Ridley is known for its commitment to the bible, emphasis on character formation and development of a strong community in which to learn and grow. Students come from a wide range of denominations and backgrounds providing a stimulating, diverse and welcoming environment. Whether you are studying on campus or online, Ridley offers training for many different ministry options.
On this KZread Channel, you will find videos about campus life, snippets of international scholars who deliver our world-class online subjects, and trailers for our online Ridley Certificate course.
Пікірлер
Resumo: A palestra de Dr. Rhys Bezzant explora a profundidade e o significado da Ceia do Senhor (Santa Ceia) na vida dos discípulos cristãos, especialmente dentro da tradição anglicana. Ele começa destacando um momento pessoal em que a resposta litúrgica "E também com você" demonstrou a formação litúrgica profunda entre os anglicanos. Dr. Bezzant argumenta que a Ceia do Senhor é um elemento essencial para qualquer agenda de discipulado na igreja. Ele observa que muitas igrejas perderam o entusiasmo pela Ceia, tratando-a como uma formalidade ou algo que pode ser embaraçoso diante de não-cristãos. Ele enfatiza que a Ceia do Senhor é um dom maravilhoso de Deus para ensinar e treinar os fiéis em seu discipulado diário. Ele critica a visão de que a Ceia é apenas um lembrete cerebral do sacrifício de Cristo, argumentando que é uma experiência presente da presença de Deus. Ele menciona que, historicamente, a Reforma Protestante e o Avivamento Evangélico do século XVIII reforçaram a crença na presença próxima e pessoal de Deus na Ceia. Dr. Bezzant também discute a importância de entender a Ceia do Senhor como parte de uma narrativa bíblica maior, que conecta os participantes à história redentora de Deus. Ele sugere que a Ceia deve ser vista como um momento culminante tanto na história bíblica quanto na vida espiritual dos participantes. Além disso, ele aborda a importância do uso dos corpos na celebração da Ceia, destacando como a participação física pode treinar os fiéis em sua vida de discipulado. Ele menciona que a Ceia é uma oportunidade para rededicar nossos corpos ao serviço de Deus e para experimentar a comunhão com Cristo e com a comunidade de fé. Dr. Bezzant conclui que a Ceia do Senhor é uma prática essencial para a formação de discípulos, oferecendo uma experiência tangível da graça de Deus e fortalecendo a identidade e a missão dos cristãos. Ele encoraja as igrejas a redescobrirem a profundidade e a riqueza dessa prática litúrgica para fortalecer a vida espiritual e o discipulado de seus membros. Pontos Principais: Importância da Ceia do Senhor: A Ceia é fundamental para a formação de discípulos e deve ser tratada com entusiasmo e reverência. Presença de Deus: A Ceia é uma experiência presente da presença de Deus, não apenas um lembrete do passado. Narrativa Bíblica: A Ceia conecta os participantes à história redentora de Deus, reforçando sua identidade cristã. Uso dos Corpos: A participação física na Ceia treina os fiéis em sua vida de discipulado. Rededicação: A Ceia é uma oportunidade para rededicar nossos corpos e vidas ao serviço de Deus. Dr. Bezzant conclui que a Ceia do Senhor é uma prática rica e multifacetada que deve ser central na vida da igreja e na formação de discípulos. - GPT-4o Copiar
Exactly, the Bible was written in Greek, follow the Greeks. How could of they possibly got it wrong. That's why I am eastern orthodox church , everything else is heresy.
Εν αρχη ο λογος, και ο λογος ην προς τον θεον, και θεος ην ο λογος. Ουτος ην εν αρχαη προς τον θεον. Παντα δι αυτου εγενετο, και χωρις αυτου εγενετο ουδε εν ο γεγονεν. Εν αυτω ζοη ην και η ζωη ην το φως των ανθρωπων, και το φως εν τη σκοτια φαινει και η σκοτια αυτο ου κατελαβεν
Εύγε κε Καθηγητά. Είστε Λακωνικός, περιεκτικός και πλήρως διαφωτιστικος.
I don't agree with the translation "and the word was God" . The lack of the article makes it: "and the word was A god"...! (was "divine")
The corect is ερμηνεία not εξήγησις.With love from Thessaloniki Greece Europe.
Fast forward to 2024 and those people are still fighting and killing each other
The best material for all ages. El mejor material para todas las edades, desde niños a adultos. Congratulations!! God bless
Would be much better without the music. Thank you for the content. God bless.
I have always found it interesting how the article is not used at the start. However we understand the time period of ἀρχηῇ, we know the word was there. I love the chaiasm in this text. It is interesting that the imperfectivity of ἦν is pointed out here. The fact that there is no pure aorist of ἧν makes me wonder if we should take care to read too much into verbal aspect here. Although ultimately, perhaps the reason there is no aorist of ἦν is because the perfective form is filled with the perfect tense-form.
Amen
Your translation is to support your false belief
Tweaking around with the Greek in John 1:1:to override what the rest of the scriptures say is for what reason? Jesus was WITH God as any Firstborn would be lohically with his parents before the others came along.
An excellent overview of the basics. Thank you. Do tell us more about Luther, one fascinating fellow.
The beginning: In the Scriptures, the meaning of the term “beginning” depends on the context. Here the Greek word ar·kheʹ cannot refer to “the beginning” of God the Creator, for he is eternal, having no beginning. (Ps 90:2) It must, therefore, refer to the time when God began creating. God’s first creation was termed the Word, a heavenly designation of the one who became Jesus. (Joh 1:14-17) So Jesus is the only one who can rightly be called “the firstborn of all creation.” (Col 1:15) He was “the beginning of the creation by God”(Re 3:14), so he existed before other spirit creatures and the physical universe were created. In fact, by means of Jesus, “all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth.”-Col 1:16;
Hey brother or sister
True and simple to those who want to see. The term BEGINNING cannot refer to God. Time only begins after God has created someone or something. Any FIRSTBORN would be WITH his father before the others come along. Jesus was WITH God when time began. 'In the BEGINNING the Word was' 'and the Word was WITH God' - John 1:1
Deut 6.4-6, Mark 12.28-32, John 17.3, John 20.17, Rom 15.6, Rom 16.27, I Cor 8.6, II Cor 11.31, I Tim 2.5, Rev 3.2, Rev 3.12, and many other scriptures.
Trinitarian eisegesis: The Word is Jesus. God is a trinity. In the beginning was Jesus and Jesus was with the trinity, and Jesus was the trinity. Jesus was in the beginning with the trinity.
Hahaha
Erasmus way to say greek insults greeks we never used or use that way .
He actually grouped θεον and θεός to mean thing? Θεόν and θεός do not mean the same thing. Θεος is a general description. It can be used for and angel or even a human like a King. In 2 Corinthians 4:4 it’s used to describe Satan. So Satan is actually called A god that is a θεός. In John 1:1 the word θεον (Theon) is talking about “The God” that is Jehovah. The word θεός (theos) which would mean “a god” is talking about Jesus. Besides HOW can a person be WITH a someone and be that same person??? That math makes NO sense whatsoever. So translating θεός to be “a god” is a very accurate translation.
Wrong Θεός and Θεόν mean both God in greek.
@@user-pj7sq7ce1f Correction. Θεός, Θεον, θεό and θεού are all related. I do know in John 1:1 Θεό is the modern Greek and Θεόν is 1’s century. Θεον is talking about Jehovah and θεός is talking about Jesus. So that is talking about 2 people. Remember 2 Corinthians 4:4 uses the phrase “ό θεός” now is that talking about Jesus? Jehovah? Absolutely not!!! That is Satan! So in English Satan is clearly “A god”. And Acts 28:6 the Ancient Greek called the apostle Paul Θεον the modern Greek uses θεός. The KJV says “A god.” But I guess as long as it doesn’t fit the trinity teaching it has to mean nothing.
@@Jimmy5991-eb3re well you have to read words in context for example Πνεύμα in the NT can mean God the essence of God the Holy Spirit an angel a soul a demon aiir etc .
@@Jimmy5991-eb3re Now about the Trinity. It is an issue of theophany at first not reading a text book
@@user-pj7sq7ce1f I can tell you don’t know Greek. Πνεύμα actually means “you”. That is you as a person. It doesn’t mean God or the holy spirit let alone an angel. It means “soul” you are your soul.
great talk
My late father S Preston Walker who worked for the British and Foreign Bible Society (Bible Society of Australia) quoted Menzies opening Bible House Canberra in 1960 as saying the Bible was the Fountainhead like at 23:28. Good to get the sidelight to this statement from this video.
Praise Jesus for John Calvin!
Online church is good if the local churches are struggling to engage with locals and online gives better material to build person up.
Foxes Book of Martyrs has some of the early church fathers' martyrdoms.
Hi Guys Another wonderful season, which I have not only enjoyed but have really benefited from. The last episode was a great way to finish the series. I do hope there will be a Season 4 and that it won't be too long to it! Every blessing for your ministries!
Great presentation, I'm just getting into the 2nd Century Church Fathers. I am doing this as so many cults misquote and misrepresent the Fathers. Thanks for this video and the relaxed way you guys discuss church history.
Church of England in UK is very institutionalised so it has a close link with Parliament. This causes obstacles re same sex marriage and ordering the church round. There is more formalism in these churches as Church of England just performs rites re births, deaths and marriages and not much evangelism so can be very dead spiritually.
3:52 talks about the themes
I have one word for Dr Harrower and his enthusiasm for Calvin's version of Christendom in Geneva, Servetus I also suggest a visit to Edinburgh's Grassmarket where Episcopalians executed Presbyterians in large numbers over who got to control the Church and State.
12:30 Calvinism is a helpful system??? Absolutely terrible. It fits the narrative of scripture best??? What scripture are you reading? It’s not the Christian Bible. Calvinism is complete trash. It does not fit the narrative of scripture. It alleges some terrible things about God and is entirely unbiblical. In fact, it’s “doctrine of election” is the very same theological error that Jesus and the apostles were dispelling, not creating. It was already present in the Jewish religion and it’s what le d to the crucifixion of Christ. It was around for thousands of years, then Christ dispelled it and it was gone for a few hundred years. Then Augustine resurrected it like an idiot and it’s been back for almost another couple thousand years.
9:20 “How would you explain the formula [that the atonement is sufficient for all but efficient for only some.]” Again, this is nonsense and there is a clear answer. The atonement is 100% sufficient and efficient. Christ’s sacrifice was sufficient atonement for all sins for all time and God accepted it for atonement for all sins for all time. 100% sufficient and 100% efficient. Read the Bible people.
9:07 “everyone has different ideas about how one becomes ‘elect’” There is a clear solution. Everyone is elect. This is literally the Gospel being preached by Jesus and the apostles. No one is NOT elect.
3:11 I don’t know who the interviewee is but this is a terrible display of logic. It’s not double punishment. God chose to forgive everyone for their sins and if they surrender to his mercy he’ll grant them eternal life. There’s no double punishment here, there’s forgiveness and surrender.
Love this podcast. Scott's command, character, consequences is a nice summation of ethical categories, and I completely agree with Mike's assessment on Lynn Cohick's commentary evaluation. Her commentaries are excellent. I really look forward to your book reviews. Please keep them coming. I'm also with Scott on Pope Benedict on ethics.
Dogmatics … catechesis … why are dad jokes so funny 😭
Aussie theology of "she'll be right" and "no worries"?
I agree on no AFL, but cannot agree with no coffee.
This is awesome. This is helping me expand my knowledge I’m gaining from Fr Mike Schmidtz Bible in A Year.
yes new season. please talk about contemporary theologies
Praise the Lord! With God in the centre of your ministry we trust you will be blessed in your calling.Our prayers are with you and the family
Why in all Videos i watch to this topic, no one argues about the definite article in Front of the first appearence of the word god? Doesn't it has to be translated " and the word was with/towards THE god?
That is because those who want to believe that Jesus was God need to ignore what goes against their belief. Logically, no one can be WITH his wife and he be his own wife. But Trinitarians have no use for logic.
@@tongakhan230STRAW MAN ALERT‼️”No one can be WITH his wife and he be his own wife.” It’s clear that you have zero understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity. The husband and wife together are considered one flesh. Also, they are both human beings, so they share that in common. In a similar fashion, God the Father and God the Son, share the same nature and essence. Both are divine! Learn what the doctrine of the Holy Trinity really teaches, before you try to shoot it down!
@@jeffreypaulross9767 : A person who is WITH his wife will also be his wife. That is what those who want to make Jesus into God using John 1:1 do. A husband CANNOT be his wife although they work together as ONE UNIT. Jesus and his God Jehovah CANNOT be one and the same individual just because they work together in unity. (John 17:22) I have given them the glory that you have given me, in order that they may be one JUST AS we are one. THEM, THEY = ALL Jesus' disciples. WE = Jesus and God. What is Jesus comparing in his statement? That ALL his disciples be one individual? Or that they are united in thought and purpose JUST AS he and God were? Read 1 Corinthians 1:10.
@@tongakhan230 See, that’s what you don’t understand about the Trinity! We have never said that Jesus and the Father are the same individual. That’s not the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. Hear o Israel, the Lord thy God is one. (DEUTERONOMY 6:4) We got that! We believe that the Father is referred to as God, throughout scripture. (1CORINTHIANS 8:6) We got that too! We believe that Jesus is referred to as God in many Bible verses, but yet we still believe that there is only one God! How can that be? We also believe that the Holy Spirit is also referred to as God. So now, there are three persons in the Bible that are referred to as God, but yet THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD! Now here is where the doctrine of the Holy Trinity comes in. We believe that the one God (singular) is defined in three separate persons. Not three separate Gods like everybody who isn’t a knowledgeable Trinitarian tries to define it as. So, that one God, or Godhead, consists of three separate persons. The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit, And they’re all called God. I’ve heard non Trinitarians say something like 1+1+1=3 doesn’t it? Nope, that’s not it! If you gotta use math to explain the Trinity, try 1x1x1=1
Grüße von D.Virgils aus Belin/Babylon
Just a fashionable text of a moderately educated person of that period , to express what he wanted to say in greek language. This is how this text sounds to a mother tongue, greek speaking person if today. All the words are widely in use today in modern greek, as they appear here
Literally: “in beginning was the word( word/reason) and the word(word/reason) was toward god and god was the word ( word/reason), who was in beginning towards the god, everything through himwas made, and without himwas made, nothing…… “ from a simple greek speaking person from Greece. I didn’t check at all if my translation is close to yours. But I tried to translate literally what i see. The main thing here is that logos means both :word and reason, in this sentence inclined towards reason mainly.
God's plan and purpose. Do you believe that Him is the correct translation in 2,3,and 4, or should it be "it" rather than Him referring to the Logos?
@@MichaelTheophilus906 λογος( word for you), in greek refers to something that was never supposed to be a divine entity itself. Logos , just means: word ir reason. In greek language though, it’s a masculine noun (him), not a neutral (it) one. Given that in English language, there are 3 genders fir nouns ( like in greek), i would translated as: him. But without meaning that im giving a devine property to the word ( logos), necessarily, cause the original Greek text does not gives either.
in the Simplified English text, it is message, and in the Spanish language version the term is Verb....
Praying for all unbelievers and του Αντίχριστου. May you find the truth of Our Savior Γιαχ-οσούα.
Αλλαχ αλλαχ και τρις αλλαχ.
0:30 Isaiah saw the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah, kings of Judah Judah was one of the twelve tribes of Israel but over time it took on the name of a nation, of the Southern Kingdom 1:05 930BC just after the reign of Solomon, divide of the unified nation of 12 tribes into two, Israel (10 tribes to the north, aka Ephraim) and Judah (2 tribes-Judah, Benjamin-to the south) Judah is where Jerusalem was and where the Davidic kings would reign 1:40 Isaiah’s message is primarily directed to Jerusalem (Judah) 1:50 Uzziah aka Azariah and His Son Jotham brought(? Or inherited?) peace during 700s BC 2:20 Ahaz and Hezekiah faced three crises: 1) 735BC Isaiah chapter 7: Aram and Israel, nations to the north, formed a coalition against Judah; but Assyria attacked Aram and Israel, preventing them from conquest of Judah //is there any indication or reason to believe that Judah and Assyria may have communicated to form an alliance? 3:15 2) the Assyrian empire was again on the rise in the 700sBC, now called the Neo-Assyrian Empire under kings: Sargon, Tigaleth Pileser III, Sinnacherib
i had dilema, this helped,thank u:)!
Wished you could read all of it at the beginning in Greek just to hear the pronunciation. But still helpful thank you
This is amazing. The way you explain. Really helpfull. Thanks for sharing.
An example of the Greek (2316) θεὸς “God” in the predicate nomitive case, and without the article, as being capitalized. This is the Unitarians and JWs excuse for translating JN 1:1C as “The Logos was a god.” Mark 12:27 refutes that. ASV “He is not [the] God of the dead, but of the living: ye do greatly err.” Interlinear: “not He is God of [the] dead but” The article “the” is not there preceding the noun θεὸς in the Greek text. And yet the context demands the capitalization of “God.” And so it does in JN 1:1C Using this example, Jn 1:1C could just as legally, by biblical Greek example, be translated: “The Logos was the God.” and be just as correct. Thank you for an excellent lesson in Greek!