If you enjoy Titanic Content, you have come to the right place, as I will post many videos for Titanic. I might post some music videos. Here is my Discord.
The footage being sped up isn't a bad thing. In the novel, Titanic shot up like a bullet and climbed out as fast. So great work overall.
@user-tq9kb7ur1y4 сағат бұрын
The good thing is, I don’t even have to pay to watch it😂
@user-ce3sx8lk4d10 сағат бұрын
Your theory is just so wrong first the stern wouldnt be in that position for so long and there was no port list
@deviyulia428119 сағат бұрын
Its looks like a foam
@Miguelisthebest21 сағат бұрын
water splash when the stern is sunk lol
@miguellopes372Күн бұрын
ele tinha rachado no meio
@user-rd1sc4ys8hКүн бұрын
Pero el titanic está partido a la mitad no?
@ThomasthatguyКүн бұрын
Did they dunk a real ship into the water and then raised it
@jonathanlandau-litewski7405Күн бұрын
A model yeah. Still exists somewhere or did until a few years ago.
@RedStarClass2 күн бұрын
It’s one of 2 things, the lower bow that you see getting buried in the sand is either crushed due to the impact, or it dug into the sand and may be in good shape.
@zyloproductions48703 күн бұрын
Do you have a version of this where it’s just yours on fullscreen? Like just recreation. It would be cool to see it without the comparison.
@JanTheAnimator_Official3 күн бұрын
Beautiful recreation! :D
@user-lw8kz8sp4i3 күн бұрын
You forgot the 2019 roblox titanic theory where the back of the stern sinks by a bit for a second then after a pause the stern rises vertically and sinks in slowly with no dramatic affect like sprays or splashes pretty much and the air pressure causes air to violently spray out of deck and the ship starts spraying water just as the superstructure of the ship sinks underwater
@there_are_bugs_under_your_skin3 күн бұрын
for those wondering why we shouldnt raise the titanic: 1. its a gravesite for the people who died on that night and should rightfully remain untouched out of pure respect 2. it would cost a shit load of money that we dont have 3. the sand is the only thing holding the wreck together so it would fucking disintegrate
@randomrazr4 күн бұрын
amazing how well practical effects can hold up
@Bacon178554 күн бұрын
why is it in 1 piece? And 2ouldnt the funnels not be attached 🤓🤓🤓
@zacharylewis28024 күн бұрын
The reason it’s in one piece is because of classism from 1912. The testimonies of 1st class passengers who were already in lifeboats who couldn’t see the ship break in half because of just how dark it was were prioritized over some 3rd class passenger who got pulled out of water after the sinking who was still on the ship when it split apart. So until Robert Ballard discovered the wreck in 1985, the official version of events was that it sank whole, and the ship splitting in half was a fringe conspiracy theory. As for the funnels, there’s no excuse besides the visual. The first three funnels were known to have fallen off. The fourth one is debated nowadays, but it probably broke off as it fell to the ocean floor.
@styopmusic87515 күн бұрын
😢😢😢😢
@Myuutantobasuta6 күн бұрын
Cool Idea, It's a little bit off, but close enough.
@TitanicEmpire6 күн бұрын
the animation looks good👍
@Usernametrenticussross17roblox4 күн бұрын
IM FAN😱😄
@dannys9426 күн бұрын
so many pin-pong balls
@JealouseStatement6 күн бұрын
Hot.
@dragonmares591107 күн бұрын
Your love for the titanic is always amazing me
@alexandertruong78397 күн бұрын
no way this looks so fire
@TandMe7 күн бұрын
recreation is better
@Tamity7 күн бұрын
wrong
@TandMe7 күн бұрын
@@Tamity not wrong
@Tamity7 күн бұрын
@@TandMe wrong (2)
@bogdanmishkov63856 күн бұрын
wrong tbh
@bogdanmishkov63856 күн бұрын
what i mean is, recreation is quite good, but it cannot be compared with real life frames lets pay respect to film makers, shalln't we? im pretty sure that raise the titanic scenes were made IRL, not just using some funni goofy graphics...
@Titanic84367 күн бұрын
Raise the ship 10/10 animation
@Tamity7 күн бұрын
If you are wondering why the footage is so sped up, it is because there was no way I was gonna bake a 3 minute fluid simulation. That fluid simulation alone was 300 GB. So yeah, wasn't really possible to do it without speeding it up. Hope you guys liked it.
@punchieouchieguy6 күн бұрын
I'm watching this on 720p on a cracked galaxy, my guy
@IloveCruiseShips191243 минут бұрын
Hi Tamity, i have a question: What are your thoughts on new research about boat 10 which suggests it was lowered later than prevoiusly though, after Baoat D began to lower? I agree with it as it explains Edward Buley and Frank Evans accounts. Great animation as always, keep up the great work :)
@Therobloxstoryteller12311 күн бұрын
Combined with the 2012 capsize
@Therobloxstoryteller12311 күн бұрын
Not the 2012, the 1995
@Therobloxstoryteller12311 күн бұрын
I believe the first one of James Cameron, with the capsize
@mr.naptime12 күн бұрын
Other than the cursed character models You did stellar
@Tamity14 күн бұрын
If you are wondering why I've decided to make such an unfair comparison, it's not because I thought my version was better. Of course the 1997 version will be better (higher budget, mixed with practical effects). No I just did a comparison to make the video less boring lmao. I knew if I just decided to compare the 2 videos it'll get more views than the other videos recreating the million dollar shot. It does in fact work so I might do 2 more recreations from other movies with the same format.
@oikeasti_anton14 күн бұрын
Love your reply haha! Please do just that😁
@IdiotKlub15 күн бұрын
Buddy it’s fine if one singular bulkhead is breached, this would not happen
@glutsa16 күн бұрын
By the way, after the break on the Titanic the light was on.🤔
@Watermeloncat1232216 күн бұрын
You: ThE 4Th FuNnEl NeVeR cOlLaPsEd Also you:
@UrbroRandom17 күн бұрын
The fact that the movie was made in 1997 is insane.
@markcannatarofilms18 күн бұрын
I never realized before seeing this that in the 1997 version, the shadows at the very front of the ship are facing a different direction than the shadows falling on the rest of the ship from about the smoke stacks and back. I'll never unsee that now.
@Redwood_Distributions19 күн бұрын
The thing about million dollar shot in the film is that they used a mix of miniature and CGI. So no matter how many times someone remakes it on computer, it will never look as realistic.
@markelder716021 күн бұрын
It wouldn't really matter if the damage was 5 compartments it would sink head on or side collision.
@MentalParadox21 күн бұрын
1997 better
@spaceguy20_1221 күн бұрын
0:13 ah yes, very realistic looking cgi person going down the right stair
@crisppxls21 күн бұрын
I am pretty sure that the actual boat in the 1997 shot is a miniature pass - not CG. The characters walking around deck were obviously CG but to me the lighting on the boat looks too good for 97 rendering.
@MerchantIvoryfilms21 күн бұрын
Jurassic Park T-Rex was made on windows 92 and to this day all the VFX shots looks 100,000 more photo realistic than those crappy new ones made on top of the line computers 25 years later.
@turbo_Guido21 күн бұрын
i am a blender artist myself and love the titanic. I can't imagine how long it took to render/bake everything. excellent job what are the specs on your computer? I have a 3080 ti with a ryzen 9... 32 gb ram and I don't think my computer could handle this.
@turbo_Guido21 күн бұрын
i can't imagine how long this took to render
@TheEpicGang322 күн бұрын
Day time💀
@josephnjovuvisuals22 күн бұрын
great work, if only you had put in more work in the color grading, especially black and white levels, and if the foam wasn't popping and fading, it would indistinguishable
Пікірлер
What the hellllllllllllllllllllll
The footage being sped up isn't a bad thing. In the novel, Titanic shot up like a bullet and climbed out as fast. So great work overall.
The good thing is, I don’t even have to pay to watch it😂
Your theory is just so wrong first the stern wouldnt be in that position for so long and there was no port list
Its looks like a foam
water splash when the stern is sunk lol
ele tinha rachado no meio
Pero el titanic está partido a la mitad no?
Did they dunk a real ship into the water and then raised it
A model yeah. Still exists somewhere or did until a few years ago.
It’s one of 2 things, the lower bow that you see getting buried in the sand is either crushed due to the impact, or it dug into the sand and may be in good shape.
Do you have a version of this where it’s just yours on fullscreen? Like just recreation. It would be cool to see it without the comparison.
Beautiful recreation! :D
You forgot the 2019 roblox titanic theory where the back of the stern sinks by a bit for a second then after a pause the stern rises vertically and sinks in slowly with no dramatic affect like sprays or splashes pretty much and the air pressure causes air to violently spray out of deck and the ship starts spraying water just as the superstructure of the ship sinks underwater
for those wondering why we shouldnt raise the titanic: 1. its a gravesite for the people who died on that night and should rightfully remain untouched out of pure respect 2. it would cost a shit load of money that we dont have 3. the sand is the only thing holding the wreck together so it would fucking disintegrate
amazing how well practical effects can hold up
why is it in 1 piece? And 2ouldnt the funnels not be attached 🤓🤓🤓
The reason it’s in one piece is because of classism from 1912. The testimonies of 1st class passengers who were already in lifeboats who couldn’t see the ship break in half because of just how dark it was were prioritized over some 3rd class passenger who got pulled out of water after the sinking who was still on the ship when it split apart. So until Robert Ballard discovered the wreck in 1985, the official version of events was that it sank whole, and the ship splitting in half was a fringe conspiracy theory. As for the funnels, there’s no excuse besides the visual. The first three funnels were known to have fallen off. The fourth one is debated nowadays, but it probably broke off as it fell to the ocean floor.
😢😢😢😢
Cool Idea, It's a little bit off, but close enough.
the animation looks good👍
IM FAN😱😄
so many pin-pong balls
Hot.
Your love for the titanic is always amazing me
no way this looks so fire
recreation is better
wrong
@@Tamity not wrong
@@TandMe wrong (2)
wrong tbh
what i mean is, recreation is quite good, but it cannot be compared with real life frames lets pay respect to film makers, shalln't we? im pretty sure that raise the titanic scenes were made IRL, not just using some funni goofy graphics...
Raise the ship 10/10 animation
If you are wondering why the footage is so sped up, it is because there was no way I was gonna bake a 3 minute fluid simulation. That fluid simulation alone was 300 GB. So yeah, wasn't really possible to do it without speeding it up. Hope you guys liked it.
I'm watching this on 720p on a cracked galaxy, my guy
Hi Tamity, i have a question: What are your thoughts on new research about boat 10 which suggests it was lowered later than prevoiusly though, after Baoat D began to lower? I agree with it as it explains Edward Buley and Frank Evans accounts. Great animation as always, keep up the great work :)
Combined with the 2012 capsize
Not the 2012, the 1995
I believe the first one of James Cameron, with the capsize
Other than the cursed character models You did stellar
If you are wondering why I've decided to make such an unfair comparison, it's not because I thought my version was better. Of course the 1997 version will be better (higher budget, mixed with practical effects). No I just did a comparison to make the video less boring lmao. I knew if I just decided to compare the 2 videos it'll get more views than the other videos recreating the million dollar shot. It does in fact work so I might do 2 more recreations from other movies with the same format.
Love your reply haha! Please do just that😁
Buddy it’s fine if one singular bulkhead is breached, this would not happen
By the way, after the break on the Titanic the light was on.🤔
You: ThE 4Th FuNnEl NeVeR cOlLaPsEd Also you:
The fact that the movie was made in 1997 is insane.
I never realized before seeing this that in the 1997 version, the shadows at the very front of the ship are facing a different direction than the shadows falling on the rest of the ship from about the smoke stacks and back. I'll never unsee that now.
The thing about million dollar shot in the film is that they used a mix of miniature and CGI. So no matter how many times someone remakes it on computer, it will never look as realistic.
It wouldn't really matter if the damage was 5 compartments it would sink head on or side collision.
1997 better
0:13 ah yes, very realistic looking cgi person going down the right stair
I am pretty sure that the actual boat in the 1997 shot is a miniature pass - not CG. The characters walking around deck were obviously CG but to me the lighting on the boat looks too good for 97 rendering.
Jurassic Park T-Rex was made on windows 92 and to this day all the VFX shots looks 100,000 more photo realistic than those crappy new ones made on top of the line computers 25 years later.
i am a blender artist myself and love the titanic. I can't imagine how long it took to render/bake everything. excellent job what are the specs on your computer? I have a 3080 ti with a ryzen 9... 32 gb ram and I don't think my computer could handle this.
i can't imagine how long this took to render
Day time💀
great work, if only you had put in more work in the color grading, especially black and white levels, and if the foam wasn't popping and fading, it would indistinguishable