Пікірлер

• 
  @leomarty60022 сағат бұрын

  What's the previous course? Where can I find the previous lectures?

• 
  @dogwithwigwamz.732014 сағат бұрын

  `Then must all shapes correspond to a linear, quadratic, cubic, quartic, quintic..... n` equation ? ... so that we have no option but to look out for and find some space and ascribe it to a Set of which the equation, n becomes entirely satisfactory ?

• 
  @user-qd9pe6ob6e2 күн бұрын

  I already learnt something at the beginning of the video, usually say ur prayers before a test but i spose before a lesson aswell

• 
  @florasotodgan66527 күн бұрын

  never trust the government 😂❤

• 
  @rafaelprior48349 күн бұрын

  still why the cancellation laws says multiply by the left on both sides? or right?

• 
  @violetcramer24249 күн бұрын

  I think your mic died at 30:03 which is a shame since the rest of the video looked important.

• 
  @danielpeixoto376310 күн бұрын

  Been having difficulty on my physics with calc class online course, and found you today. I am glad, you make it simple and it's fun to watch. Also, I appreciate the prayer at the beginning, maybe that's what I was needing, lol!

• 
  @ClumpypooCP10 күн бұрын

  SO GLAD you have videos about modules!!

• 
  @user-cu9ww9tj4i12 күн бұрын

  인내심이 좋으신거 같아요.그리고 실제로 세상을 날카롭게 보는거 같아요.

• 
  @quantumkarthik13 күн бұрын

  Sir, in the description, you mentioned that being "already familiar with Differential Geometry" is important. I will be starting my Master's Thesis on General Relativity and am interested in taking a course on Differential Geometry. However, I've encountered some confusion while searching for one. Many courses list Topology as a prerequisite, and I've also seen Lee's books mentioned, which come in three volumes with different suffixes. Prof. Dr. James, can you please guide me on how to proceed? My background is in Theoretical Physics, and I am currently in the second year of my Master's by Research (M.Res) in Physics. Additionally, do you have any courses that might help me with this problem?

• 
  @HiiBaby-rw6ru15 күн бұрын

  Thanks for providing.... complete course for complex analysis sir 🙏

• 
  @PunisherTR18 күн бұрын

  Hi Sir. I'm following your youtube videos and in your website you have a note for yourself to add some files. Will you update your website for Lie Theory and Manifold Theory. There is no content in their sections.

• 
  @punditgi22 күн бұрын

  Many thanks for this video! 😊

• 
  @pawebielinski490323 күн бұрын

  This is actually very cute :)

• 
  @RM-gc8lx24 күн бұрын

  Thank you so much, Professor Cook. Incredibly helpful. Feels as if you’re talking to one in an approachable and friendly manner right in their living room. I love the bursts of enthusiasm and the meandering. Vistas here and there pop up and we get a feel of the massiveness and deep interconnectedness that is our current understanding of mathematics. And it helps even when you might forget something! Interesting to see you put your mathematical detective cap on to figure it out, or perhaps to place the tidbit in perspective by sketching it out and then proceeding with the bigger picture. Reveals how a mathematician who’s aware of the territory and its many developments views it all from a point of familiarity. Heartfelt thanks for this course, and all the others. Eagerly awaiting any new ones. Thanks again a million times over!

• 
  @HarmonicaoscillatorАй бұрын

  I know nothing about quaternions and so this comment may be useless, but the commutation relations for i, j, and k seem like the same for generalized angular momentum

• 
  @hackvlixАй бұрын

  Same Lie algebra, I suppose.

• 
  @HarmonicaoscillatorАй бұрын

  @@hackvlix that’s exactly what I was wondering. I just know literally nothing about quaternions so I didn’t dare suppose something and it end up being wrong 😂😂

• 
  @hackvlixАй бұрын

  @@Harmonicaoscillator It's su(2) (aka so(3)), the Lie algebra generated by i, j, k (can be identified with the Pauli matrices, among other things).

• 
  @afzalsoomro7950Ай бұрын

  Hello Professor! I am a university student (math major) currently in 3rd year. Because of many circumstances (like very poor education system in my university and country) I haven't studied maths in a real way. In our university, we don't get homework, there are no professors for pure maths so mostly TA's are used to teach us. They use to watch indian KZread videos before teaching us and still they teach wrong sadly. There are such issues that's why I can't study math properly. So I always do self study. I am very familiar with derivatives, limits and integration. Now recently I thought to do selfstudy of calculus. Because there are many gaps in my knowledge of calculus. That's why nowadays I am studying • Analysis from Abbott's book (Understanding analysis by Abbott), current on chapter 2. • Studying complex numbers (from Oxford university's notes, that i found from their Archives)--- it is easy so hopefully in few days I will read it. • Calculus, for calculus 1 I am following your notes and lectures. My plan is to cover Calculus 1,2,3 and maybe manifolds theory and other subjects from your lectures. Yesterday I took a complete view of your notes (of calculus 1) these were amazing I found a lot of material that I never studied. So my strategy is to watch your videos and read your notes. (After that make my own notes). Besides this I am using James Stewart's book of calculus. Currently I am going though the exams of university. Just last two exams are remaining. Then I will get plenty of time for study. Then my plan is to cover atleast Calculus 1 and 2 in coming 2 months. Maybe it take some more time, because of some issues (like I live in joint family, and have no personal room or study table, noise etc). Professor, am I on the correct path? I will appreciate any suggestions, feedback and help from you. Thank You.

• 
  @vortexsciАй бұрын

  Hello Mr. Cook! I just want to say, your channel is a big inspiration for my own channel!

• 
  @violetcramer2424Ай бұрын

  Wow, those bows in my hair look ridiculous from the back.

• 
  @pezvilleАй бұрын

  wow terrible teacher

• 
  @hassansameh3404Ай бұрын

  I can't find the PDF of "MIssion i", how could I find these.

• 
  @EzraSchroederАй бұрын

  can't find your email on liberty. would really like the course notes. a random hobbyist on the internet.

• 
  @deniz.7200Ай бұрын

  The example was really helpful sir.

• 
  @debojitsikdar2046Ай бұрын

  This is really well put together. Most teachers won't touch on the intricacies of mathematics just to keep things simpler. Could I ask where can I get the pdfs used in this lecture and/or which book can I refer to?

• 
  @debojitsikdar2046Ай бұрын

  Never mind, I found them in your replies to other comments. Looked through them and my appreciation for you magnified greatly. Thank you for your efforts🙌🖤

• 
  @perx8063Ай бұрын

  Great lectures. Sir is it possible to get copy of lectures notes , tutorials and solutions so we can practice after watching your videos. Watching from Sydney Australia 🇦🇺 Love your lectures

• 
  @ronalton3374Ай бұрын

  Saludos, welcomes, greetings from LATAM there is other hour, maybe Im writing form the past, I'm the first comment I think 🤔, regarding to your current time. Any way happy to be the first in give the greetings

• 
  @MATEMATICAalALCANCEdeTODOSАй бұрын

  Excellent and fun lecture.

• 
  @mohammadmehabadimohammadi6761Ай бұрын

  Thanks for this great course. Very well reasoned. Excellent prof.

• 
  @user-tf4yw2gv8fАй бұрын

  you haven't derived and explained the Christoffel symbol's variation at 37:36 and I'm facing problems in solving it. How to solve.?

• 
  @shoopincАй бұрын

  lol I know of Frobenius from his algebra and norm, but not personally. He has in fact been dead a while.

• 
  @joeycal9075Ай бұрын

  Should be "accepting" not "excepting" around 18:48

• 
  @xanderlewisАй бұрын

  OK... I'm seven years late, but the bit with the equilateral triangle and the distance to the barycentre (/centroid) confused me for a bit. It's actually two-thirds the *height* of the triangle; not two-thirds the side length. Since the height is slightly less than the side length x (it's sqrt(3)/2 * x), it's not showing that the inequality is sharp as mentioned in the video - to do that you'd have to show that there's a point two-thirds of the *side length* away from the nearest vertex, which is a slightly larger quantity the two-thirds the height and presumably isn't achieved since the vertices seem to achieve the supremum already.

• 
  @xanderlewisАй бұрын

  The supremum of ||b - p_i|| in the case of the equilateral triangle with side length x is actually (sqrt(3) / 3) * x - disappointingly slightly smaller than 2/3 * x and so the bound is not sharp.

• 
  @punditgiАй бұрын

  Excellent video! Many thanks. 😊

• 
  @NN-el9mdАй бұрын

  Good job man, keep it up. Pretty informative.

• 
  @punditgiАй бұрын

  Thanks for the video! 😊

• 
  @DirtSlabАй бұрын

  Baller video

• 
  @punditgiАй бұрын

  Thanks for all your videos! 🎉😊

• 
  @namehidden7456Ай бұрын

  Awesome lecture sir! Love from India!

• 
  @forheuristiclifeksh78362 ай бұрын

  1:00

• 
  @beck42182 ай бұрын

  Liberty U? lol.

• 
  @iamnobody20032 ай бұрын

  I am missing perhaps a great lecture only because of poor audio quality :''(

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @BigSimp2 ай бұрын

  Bad video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video

• 
  @DirtSlab2 ай бұрын

  Baller Video