you looks like steve rogers minus super soldier serum
@PhilHoffmanReviews11 күн бұрын
Just when I thought I was done buying new bibles 😭
@nateginsterblum9 күн бұрын
Don’t buy it if you don’t need it lol.
@ralfmeier64602 күн бұрын
Rather buy old bible like 1775 one, in it they shows that sunday was/is the 1st day of week and the year starts around march, not january. We have to DIG for the truth. Go back in time to the original
@jhlawson13 күн бұрын
Do you get to keep all these Bibles or do you just do reviews of them?
@nateginsterblum13 күн бұрын
This Bible I purchased on my own!
@sdhute14 күн бұрын
Is that paste down liner paper or synthetic?
@nateginsterblum14 күн бұрын
It’s a paste down!
@sdhute14 күн бұрын
paste down paper a presume then. Some mfg will use synthetic for a paste down. Preventing the paper from ripping the the spine. Similar to how lockman does the nasb leathertex
@ralfmeier646014 күн бұрын
I do hardly trust any bible newer then 1950.
@vigilantezack14 күн бұрын
They tell you exactly what is updated.
@ralfmeier646014 күн бұрын
@@vigilantezack what do you mean by updated? The bible does not change. I need to have verse Matthew 17,21 . Some trabslations do not have it 'Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. ' that verse is a 1st check if a translation is trustworthy. Then, is the question about the name of the lord. Is just 'Lord' written or the real names like jehova. You can get a Christian with every bible, but most of the newer versions are sadly not the real truth anymore.. 😥
@JosephAquino143013 күн бұрын
@@ralfmeier6460if you can’t read Greek and Hebrew then you need to have a translation thats majority. Its already been proven that though the the critical text is 94% identical to the majority, the 6% will is VERY important. The Westcott and Hort influenced Bibles contain the verses they once omitted in footnotes. Nothing is exactly missing but nothing is right either. If you’re going to take the time to footnote the verse you might as well include it where it was DIVINELY INSPIRED to be. The verses that they claim are not in the earliest manuscripts, them Alexandrian ones, get annihilated by the early church fathers!!! Every last verse they omitted like the adulterous for example was quoted by early church fathers almost 150 years BEFORE the W&H manuscripts were created. You see they tried to silence the Majority text with “Oldest” manuscripts one the basis that there wasn’t anything older… but the dummies forgot they recorded the words of the church fathers!!! Get yourself a good Ruckman Reference of a Common Mans Bible! Jump into one of them. You can read the W&H stuff but do it as a means to add to your OWN interpretation. Good Luck Brothers and Sisters. Ruckman Reference! He’ll steer you the right way.
@vigilantezack8 күн бұрын
@@ralfmeier6460 Yes, the bible changes to update the language. How do you think it's translated into all the languages of the world? Do you know what translators have to do to make sure phrases and sentences are carried between languages so that the meaning isn't lost on them? You know how hard it is to translate cultural "sayings" that other languages don't have? If an American says "I'm parched", there might not be perfect word-for-word translations in every language and even if there is, it might not mean the same thing to the other people. It might translate "I'm dry dirt" which is not going to get the meaning across unless the translators do a good job adopting these into the language, especially the language doesn't have both the equivalent words, and equivalent "saying". That said, when publishers update scripture, they are doing so to fix translation issues, make less clear language more clear in modern English, update archaic language that nobody uses any more, make smoother sentence structures, become more accurate according to scholarship and reviewing of more manuscripts, or even just to fix printing errors, misspellings. The problem with your kind of thinking is you assume conspiracy about everything instead of realizing that language changes over time and it's ok to update translations of books. Matthew 17:21 was not "removed" from bibles, it isn't there because by all accounts it's not original, it was added to scripture most likely. The translator notes on the NET say this: --- "Many important MSS (א* B Θ 0281 33 579 892* pc e ff1 sys,c sa) do not include 17:21 “But this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.” The verse is included in א2 C D L W ƒ1, 13 M lat, but is almost certainly not original. As B. M. Metzger notes, “Since there is no satisfactory reason why the passage, if originally present in Matthew, should have been omitted in a wide variety of witnesses, and since copyists frequently inserted material derived from another Gospel, it appears that most manuscripts have been assimilated to the parallel in Mk 9.29” (TCGNT 35). The present translation follows NA27 in omitting the verse number as well, a procedure also followed by a number of other modern translations." --- There is no grand conspiracy to destroy the blessed KJV. It's just that the verse likely was never there in the first place. The theological concept of 17:21 is not lost, as the idea is still shown in Mark 9:29. This isn't some conspiracy to destroy a core doctrine or something. KJV is a fine old translation that served the English church for a good while. But it was not based on a vast survey of available manuscripts. It was based almost entirely on the word of one man Erasmus. Well guess what, we can do a lot better than Erasmus now.
@nathanbowman63536 күн бұрын
I prefer a Bible that doesn't have extra stuff that was clearly added to address the current days of issues of that time. KJVO'ism is not rooted in earnest study or research but in pride. The oh-so-common belief of "the other Christians have it wrong," but we're the "real" Christians.
@joesbibles563615 күн бұрын
Nice thoughtful review. How is the paper in it? You mentioned it’s heavier weight than the heirloom.
@nateginsterblum15 күн бұрын
The paper is okay, its the same paper in every thinline printed in China. Its a 30gsm rougher feel.
@nateginsterblum15 күн бұрын
I love your channel and I have a question for you can you shoot me an email? [email protected]
@booishoois30915 күн бұрын
It's real classy!
@veedub9516 күн бұрын
I have two versions of this text block. One is a 2011 text the other is a 2016 text. Exact same page format for both Bibles one is around 2012, and the other ones 2019 as far as I can tell this one has the same tax block so the cover is the only thing different about it.
@arin646421 күн бұрын
you look handsome in beard
@Omarnasra00721 күн бұрын
What did he take to get a beard like this guys
@TylerErickson-nb3il22 күн бұрын
Great video brother! Been debating on this or the alpha and was wondering how the ghosting was with this thinline and if you would recommend it for an everyday carry/reader.
@nateginsterblum21 күн бұрын
The Thinline is the perfect form size for me. If ghosting typically bothers you I wouldn’t recommend this Bible. The ghosting is there and it isn’t line matched. It’s not terrible, but if you’re picky it’ll bother you. The alpha is line matched, same font, and a bit smaller. I like the Thinline better because the Thinline footprint is my favorite but alpha wins out in readability and practicality.
@matthevandaalen628924 күн бұрын
Now this is handsome
@patrikmaric-eo7vb27 күн бұрын
Bro went eminem>homelander>prince charming
@user-oi3uw4pg8eАй бұрын
👌🏻
@retropursuit992Ай бұрын
I have to wear a hat everyday whilst it’s growing it’s awful 😂
@ahmet8518Ай бұрын
Brother, the true religion is Islam, the Bible is a book changed by people, I can prove it to you.
@nateginsterblumАй бұрын
The Bible is the most historically verified work of literature and the first book ever printed. Mohamed came hundreds of years after Jesus and denied the bodily death and resurrection of Christ.
@ahmet8518Ай бұрын
@@nateginsterblum Just because the Bible is the first book printed does not mean that it is not corrupted. We Muslims believe that Jesus Christ lives in the sky with his body and soul because Allah Almighty says so in the Quran. It was Judas Iscariot, not Jesus, who was crucified
@nathanbowman63535 күн бұрын
@@ahmet8518 The falsehoods of the Quran are easily seen. Just one example is Surah 20:85-88, 95: “He [Allah] said, ‘We have tempted thy people since thou didist leave them. The Samaratin has led them into error.’ Then Moses returned…and we cast them [(gold) ornaments], as the Samaritan also threw them, into the fire.’ (Then he brought out for them a Calf, a mere body that lowed; and they said, ‘This is your god, and the god of Moses, whom he has forgotten.’)…Moses said, ‘And thou, Samaritan, what was thy business?’” How can a Samaritan have led the Israelites astray at the time of Moses (approx 1400 B.C.) when the city of Samaria was founded by King Omri about 870 B.C.? The Samaritans did not exist until after the exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the resettlement of the area under King Sargon II in 722 B.C. with non-Israelites who then adopted a syncretism (mixture) between the religion of the Jews and their own polytheistic background. The Samaritans did not exist until 530 years after Moses. By this mistake alone, the Qur’an can be rendered unreliable and certainly not an inerrant work of God. Sura 34:50 commands Muhammad to say, "If I go astray, I go astray only to my own loss," which is a severe factual error in the Qur'an as well as contradicting the teaching of the Qur'an in a number of other verses. The Qur'an attacks those who worship anyone besides God (e.g. angels or prophets) because those can neither create, nor give life, nor cause anyone to die. Yet, the Qur'an explicitly states that one angel or several angels are causing certain people to die [Sura 4:97, 16:28, 32, 32:11]. Muhammed is a known con artist who stole and lied as he sought fit. Islam is not spread by the teaching of apostles but by the sword. Islam relies on violence and oppressiveness, not truth. Statistically, 84 million Muslims today believe violence against civilians is justified. It cannot stand on the truth of its own claims, and must result to violence to stay relevant.
@armandocastro4548Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video brother! I believe that bible is 38gsm. It looks thicker than the new ones.
@nateginsterblumАй бұрын
man, that would be wild. It may be true
@bezag7360Ай бұрын
Si te interesa la comparativa de biblias, desde la app "JW Library", puedes acceder a varias de las ediciones inglesas más importantes, ver un mismo versículo en simultaneo de varias traducciones, subrayarlas, añadirles notas, etc. Es gratuita y sin publicidades. También podrás encontrar la "New World Traslation of the Holy Scriptures (Study Edition)", con multitud de notas de estudio con lecturas alternativas de un mismo versículo, información suplementaria, mapas, contenido multimedia, etc. etc...
@bezag7360Ай бұрын
Luces mejor con barba y con cabello corto 😉
@nathanbowman6353Ай бұрын
Why did go with this over the heirloom alpha?
@nateginsterblumАй бұрын
I liked the size of the Thinline better. However, the alpha is probably the better bible because of the readability
@FernandoSegura-od7bpАй бұрын
Beautiful, thanks for taking the time to make this video!
@nateginsterblumАй бұрын
Absolutely, glad you enjoyed it
@PremierCCGuyMMXVIАй бұрын
With and without the beard you are really attractive ❤
@1aikaneАй бұрын
Month 4 thru 12 all looked great
@millennialranger9716Ай бұрын
Have you had any issues with the paper being 28 gsm?
@nateginsterblumАй бұрын
Yes a page tore today
@millennialranger9716Ай бұрын
@@nateginsterblum I’m sorry to hear that. Thanks for your response and an excellent review!
@BibbenАй бұрын
How long can it goddamn take to grow a beard, its so frustrating, ive been growing out and shaving mine for over 3 years. I let my beard grow for 2 months and yet almost no visible results.
@ThickWalrusАй бұрын
Not even gonna lie i get that length in like 3 months
@Ryeguy5Ай бұрын
Why??? This is sooo stupid
@bezag7360Ай бұрын
Amo tu barba! Vi tu video "100 days...", y tenemos el crecimiento de la barba muy parecido, así que me hace ilusión logar una barba con misma densidad que la que tienes en este momento. 😊
@luishuerta61862 ай бұрын
Bold font printed!
@thisismyname6702 ай бұрын
in what month did you get a haircut?
@fabricioparaghamian94962 ай бұрын
Both hairline and beard are top tier, you got some good genes 😅
@maruanopl87562 ай бұрын
Can we talk about the hairstyle ? Is it undercut or high fade ? Or is it modern pomp?
@anonymousss14732 ай бұрын
I advice you to read the Quran as well
@nateginsterblum2 ай бұрын
I plan to. Have you read the Bible all the way through?
@anonymousss14732 ай бұрын
@nateginsterblum To be fair not all the way thru, I didn't know which Bible to pick. I used to search for quotes in the Bible and save it.
@nathanielginsterblum2 ай бұрын
understandable. If English isn't your first language I would encourage you to read NLT or NIV translation. Otherwise, I would encourage you to read the ESV. Have you looked into the reliability and historical accuracy behind the transmission of the Bible? I would encourage you to look up videos by Lee Stroble or William Lane Craig. Also, Nabeel Qureshi is an expert on the topic of Quran vs Biblical reliability here's a link to a video kzread.info/dash/bejne/YoRkz5ebl9W1dNY.html @@anonymousss1473
@kevingaming80882 ай бұрын
0:06
@psychofootball88152 ай бұрын
Cara, minha barba ta literalmente igual a sua com 19 dias, mesmo tamanho e mesma dencidade
@institutoshizen3 ай бұрын
Thank you man! Btw, your beard shape looks EXACTLY like CBum's 🔥
@Isho_s3 ай бұрын
Nice video review bro. I don’t know if you’re looking to try to make your channel theological but you should really try to expand your channel
@nateginsterblum3 ай бұрын
I’m looking into doing this at some point in the future. Thanks for watching!
@bangtanbangtan83383 ай бұрын
why are the comments so negative
@scoon21173 ай бұрын
Definitely keep it. Looking like Aaron from the walking dead.
@honestman55343 ай бұрын
You’ll look good with long hair. Your hair is gorgeous!
@user-vg4ml2rr8g3 ай бұрын
Надо снять еще видео про бороду😊
@user-xe2ct7ot4u3 ай бұрын
What hair product do you use?
@jamesbmedia89963 ай бұрын
This actually a year? I had a shaved head start of June 2023. And my hair is longer than the 1 year pic lol
@loungejay85553 ай бұрын
Perhaps it's the lighting but there seems quite a difference between day 5 and day 6.
Пікірлер
LOOKS AWESOME!!! LOVE IT!!❤️❤️👍👍😊😊
Day 81 seemed like that sweet spot to me
you looks like steve rogers minus super soldier serum
Just when I thought I was done buying new bibles 😭
Don’t buy it if you don’t need it lol.
Rather buy old bible like 1775 one, in it they shows that sunday was/is the 1st day of week and the year starts around march, not january. We have to DIG for the truth. Go back in time to the original
Do you get to keep all these Bibles or do you just do reviews of them?
This Bible I purchased on my own!
Is that paste down liner paper or synthetic?
It’s a paste down!
paste down paper a presume then. Some mfg will use synthetic for a paste down. Preventing the paper from ripping the the spine. Similar to how lockman does the nasb leathertex
I do hardly trust any bible newer then 1950.
They tell you exactly what is updated.
@@vigilantezack what do you mean by updated? The bible does not change. I need to have verse Matthew 17,21 . Some trabslations do not have it 'Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. ' that verse is a 1st check if a translation is trustworthy. Then, is the question about the name of the lord. Is just 'Lord' written or the real names like jehova. You can get a Christian with every bible, but most of the newer versions are sadly not the real truth anymore.. 😥
@@ralfmeier6460if you can’t read Greek and Hebrew then you need to have a translation thats majority. Its already been proven that though the the critical text is 94% identical to the majority, the 6% will is VERY important. The Westcott and Hort influenced Bibles contain the verses they once omitted in footnotes. Nothing is exactly missing but nothing is right either. If you’re going to take the time to footnote the verse you might as well include it where it was DIVINELY INSPIRED to be. The verses that they claim are not in the earliest manuscripts, them Alexandrian ones, get annihilated by the early church fathers!!! Every last verse they omitted like the adulterous for example was quoted by early church fathers almost 150 years BEFORE the W&H manuscripts were created. You see they tried to silence the Majority text with “Oldest” manuscripts one the basis that there wasn’t anything older… but the dummies forgot they recorded the words of the church fathers!!! Get yourself a good Ruckman Reference of a Common Mans Bible! Jump into one of them. You can read the W&H stuff but do it as a means to add to your OWN interpretation. Good Luck Brothers and Sisters. Ruckman Reference! He’ll steer you the right way.
@@ralfmeier6460 Yes, the bible changes to update the language. How do you think it's translated into all the languages of the world? Do you know what translators have to do to make sure phrases and sentences are carried between languages so that the meaning isn't lost on them? You know how hard it is to translate cultural "sayings" that other languages don't have? If an American says "I'm parched", there might not be perfect word-for-word translations in every language and even if there is, it might not mean the same thing to the other people. It might translate "I'm dry dirt" which is not going to get the meaning across unless the translators do a good job adopting these into the language, especially the language doesn't have both the equivalent words, and equivalent "saying". That said, when publishers update scripture, they are doing so to fix translation issues, make less clear language more clear in modern English, update archaic language that nobody uses any more, make smoother sentence structures, become more accurate according to scholarship and reviewing of more manuscripts, or even just to fix printing errors, misspellings. The problem with your kind of thinking is you assume conspiracy about everything instead of realizing that language changes over time and it's ok to update translations of books. Matthew 17:21 was not "removed" from bibles, it isn't there because by all accounts it's not original, it was added to scripture most likely. The translator notes on the NET say this: --- "Many important MSS (א* B Θ 0281 33 579 892* pc e ff1 sys,c sa) do not include 17:21 “But this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.” The verse is included in א2 C D L W ƒ1, 13 M lat, but is almost certainly not original. As B. M. Metzger notes, “Since there is no satisfactory reason why the passage, if originally present in Matthew, should have been omitted in a wide variety of witnesses, and since copyists frequently inserted material derived from another Gospel, it appears that most manuscripts have been assimilated to the parallel in Mk 9.29” (TCGNT 35). The present translation follows NA27 in omitting the verse number as well, a procedure also followed by a number of other modern translations." --- There is no grand conspiracy to destroy the blessed KJV. It's just that the verse likely was never there in the first place. The theological concept of 17:21 is not lost, as the idea is still shown in Mark 9:29. This isn't some conspiracy to destroy a core doctrine or something. KJV is a fine old translation that served the English church for a good while. But it was not based on a vast survey of available manuscripts. It was based almost entirely on the word of one man Erasmus. Well guess what, we can do a lot better than Erasmus now.
I prefer a Bible that doesn't have extra stuff that was clearly added to address the current days of issues of that time. KJVO'ism is not rooted in earnest study or research but in pride. The oh-so-common belief of "the other Christians have it wrong," but we're the "real" Christians.
Nice thoughtful review. How is the paper in it? You mentioned it’s heavier weight than the heirloom.
The paper is okay, its the same paper in every thinline printed in China. Its a 30gsm rougher feel.
I love your channel and I have a question for you can you shoot me an email? [email protected]
It's real classy!
I have two versions of this text block. One is a 2011 text the other is a 2016 text. Exact same page format for both Bibles one is around 2012, and the other ones 2019 as far as I can tell this one has the same tax block so the cover is the only thing different about it.
you look handsome in beard
What did he take to get a beard like this guys
Great video brother! Been debating on this or the alpha and was wondering how the ghosting was with this thinline and if you would recommend it for an everyday carry/reader.
The Thinline is the perfect form size for me. If ghosting typically bothers you I wouldn’t recommend this Bible. The ghosting is there and it isn’t line matched. It’s not terrible, but if you’re picky it’ll bother you. The alpha is line matched, same font, and a bit smaller. I like the Thinline better because the Thinline footprint is my favorite but alpha wins out in readability and practicality.
Now this is handsome
Bro went eminem>homelander>prince charming
👌🏻
I have to wear a hat everyday whilst it’s growing it’s awful 😂
Brother, the true religion is Islam, the Bible is a book changed by people, I can prove it to you.
The Bible is the most historically verified work of literature and the first book ever printed. Mohamed came hundreds of years after Jesus and denied the bodily death and resurrection of Christ.
@@nateginsterblum Just because the Bible is the first book printed does not mean that it is not corrupted. We Muslims believe that Jesus Christ lives in the sky with his body and soul because Allah Almighty says so in the Quran. It was Judas Iscariot, not Jesus, who was crucified
@@ahmet8518 The falsehoods of the Quran are easily seen. Just one example is Surah 20:85-88, 95: “He [Allah] said, ‘We have tempted thy people since thou didist leave them. The Samaratin has led them into error.’ Then Moses returned…and we cast them [(gold) ornaments], as the Samaritan also threw them, into the fire.’ (Then he brought out for them a Calf, a mere body that lowed; and they said, ‘This is your god, and the god of Moses, whom he has forgotten.’)…Moses said, ‘And thou, Samaritan, what was thy business?’” How can a Samaritan have led the Israelites astray at the time of Moses (approx 1400 B.C.) when the city of Samaria was founded by King Omri about 870 B.C.? The Samaritans did not exist until after the exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the resettlement of the area under King Sargon II in 722 B.C. with non-Israelites who then adopted a syncretism (mixture) between the religion of the Jews and their own polytheistic background. The Samaritans did not exist until 530 years after Moses. By this mistake alone, the Qur’an can be rendered unreliable and certainly not an inerrant work of God. Sura 34:50 commands Muhammad to say, "If I go astray, I go astray only to my own loss," which is a severe factual error in the Qur'an as well as contradicting the teaching of the Qur'an in a number of other verses. The Qur'an attacks those who worship anyone besides God (e.g. angels or prophets) because those can neither create, nor give life, nor cause anyone to die. Yet, the Qur'an explicitly states that one angel or several angels are causing certain people to die [Sura 4:97, 16:28, 32, 32:11]. Muhammed is a known con artist who stole and lied as he sought fit. Islam is not spread by the teaching of apostles but by the sword. Islam relies on violence and oppressiveness, not truth. Statistically, 84 million Muslims today believe violence against civilians is justified. It cannot stand on the truth of its own claims, and must result to violence to stay relevant.
Thanks for the video brother! I believe that bible is 38gsm. It looks thicker than the new ones.
man, that would be wild. It may be true
Si te interesa la comparativa de biblias, desde la app "JW Library", puedes acceder a varias de las ediciones inglesas más importantes, ver un mismo versículo en simultaneo de varias traducciones, subrayarlas, añadirles notas, etc. Es gratuita y sin publicidades. También podrás encontrar la "New World Traslation of the Holy Scriptures (Study Edition)", con multitud de notas de estudio con lecturas alternativas de un mismo versículo, información suplementaria, mapas, contenido multimedia, etc. etc...
Luces mejor con barba y con cabello corto 😉
Why did go with this over the heirloom alpha?
I liked the size of the Thinline better. However, the alpha is probably the better bible because of the readability
Beautiful, thanks for taking the time to make this video!
Absolutely, glad you enjoyed it
With and without the beard you are really attractive ❤
Month 4 thru 12 all looked great
Have you had any issues with the paper being 28 gsm?
Yes a page tore today
@@nateginsterblum I’m sorry to hear that. Thanks for your response and an excellent review!
How long can it goddamn take to grow a beard, its so frustrating, ive been growing out and shaving mine for over 3 years. I let my beard grow for 2 months and yet almost no visible results.
Not even gonna lie i get that length in like 3 months
Why??? This is sooo stupid
Amo tu barba! Vi tu video "100 days...", y tenemos el crecimiento de la barba muy parecido, así que me hace ilusión logar una barba con misma densidad que la que tienes en este momento. 😊
Bold font printed!
in what month did you get a haircut?
Both hairline and beard are top tier, you got some good genes 😅
Can we talk about the hairstyle ? Is it undercut or high fade ? Or is it modern pomp?
I advice you to read the Quran as well
I plan to. Have you read the Bible all the way through?
@nateginsterblum To be fair not all the way thru, I didn't know which Bible to pick. I used to search for quotes in the Bible and save it.
understandable. If English isn't your first language I would encourage you to read NLT or NIV translation. Otherwise, I would encourage you to read the ESV. Have you looked into the reliability and historical accuracy behind the transmission of the Bible? I would encourage you to look up videos by Lee Stroble or William Lane Craig. Also, Nabeel Qureshi is an expert on the topic of Quran vs Biblical reliability here's a link to a video kzread.info/dash/bejne/YoRkz5ebl9W1dNY.html @@anonymousss1473
0:06
Cara, minha barba ta literalmente igual a sua com 19 dias, mesmo tamanho e mesma dencidade
Thank you man! Btw, your beard shape looks EXACTLY like CBum's 🔥
Nice video review bro. I don’t know if you’re looking to try to make your channel theological but you should really try to expand your channel
I’m looking into doing this at some point in the future. Thanks for watching!
why are the comments so negative
Definitely keep it. Looking like Aaron from the walking dead.
You’ll look good with long hair. Your hair is gorgeous!
Надо снять еще видео про бороду😊
What hair product do you use?
This actually a year? I had a shaved head start of June 2023. And my hair is longer than the 1 year pic lol
Perhaps it's the lighting but there seems quite a difference between day 5 and day 6.
Any interest in selling?
you hair growing speed is slow😅
shave yourself!