The videos share the unexpected and unconditional. WHAT IS, is already what’s longed for, which is always overlooked by what is commonly considered normal, even necessary: the experience that “what is” is personal.
The key to understanding what he's saying, is to watch the video without sound. Better yet, watch it without sound and without video.
@theprimalwisdom4929 Жыл бұрын
It's just so obvious looking at him he literally doesn't need to say even a word.
@ccr7712 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Jim 👍
@kasunlee.s12272 жыл бұрын
Oh the comments are turned on lol
@tlouandtherest43782 жыл бұрын
He stands with a format of Experience Illusion Perfect Dream Understanding I am Now Knowing Recognize Story Apparent Using these amongst other words is like a script as to launch his gunk , the script of words allows him to go back to his basic BS Yes BS Memories are an illusion too right Part of the dream experience I don’t like this dude , he is repulsive and has some type of hidden agenda lurking in his mind for what purpose who gives a damn
@annaferrari3022 жыл бұрын
❤️
@iangoss78412 жыл бұрын
Perfect ending...
@Tuunyiii2 жыл бұрын
"Ja jó, oké" xDDD 5 percnél
@erry29073 жыл бұрын
I think the meeting/interview is much more vibrant/interesting when the questioner is new(er) to “the message”. As it seemingly is in this video. Started with the latest; but this is better, whatever that means.
@bend0matic3 жыл бұрын
Why are your comments turned off for the majority of your videos?
@user-zb1yw5vs4c6 ай бұрын
He doesn't like his ego bruised.
@Nothing-tz6un3 жыл бұрын
This is clarity, beyond conception.
@Avegadez3 жыл бұрын
I'm a bagel cause why not
@aliciainmx4 жыл бұрын
This presentation is clear and audible. I do appreciate being able to hear. I do wish questioners would speak up more clearly. I want to hear every word.
@FirstPersonHood4 жыл бұрын
Newman could not have been clearer. The mind will always avoid its transparency.
@FirstPersonHood4 жыл бұрын
Great to see how a direct message creates so much tension among the commenters.
@narendranarotam38164 жыл бұрын
The ego will never understand so the talk is useless
@FirstPersonHood4 жыл бұрын
The ego can understand it is impossible.
@N8teyrve5 жыл бұрын
Honestly Jim is just the best pointer at this that there isn't.
@lightofawareness108 Жыл бұрын
Pointless comment well taken
@arthurhelmers32345 жыл бұрын
it never happened because you can not remember that it happened
@arthurhelmers32345 жыл бұрын
nothing has been figured out by man, they have found something that was always there
@arthurhelmers32345 жыл бұрын
I never had the feeling that I opened my eyes for the first time
@arthurhelmers32345 жыл бұрын
if you can not remembering history, everything becomes a new experience
@arthurhelmers32345 жыл бұрын
the tongue moves and speaks
@curiosity_saved_the_cat5 жыл бұрын
But you did do a great job Jim. Your radical approach exposed a hidden agenda and brought tears to my eyes, in a good way.
@josephbondi78305 жыл бұрын
Again due to lack of extra microphone, one is in the lurch as to what the response refers to, because of inability to decipher audience participation!
@josephbondi78306 жыл бұрын
Please, 80% of the dialogue is garbled, due to the captions going awry, distorted by poor translation. And the lousy voice pickup from microphones in use. Hence it's difficult to extract meaning to the ongoing dialogue! Terrible presentation due to lack of microphone setup. Why is that not seen thru?
@vedobecic25866 жыл бұрын
I realy enjoy ,when he speaks
@chimpsteaparty57676 жыл бұрын
i love your stoic kinda stlye
@darren81216 жыл бұрын
Very confusing speaker. There are easier explanations. Scott Kiloby is much clearer.
@lightdweller16 жыл бұрын
What I grapple with here is... why need to know the source of reality? Why not enjoy experiencing our illusions? Why do we make that wrong in our aspiration to find the source of beingness, or non-beingness depending upon which way you look at it. To note here: I love how this guy doesn’t make illusions wrong, even though he sees that they have no core, no solidity, because WE have no core or solidity! What if illusion is also contained within non-duality, where there is nothing outside of non-duality. In our illusions we are simply experiencing the micro instead of the macro - or as part of the macro... if that makes sense! 🙏
@whowonthatballgame42986 жыл бұрын
Source of reality all agree is a mystery. It shows up Being everything/nothing , no where and every where .The illusionary me makes it mean something via concepts and beliefs, which is also the mystery being a separate self. "Jim " does bring humor to the mystery and is not charging thousands of dollars . Good bargain if you can get yourself out of the way. ...No me no problem and the mystery flows as it is.
@DarkEnerg0n6 жыл бұрын
This group really threw out there. Thanks Jim! Hope you keep it up!
@sorenmj16 жыл бұрын
Its hard to follow many of these videos. Not even the texting kan follow.
@davidreynolds49427 жыл бұрын
Explained horribly, listen to Rupert Spira instead
@amazingme14086 жыл бұрын
hes an ass.......eckart would destroy him in a staring match possibly arm wrestling
@ndnd2023 Жыл бұрын
It's a different conversation altogether to what Spira is talking about.
@spiraldynamics60087 жыл бұрын
How to make money with nothing ....
@WriteNowTV7 жыл бұрын
I think Jim is exploring the "nature" of the moment, extrapolating it into a big understanding of how consciousness works. His view is essential but reductionist. As if it explained everything we know; but I think he has a unique perspective coming from his own truth of nonduality.
@jimiguplassie61807 жыл бұрын
Its like a Space Pod from outer Space landed on Earth and dropped off another Tony Parsons/Richard Sylvester, Quoting the exact same words and even rubbing the fingers together????.
@amazingme14086 жыл бұрын
...wel they all hang out... watch out for my new chanel...parsons on fuckin steroids.....im so full of shit you will love me
@inconceivablenot2or1205 жыл бұрын
Guttermonk Be. “Just this”
@jwright1234567898 жыл бұрын
My favorite quote about 'getting it': "Something that never happened stops appearing to have happened." :-)
@bombingraid18368 жыл бұрын
Tony Parsons Jr
@amazingme14086 жыл бұрын
me 3
@abishek32798 жыл бұрын
This guy has a tone of like, It happened to me, I am nothing you are nothing, no one will get it, but at the same time he has that slight arrogance about it. He says it is all hopeless to even try for enlightenment. It will happen but noone can do anything or nothing can be done for others to live without ego. I like him but the way he has to chosen to explain is crazy, but then all masters have their uniqueness and eccentricities.:)
@kwixotic8 жыл бұрын
You've stated it EXACTLY as he and the neo-Advaitans really are, with all that "this is it", "it's just what's happening", "nothing and nobody to gain anything", "nothing ever happened." All this means something when you live "your" life in accordance with this recognition, NOT just by having a split second awakening into it. Plenty of people, given the right circumstances or "timing" can indeed recognize this but very few if any of them retain that in their relative day to day existence. And a fair number don't even grasp that these Advaitan concepts can lead to absurd justifications by those not mature enough(i.e, I'm at liberty to rob a bank because, well, after all there's "nobody" doing it). No less than the Buddha himself emphasized the relevance of the Relative co-existing with the Absolute.
@kalprao7 жыл бұрын
This is where these teachers fail big time,in trying to convey to their students what reality is . in What is real and what is not real . it really is pointless when you think about it ...these people leave more confused with pointless information
@humanoid83447 жыл бұрын
kwixotic mad cause bad lolll
@abishek32798 жыл бұрын
why nobody talks about how contagious his laugh is
@3877michael8 жыл бұрын
Be happy you will never be happy ~ Karl Renz
@davidleitman8 жыл бұрын
Jim, isn't it proof that there is such a thing as a self if you consider that people have attested to being self aware after they have left their bodies and returned?
@billyjo18818 жыл бұрын
+David Leitman I would say David that is a memory { a concept } of an experience, experiencially nothing is happening. Linguistically we can never describe what we are experiencing right Now, as soon a we try to describe the Now we are really describing what happened " a little while ago "
@davidleitman8 жыл бұрын
Hi Bill, are you saying that if infinity is all there is ("this" as Jim calls it) that there is not eternity? maybe just like space and time are parts of the same thing, not separate as we would perceive them to be in this dimension. But that infinity/eternity might be part of the same thing too, so that "this" is co-illusory with "now" I'd very much like to know your thoughts on this Bill David
@billyjo18818 жыл бұрын
+David Leitman Hi David my strong suit is not science its more in language. What Jim is sharing as is Tony Parsons is dissolving the importance of the separate self so as what is happening is simply happening, thus,,,, This is it. A scientist would add meaning to what is happening thus reinforcing the separate self and liberation and freedom becomes trapped in another concept of what is happening. We cant couch experience in concepts. Two very distinct domains of epistemology. As Jim would say no one knows this because no one is here in absolute zero " time " I shows up in relative time as a story as a concept of what is happening.
@davidleitman8 жыл бұрын
so self is not separate, but the thing that attests that it is is the illusion of self, is that what you're saying? I guess my question was what is eternity? Would you say eternity is an illusion?
@billyjo18818 жыл бұрын
+David Leitman Good question David. What I am enjoying about listening Jim, Tony Parsons and Ella May is their take that the separate self is an illusion. Most mystics have stated the world is illusion. That statement the world is illusionary at least in my experience did nothing to dissolve the separate self. I find listening to Jim, Tony and Ella and their communication that me is the illusion distinct from the world very liberating. So not sure if eternity is an illusion but the separate self as what is being communicated as the illusion seems to allow the me to no longer be so important and the This is it.. of eternity is directly experienced. So would say David the separate self is the illusion and eternity is felt with a sense of aliveness using pure attention from pure Awareness. Eternity would be the ground of Being of what's possible once the seperate self loses its self importance.
@davidleitman8 жыл бұрын
Jim, would you be willing to speak regarding the New Testament's record of Jesus coming back from the dead with a clear sense of self and what the implications of that would be for your world view?
@Davidthemarathoner8 жыл бұрын
+David Leitman I guarantee he wont. And definitely not in the way you are asking for or fishing for. If people clearly see what Jim is pointing to, over and over and over again, then such idealistic questions would not ever have a need to be asked. And I can tell you as a certainty that Jim doesn't have a "world view". The "new testament" as was its horrific predecessor was written by very unbalanced individuals. Religiosity and programming that is completely dualistic in every conceivable way. These horrific documents were written by very pitiable individuals who were misogynistic, neurotic bordering on psychosis, violent control freaks with very clear agendas. And the piece you are asking him to speak about is hearsay and at best a fairy-tale and a hypothetical that has zero to do with direct experience and direct seeing/non-dual seeing of the empty nothingness that is reality and ultimate truth of all things. Everything created and conceptualized and labeled has and is human invented meaning - every so-called spiritual practice, all the ridiculous religious bullshit, all theosophy, philosophy, every ideology, up to and including the old and new testaments. This is only seen when its seen and not a second before. "A clear sense of self". First and most obvious holes here that neither you nor anyone else was there when this so-called event was purported to have happened lolo and all this is, in all probability made up fairy tales. This personage (if he even existed) lived in the middle east possibly over 2000 years ago. This has no bearing on your life as it is now. Isn't this obvious to you? So instead of so many herd-like followers reading the (very doubtful) words of dead people, as a refreshing change the issue and challenge would be to question and examine all of your beliefs and invented stories. It does not matter who said what 2000 years ago. "Coming back from the dead". This is an allegory not a factual event that happened. The body doesn't return from death. And again this will have absolutely no bearing on Jim's so-called world view because he doesn't have one. Question. Examine. Direct seeing and direct experience...... A thought/desire arises, and action takes place and then the mind steps in and makes up a reason whilst assuming ownership. Just have a look at the mechanism. First to arise in me, but the last one just isn't there. There is much to be learned from that simple little formula. Not rereading some book purportedly written by saintly whomever with horrible agendas.
@jmac75738 жыл бұрын
What I am is the space in which everything arises. Just reporting what I call "the experience".
@josephsaff3 жыл бұрын
Jim would say that there is no I. There is nothing except what is appearing. No space, no holder, no essence, no nothing
@robertjsmith8 жыл бұрын
cant hear what people are asking
@taylorcantly39547 жыл бұрын
robert smith it's ok. It doesn't matter.
@hesterzijlstra4428 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your sharing Jim, enjoy listening to it a lot, very clear!
@MrBillcallahan8 жыл бұрын
What was going on in the Nov 2015 tape. It seems Jim became passionate and out of control. I liked it.
@taylorcantly39547 жыл бұрын
Bill Callahan Its just what apparently happened. There wasn't a Jim doing anything. Absolutely entertaining
Пікірлер
The separation MUST REMAIN A SECRET.
☯️
this is New Age talk - pantheism.
A better audio quality would be appreciated ♡
The key to understanding what he's saying, is to watch the video without sound. Better yet, watch it without sound and without video.
It's just so obvious looking at him he literally doesn't need to say even a word.
Thanks Jim 👍
Oh the comments are turned on lol
He stands with a format of Experience Illusion Perfect Dream Understanding I am Now Knowing Recognize Story Apparent Using these amongst other words is like a script as to launch his gunk , the script of words allows him to go back to his basic BS Yes BS Memories are an illusion too right Part of the dream experience I don’t like this dude , he is repulsive and has some type of hidden agenda lurking in his mind for what purpose who gives a damn
❤️
Perfect ending...
"Ja jó, oké" xDDD 5 percnél
I think the meeting/interview is much more vibrant/interesting when the questioner is new(er) to “the message”. As it seemingly is in this video. Started with the latest; but this is better, whatever that means.
Why are your comments turned off for the majority of your videos?
He doesn't like his ego bruised.
This is clarity, beyond conception.
I'm a bagel cause why not
This presentation is clear and audible. I do appreciate being able to hear. I do wish questioners would speak up more clearly. I want to hear every word.
Newman could not have been clearer. The mind will always avoid its transparency.
Great to see how a direct message creates so much tension among the commenters.
The ego will never understand so the talk is useless
The ego can understand it is impossible.
Honestly Jim is just the best pointer at this that there isn't.
Pointless comment well taken
it never happened because you can not remember that it happened
nothing has been figured out by man, they have found something that was always there
I never had the feeling that I opened my eyes for the first time
if you can not remembering history, everything becomes a new experience
the tongue moves and speaks
But you did do a great job Jim. Your radical approach exposed a hidden agenda and brought tears to my eyes, in a good way.
Again due to lack of extra microphone, one is in the lurch as to what the response refers to, because of inability to decipher audience participation!
Please, 80% of the dialogue is garbled, due to the captions going awry, distorted by poor translation. And the lousy voice pickup from microphones in use. Hence it's difficult to extract meaning to the ongoing dialogue! Terrible presentation due to lack of microphone setup. Why is that not seen thru?
I realy enjoy ,when he speaks
i love your stoic kinda stlye
Very confusing speaker. There are easier explanations. Scott Kiloby is much clearer.
What I grapple with here is... why need to know the source of reality? Why not enjoy experiencing our illusions? Why do we make that wrong in our aspiration to find the source of beingness, or non-beingness depending upon which way you look at it. To note here: I love how this guy doesn’t make illusions wrong, even though he sees that they have no core, no solidity, because WE have no core or solidity! What if illusion is also contained within non-duality, where there is nothing outside of non-duality. In our illusions we are simply experiencing the micro instead of the macro - or as part of the macro... if that makes sense! 🙏
Source of reality all agree is a mystery. It shows up Being everything/nothing , no where and every where .The illusionary me makes it mean something via concepts and beliefs, which is also the mystery being a separate self. "Jim " does bring humor to the mystery and is not charging thousands of dollars . Good bargain if you can get yourself out of the way. ...No me no problem and the mystery flows as it is.
This group really threw out there. Thanks Jim! Hope you keep it up!
Its hard to follow many of these videos. Not even the texting kan follow.
Explained horribly, listen to Rupert Spira instead
hes an ass.......eckart would destroy him in a staring match possibly arm wrestling
It's a different conversation altogether to what Spira is talking about.
How to make money with nothing ....
I think Jim is exploring the "nature" of the moment, extrapolating it into a big understanding of how consciousness works. His view is essential but reductionist. As if it explained everything we know; but I think he has a unique perspective coming from his own truth of nonduality.
Its like a Space Pod from outer Space landed on Earth and dropped off another Tony Parsons/Richard Sylvester, Quoting the exact same words and even rubbing the fingers together????.
...wel they all hang out... watch out for my new chanel...parsons on fuckin steroids.....im so full of shit you will love me
Guttermonk Be. “Just this”
My favorite quote about 'getting it': "Something that never happened stops appearing to have happened." :-)
Tony Parsons Jr
me 3
This guy has a tone of like, It happened to me, I am nothing you are nothing, no one will get it, but at the same time he has that slight arrogance about it. He says it is all hopeless to even try for enlightenment. It will happen but noone can do anything or nothing can be done for others to live without ego. I like him but the way he has to chosen to explain is crazy, but then all masters have their uniqueness and eccentricities.:)
You've stated it EXACTLY as he and the neo-Advaitans really are, with all that "this is it", "it's just what's happening", "nothing and nobody to gain anything", "nothing ever happened." All this means something when you live "your" life in accordance with this recognition, NOT just by having a split second awakening into it. Plenty of people, given the right circumstances or "timing" can indeed recognize this but very few if any of them retain that in their relative day to day existence. And a fair number don't even grasp that these Advaitan concepts can lead to absurd justifications by those not mature enough(i.e, I'm at liberty to rob a bank because, well, after all there's "nobody" doing it). No less than the Buddha himself emphasized the relevance of the Relative co-existing with the Absolute.
This is where these teachers fail big time,in trying to convey to their students what reality is . in What is real and what is not real . it really is pointless when you think about it ...these people leave more confused with pointless information
kwixotic mad cause bad lolll
why nobody talks about how contagious his laugh is
Be happy you will never be happy ~ Karl Renz
Jim, isn't it proof that there is such a thing as a self if you consider that people have attested to being self aware after they have left their bodies and returned?
+David Leitman I would say David that is a memory { a concept } of an experience, experiencially nothing is happening. Linguistically we can never describe what we are experiencing right Now, as soon a we try to describe the Now we are really describing what happened " a little while ago "
Hi Bill, are you saying that if infinity is all there is ("this" as Jim calls it) that there is not eternity? maybe just like space and time are parts of the same thing, not separate as we would perceive them to be in this dimension. But that infinity/eternity might be part of the same thing too, so that "this" is co-illusory with "now" I'd very much like to know your thoughts on this Bill David
+David Leitman Hi David my strong suit is not science its more in language. What Jim is sharing as is Tony Parsons is dissolving the importance of the separate self so as what is happening is simply happening, thus,,,, This is it. A scientist would add meaning to what is happening thus reinforcing the separate self and liberation and freedom becomes trapped in another concept of what is happening. We cant couch experience in concepts. Two very distinct domains of epistemology. As Jim would say no one knows this because no one is here in absolute zero " time " I shows up in relative time as a story as a concept of what is happening.
so self is not separate, but the thing that attests that it is is the illusion of self, is that what you're saying? I guess my question was what is eternity? Would you say eternity is an illusion?
+David Leitman Good question David. What I am enjoying about listening Jim, Tony Parsons and Ella May is their take that the separate self is an illusion. Most mystics have stated the world is illusion. That statement the world is illusionary at least in my experience did nothing to dissolve the separate self. I find listening to Jim, Tony and Ella and their communication that me is the illusion distinct from the world very liberating. So not sure if eternity is an illusion but the separate self as what is being communicated as the illusion seems to allow the me to no longer be so important and the This is it.. of eternity is directly experienced. So would say David the separate self is the illusion and eternity is felt with a sense of aliveness using pure attention from pure Awareness. Eternity would be the ground of Being of what's possible once the seperate self loses its self importance.
Jim, would you be willing to speak regarding the New Testament's record of Jesus coming back from the dead with a clear sense of self and what the implications of that would be for your world view?
+David Leitman I guarantee he wont. And definitely not in the way you are asking for or fishing for. If people clearly see what Jim is pointing to, over and over and over again, then such idealistic questions would not ever have a need to be asked. And I can tell you as a certainty that Jim doesn't have a "world view". The "new testament" as was its horrific predecessor was written by very unbalanced individuals. Religiosity and programming that is completely dualistic in every conceivable way. These horrific documents were written by very pitiable individuals who were misogynistic, neurotic bordering on psychosis, violent control freaks with very clear agendas. And the piece you are asking him to speak about is hearsay and at best a fairy-tale and a hypothetical that has zero to do with direct experience and direct seeing/non-dual seeing of the empty nothingness that is reality and ultimate truth of all things. Everything created and conceptualized and labeled has and is human invented meaning - every so-called spiritual practice, all the ridiculous religious bullshit, all theosophy, philosophy, every ideology, up to and including the old and new testaments. This is only seen when its seen and not a second before. "A clear sense of self". First and most obvious holes here that neither you nor anyone else was there when this so-called event was purported to have happened lolo and all this is, in all probability made up fairy tales. This personage (if he even existed) lived in the middle east possibly over 2000 years ago. This has no bearing on your life as it is now. Isn't this obvious to you? So instead of so many herd-like followers reading the (very doubtful) words of dead people, as a refreshing change the issue and challenge would be to question and examine all of your beliefs and invented stories. It does not matter who said what 2000 years ago. "Coming back from the dead". This is an allegory not a factual event that happened. The body doesn't return from death. And again this will have absolutely no bearing on Jim's so-called world view because he doesn't have one. Question. Examine. Direct seeing and direct experience...... A thought/desire arises, and action takes place and then the mind steps in and makes up a reason whilst assuming ownership. Just have a look at the mechanism. First to arise in me, but the last one just isn't there. There is much to be learned from that simple little formula. Not rereading some book purportedly written by saintly whomever with horrible agendas.
What I am is the space in which everything arises. Just reporting what I call "the experience".
Jim would say that there is no I. There is nothing except what is appearing. No space, no holder, no essence, no nothing
cant hear what people are asking
robert smith it's ok. It doesn't matter.
Thanks for your sharing Jim, enjoy listening to it a lot, very clear!
What was going on in the Nov 2015 tape. It seems Jim became passionate and out of control. I liked it.
Bill Callahan Its just what apparently happened. There wasn't a Jim doing anything. Absolutely entertaining