Пікірлер

• 
  @mohsensaffar93718 сағат бұрын

  hello. are you still playing on mateview gt? Are you satisfied with it while gaming ?

• 
  @yezivid7 сағат бұрын

  I've replaced it a few weeks ago with an Odyssey G8 OLED and gave the Mateview GT to my little brother, but I really enjoyed my time with it. It had pretty good motion clarity for a VA panel, never had issues with VRR flicker (unlike the Xiaomi Mi Curved 34), had decent colors and plenty of brightness. Good quality stuff by Huawei.

• 
  @mohsensaffar93717 сағат бұрын

  @@yezivid thank you so much. I want to buy one, still doubt on ghosting. Do you have any problem? and did you play on 144 or 165hz ?

• 
  @mohsensaffar93717 сағат бұрын

  @@yezivid g8 is definitely better of course, however please tell me about how much are the differences.

• 
  @yezivid7 сағат бұрын

  ​@@mohsensaffar9371 G8 OLED is just another world, with true blacks, awesome HDR performance and pretty much perfect motion clarity, it's like night and day from the Mateview GT, tho it costs like 2 times more. However, OLED still has it's problems with burn-in, ultrawide screens especially could suffer from that if you're watching lot of 16:9 content, with black bars on the sides - just like me lol, that's why I've hooked up a secondary display for basic tasks, I only use my OLED for movies and gaming. Now I can only hope that it will last for at least 3 or 4 years without major issues. Ghosting, or more like black smearing IS a problem with VA, no doubt about that. The Mateview GT still has some black smearing, but with the Overdrive profile set to Level 3, it never really bothered my. Noticeable, but I got used to it in a few days. Nevertheless, IPS still has it's own flaws with the garbage contrast ratio/black levels, and it's definitely more annoying for me than VA's smearing issues. It really just comes down to personal preference - choose your own demons.

• 
  @an2219510 сағат бұрын

  Is the bass stronger than in Logitech z623??

• 
  @yezivid9 сағат бұрын

  Definitely not, since the bass in the Z623 is already too pronounced, combine that with the high crossover frequency, and in the end all you get is a muddy mess. The Z623 is nowhere near of a good speaker. However, the S3000 on it's own has plenty of bass, with a decent low-end that bottoms out at around ~38Hz.

• 
  @an2219510 сағат бұрын

  Do this speakers have more bass than logitech z623??

• 
  @45eno4 күн бұрын

  Almost exactly what my five AM5 builds have. Two 7600X and Three 7800X3D.

• 
  @necdeterhan57586 күн бұрын

  how comes i play 80 fps with same card it doesnt drops less than 78. 14900f 64-6400gskill ventus 4080super

• 
  @yezivid6 күн бұрын

  It has been 3 months since I uploaded this video. The game probably got some optimizations, they also added a toggle for Async Compute, if you disable this it boosts your FPS a bit on 40 series cards. Also, different maps performs quite differently, so for a fair comparison you must test on the same map as I played on.

• 
  @hectortiman71518 күн бұрын

  Song/Artist pls

• 
  @yezivid8 күн бұрын

  It's right there, in the description. "Music: Witchouse 40k - BAYONETTA"

• 
  @felixkjelberg300410 күн бұрын

  how havy is helldivers 2 again? -yes

• 
  @user-dd6gp6cd2v24 күн бұрын

  I want to see frame gen on dlss off.

• 
  @yezivid24 күн бұрын

  Without DLSS it would only run around 30-40FPS, frame-gen is basically useless at this low framerate.

• 
  @user-dd6gp6cd2v24 күн бұрын

  @@yezivid dlss on graphic blur

• 
  @Andrey-cc6qt24 күн бұрын

  look like a mobile game but runs like alan wake 2, amazing stuff

• 
  @yezivid24 күн бұрын

  Technically I don't think that it looks bad, but imo it's just sooo generic, soulless and unappealing. But hey, at least it also runs like crap lmao.

• 
  @Defffman26 күн бұрын

  70fps?😢 my 1070ti its 55-60fps and 7years old😅😅😅😅😅

• 
  @yezivid26 күн бұрын

  Well, then you are definitely not playing at native 1080p Ultra, cause even a 1080 Ti can only manage around 65FPS at High preset. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lKWAsdubgdHcqsY.htmlsi=1u0x3sbHXwCNawny

• 
  @konubi27 күн бұрын

  Weird too, I still have an I9 9900K from 2018 with originally an RTX 2080 Super that I replaced with an RTX 4080 Super. However, this test is not very realistic. Maybe I have a gold sample??? but my I9 9900K with a Tdp of 95watts. at stock, at 1.15V-1.2V max, never exceeds 60 watts in games. It does not heat up much and in oc, it can reach 5.1 gz at 1.3V. It is a very good CPU. Unless you play Counter Strike and you want 600 fps and more in 1440P. In 2K, 4k ultra setting, there is very little difference between all these CPUs. If you have at least a 6C/12T CPU like an I7 8700K or a Ryzen 3600+ or ​​better an 8C/16T with at least a Ryzen 3700+ or ​​an I9 9900K, no need to change cpu + mobo+Ram. Change first, the graphics card. I then plan to change the CPU (if I I'm still alive until then) but not before the New Intel Arrow Lake or Ryzen 9000 with DDR5 and PCI Gen 5.0. Otherwise for this test, some say that Hyperthreading (HT) reduces performance in games. Sometimes, it must be deactivated. For information purposes, the next Intel 15th generation CPUs which will now be called Intel Core Ultra 2xx will no longer integrate Hyperthreading (HT). )

• 
  @konubi27 күн бұрын

  Strange on other tests the i9 9900K is more efficient kzread.info/dash/bejne/em2blKOIg6behpc.html. I have the impression that concerning the CPU game tests. Lots of tests, leads us into error. in reality, in addition, all these CPUs between 6c/12T and 8C/16T and above there is almost no difference in 1440P, 4K Ultra. Don't forget that all these games are coded using the PS5 CPU which is mini Ryzen 8c/16T. (equivalent to a ryzen 1800x because only 16 mb of cache)

• 
  @yeshwantkethineni3694Ай бұрын

  Could you test low core count/disabled cores (3-5?), maybe in CP2077 at Medium 1080p DLSS (and maybe even 50/60fps cap if it can reach/saturate that)? I'm not sure what other typical games would stress the CPU more than the GPU

• 
  @yezividАй бұрын

  I think 50-60FPS in Cyberpunk is absolutely possible, even with like 4 cores/threads. A few months ago I did a few benchmarks with a 5800X3D at 4 cores/SMT Off, it was genuinely surprising how capable it still was even with that low core count: kzread.info/dash/bejne/immor5eTct2_Zdo.htmlsi=4RE_sXo6LFDz3DDu I did want to run a few benchmarks with my 7800X3D downcored to 4/6 cores, but I got rid of the CPU before I had the time to do it lol. Now I'll stick to the 7600X for at least a few months, so I'll definitely gonna upload some stuff with lower core counts (maybe even compare it to something like a 5600X). One thing I really wanted to test is how the L3 cache would scale with lower core counts, maybe the extra cache could help to somewhat eliminate the lack of cores - tho I' would need both a non-X3D and a X3D chip (or preferably a 7900/7950X3D) to make that happen.

• 
  @yeshwantkethineni3694Ай бұрын

  @@yezivid I was thinking with PL and/or more busy areas it would be harder to run, IIRC I remember you needed like a 5600X3D or a 3700 (basically 8 core or very good 6 core lol) to get ~60fps

• 
  @akatosh9298Ай бұрын

  А если тени и глобально освещение на максимум выставить?

• 
  @user-sb4yq5pj2tАй бұрын

  monitor ?

• 
  @NextGenCeoTVАй бұрын

  1440P no differences.

• 
  @45eno4 күн бұрын

  Nope there is. Depends on game, settings and fps targets.

• 
  @NextGenCeoTV4 күн бұрын

  @@45eno yes bro definitely. Because i got this cpu too and yes difference is depending for the games.

• 
  @PatoChuАй бұрын

  Dude, you should make the game less GPU intensive and more CPU intensive, realistically there should be like a 30-50% FPS difference... Disable RT, lower the graphics to low and you'll see a huge difference. CPU upgrades specially for gaming should mostly be competitively based... no one is playing competitive Fortnite with RTX on.

• 
  @yezividАй бұрын

  You will never see 50% difference on average, maybe not even 30% - in HUB’s day one review, they’ve measured a 16% difference between the 7800X3D and 7600X, while in the Intel 14th gen review, it was 28% on average. It really depends on the game, some games benefits hugely from the massive L3 cache while others doesn’t really care about it. I admit that I had some GPU bound scenes, tho it was mostly in just Returnal/Starfield, the other games were nearly always CPU bound. I realized in the end that I could have used lower settings, but I started testing with the 7600, since I only had this CPU for like 2 weeks, while my 7800X3D was under warranty-process. Talking about RT - I usually turn up CPU intensive graphics settings, and while RT puts a decent load on the GPU, it’s also pretty heavy on the CPU too - if I remember correctly, there was a much less difference in Cyberpunk without RT, but Marvel’s Spider Man’s RT is also really CPU intensive if you max out the object range slider. You can test CPU performance in a lot of ways, and I don’t think there is only one correct way to do - that’s just how I prefer to test.

• 
  @megadeth8592Ай бұрын

  rt effects cpu......

• 
  @PatoChuАй бұрын

  @@megadeth8592 but it still relies more on your GPU

• 
  @PsyfuriousАй бұрын

  Overclocked?

• 
  @yezividАй бұрын

  Yes, as you can see on the in-game overlay too. CPU at 4.5GHz, GPU at 1455MHz.

• 
  @Andrei_BelozorovichАй бұрын

  All my life I dreamed of playing on a 4080 card in resolution 1080P

• 
  @kaponeckoАй бұрын

  that was it is only cpu limited which is point of the video.

• 
  @a-125322 ай бұрын

  Would adding the T5 subwoofer make much difference or not much?

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  Adding an 8" sub to a pair of 8" speakers is just stupid imo, obviously you would get more bass (tho the 2850DB can produce plenty of bass on it's own), but it wouldn't expand the frequency range, since the T8 can only go as low as ~38Hz. You'll need at least a 10" or 12" sub to get some worthy improvements in the low end.

• 
  @knubivandubi57972 ай бұрын

  finally a test that shows what i wanted , no fake shit, well abit OC is ok :) Thank you very much

• 
  @reeeformat38432 ай бұрын

  ive got the same setup runing at 1440p ultra settings and used to get sround 100-110 fps but now has gone down to 60-70fps for some reason in the last few weeks. Tried re-installing the game, same thing. No idea what happened or if some update caused it

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  Try disabling Async Compute in the graphics settings, tho it shouldn't cause that much of a difference.

• 
  @reeeformat38432 ай бұрын

  @yezivid figured it out. Just goes to show how buggy this game still is. I was testing a 4k monitor a couple weeks back and I guess its when the issue started to happen when I switched back to my 1440p monitor. Even though I have it set at 1440p even re-installed the game didn't fix it. So I simply set it down to 1080p resolution and then back to 1440p and now it's showing around 110fps like how it supposed to.

• 
  @l4zyyy.-4822 ай бұрын

  Thank you very much bro,good to see 150+ fps

• 
  @l4zyyy.-4822 ай бұрын

  Can you pls do 1440p ultra dlss set to quality and no rtx pls,i will buy this set up and i want to know how much fps will it get on ultra and dlss set to quality

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  Will do it tonight.

• 
  @l4zyyy.-4822 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid and pls test in conquest 64 players mod

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  @@l4zyyy.-482 There you go, bud. kzread.info/dash/bejne/amalmdpumM2-nc4.htmlsi=K_6mVdzksLsmac7G

• 
  @l4zyyy.-4822 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid thank you very much

• 
  @ChainingFilly72 ай бұрын

  I’m playing on 3440x1440 with the same cpu and gpu as you. Getting around 80-90 fps. But that’s probably because of the 3440x1440 ultrawide

• 
  @Tekilafiend332 ай бұрын

  What’s the pbo on the cpu?

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  Nothing fancy, CO -30 on all cores, Boost Override 200, and I think I also got PBO Enhancement at 90 Level 5. Getting an average of ~4964MHz effective clock speed while running Cinebench R24.

• 
  @Tekilafiend332 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid nice! Thank you for the info. Have a good day 😊

• 
  @pt69982 ай бұрын

  I get about 60-70fps with a 3070FE, 12700k setup at 1440p ultra settings. 🤔 Really surprised the 4080S can't run this over 120-140fps.

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  At 1440p Ultra, I'm getting around 130-140FPS. Also, I just realized that now they added a toggle for Async Compute. Now that with this turned off, the game runs even better, going from 90-100FPS to 100-110FPS at Ultrawide 1440p.

• 
  @blond_slut2 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid what is that new technology?

• 
  @canpehlivan24972 ай бұрын

  360mm aio and 80+ degrees on 7800x3d? Something must be wrong

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  High room temp, low fan speed and no offset mount, guess these combined did the trick lol. Now that I got the offset mount, the 7800X3D maxes out at 82C under Cinebench R24.

• 
  @canpehlivan24972 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid l have thermalright phantom spirit Se 120 and it never reaches 80c in cinebench

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  @@canpehlivan2497 Thats weird. What is your average clock speed and package power while running Cinebench?

• 
  @just_OsaMa232 ай бұрын

  ​@@canpehlivan2497I'm going yo buy it.. do u have any problems with it?

• 
  @userbunny142 ай бұрын

  @@canpehlivan2497 temps can vary because of a WIDE range of things. Room temp, case airflow, fan/pump speed. A CPU will run hotter with a low quality AIO in a 30 degree room if the AIO is on low settings, then a great air cooler on MAX speed in the same room. Then there is always variance between regardless. Several degrees is probably weird if it was running the EXACT same set up, but barely anyone is.

• 
  @nolandderlugner13512 ай бұрын

  how do you use it, which video palyer etc?

• 
  @yezivid2 ай бұрын

  Both clips was played in Chrome, using the sites own player. Cowboy Bebop (360p) was at a site called Indavideó, while Bleach Opening (480p) was on KZread.

• 
  @SoundBubble3 ай бұрын

  Very nice comparison. Anime is the primary thing I've been using it for. It smoothes out a lot of liveaction movies (skin details etc.) unfortunately and makes them seem unnatural, but as anime is already "smooth" to begin with, that's hardly an issue.

• 
  @j82653 ай бұрын

  7600 goat

• 
  @cesarcoronado36033 ай бұрын

  Is it worth getting the better cpu?

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  You are the only one who knows the answer for that question. Do you need that kind of performance that the 7800X3D offers? From a price/performance standpoint, definitely not worth it. There's always diminishing returns beyond a certain performance level. Right now, the 7600 is probably the best bang-for-buck if you want a good gaming CPU. High-end never really was about good price/perf.

• 
  @igorzanetti51893 ай бұрын

  Could you repeat this test with fidelity cass instead please? Im thinking about building a pc like your but i need some information first

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  FidelityFX CAS is basically just a sharpening filter. You would probably get a bit more FPS while using CAS insted of DLAA, but we are only talking about a few percentage difference at most.

• 
  @MXG23 ай бұрын

  Dear friend, do you know if the mobo x99 pr9 supports this cpu?

• 
  @riceahoy3 ай бұрын

  My setup is worse, I should do a video

• 
  @TheNiktus3 ай бұрын

  My setup is better, i should do a video.

• 
  @DoruPoteras3 ай бұрын

  Hello¡ May i ask you how did you recorded this video? Seems so good quality in comparision with others videos in youtube of the same game even on 4k.

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  Actually, it's just Shadowplay, at a 100Mbps bitrate. Not even raw footage, since I'll always use Premiere Pro for some basic corrections.

• 
  @baksooobaksooo48163 ай бұрын

  next time, stop spreading cpu usage, why even people do that, so stupid. and do 2k/4k benchmark

• 
  @ozgunmuzik3 ай бұрын

  which game is tjis?

• 
  @willfal65273 ай бұрын

  Ive a 5800X3d and Saphire Toxic 6900XT extreme, game runs smooth so I guess it cant be optimised for high end hardware because I get the same fps as your metrics are showing, also ultra and native.

• 
  @geeker95452 ай бұрын

  4K?

• 
  @silverbashspam97012 ай бұрын

  you are getting the same fps at 1440p not 4k, at 4k you would not even get 60 plus

• 
  @MarbyEgnalig3 ай бұрын

  Wow

• 
  @Jonen560ti3 ай бұрын

  optimisation actually seems pretty reasonable

• 
  @raiderlegendary96023 ай бұрын

  Im getting around 100fps on 3440x1440p ultra wide, ultra settings on a intel 14900kf/4080

• 
  @yeshwantkethineni36943 ай бұрын

  Really cool video, did you do the first core? Since that one will get more load (guessing), maybe the other cores would perform better. Could you do this with Returnal? same 60fps cap, maybe it would be interesting to compare to my 60fps limit Returnal video (maybe better to try with 2 cores lol)

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  Yep, it was the first core that was active. Maybe it really wasn't the best choice, since my max clock speed was only 4875MHz, while it should boost up to 5050MHz, so I'll do some more testing with the other cores. Also, I'll definitely check out Returnal and some other games too, in the near future.

• 
  @yeshwantkethineni36943 ай бұрын

  @@yezividalso see if you can limit power (to under 30W?) or how much limiting clock helps/hurts (maybe 2.5Ghz 4 core vs 5Ghz 2 core type of things, or maybe 3 core <5Ghz vs 5 core <3Ghz) from my X13 returnal video, it only needs 25W to get 60fps locked, and can do more with FG, so I think you can keep a 60fps lock (I would assume X3D should do better, but I have seen that the idle usage is higher because of the cache)

• 
  @edjonhadley13 ай бұрын

  WOW never realised how good ultrawide looked in games, this game especially with it's vast landscapes on a planet like this and lighting blasting out towards the player

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  Going ultrawide was easily the best upgrade that I did, ever. It provides a much more immersive gaming experience than a standard 16:9 display. Ultrawide is awesome, can't recommend enough.

• 
  @vini-ix8yt2 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid you cant go back after upgrading to ultrawide. I am playing since 2020 on ultrawide and there is no way I play on 16:9 ever again. Ultrawide is just to good.

• 
  @Milkmen3 ай бұрын

  Hey Yézi_ , great stuff! Haha, looks like we're making similar videos!

• 
  @And_Rec3 ай бұрын

  look a game dont need to have path tracing killing your fps to hae good lighting...

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  I meeean, path tracing is a bit more than just “good looking lighting”. It’s expensive now, but eventually it will probably be a mainstream tech. But sure, don’t get me wrong, Helldivers 2s lighting looks pretty impressive even without RT/PT, tho it lacks a bit in other graphical standpoints.

• 
  @gezimlimoni23193 ай бұрын

  Why not CS2?

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  CS2 runs at like 300-400FPS even on a Ryzen 5 5600, in my book it's an irrelevant game as a CPU benchmark.

• 
  @gezimlimoni23193 ай бұрын

  @@yezivid still good to know on the test benchmarks,,,thanks for the reply!

• 
  @stevenm25343 ай бұрын

  I play at 2560x1440p, with the same hardware as you. During gameplay though it seems my GPU and CPU usage are similar and I can’t figure out why, I feel as though I should get better frames. Like for example 78% GPU usage and 68% CPU usage (pulled that out of my head but something along those lines)

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  Weird, could you possibly be CPU limited at 1440p? My GPU usage is around ~95-99%, and the lowest FPS I've seen was around 80 tho I'm not really paying attention to the overlay when I'm in intense fights. I'll do another benchmark run at other resolutions/maps, so far it looks like the missions against the machines are more resource-heavy.

• 
  @TheAyane93 ай бұрын

  Almost definitely cpu limited. The game does use a lot of cores well, but will still be limited by the most heavily loaded threads. So even if your overall cpu is usage is 68%, 1,2,3, or 4 cores may be hitting 90/100% limiting the overall frame rate.

• 
  @BARBARBINKLE3 ай бұрын

  turn off framerate limit in game and just leave vsync on. Whenever I have a frame limit in this game my cpu usage goes through the roof and my cpu temp goes from mids 60s to high 70s.

• 
  @alexyt750293 ай бұрын

  Hi. When you press on/off button on control remote, how many seconds after the speaker turns on?

• 
  @yezivid3 ай бұрын

  Around 4-5 second. (Plus sometimes another 3-4 seconds till it connects to the other speaker.)