Пікірлер

• 
  @user-py7qf6iz9y4 сағат бұрын

  Bar am so glad you survived that horrible nightmare❤ Am so sorry and Condenlences for all the beautiful people that were murdered by terrorists Hamas. Including loosing your friend. 💔✝️🕯️

• 
  @user-py7qf6iz9y4 сағат бұрын

  Islam does not know about Respect.

• 
  @demonstrateit2223 күн бұрын

  Perform legal reasoning: General overview: Be exposed to facts that a client brings , determine what legal issues arise from those facts. What constitutes a single issue? Apply the facts and the fact pattern to the rule. Analysis/application section is where: you make analogies (similarities) & distinctions (differences) State only the rules that pertain to the issue. The cases you have read corroborating Conclusion, what would a court likely conclude on the issue, tend to do/conclude Conclusion in line/parallel to analysis , which will show that what you wrote is strong, so conclude on what a court will likely hold for each issue

• 
  @JjingoDisan-h6z3 күн бұрын

  Hello how are you

• 
  @julio-iz3sk4 күн бұрын

  🇵🇦💙🇮🇱

• 
  @idrismohd15018 күн бұрын

  Hannibal

• 
  @chrissharrard42009 күн бұрын

  Was a decent story UNTIL you reminded us that ALL Zionists are indoctrinated from birth to HATE an entire population of other human beings…😢

• 
  @AkuZ9 күн бұрын

  Why do all "israelis" not only look like, but also talk English like europeans...wait...😂

• 
  @BizLaw9 күн бұрын

  @@AkuZ it’s because about 50% of Israeli Jews ARE European or at least from Europe/Russia - known as “Ashkenazi.” 🙋🏻‍♂️ 🙋🏼‍♀️ Most of the other 50% are Mizrahi or Safardi and look Arab because, well, they are Arab. 🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♀️ And there’s a very small population of black Jews in Israel and they definitely look different than the guy in this video! 💁🏿‍♂️💁🏿‍♀️ So I half agree with you and moreover I understand how you’d get the impression that all Israelis are Ashkenazi because I think they are more prominent in Israeli society and media.

• 
  @AkuZ9 күн бұрын

  @@BizLaw Thanks for the explanation. I totally agree with your last point - the media doesn't show us the "regular" israelis, but mostly those with apparent eastern european origins (Russians, polish, ukraines...), and sometimes we get rrally surprised and confused at the same time when an israeli starts speaking and sound more american than americans themselves. People - at least here in Germany - have the idea that israelis all have been living there for genereations, but it's not true - if you think of the majority of the settlers in the Wedt Bank or Al-Quds (East Jerusalem), you easily get the impression that they just stepped out of a plane from North America or Poland or Russia... unfortunately, they're given land that they have 0% connection to at the expense of the indigenous people that have been living there for many many generations. But that's the problem of the zionist ideology and it's the biggest problem in my eyes: People around the world can't distinguish between the religion of Judaism and the ideology of zionism.

• 
  @nancikuba422 күн бұрын

  @AkuZ Before the Arab conquest, the northern land was called Israel & the southern land was called Judea. Most of the Bible talks about the Jews living on the land. Including Jesus.

• 
  @gerry38139 күн бұрын

  Hasbara bullshit

• 
  @BizLaw9 күн бұрын

  @@gerry3813 “hasbara” means explanation but anti-Israel advocates use it to mean “propaganda”. The speaker in the video described what happened to him and them offers a message of hope for peace. What aspects of this are “propaganda”? Or by “bullshit” do you mean to doubt the credibility of the speaker? Are you suggesting his story is not true? In the latter case, how do you explain away the substantial evidence that Nova festival goers were attacked and murdered? Thanks for contributing to civil discourse around this important issue.

• 
  @donnabailey53255 күн бұрын

  What's "Bullshit"? Don't be so rude.

• 
  @nancikuba422 күн бұрын

  @gerry3813 The reason Hamas did what they did on Oct7 was that they felt it was perfect time to spread their propaganda to the western world because they knew they would jump on board protesting against oppression after watching BLM protests in 2020. Knowing so many will believe anything as long as you can show oppression. What other reason did Hamas do it for. They knew so many are so easily manipulated to believe what they are spreading. What other reason did they go into Israel on Oct 7. How did they benefit from it? Your comment is what those blindly following anything they’re told. Again what other reason forOct 7?

• 
  @erdem5945710 күн бұрын

  Wow, comments are deleted within seconds, world-class!

• 
  @BizLaw10 күн бұрын

  Yes, KZread's default content moderation settings should work nearly instantly, since they are done by algorithm (or AI); then, it requires manual review to re-publish them. (It's notable that flagged comments are hidden, not deleted, as they can be re-instated.) In this case, however, there were no comments made regarding this video prior to yours. For those who are interested, I have elsewhere written about free speech on private social media platforms like KZread. Thanks for continuing the civil discourse. digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2722&context=jour_mlr

• 
  @michaelgrant915311 күн бұрын

  Excellent presentation, thank you.

• 
  @sharonleis136512 күн бұрын

  Satan is real. You saw it.

• 
  @la_actriz954622 күн бұрын

  This is an excellent, easy-to-digest explanation.

• 
  @As_SulayАй бұрын

  9:45

• 
  @As_SulayАй бұрын

  9:51

• 
  @BadGalYanaАй бұрын

  Super helpful, thank you!

• 
  @thegrandlevel3132 ай бұрын

  Excellent presentation, but for those interested in more specific detail with securities particularly: 14:13 CORRECTION: rather, it’s a good point, however, I think it’s simplified for time, but I’d like to note: Underwriters may or may not be taking the risk. The analogy of Amazon vs Walmart in BOTH cases they are underwriters. Underwriters can be on a “Best-Effort” Underwriters in which they make their best effort to sell the shares or debt securities but have no duty to purchase the rest, nor do they ever even take possession. There can be “best effort” underwriters who sell on a “All or None” in which the hold the shares in escrow but do not have a title or ownership, and when either the cash pile is full and the shares are gone and the cash goes to the issuer, OR A MINI-max in which when the cash is just enough, or the number of shares misses the minimum number the issuer wanted sold, they will transfer the shares and cash to the investor or issuer appropriately. There are underwriters who promise to buy… But in Securities, they are all still underwriters, so when you look to buy an IPO or APO… you should ask what kind of underwriting they are using. Or… since this is for business folks. When you go public, what is the ideal kind of underwriter to use? What kind of contract? If there is no point if you can’t buy that server for your AI, and a penny less won’t serve you, and if you can’t raise the money, you’d rather go back to the drawing board with the equity, then maybe an all or none is what you need. If your idea is so awesome, and already very profitable, you should try to get a broker/dealer to buy every share you need sold.

• 
  @Pikaboo12342 ай бұрын

  and the academy award goes to Zehmer!!!

• 
  @chasemorello602 ай бұрын

  👨‍🏫

• 
  @bobdole87272 ай бұрын

  Mah mommuh went to dusquenne for lawyer school

• 
  @kuhiuvjgct2 ай бұрын

  You're an actual angel.

• 
  @evelynsimmons76022 ай бұрын

  *Promosm* 😇

• 
  @Sunil-qm8wx3 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much Professor Oranburg. Awesome lectures. We sincerely appreciate it.

• 
  @shakeelndu3 ай бұрын

  May I have access to your other (hidden) lectures?

• 
  @shakeelndu3 ай бұрын

  Thanks a lot!

• 
  @josephsmyth8323 ай бұрын

  This is very fascinating especially having a connection to various different religious texts. Ho does the rule of law in relation to jurisprudence play a role in this, such as natural law? You have referenced equity, does this go back to Aristotle?

• 
  @NAAjine3 ай бұрын

  Great to see more content on this channel! Thanks for creating!

• 
  @chasemorello603 ай бұрын

  🔥🧅🌋🧅🔥

• 
  @nati69694 ай бұрын

  No reliable at all in my experience.

• 
  @morenikejiolaidedada58304 ай бұрын

  What is the difference between utmost good faith and good faith

• 
  @chasemorello604 ай бұрын

  🧑🏼‍🏫

• 
  @4shanna5 ай бұрын

  The majority in Groves awarded cost of performance, 60,000. not diminution... also you accidentally said $300 at one point which I'm assuming was a slip up with the market value in Peevey?

• 
  @jason-ub8qz5 ай бұрын

  This is not good at all. They should do it only in fraud cases not all

• 
  @devipershad-md3xx5 ай бұрын

  i am a 12 year old and i understand every freaking thing you all lol

• 
  @brainonpizza27835 ай бұрын

  I'm starting Law School in a few days. Amazing video, very explanatory! Thank you very much!

• 
  @abnormalbr33d5 ай бұрын

  Man ive been so lost in contracts class. This one video just put it all together and made sense. 🙏

• 
  @jihyelee71405 ай бұрын

  Great video, thank you professor.

• 
  @AM-ly2fw6 ай бұрын

  Me watching this video as a business Major and thinking.... hmm maybe law isn't bad after all.

• 
  @buddylovely7 ай бұрын

  Shareholders do not own the corporation. Shareholders are not principals. Shareholders are shareholders who provide capital and have specific rights. The shareholder does not grant authority to directors as the directors sell shares in an IPO. The shareholders can't "appoint" the directors if they don't exist.

• 
  @georgemckenzie25257 ай бұрын

  Fainess, Acting fairly is not imposing impossible terms such as : "Return the bottom portion of this loan statement with your payment.. by this due date*, but not delivering the loan statement until 90 days past the due date stipulated.

• 
  @Essy3117 ай бұрын

  Do you have a link to your flow chart?

• 
  @StephMedia1237 ай бұрын

  It would benefit the general population more to focus on what the available remedies are when a goliath breaches that implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It's probably often the only cause of action someone can rely upon to attempt to pursue justice.

• 
  @KatiushkaVR7 ай бұрын

  This 12 minute video was more helpful than my entire semester of “privately owned businesses” class. Thank you.

• 
  @trisix998 ай бұрын

  I'm wondering if you can give an example of a promissory condition? Also, I'm wondering why the condition in Jacob & Young v Kent was not an explicit condition or term? Thank you so much!

• 
  @BizLaw8 ай бұрын

  Sure -- because most contractual promissory are promissory conditions! Recall that contracts require an exchange of promise -- this is the consideration doctrine. If promises are given in exchange for each other, then they are mutually conditional on each other, too. For example, if you promise to buy someone's car on Friday for $10,000 in the local Starbucks parking lot, and if they don't show up with the car, do you have to pay the money? Of course not! Why? Because your promise to pay the $10,000 is IMPLICITELY conditioned on their tendering the car. Their promise to sell you the car is both a promise -- you can sue for failure to tender the car -- and a condition -- you do not have to perform your obligation of paying if the car is not made available to you. There are more complex examples, but, in the main, we should strive to understand that the major promises in contracts are also implicit conditions on the others' mutual performance.

• 
  @clippersfan88985 ай бұрын

  @@BizLawawesome! I am just confused on how it is a promise and a condition though. I see the promise but what is the condition?thank you!

• 
  @user-zy3bh3bs7k8 ай бұрын

  SUPERB EXCELLENT .

• 
  @alexanderroodt50528 ай бұрын

  Heres what my AI said that I trained on my own countries laws: In this scenario, it is likely that the man will prevail if he brings suit against the gardener for breach of contract. The correct answer is (B) The man, because the gardener's part performance necessarily implied an acceptance and a promise that he would render complete performance. Under contract law, a valid contract requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual intent to be bound. In this case, the man made an offer to the gardener, stating that if the gardener promises to mow his lawn by Saturday, he will pay him N$900. This offer creates the initial terms of the contract. The gardener's actions can be seen as acceptance and part performance of the contract. Despite not explicitly stating his acceptance, the gardener arrived at the man's home on Friday and began mowing the lawn. This conduct can be interpreted as an implied acceptance of the offer and a promise to render complete performance. However, the gardener's performance was incomplete as he only mowed half of the lawn. This constitutes a breach of contract as he did not fulfill his obligation to complete the job by Saturday. The gardener's subsequent note, apologizing for running out of gas and stating that he will finish the job on Monday, can be seen as an attempt to cure the defective performance. While this may be considered an offer to cure, it does not absolve the gardener of his initial breach of contract. Therefore, the man is likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the gardener for breach of contract. The gardener's part performance and subsequent offer to cure do not excuse his failure to complete the job as agreed upon in the original contract.

• 
  @sinrock859 ай бұрын

  Why wouldn’t the Americans lives matter more than shareholder dividends? Why has this not been contested? 😢

• 
  @James-xn7ny10 ай бұрын

  Awesome video, thank you!

• 
  @Lets.Go.Brandon10 ай бұрын

  "agape," self-sacrificing love