Пікірлер

• 
  @alexj.90112 күн бұрын

  might have to put a supercharger in that car so we can get it to 3000N and get 6 m/s^2

• 
  @sofiancv12 күн бұрын

  Great explanation!

• 
  @IOSALive13 күн бұрын

  Garrison Turner, I subscribed because your videos are super cool!

• 
  @MartinKorim18 күн бұрын

  Well explained 👍

• 
  @garrisonturner567017 күн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @kelvindavid159225 күн бұрын

  Firstly Thank you for all your lectures sir they're really helpful,and i have one question sir where is the 10 coming from at g wich is Gravity why not use 9.80 are they the same?

• 
  @garrisonturner567024 күн бұрын

  This video was recorded for a conceptual physics class so I had no problem letting students use 10 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. In fact the books we used made the approximation everywhere. For algebra or calculus-based courses though, I strictly use 9.8. Thanks for watching and I hope the videos are useful!

• 
  @Justuskalasathefithdimension28 күн бұрын

  Wow 😲😳. God bless you sir. I really needed this ❤

• 
  @DanielCee-lm7geАй бұрын

  This was so helpful, on a topic I was really struggling with. You sir are the goat, may your pillow always be cold on both sides.

• 
  @kelvindavid1592Ай бұрын

  thank you for your lectures they've really helped me alot, thank you once again and I love you sir........

• 
  @leventeonodi1122Ай бұрын

  How come it only has 190 views? Amazing video, thank you so much!

• 
  @user-ri3uv7xz6p2 ай бұрын

  Wish my physic tutor was you. Well explained...thank you and may GOD bless your carrier.

• 
  @user-pm1sn3gl3x2 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @ZIBANOMAUNGA-qt9tj3 ай бұрын

  Thank you sir this really helped me in revising for my test

• 
  @garrisonturner56703 ай бұрын

  Glad it helped!

• 
  @user-ec7pp6bj2p3 ай бұрын

  Thanks alot for your physics videos am from Ghana Africa and you have really help me alot

• 
  @garrisonturner56703 ай бұрын

  Glad they are useful! Good luck in your studies. If there are particular topics you need covered, let me know. I can’t make guarantees to make them but I can do my best as I have time.

• 
  @skygame50043 ай бұрын

  Thank you sir.

• 
  @RongNam-hw2fn3 ай бұрын

  This was such a great teaching

• 
  @user-sb7np6nq5o3 ай бұрын

  This is really helping me 😊

• 
  @garrisonturner56703 ай бұрын

  Glad it did!

• 
  @GlowUpMensUS3 ай бұрын

  Wow 🤩

• 
  @garrisonturner56703 ай бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @user-ru8mh5bu3b3 ай бұрын

  Really appreciate it Thanks

• 
  @Sk_cule7474 ай бұрын

  Life saver, thank you 💫

• 
  @user-ly2jq4ce8w4 ай бұрын

  can you teg me in your next video conversion of units

• 
  @garrisonturner56704 ай бұрын

  Is there a specific part of unit conversions that is confusing? I might be able to help.

• 
  @qennyaa4 ай бұрын

  thankyou so much man

• 
  @garrisonturner56704 ай бұрын

  Glad it helped!

• 
  @thelmyasu30734 ай бұрын

  This was very helpful for me. Thank you so much, sir

• 
  @senaanosama51816 ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @user-bn7vx4iz7q6 ай бұрын

  This is my biggest problem in physic 😢

• 
  @sahibhasan70956 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much

• 
  @user-nf1xr2xj3c7 ай бұрын

  His has helped me to understand

• 
  @hopcfizl36717 ай бұрын

  At 3:29, did you mean ro say per unit time instead of per unit cycle?

• 
  @garrisonturner56707 ай бұрын

  Yes. Good catch.

• 
  @jameshenry35307 ай бұрын

  So, 2000 pounds = 1 ton is not an equation?

• 
  @garrisonturner56707 ай бұрын

  Sure it is. It is also a useful conversion factor as well. It's not an equation in the algebraic sense with multiple variables, but it is an equation demonstrating an equivalency.

• 
  @jayantamiri7557 ай бұрын

  Inaccurate video. Less negative displacement as compared to positive displacement

• 
  @garrisonturner56707 ай бұрын

  I think you’re being a little nit-picky for a few reasons. 1) If it’s off, it’s not by much. A little more than half of the 200g print on the mass goes past the 30 cm mark above the dashed line at 50 cm and similarly past the 70 cm mark below. If it’s off, it’s by less than 2 cm. 2) Given that this was shot for a physics lab in which uncertainty is to be estimated/discussed, any perceived deviations would be included in the error analysis, and the deviation of perhaps 1 cm out of the amplitude of 20 cm is well within the uncertainty that one would see in a physical classroom experiment. Even though this is a simulation, there are plenty of ways error can crop in; I may not have set the dashed line exactly at the 50 cm mark (you might never know because you don’t know if there is any error due to camera angle), I might not have pulled the mass down exactly 20 cm from either the dashed line or the 50 cm mark (if they are in fact not exactly lined up), and the list goes on. This is part of understanding error and how to discuss it. If you were my student writing a lab report based on the video, I’d expect you to give me details and calculations based on your basic uncertainty estimates to derive final uncertainty values for whatever measurement is being made; the spring constant, energy conservation, predicted frequency, etc… so, even if there are deviations from true harmonic motion, it’s not a flaw in the simulation (the mass continues to bounce between the same two numbers), but perhaps a slight error in the equilibrium position. Although I would still argue it’s minuscule but also a great way to dive into complex error analysis on a relatively simple mechanical system.

• 
  @jayantamiri7557 ай бұрын

  I have re-watched the video carefully. You are correct.

• 
  @garrisonturner56707 ай бұрын

  @@jayantamiri755 if you really want to get it down to as accurate as the video can get, plot points at every place you can pause the video and do a chi-square fit on the frequency, amplitude, and phase. This will give the best estimate for any deviation the true equilibrium point is from the 59 cm mark.

• 
  @iHamza77 ай бұрын

  Really helpful video!

• 
  @flixerstudios18628 ай бұрын

  Where did we use the fact that they do not collide head on? If the would collide head on then there would be no angle between them.

• 
  @ari-man8 ай бұрын

  Cool video, thanks

• 
  @pirilacbanda24408 ай бұрын

  Literally have an exam in 20 minutes

• 
  @muhammadmuqri55708 ай бұрын

  alhamdulillah. thank you prof

• 
  @traceyonu42288 ай бұрын

  This is definitely going to help me pass my JAMB

• 
  @lincychamba55798 ай бұрын

  Well explained

• 
  @user-sg8mw3ii3i8 ай бұрын

  Thank you so much for this!!!

• 
  @henrymusonda27349 ай бұрын

  Thank you ❤️💯 understood

• 
  @miketembo72509 ай бұрын

  Awesome 👍

• 
  @warrennesh23949 ай бұрын

  Great lecture

• 
  @rettnieters66109 ай бұрын

  This that hot sh*t 🥵🥵🥵🎶🎶🎶 STRAIGHT GAS

• 
  @zachh32919 ай бұрын

  PYTHAGORIZE THAT BIH🤑🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

• 
  @russellianaclark90639 ай бұрын

  As someone who has been battling with dyslexia my entire life this video explains dimensional analysis very very well! I have looked at other videos and I have only grasped very little. Thank you. Looking forward to watching your other videos.

• 
  @garrisonturner56709 ай бұрын

  I appreciate your response. I’m glad to know folks are finding the content useful in their studies. Best of luck!

• 
  @user-rf4te3nx3q9 ай бұрын

  Perfect ty sm

• 
  @IndrajithNaidu9 ай бұрын

  Thank you very much

• 
  @garrisonturner56709 ай бұрын

  You’re welcome!

• 
  @jacepolito3269 ай бұрын

  We making it out of the classroom with this one 🔥💯🙌

• 
  @theminerpigeon6069 ай бұрын

  This really helped me out in my physics class at my college because I didn’t understand the lecture materials at all and was just stuck for what felt like an eternity

• 
  @h_2a9 ай бұрын

  شكلي الوحيد عربي هنا👀

• 
  @user-kg6mx2yy5o9 ай бұрын

  Wow you are the first teacher to make me understand this topic❤

• 
  @garrisonturner56709 ай бұрын

  Glad you found this helpful!

• 
  @michaeldominguezjr75039 ай бұрын

  You spelled “is” wrong