 күн бұрын
@@waynoswaynos Discussing plasma states can be a bit extreme for typical metallurgical processes like fire assay. Let's focus on the practical aspects of managing and minimizing the loss of gold during high-temperature processes like fire assay, particularly in relation to the volatilization of lead and its impact on gold recovery. Understanding Lead Volatilization in Fire Assay In the fire assay process, lead is used as a collector for precious metals. However, lead can volatilize at high temperatures, and this volatilization can carry precious metals, including gold, away from the assay sample, leading to losses. Key Points and Strategies to Minimize Losses Proper Temperature Control: Melting Point: Lead has a melting point of 327.5°C and starts to volatilize significantly at temperatures above 600°C. Fire assays typically operate at around 1000-1200°C, increasing the risk of lead volatilization. Controlled Heating: Gradually increasing the temperature and maintaining it at the lower end of the required range can reduce the amount of lead volatilized. Use of Appropriate Fluxes: Flux Composition: Ensure that the flux composition is optimized to bind with impurities and reduce the need for excessively high temperatures. Reducing Agents: Use of reducing agents like carbon or charcoal can help minimize the oxidation of lead, reducing its volatilization. Efficient Furnace Design: Gas Collection Systems: Incorporate systems to collect and condense volatile components, including lead vapors. This can capture both lead and any gold that might be carried with it. Proper Ventilation: Ensure the furnace has adequate ventilation to safely manage gases without losing valuable materials. Sample Handling: Cupellation: In the cupellation stage, where lead is absorbed by the cupel and precious metals are left behind, ensure the process is done at the correct temperature and duration to minimize lead loss while effectively separating the gold. Recycling Lead: Consider recycling the lead collected in gas scrubbing systems to recover any gold that might have been volatilized with it. Analytical Verification: Post-Assay Analysis: Analyze residues and slags post-assay to check for any remaining gold. This can be done using techniques like ICP-MS or AAS. Reprocessing: If significant gold is found in the residues, reprocess these materials to recover the lost gold. Example Procedure Sample Preparation: Mix the sample with fluxes (e.g., litharge, soda ash, borax) and place it in a crucible. Fusion: Heat the mixture in a furnace to around 1000-1200°C. Monitor the temperature closely to avoid excessive lead volatilization. Collection: During the fusion, lead collects the precious metals, forming a lead button at the bottom of the crucible. Cupellation: Transfer the lead button to a cupel and heat it in a cupellation furnace. Lead is absorbed by the cupel or vaporized, leaving behind a precious metal bead. Residue Analysis: Analyze the remaining slag and cupel for any residual gold. Collect and treat any gases and residues to recover volatilized lead and gold. Conclusion Minimizing the loss of gold during fire assay requires careful control of temperature, efficient furnace design, appropriate flux usage, and thorough post-process analysis. By implementing these strategies, you can reduce the volatilization of lead and ensure maximum recovery of precious metals. ~ CHEERS
@waynoswaynos2 күн бұрын
@@Jatslo Thank you, I have copied and pasted this thread to my metallurgy notes and formatted it. You have shared some things I had not considered. Appreciated.
@prospectorpete3 күн бұрын
I dont think you stopped all the gold. Firstly you didn't keep adding smb until a white foam appeared on the surface and secondly I didn't see you do a stannous test to see if you dropped it all. My guess is some of the gold is still in solution
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Good points! I went back and re-processed the liquid and found a very small amount of gold, about 4% of the original. So, yes, there was more gold but not nearly enough to account for the differences. More experiments to follow.
@jdeluisa3 күн бұрын
It's likely that you would have to do multiple digestions
@MK-tx1nd3 күн бұрын
During your chemical extraction process, you run out of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid, it seems. Boil the sample in hydrochloric acid first, to destroy carbonates and sulfides, then add the nitric acid to form aqua regia. Hope it makes sense, when you think about it... ;)
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Yeah, I've wondered about this too. The amount of time, heat and chemicals to use. Can we actually destroy sulfides with HCl alone?
@MK-tx1nd3 күн бұрын
@@orophilia I think so. The sulfide ion can be displaced by chloride and it should be driven off as H2S. If you use concentrated hydrochloric acid, the sulfides and carbonates should be destroyed fairly easily, however particle size and permeability do matter. Heating up and boiling, when the initial reaction subsided, is the way to go. You could also use nitric acid, however there is a side reaction you should be aware of... you can easily oxidize the sulfide ion to sulfate, thus requiring much more of nitric as if there were only metals present. The nitric route may give you the possibility to extract the silver, though. You could even use sulfuric acid, for destroying carbonates and sulfides under oxidative conditions (boiling in air to oxidize sulfur compounds to sulfides). Sulfates shouldn't interfere with the subsequent processing, I guess ;)
@jamesculver8293 күн бұрын
Great explanation of what you are doing. I would think that some of the rock has neutralized some of the reactions. So letting it cook on heat for more time, keeping it hydrated. Should help that. Very rich ore indeed!
@cooljets3 күн бұрын
Gold will not go into solution until all of the Iron is dissolved, and since the residue contained undissolved Iron, not all of the Gold was dissolved. Ore from that part of the World is very rich in Iron. Cyanide is consumed by the Iron, thus making that process uneconomical, even with very rich ore.
@noshadrai24783 күн бұрын
Good sir
@AUMINER13 күн бұрын
I suspect the silver was lost in the flux, chapman flux has a tendency to collect silver. One way to determine that would be to do another 100G smelt with an assay flux vs a smelting flux. You could also fire assay the flux again, or use an XRF on it after it's very finely ground. A local jewellery shop that has an XRF will might be a good option. AguaRegia will not pull silver into solution, or, if the silver/gold ratio is too low, the gold will not go into solution as it's locked up in the silver. Silver is much more of a problem metal than many realize.
@TerribleShmeltingAccident3 күн бұрын
silver should be trapped by the HNO3, no?
@jdeluisa3 күн бұрын
@@TerribleShmeltingAccident It would be soluble in nitric alone, but AR produces Ag Chloride which is insoluble.
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Hi Auminer! I have been ignoring the value of silver because I think most gold miners consider it an annoyance. However, if the amount of silver is high and the fire assay does not show it, then we could be mislead into thinking that aqua regia (AR) will work when actually it won't because the silver will block the acid from dissolving the electrum (gold + silver alloy). However, I've done many fire assays with this flux on various ores that contain gold and silver and the silver always shows up in the assay results, sometimes in large quantities, so I don't think we have this problem. Note that the MnO2 content of my flux recipe is low. So, assuming that we don't loose much silver in the fire assay, then this ore contains almost pure gold, which should be easily dissolved in AR. So, I don't yet have a good explanation for the loss of gold in the chemical extraction. I'm learning to be more careful and I'll run more material to see if I can figure it out. As always, I deeply appreciate your comments.
@AUMINER13 күн бұрын
@@orophilia all excellent points. I'd be curious to see what the ore looks like under your microscope, both before and after leaching, also what your shaker table would recover in relation to the size of this gold. There are some good comments posted here, and I think the high iron content might be an issue consuming the acids. Looking forward to solving this mystery on this very rich ore :)
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
@@AUMINER1 That's a good idea. Will do.
@petepeterson45403 күн бұрын
no stanus test
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Yes, I need to be rigorous about testing.
@johnnyjones-pf7pv3 күн бұрын
I think you need to make the particulars 100 mesh or even smaller
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Yeah, that's got to be one of the experiments.
@HectorRamirez-hf7fj4 күн бұрын
When you added urea to neutralize nitric the was really no reaction, maybe you just need it more nitric to get the other have, I don't know amazing videos!!
@orophilia3 күн бұрын
Yeah, I need to be more careful about the amount of HNO3
@cmb9994 күн бұрын
By far best video ive seen. Very detailed, straight to the point. Covered more in 5 min than most do in a half hour. Thank you.
@criscris50614 күн бұрын
very good and detailed
@thisoldminewithlars53244 күн бұрын
Very interesting results. Was this sample raw crushed ore or was it pre-concentrated? Either way, I’d like a slice of that pie. If smelting gives the best results than I would smelt the rest. There may be some other mineral in the ore which is interfering with the chemical recovery process.
@orophilia4 күн бұрын
The guy who sent the ore did not make any further comments. I have 500 grams left and I'm going to figure this out. Best to you, Lars.
@MerchantMarineGuy4 күн бұрын
@@orophiliamanganese can interfere with chemical processing
@reeffishing34554 күн бұрын
Great Vid, Awersome viewing we got so much info from all your testing. That red stuff will stain anything. Please keep up the great work and let's see if the remaining material holds the same rewards. Looking forward to Part 2. 😊
@orophilia4 күн бұрын
Thanks, man. I enjoyed it. I still have 500 grams and I'm going to figure this out.
@TerribleShmeltingAccident4 күн бұрын
seems fishy being that you found refined gold in ore.....must have been seeded? as far as whats wrong with the chemical vs fire assay? speed.leaching au from ore needs time. time in aqua regia, time slowly adding reducing agent (whether smb or stannous,) time letting it drop. Im certainly no expert but ive seen countless times where what i assumed to be waste solution (after dropping au,) would have a brown precipitate dropping for many days after I thought was done!
@orophilia4 күн бұрын
Yeah, that's good info. I'm going to check that carefully.
@TerribleShmeltingAccident4 күн бұрын
@@orophilia i should have said "MAY have been seeded" instead of "must have been," as i dont want to accuse anyone of anything being i dont have all the facts.
@MerchantMarineGuy4 күн бұрын
@@TerribleShmeltingAccidentWA is some of the purest in the world - also some of the oldest. Normally 98-100% pure. It’s hard to measure volumes at that size accurately.
@TerribleShmeltingAccident3 күн бұрын
@@MerchantMarineGuy everything about this sample was unusual....if its too good to be true. Are you familiar with the mining scam that took Charles Tiffany (founder of tiffanys?)
@MerchantMarineGuy3 күн бұрын
@@TerribleShmeltingAccident small sample, big errors. It’s only 1kg. What you want to do is crush a bulk sample of ~1t and then process the cons.
@mohammednovalija4 күн бұрын
All my chores nd plans put on hold - Latest tape from Orophilia has arrived.
@ArnulfoCaviedesCardoso4 күн бұрын
Thank you for your kindness. In my country, hydrochloric acid is 10 times more expensive than nitric acid. Taking all precautions, would you say that it is better to use nitric acid first for pre-cleaning?
@orophilia4 күн бұрын
Without knowing the details of the ore that you're working with, your economic situation, and the available materials and machines, it's impossible to say. Generally, concentrate the ore as much as possible without loosing a lot of gold. If high in sulfides then roast before chemical extraction.
@ArnulfoCaviedesCardoso4 күн бұрын
Dear Sir, According to your knowledge, is it advisable to roast the entire material or the concentrate, even when working with acids?
@orophilia4 күн бұрын
If the gold is "locked up" in sulfides then yes, it's advisable to roast the concentrate to oxidize the sulfides and make it easier for the acid to get to the gold particles. But, of course, it depends on the ore. The fumes are dangerous.
@ArnulfoCaviedesCardoso4 күн бұрын
@@orophilia Thank you.
@ErikMartinez-si9zf5 күн бұрын
Dawn liquid soap breaks up water tension in the clay and the water your using. You must use clean water to see what your doing !!
@ErikMartinez-si9zf5 күн бұрын
Dawn liquid soap as a tension surfactant breaker is cheap compaired to Jet Dry !!$$$$$$$$$
@orophilia5 күн бұрын
You are absolutely right. Dish soap is better and much cheaper than jet dry.
@ErikMartinez-si9zf5 күн бұрын
Use Dawn liquid soap in your clay and a potato smasher with extended handle. To break up clay
@jimrodriguez97475 күн бұрын
is that an oasis for the donkeys?
@orophilia5 күн бұрын
For humans. The burros are freeloaders. ;-)
@brandongurr51815 күн бұрын
I need you to contact me before I continue my build
@orophilia5 күн бұрын
What can I do for you, Brandon?
@shots-shots-shotseverybody27076 күн бұрын
I fully understand. I can relate as Father-Time has beaten me up so badly with his "getting old Rod" this past decade that one would think that he must believe I owe him money or something. Well here is a Hale Mary question: if you have one of your personal grinders collecting dust or sitting idle even a used one and want to get rid of what the wife may designate as "clutter" in her mind and she wants you to clean the house up and to scale down then please keep me in mind and reach out to me here. May the Lord bless you and yours
@orophilia6 күн бұрын
If I build a new one you'll get first dibs. :-)
@shots-shots-shotseverybody27076 күн бұрын
@@orophilia thank you
@shots-shots-shotseverybody27076 күн бұрын
Will you sell me one of your rock grinders you designed? Let me know. Pretty nifty
@orophilia6 күн бұрын
Thanks for such a wonderful comment! I'm too old to make stuff for sale, but as a younger lad I would have jumped at it.
Пікірлер
More about the funnel seal ring. Is it tapered or just stretched to the funnel's cone. I prefer to ask a human and get a real answer, even a relatively simple one. Just never seen those, it is usually the glass frit or ceramic filters that are a quarter the size. Have reservations about the fritt actually being clean after use. Tossng a cotton ball away sounds simpler.
I bought the rubber seal rings as a set on Amazon. you get 6 or 7 different nesting sizes. They are very handy. I think the funnel with cotton is way better than the glass frit type for this work
Upwind does not guarantee anything. You make a low pressure zone on the downwind side (the Lee) of your body. Right kinda breeze and distance, you'll get a face full of it. Like campfire smoke, it reaches out for ya. You're alright enough with what you are doing, but if it was something insanely poisonous, ya better not. You'll be haunting people afterwards, not ideal.
you are right. it’s always better to wear good protection than to take a chance with these nasty vapors.
What about a strong base opposed to an acid? I believe that dirt is quartz sodium hydroxide
can you recommend a method?
Over $100,000 in gold per MT? Absolutely incredible! Can I get just one 10 yard dump truck of it? I would be rich!
yeah, incredible. I’d enjoy trying to extract it!
Sreetips, Chief, I think you have a bit of competition here.
Smelting the Iron out would be the easiest way to go. The inquart the gold with silver, cornflake it. Then use nitric acid to separate all the wastes from the gold. Aqua Regia to start purification of the gold. Lot of steps but you want pure gold, you do what is easiest. Don't understand why no SMB to drop the gold.
Great job on that table
Geochemist of 35 years here. This is a tough one given all of the iron present in the sample. 1. Trust your fire assay. 2. As another commenter here said, you might consider (getting a taller beaker) and adding additional HCl and Nitric as required in the first go to try to get everything into solution the first time. The trick is to get the iron out of the way. I've never worked at a mine where this was a problem, so I can't definitively point the way. One thing you might try is to soak a small sample (50g?) in oxalic acid until it cleans up, rinse it well and then run it with AR. Oxalic will reduce the Fe2O3 to FeO with some Fe staying in solution so you will still have some Fe to deal with, but not as much and with a weaker bond. 3. You need to filter and wash the slimes left over from filtering the AR solution. I suspect that you will find 'coarse' gold in there. By the way, when you did your math...I could have sworn that was a 250g sample, not a 350g one as you calculated. You are still short at 1039g/t so something is going on. I suspect it's the iron. Overall, a great video and your friend is going to be a happy man if his mine runs that grade for a while! *EDIT: In the beginning, when you did your HCl boil? Replace that with a nitric boil. That should remove the iron, but the nitric MUST be dilute, try 4 parts distilled water and one part of your 30 something percent nitric.
Great comment. Thanks
Nice experiment. We like that u like Jason.😊
In your position, for the chemical extraction I would first roast the ore to keep only the oxides, treat with HCl to remove non precious metals, decant and proceed with AR (this to keep all the precious metals for an all encompassing assay), or treat the ore with Nitric for a gold content only assay before I touch the AR. All the other metals will drop the gold from solution so its imperative to remove those first, then your process can continue as it was done in the video. BTW, great Flux recipe!
thanks for the excellent comment
You will see the gold you have concentrated?
yes, eventually
You need a ore splitter to obtain a statistically representative sample based on my years of chemical analysis of ore
have you tried the method that I used in the video?
This guy is fantastic, careful process: kzread.info/dash/bejne/enlptKaCnrPTZ8Y.htmlsi=6xHcbWbafZEeDLrs
BTW, he intentionally en quarts silver when recovering gold from cheap jewelry. Silver never stops him from achieving four 9’s
That is a lot. Try adding more distilled water, as medium for the gold to dissolve into.
wasnt the reverse true with the last vid? with fire vs chem assay?
I always get more Au from a fire assay as long as I have well mixed and well divided material
#Sreetips
yep
a paint brush and dust pan do wonders. love ur expertise though😊
Dry off the leftovers from the chemical extraction and do a fire assay on it to prove the gold is still there and was not dissolved?
I would like to see the concentration result from running through a simple sluice or maybe a good panning then examining under magnification to see the texture coarseness. With chemical extraction on ore I would roast the fine powder then pour the hot powder into a beaker of ice water which will cause the particulate to crack even finer to release more gold dust.
the ice bath shock sounds interesting. thanks
With such a high yield of gold per metric ton, it's possible that the sample contains minerals with significant gold content, including tellurides such as calaverite (AuTe₂), krennerite (Au₈Te₆), sylvanite ((Au,Ag)Te₂), and other gold-bearing minerals. Tellurides are a group of minerals where gold is combined with tellurium. These minerals can contain significant amounts of gold, sometimes in very high concentrations. For example, Calaverite: AuTe₂, typically contains about 44% gold. Testing for tellurium in ore samples can be done using various analytical techniques. Sylvanite ((Au,Ag)Te₂) can be ruled out due to the absence of silver, if that is a true conclusion.
Thanks, Jatslo.
Losses in the iron removed by magnet and perhaps in the cotton wool. And, what if the bead was heavier than gold because it contained something heavier than gold? Platinum maybe. Wasn't a very golden bead on my screen. And Thank you. Great lessons here. Some insightful comments also.
It did look very pale yellow on my screen to but the process looked perfect, Platinum would be my guess also.
6:47 This my friend is the difference. I put a magnet in my pan I can see gold come up with the iron. Yes, it’s a real thing.( @BiggestKev1960 ) Try a fire assay (or other) on the iron that came off the difference. If you do, call it part two. I want to revisit this story. Much appreciation, Geraldton, Western Australia
Yes, I still have that magnetic material saved. I'll test it.
What filter medium are you using?
I use regular lab filters and I use cotton for very fine filtration of colloidal gold.
It seems like you're dealing with a significant discrepancy between fire assay results and chemical assay results in the context of gold recovery, possibly due to differences in sample preparation processes. Here's a more detailed look at the potential issue: Roasting Before Fire Assay: If you roasted the sample before conducting the fire assay, the roasting process likely helped to break down complex compounds that might otherwise retain the gold, thereby making it more accessible for the assay process. Roasting can convert sulfides and other compounds into oxides, which are easier to deal with in the fire assay. No Roasting Before Leaching: If you did not roast the sample before leaching, the gold might still be locked within these complex compounds, preventing it from being dissolved and recovered during the leaching process. This could lead to significantly lower gold recovery rates. Possible Causes for Discrepancy: - Presence of Sulfides or Other Refractory Materials: The presence of sulfides or other refractory materials in the ore can trap gold and prevent it from being leached effectively unless these materials are broken down by roasting. - Complex Gold Compounds: Gold can form complexes with other elements that are stable under normal leaching conditions but break down upon roasting, releasing the gold. - Inadequate Leaching Conditions: If the leaching conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, reagent concentrations) are not optimized, the gold might not be fully extracted, leading to lower assay values. Recommendations: 1. Roast Samples Before Both Fire Assay and Leaching: To ensure consistency and more accurate comparisons, roast the samples before both the fire assay and the leaching process. This will help to break down any refractory compounds and release the gold. 2. Conduct Diagnostic Leaching Tests: Perform a series of diagnostic leaching tests to identify the specific reasons for the low recovery. This could include varying the roasting conditions, changing leaching reagents, or adjusting other parameters to see what maximizes gold recovery. 3. Characterize the Ore: Use techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), or energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to analyze the mineral composition of the ore. Understanding the specific minerals present can help in tailoring the roasting and leaching processes. 4. Optimize Leaching Parameters: Ensure that the leaching conditions are optimized for the specific type of ore you are dealing with. This might involve adjusting the concentration of the leaching agent, temperature, or other parameters. By identifying and addressing the specific factors that are causing the gold loss during the leaching process, you can improve the overall recovery and reduce the discrepancy between fire assay and chemical assay results. The behavior of gold in natural environments and its implications for assay and leaching processes. Here's a more detailed explanation and some additional considerations: Natural Formation of Gold Complexes In nature, the interaction of acidic gold-bearing fluids with alkaline solutions can lead to the formation of water-soluble gold complexes. The pH of the environment plays a crucial role in determining the solubility and stability of these complexes. Acidic Conditions: Under acidic conditions (low pH), gold can form complexes with chloride ions (e.g., AuCl₄⁻) or other ligands that keep it in solution. Alkaline Conditions: When these acidic solutions encounter alkaline conditions (high pH), the chemistry changes, potentially leading to the precipitation of gold complexes. For example, if the pH reaches around 8, certain gold complexes might precipitate out of solution. Resistance to Aqua Regia Some gold complexes that precipitate out under alkaline conditions can become resistant to dissolution by aqua regia. Aqua regia, a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid, is typically very effective at dissolving gold, but certain complexes might resist this treatment due to their chemical stability. Practical Implications for Assay and Leaching Preserve Leach Solutions: Do not discard your leach solutions prematurely. Since gold can form soluble complexes, especially in the presence of varying pH levels, it is essential to process these solutions thoroughly to recover as much gold as possible. pH Control: Monitor and control the pH of your leaching solutions carefully. Ensure that the pH is optimized to prevent the formation of resistant gold complexes and to maximize gold dissolution. Sequential Leaching: Consider using sequential leaching techniques to break down different gold complexes. This might involve using different leaching agents or adjusting the pH in stages to ensure complete recovery of gold. Advanced Analytical Techniques: Use advanced analytical techniques to understand the nature of gold complexes in your solutions. Techniques such as mass spectrometry, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can provide insights into the speciation of gold in different environments. Pre-treatment Methods: If you suspect that certain gold complexes are resistant to aqua regia, explore pre-treatment methods that might break down these complexes. This could involve oxidative roasting, pressure oxidation, or other methods to convert resistant complexes into forms that are more amenable to leaching. By understanding the chemistry of gold in different pH environments and taking appropriate steps to manage the leaching process, you can improve gold recovery and reduce losses. Tellurides, such as gold telluride (calaverite) and other gold-tellurium compounds, can be resistant to aqua regia. These compounds often require special treatment to break down the telluride matrix and release the gold for effective recovery. Here are some key points and strategies for dealing with gold tellurides: Characteristics of Gold Tellurides Resistance to Aqua Regia: Gold tellurides are known to be resistant to dissolution by aqua regia due to the strong bond between gold and tellurium. Refractory Nature: These minerals are considered refractory because they do not easily yield gold through conventional leaching or cyanidation processes. Strategies for Processing Gold Tellurides Roasting: Roasting gold tellurides at high temperatures can oxidize the tellurium, converting it into a form that is more easily separated from the gold. This process typically involves heating the ore in the presence of oxygen to break down the telluride matrix. Pressure Oxidation (Autoclaving): This method involves treating the ore under high pressure and temperature with oxygen or air, often in an autoclave. This can effectively oxidize the tellurides and liberate the gold for subsequent recovery by leaching. Alkaline Leaching: Some tellurides may be amenable to alkaline leaching, using reagents such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to break down the telluride structure and release gold. Bio-oxidation: Using certain bacteria that can oxidize sulfides and tellurides, bio-oxidation can be a viable method for treating refractory gold telluride ores. Thiosulfate Leaching: An alternative to cyanide, thiosulfate leaching can be effective for some refractory ores, including those containing tellurides. This method uses ammonium thiosulfate as a leaching agent in the presence of a copper catalyst and an ammonia buffer. Ultrafine Grinding: Reducing the particle size of the ore through ultrafine grinding can increase the surface area and make the tellurides more accessible to leaching reagents. This can be combined with other pre-treatment methods to enhance gold recovery. Process Workflow Example Crushing and Grinding: Reduce the ore to a fine particle size to expose the gold tellurides. Roasting: Heat the ground ore to high temperatures in the presence of oxygen to oxidize the tellurium and other sulfides. Leaching: Use a suitable leaching agent, such as cyanide or thiosulfate, to dissolve the gold. Recovery: Recover the dissolved gold from the leach solution through methods such as activated carbon adsorption or electrowinning. Tailings Treatment: Treat the tailings to ensure that any residual gold or harmful byproducts are managed appropriately. Conclusion Processing gold tellurides requires specialized techniques to overcome their refractory nature. By employing methods like roasting, pressure oxidation, or alternative leaching reagents, you can effectively break down the telluride matrix and recover the gold. It's essential to carefully select and optimize these methods based on the specific characteristics of the ore you are dealing with. ~ CHEERS P.S. You should remove your free gold first, but not spend a lot of time doing that. This is because you will lose gold down the line; there is no perfect process. It is paramount to remove the gold in the very earliest stages, and thanks for taking time out of your day to educate the rest of us. 😎
Thanks, Jatslo! As usual, a very useful comment. At least one experiment will include roasting.
@@orophilia Ensuring comprehensive recovery of gold from refractory ores, such as gold complexes, involves careful management of all phases of the process, including gas emissions and residual liquids. Gold is a solid, liquid, gas and plasma just like all matter.
@@Jatslo Really interesting and insightful comments, thank you Jatsio. I try to boil acids in a distillation setup so I can recover acids that would otherwise vent to atmosphere. I have noticed an odd smell that is in these weaker distilled acids that are not present in fresh acids. Makes sense that this could be some sort of gas or plasma. If so, are their any techniques you might suggest that can fix these volatile aspects to increase my yield? Depending, I often add these to the next boil and they eventually end up being cemented out with Copper, then Iron metal, before I eventually recover my nitrates. Developing some sort of semi-closed-system seems prudent tome. Waste not, want not, and all of that.
@@waynoswaynos Discussing plasma states can be a bit extreme for typical metallurgical processes like fire assay. Let's focus on the practical aspects of managing and minimizing the loss of gold during high-temperature processes like fire assay, particularly in relation to the volatilization of lead and its impact on gold recovery. Understanding Lead Volatilization in Fire Assay In the fire assay process, lead is used as a collector for precious metals. However, lead can volatilize at high temperatures, and this volatilization can carry precious metals, including gold, away from the assay sample, leading to losses. Key Points and Strategies to Minimize Losses Proper Temperature Control: Melting Point: Lead has a melting point of 327.5°C and starts to volatilize significantly at temperatures above 600°C. Fire assays typically operate at around 1000-1200°C, increasing the risk of lead volatilization. Controlled Heating: Gradually increasing the temperature and maintaining it at the lower end of the required range can reduce the amount of lead volatilized. Use of Appropriate Fluxes: Flux Composition: Ensure that the flux composition is optimized to bind with impurities and reduce the need for excessively high temperatures. Reducing Agents: Use of reducing agents like carbon or charcoal can help minimize the oxidation of lead, reducing its volatilization. Efficient Furnace Design: Gas Collection Systems: Incorporate systems to collect and condense volatile components, including lead vapors. This can capture both lead and any gold that might be carried with it. Proper Ventilation: Ensure the furnace has adequate ventilation to safely manage gases without losing valuable materials. Sample Handling: Cupellation: In the cupellation stage, where lead is absorbed by the cupel and precious metals are left behind, ensure the process is done at the correct temperature and duration to minimize lead loss while effectively separating the gold. Recycling Lead: Consider recycling the lead collected in gas scrubbing systems to recover any gold that might have been volatilized with it. Analytical Verification: Post-Assay Analysis: Analyze residues and slags post-assay to check for any remaining gold. This can be done using techniques like ICP-MS or AAS. Reprocessing: If significant gold is found in the residues, reprocess these materials to recover the lost gold. Example Procedure Sample Preparation: Mix the sample with fluxes (e.g., litharge, soda ash, borax) and place it in a crucible. Fusion: Heat the mixture in a furnace to around 1000-1200°C. Monitor the temperature closely to avoid excessive lead volatilization. Collection: During the fusion, lead collects the precious metals, forming a lead button at the bottom of the crucible. Cupellation: Transfer the lead button to a cupel and heat it in a cupellation furnace. Lead is absorbed by the cupel or vaporized, leaving behind a precious metal bead. Residue Analysis: Analyze the remaining slag and cupel for any residual gold. Collect and treat any gases and residues to recover volatilized lead and gold. Conclusion Minimizing the loss of gold during fire assay requires careful control of temperature, efficient furnace design, appropriate flux usage, and thorough post-process analysis. By implementing these strategies, you can reduce the volatilization of lead and ensure maximum recovery of precious metals. ~ CHEERS
@@Jatslo Thank you, I have copied and pasted this thread to my metallurgy notes and formatted it. You have shared some things I had not considered. Appreciated.
I dont think you stopped all the gold. Firstly you didn't keep adding smb until a white foam appeared on the surface and secondly I didn't see you do a stannous test to see if you dropped it all. My guess is some of the gold is still in solution
Good points! I went back and re-processed the liquid and found a very small amount of gold, about 4% of the original. So, yes, there was more gold but not nearly enough to account for the differences. More experiments to follow.
It's likely that you would have to do multiple digestions
During your chemical extraction process, you run out of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid, it seems. Boil the sample in hydrochloric acid first, to destroy carbonates and sulfides, then add the nitric acid to form aqua regia. Hope it makes sense, when you think about it... ;)
Yeah, I've wondered about this too. The amount of time, heat and chemicals to use. Can we actually destroy sulfides with HCl alone?
@@orophilia I think so. The sulfide ion can be displaced by chloride and it should be driven off as H2S. If you use concentrated hydrochloric acid, the sulfides and carbonates should be destroyed fairly easily, however particle size and permeability do matter. Heating up and boiling, when the initial reaction subsided, is the way to go. You could also use nitric acid, however there is a side reaction you should be aware of... you can easily oxidize the sulfide ion to sulfate, thus requiring much more of nitric as if there were only metals present. The nitric route may give you the possibility to extract the silver, though. You could even use sulfuric acid, for destroying carbonates and sulfides under oxidative conditions (boiling in air to oxidize sulfur compounds to sulfides). Sulfates shouldn't interfere with the subsequent processing, I guess ;)
Great explanation of what you are doing. I would think that some of the rock has neutralized some of the reactions. So letting it cook on heat for more time, keeping it hydrated. Should help that. Very rich ore indeed!
Gold will not go into solution until all of the Iron is dissolved, and since the residue contained undissolved Iron, not all of the Gold was dissolved. Ore from that part of the World is very rich in Iron. Cyanide is consumed by the Iron, thus making that process uneconomical, even with very rich ore.
Good sir
I suspect the silver was lost in the flux, chapman flux has a tendency to collect silver. One way to determine that would be to do another 100G smelt with an assay flux vs a smelting flux. You could also fire assay the flux again, or use an XRF on it after it's very finely ground. A local jewellery shop that has an XRF will might be a good option. AguaRegia will not pull silver into solution, or, if the silver/gold ratio is too low, the gold will not go into solution as it's locked up in the silver. Silver is much more of a problem metal than many realize.
silver should be trapped by the HNO3, no?
@@TerribleShmeltingAccident It would be soluble in nitric alone, but AR produces Ag Chloride which is insoluble.
Hi Auminer! I have been ignoring the value of silver because I think most gold miners consider it an annoyance. However, if the amount of silver is high and the fire assay does not show it, then we could be mislead into thinking that aqua regia (AR) will work when actually it won't because the silver will block the acid from dissolving the electrum (gold + silver alloy). However, I've done many fire assays with this flux on various ores that contain gold and silver and the silver always shows up in the assay results, sometimes in large quantities, so I don't think we have this problem. Note that the MnO2 content of my flux recipe is low. So, assuming that we don't loose much silver in the fire assay, then this ore contains almost pure gold, which should be easily dissolved in AR. So, I don't yet have a good explanation for the loss of gold in the chemical extraction. I'm learning to be more careful and I'll run more material to see if I can figure it out. As always, I deeply appreciate your comments.
@@orophilia all excellent points. I'd be curious to see what the ore looks like under your microscope, both before and after leaching, also what your shaker table would recover in relation to the size of this gold. There are some good comments posted here, and I think the high iron content might be an issue consuming the acids. Looking forward to solving this mystery on this very rich ore :)
@@AUMINER1 That's a good idea. Will do.
no stanus test
Yes, I need to be rigorous about testing.
I think you need to make the particulars 100 mesh or even smaller
Yeah, that's got to be one of the experiments.
When you added urea to neutralize nitric the was really no reaction, maybe you just need it more nitric to get the other have, I don't know amazing videos!!
Yeah, I need to be more careful about the amount of HNO3
By far best video ive seen. Very detailed, straight to the point. Covered more in 5 min than most do in a half hour. Thank you.
very good and detailed
Very interesting results. Was this sample raw crushed ore or was it pre-concentrated? Either way, I’d like a slice of that pie. If smelting gives the best results than I would smelt the rest. There may be some other mineral in the ore which is interfering with the chemical recovery process.
The guy who sent the ore did not make any further comments. I have 500 grams left and I'm going to figure this out. Best to you, Lars.
@@orophiliamanganese can interfere with chemical processing
Great Vid, Awersome viewing we got so much info from all your testing. That red stuff will stain anything. Please keep up the great work and let's see if the remaining material holds the same rewards. Looking forward to Part 2. 😊
Thanks, man. I enjoyed it. I still have 500 grams and I'm going to figure this out.
seems fishy being that you found refined gold in ore.....must have been seeded? as far as whats wrong with the chemical vs fire assay? speed.leaching au from ore needs time. time in aqua regia, time slowly adding reducing agent (whether smb or stannous,) time letting it drop. Im certainly no expert but ive seen countless times where what i assumed to be waste solution (after dropping au,) would have a brown precipitate dropping for many days after I thought was done!
Yeah, that's good info. I'm going to check that carefully.
@@orophilia i should have said "MAY have been seeded" instead of "must have been," as i dont want to accuse anyone of anything being i dont have all the facts.
@@TerribleShmeltingAccidentWA is some of the purest in the world - also some of the oldest. Normally 98-100% pure. It’s hard to measure volumes at that size accurately.
@@MerchantMarineGuy everything about this sample was unusual....if its too good to be true. Are you familiar with the mining scam that took Charles Tiffany (founder of tiffanys?)
@@TerribleShmeltingAccident small sample, big errors. It’s only 1kg. What you want to do is crush a bulk sample of ~1t and then process the cons.
All my chores nd plans put on hold - Latest tape from Orophilia has arrived.
Thank you for your kindness. In my country, hydrochloric acid is 10 times more expensive than nitric acid. Taking all precautions, would you say that it is better to use nitric acid first for pre-cleaning?
Without knowing the details of the ore that you're working with, your economic situation, and the available materials and machines, it's impossible to say. Generally, concentrate the ore as much as possible without loosing a lot of gold. If high in sulfides then roast before chemical extraction.
Dear Sir, According to your knowledge, is it advisable to roast the entire material or the concentrate, even when working with acids?
If the gold is "locked up" in sulfides then yes, it's advisable to roast the concentrate to oxidize the sulfides and make it easier for the acid to get to the gold particles. But, of course, it depends on the ore. The fumes are dangerous.
@@orophilia Thank you.
Dawn liquid soap breaks up water tension in the clay and the water your using. You must use clean water to see what your doing !!
Dawn liquid soap as a tension surfactant breaker is cheap compaired to Jet Dry !!$$$$$$$$$
You are absolutely right. Dish soap is better and much cheaper than jet dry.
Use Dawn liquid soap in your clay and a potato smasher with extended handle. To break up clay
is that an oasis for the donkeys?
For humans. The burros are freeloaders. ;-)
I need you to contact me before I continue my build
What can I do for you, Brandon?
I fully understand. I can relate as Father-Time has beaten me up so badly with his "getting old Rod" this past decade that one would think that he must believe I owe him money or something. Well here is a Hale Mary question: if you have one of your personal grinders collecting dust or sitting idle even a used one and want to get rid of what the wife may designate as "clutter" in her mind and she wants you to clean the house up and to scale down then please keep me in mind and reach out to me here. May the Lord bless you and yours
If I build a new one you'll get first dibs. :-)
@@orophilia thank you
Will you sell me one of your rock grinders you designed? Let me know. Pretty nifty
Thanks for such a wonderful comment! I'm too old to make stuff for sale, but as a younger lad I would have jumped at it.
Enseñas muy bien! gracias
Con gusto. Gracias.
Man that crown make to that mine very spooky