Пікірлер

• 
  @staticnoice54778 күн бұрын

  Got myself a 2533.50 america's cup and a few cool extra details about it. It has a 18kt white gold insert on the bezel and on the back of the watch you can find the watches number out of the 9999 produced.

• 
  @staticnoice54778 күн бұрын

  Great video btw

• 
  @omegawatchfan7 күн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @kennyginger56869 күн бұрын

  I have black one was beatful watch

• 
  @yunlamtai978211 күн бұрын

  Love this no wave version. Comfy & classy which l am wearing almost everyday. 2500 movement runs & keeps time very well. A bit regrat to have later bought a dark side of the moon speedmaster as few to wear comparatively.

• 
  @omegawatchfan7 күн бұрын

  I think the no wave version will be a future classic.

• 
  @jacksugden819014 күн бұрын

  Cumbersome was the word you was looking for.

• 
  @Xraycrayon15 күн бұрын

  How’s the rotor noise?

• 
  @omegawatchfan15 күн бұрын

  Not too much rotor noise on mine.

• 
  @clydechavez348316 күн бұрын

  Picky picky picky, Even with all the dogging you said about the 8900. I just bought one about 2 months ago and i absolutely love it. I've gotten compliments on it though.Very happy with it. You ain't bursting my bubble.

• 
  @omegawatchfan15 күн бұрын

  Haha I'm usually not picky but I wanted to try to highlight the differences (albeit small) between the two versions. I agree the 8900 is a gorgeous and comfortable watch. I still have mine.

• 
  @robynsjp17 күн бұрын

  2503.80 here - 1st version auto blue 39 mm. Great casual piece. Your black one looks very good too !

• 
  @omegawatchfan15 күн бұрын

  Congrats that's a beautiful one! I used to have the 2518.80 (36mm blue quartz), Omega used the perfect tone of blue on these 1st gen Aqua Terras.

• 
  @buxariАй бұрын

  Which is more beautiful in your view?

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Between the 2531.80 and 2220.80 I would say the 2220.80. The applied indices make a big difference to me, makes the dial more engaging and interesting to look at.

• 
  @ohio72213Ай бұрын

  Got one of these a month or two ago. Number 1,892. Really like it. But i wear mine every single day so i wont be trying to resell mine. Also yours is the first i have seen without full charge 😂. Mines the sapphire crystal, yours is the mineral crystal right? Just read description and yeah yours is mineral. Glad i got sapphire, didnt know mineral was easily scratched.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  The sapphire is great to have on these. Because the crystal really does not have any protection from the bezel, the mineral ones get very scratched up easily.

• 
  @demarcusstrange5213Ай бұрын

  Great video! I am looking to but a steel watch. Can you provide info into the quality of the Omega vs. Hamilton. Are they using a special type of steel? Is there a finish on the polishing (i.e. scratch resistant) that one should consider? I have tried to find what makes a bracelet far superior than another as you stated about the Omega, but have not been able to find info on this as a newbie to the watch world. Please provide insight (materials/engineering) as to what goes into making the Omega a far superior watch. Thank you!

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Thanks. There is really no difference in the type of steel used nor any difference in scratch resistance. Where the difference lies is more in the manufacturing. The tolerances for the bracelet are much less on the Omega resulting in a more well put together finished product (though the Hamilton is not bad in this regard). You will also see better finishing of edges and design elements that require more work to produce (such as the twisted or lyre lugs on the Omega). The crystals are different as well, with the Omega having excellent anti glare coating while Hamiltons usually completely lack that feature. The dials on both are nice but the Omega's is more intricate and almost glows especially in combination with the superior crystal. Despite all this, I still believe the Hamilton is an excellent product for the price and I wear mine regularly.

• 
  @MattMorris481Ай бұрын

  I wish they would put that case back on the auto watches.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  It really is a great case back on the quartz AT. SMPc also has a nice solid case back.

• 
  @basvleeskruyerАй бұрын

  Easy the best watch under a 1000 euro. Put a nice Staib mesh on it and you get an awesome watch.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  They truly are fantastic quality for the price, and even more impressive given they have been around for about 30 years.

• 
  @basvleeskruyerАй бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan and discontinued. I really dont get people missing out on this watch. It is build like a tank. I had it serviced and polished back to look straight out of the Omega factory. And it is my for life watch. I dont wear my " journey watches" anymore. I reached my final watch...with exception of a Rolex Explorer 1. It will be my Dynamic Duo.

• 
  @Tsunami1982Ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @cunawaritАй бұрын

  I think my favorite quartz Seamasters are the Omega Seamaster Aqua Terras, they are so nice! A nice 36mm Seamaster Aqua Terra is just about the perfect GADA.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Agree, hard to find a better GADA. Especially the quartz versions which are low maintenance. The 2nd gen quartz AT (38.5mm case) is probably my 1st choice in that regard, followed closely by the 1st gen quartz AT.

• 
  @David-ft7xzАй бұрын

  Fortunately for you, you have both these great watches, but if you had to choose one over the other, which would it be?

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Perhaps I am in the minority but I prefer the older 8500 movement Aqua Terra. I like the case shape and bracelet design better on that one. It has longer lugs and the bracelet links are less flat, giving the whole watch a more "sculpted" look for lack of a better word. The dials on both the 8500 and 8900/8800 are beautiful and the clasp on the 8900 I find to be more comfortable, but I have to give the edge to the 8500 due to the overall appearance.

• 
  @David-ft7xzАй бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan Thank you! I'm in agreement, I prefer the vertical lines as opposed to the horizontal.

• 
  @David-ft7xzАй бұрын

  If you had to choose between the black and the blue-dialled SMPc watches - which would you choose?

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  The blue of the SMPc is a beautiful subdued color, but I think black Seamasters (whether SMPc or the predecessor) are a more versatile choice so if I had to pick only one, I'd go with the black SMPc.

• 
  @David-ft7xzАй бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan Thank you! and thank you for the channel, really enjoying the videos!

• 
  @David-ft7xzАй бұрын

  That moment when you realise someone has done a side-by-side comparison of the exact models you are thinking about buying! Thank you!

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Thanks, I hope it was helpful!

• 
  @Observer61Ай бұрын

  Nice review, I have one of these in the larger 41mm size bought new in 2004 and it is still going strong. I love it esp for travel due to ETA quick hour hand shift for time zone/date adjustment, also for it’s a “tank” like robustness/durability. Only complaint is the bezel can be near impossible to turn due to the scalloped edges not offering a solid grip if my hands are wet.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  I completely agree on the bezel and believe it's one of the few shortcomings of an otherwise great watch. The bezel looks nice but it is not very useful and difficult to turn. And if the bezel becomes worn through wear or polishing it becomes near impossible to get a grip on it. The Planet Ocean bezel in comparison is very easy to turn.

• 
  @alexchen7112Ай бұрын

  How much thicker is the 2230.50? Do you know the thickness? I'm thinking about buying it instead of the 2254 but worry it might be too thick

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  I don't have a measurement but it is noticeably thicker and the watch is more top-heavy as well. While I like the 2230 dial a lot, I think the 2254 ultimately has better proportions and is superior in comfort.

• 
  @AlexChennyАй бұрын

  I’m thinking about buying a 2230.50 right now and swapping the bezel insert. Do you think that’s a good idea? Would that resolve the top heavy issue? I really like the slimness of the 2254.50 but if 2231.50 is noticeably thicker then I might not do that.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  Hi, I just saw this reply. The bezel insert for the 2254 is thinner than the one for the 2230, so it may sit too low in the 2230 bezel (the 2230 bezel itself is thicker than the 2254 bezel, to accommodate the thicker insert). However, I have never seen that done before so maybe it would look ok. I think a straight swap of the bezel might be better than only swapping the insert. It is a shame, some years ago it was possible to get those nice dials and just swap them into the 2254, but parts are much harder to find now.

• 
  @cihatayguenАй бұрын

  Vielen lieben Dank für diesen ausführlichen Beitrag. Die minimale Struktur dieser Form, gibt der Omega pre Bond, „ gelungensten Uhren in Raum und Zeit unsere Welt „. Prädikat unnormal zum Quadrat.

• 
  @omegawatchfanАй бұрын

  You're welcome and thanks for your comment. I really hope Omega brings back this design one day.

• 
  @j.camarillotx1636Ай бұрын

  Worthless video

• 
  @GoalSquad6662 ай бұрын

  The laser edge globe is from 2007 onwards watches. I have a 2006 model, that doesn't have that globe.

• 
  @1000lightyrs2 ай бұрын

  The titanium one looks a much better, cohesive design.

• 
  @knoxo24552 ай бұрын

  Great video! I’m interested in getting a Seamaster 200. It ticks all the boxes for what I’m looking for in a watch. However, I’ve had no luck finding one in decent condition without scratches. Could you recommend any reputable retailers that currently have them in stock?

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Are you looking for a particular version? I got my nice one at a good price from a non-professional seller (on eBay) after a lot of patient searching. I believe if you restrict your search to watch stores alone, you may end up paying too much. That being said, I have had a few good experiences on Chrono24 and would definitely include them in any search.

• 
  @lachlanwalker55982 ай бұрын

  Are the braclets interchangeable between these two models?

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Yes, they are interchangeable

• 
  @greggusan2 ай бұрын

  I've had have the 2264.5 for almost 20 years and really dig. Still the best lume of any watch I own. And love the sword style hands. But in a moment of madness (about 15 years ago or so), I decided I liked the smaller numerals of the bezel insert on 212.30.41.61.01.001 and switched out the bezels. Looks pretty good IMO, but scratched the lugs a bit getting the original bezel off. Never realized that this watch would become kind of a classic. Glad I kept the original insert, but some scuffs were made.

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  I am very open to switching bezels and trying out different looks, but the smaller numerals generally match up better with the dials that have the small indices and vice versa. Though that did not stop me from putting a 2264.50 bezel on a 2532.20 (white dial "bond" smp), which I really like despite the mismatched dial and bezel.

• 
  @chadbailey70382 ай бұрын

  Wow this is so great. Thanks for sharing!

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Thank you, I hope it was helpful

• 
  @Ramblin_Man2 ай бұрын

  The titanium looks better to me.

• 
  @kobylazar66112 ай бұрын

  This is still one of my all time favorite watches!

• 
  @robynsjp2 ай бұрын

  Looks good. Is the weight of the bracelet on par with the weight of the watch ? I have the same watch with OEM bracelet and the weight is well on par. I have a Forstner 1450 on a Speedy and the bracelet is a bit lighter, the steel feels less dense.

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  The OEM bracelet is definitely heavier than the Forstner and better balanced with the weight of the watch head. As you said, the steel of the Forstner feels quite light, however, I still find it comfortable even with my co-axial Seamaster which is slightly heavier than the quartz Seamaster. Considering the Forstner is much less costly than the OEM, I can live with the lack of weight.

• 
  @robynsjp2 ай бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan Yes, and slightly lighter metal in the summer feels nice, like Titanium.

• 
  @Drugismb2 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much for this 🎉

• 
  @jimbojet87282 ай бұрын

  Well done. You have a lovely watch now. I’m considering fitting an adjustable clasp onto my watch, can you tell me where you bought yours and the cost of it? Thanks for a great vid.

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Thank you. I got it from eBay a long time ago when they were much cheaper (under $100). You might want to try calling an Omega boutique, some of them are willing to sell parts like this. These are the part numbers for the clasps that can be used: 117STZ004666 - 3 clicks adjustment 117STZ001154 - 6 clicks adjustment 117STZ001159 - 6 clicks adjustment w/diver extension If you want to install the clasp on the older type of bracelet like the one in my video, then you would also need two clasp links (part no. 118ST1589), four screws (3307), and two pins (0166).

• 
  @piotr48882 ай бұрын

  Great video. This is polished or Matt bracelet?

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Thanks, it is the matte finish.

• 
  @RationalCreed2 ай бұрын

  How long will this be supported for? My concern is that after a couple of decades you may not be able to get a replacement movement considering it will be 40yrs old by then

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  I don't think it should be a concern because the 1538 is identical to ETA 255.461, which is used in many watches, and since ETA is part of Swatch like Omega, the movements should be available. In the event it is superseded by another movement, the new one could substitute for the old version (as has happened before). And in a worst case scenario if the movement for some reason is no longer made, the huge number of these movements in existence already would ensure that spares and parts will be always available.

• 
  @oddaffinity22442 ай бұрын

  I’ve debated getting one of these for so long. I’m not sure what’s holding me back…I’m tempted to spend more for the electric blue SMP 300 quartz 36mm, but these are so similar for a better price…thank you for the really informative videos on these underrated neo vintage watches!

• 
  @theblackwoods70559 күн бұрын

  I just pulled the trigger on one near mint for 1k. It was a steal! My first😊

• 
  @AndrewIsbell2 ай бұрын

  I went with a 2504.50 but maybe this would have been better bang for the buck!

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  That is a beautiful watch. I used to have the 2518.80 (blue 36mm Aqua Terra quartz). As much as I love the 120m, I feel the Aqua Terra design is cleaner and much more timeless (this goes for the dial, case and bracelet), so I wouldn't regret buying it. I think the "timelessness" also explains why we see much greater demand for Aqua Terras in comparison with the 120m today.

• 
  @pannan802 ай бұрын

  Wish i bought one two years ago,now they cost twice as much.

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  They've definitely increased in price, but good deals can be found and thankfully a lot of these were made.

• 
  @redauwg9113 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the video. I heard you should use the 370 low drain battery compered to the 371 high drain for use in chronographes?

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  The 371 is the low drain I believe and that is the one I have used. If the fit is tight, then a 373 which is thinner. Some brands mark their battery "370/371" as well, so there is probably little difference between 370 and 371.

• 
  @redauwg9112 ай бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan Thank you for the reply👍

• 
  @MrW963 ай бұрын

  Hey! Couldn’t you tell me how you deal with loose pins in the omega seamaster bracelet? kzread.info/dash/bejne/end1rLSDgNbagrQ.htmlsi=FEsanxf72OM9soWw

• 
  @MrW963 ай бұрын

  Original bracelets better

• 
  @omegawatchfan2 ай бұрын

  Quality on the original bracelet is also quite superior. But for a cheaper alternative I think the Forstner is acceptable.

• 
  @tennistron5883 ай бұрын

  I just purchased the 2236.50 version... the midsize wear amazing!

• 
  @omegawatchfan3 ай бұрын

  Congrats! Those are really nice.

• 
  @manman16113 ай бұрын

  36mm is perfect!

• 
  @Murtagh6533 ай бұрын

  that is my favourite omega

• 
  @fb79973 ай бұрын

  Good info! Nice to see these watches together.

• 
  @HAL-xy3om3 ай бұрын

  I love mesh bands, I have several from Aliexpress, also known as Milanese's band!

• 
  @omegawatchfan3 ай бұрын

  I have never tried one from there. Have you found them to be of good quality? It is hard to find decent thicker bands among the low cost offerings.

• 
  @HAL-xy3om3 ай бұрын

  @@omegawatchfan I've been pleasantly surprised by the quality on Aliexpress, but not all are good.

• 
  @faustopadilla32263 ай бұрын

  Great in depth information.. keep it coming !

• 
  @icychap3 ай бұрын

  Awesome reference. Thank you so much for sharing.

• 
  @francis.oldfield3 ай бұрын

  All looking in great condition!

• 
  @icychap3 ай бұрын

  I like the aesthetic of the thicker band. As long as it articulates as well, that would likely be my choice.

• 
  @omegawatchfan3 ай бұрын

  It definitely is more substantial looking. This 120m is pretty thin so the thinner band looks good with it. That being said, I wouldn't use the thin band on a 300m or similar bigger watch.

• 
  @30kHunter763 ай бұрын

  If I missed this I apologize but can you tell me what size wrist you have? Thanks.

• 
  @omegawatchfan3 ай бұрын

  6 3/4