We inspire and empower organizations and individuals to shape purposeful, inclusive, and sustainable futures through innovation, collaborations, challenges, events and experiences.
For all who apeak german: this a an interview revealing the truth about climate transition: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k3p8zrRqfbWZedI.htmlsi=Vj_Nuxzm4cR_yDRP A real eye opener
@fd-idwebsites Жыл бұрын
Is this video available with better sound?
@janw4725 Жыл бұрын
Die dikke vieze pad is slecht voor het milieu.
@carolynklestinec8589 Жыл бұрын
And so the one guy says to listen to peoples concerns in order to possibly change their minds but ultimately steamroll over them regardless. Just like you are doing to the farmers . Even in the courts . Is this just a " board " of unelected climate activitists justifying the positions of the Netherlands??? Is that what this really is ??. Please take very good notes here people you are not free, you never were , and now because of this " emergency " you will see it all face to face in every spectrum. STOP , STOP AND STAND UP . Smh .
@Chris-ey1jx Жыл бұрын
You can have no legitimate discussion about climate change from any perspective until you first and foremost acknowledge climate engineering. Period. Time for truth now, look where the lies have got us.
@0Marl1 Жыл бұрын
This was a discussion like the thousands others before... wishful thinking and a waste of time 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@Goodman849 Жыл бұрын
English man here living in the Netherlands. I don't need a tesla. My bicycle is perfect. Truly excellent quote, 'the way to hell is paved with good intentions'.
@tc-fz5qn Жыл бұрын
There are scientists and there are “scientists “. Hasn’t the Covid-19 plandemic proven that to the world? Current “facts” will be replaced by new “facts” very much like the “scientists “ who propounded that the earth was flat and that the earth is the center of the universe with the sun rotating around it . What is factual and will remain factual for eternity is that yes, humans are polluting the planet with irresponsible exploitation of its natural resources including cutting down huge swabs of forests like the Amazon, irresponsible disposal of toxic wastes from manufacturing, mining processes and oil drillings, irresponsible emissions of pollutants to the atmosphere not just CO2, irresponsible usage and disposal of plastics and plastic products etc etc. If we focus on dealing with these issues rather than talking about rising temperatures, rising sea levels and warming of the oceans, melting of snow caps and all other such nebulous, debatable and uncontrollable factors , it’ll be more productive. How would implementing and imposing a carbon tax stop the rape of the Amazon forests ? Likewise, for the irresponsible mining companies and manufacturers polluting the atmosphere and rivers etc? Let’s go back to basics and deal with the issues that we can directly deal with.
@markschuette3770 Жыл бұрын
the problem is more than climate change- its also the 6th great extinction and the collapse of most ecosystems- due to our over consumption! this "overshoot" is actually the bigger problem- and combined its by far the biggest challenge mankind has ever faced. the solution has to deal with both issues as one.
@TheJmkovacs Жыл бұрын
Magic, CO2. Measuring CO2 allows us to classify, anything that amits this gas. Why do we need to measure the CO2 emissions? Well, it can be used for reasons of comparison since every living or inert object emits or can emit CO2. Is there an engineering or scientific need for it? In general, there is no need for such a metric for these considerations, except if politics enter into it. Science is based on facts, while politics is mostly based on feelings and emotions. This makes it difficult to use the same metric for both scientific and political purposes. Politics can influence man-made activities but are totally impotent for natural happenings, yet CO2 emission has its origin in both sources. The small problem with measuring CO2 is the same as with talking about history, where do we start? In history, one has to identify, at one point, the period one talks about, measuring CO2 is not that simple it can be measured more or less for animal and anthropogenic activities, but not for natural emissions. Animal and other living creature activities, CO2 emissions, are more often than not, conveniently, ignored. In light of this measuring CO2 emissions today can rarely be admitted as scientifically sound, yet it serves as the basis for political decision making.
@no1really712 Жыл бұрын
AI will fix it , it will come up the tech to fix it nothing to worry about
@basemaus3728 Жыл бұрын
Unfortunate that I couldn't make it, but I am already looking forward for the next edition!
Пікірлер
For all who apeak german: this a an interview revealing the truth about climate transition: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k3p8zrRqfbWZedI.htmlsi=Vj_Nuxzm4cR_yDRP A real eye opener
Is this video available with better sound?
Die dikke vieze pad is slecht voor het milieu.
And so the one guy says to listen to peoples concerns in order to possibly change their minds but ultimately steamroll over them regardless. Just like you are doing to the farmers . Even in the courts . Is this just a " board " of unelected climate activitists justifying the positions of the Netherlands??? Is that what this really is ??. Please take very good notes here people you are not free, you never were , and now because of this " emergency " you will see it all face to face in every spectrum. STOP , STOP AND STAND UP . Smh .
You can have no legitimate discussion about climate change from any perspective until you first and foremost acknowledge climate engineering. Period. Time for truth now, look where the lies have got us.
This was a discussion like the thousands others before... wishful thinking and a waste of time 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
English man here living in the Netherlands. I don't need a tesla. My bicycle is perfect. Truly excellent quote, 'the way to hell is paved with good intentions'.
There are scientists and there are “scientists “. Hasn’t the Covid-19 plandemic proven that to the world? Current “facts” will be replaced by new “facts” very much like the “scientists “ who propounded that the earth was flat and that the earth is the center of the universe with the sun rotating around it . What is factual and will remain factual for eternity is that yes, humans are polluting the planet with irresponsible exploitation of its natural resources including cutting down huge swabs of forests like the Amazon, irresponsible disposal of toxic wastes from manufacturing, mining processes and oil drillings, irresponsible emissions of pollutants to the atmosphere not just CO2, irresponsible usage and disposal of plastics and plastic products etc etc. If we focus on dealing with these issues rather than talking about rising temperatures, rising sea levels and warming of the oceans, melting of snow caps and all other such nebulous, debatable and uncontrollable factors , it’ll be more productive. How would implementing and imposing a carbon tax stop the rape of the Amazon forests ? Likewise, for the irresponsible mining companies and manufacturers polluting the atmosphere and rivers etc? Let’s go back to basics and deal with the issues that we can directly deal with.
the problem is more than climate change- its also the 6th great extinction and the collapse of most ecosystems- due to our over consumption! this "overshoot" is actually the bigger problem- and combined its by far the biggest challenge mankind has ever faced. the solution has to deal with both issues as one.
Magic, CO2. Measuring CO2 allows us to classify, anything that amits this gas. Why do we need to measure the CO2 emissions? Well, it can be used for reasons of comparison since every living or inert object emits or can emit CO2. Is there an engineering or scientific need for it? In general, there is no need for such a metric for these considerations, except if politics enter into it. Science is based on facts, while politics is mostly based on feelings and emotions. This makes it difficult to use the same metric for both scientific and political purposes. Politics can influence man-made activities but are totally impotent for natural happenings, yet CO2 emission has its origin in both sources. The small problem with measuring CO2 is the same as with talking about history, where do we start? In history, one has to identify, at one point, the period one talks about, measuring CO2 is not that simple it can be measured more or less for animal and anthropogenic activities, but not for natural emissions. Animal and other living creature activities, CO2 emissions, are more often than not, conveniently, ignored. In light of this measuring CO2 emissions today can rarely be admitted as scientifically sound, yet it serves as the basis for political decision making.
AI will fix it , it will come up the tech to fix it nothing to worry about
Unfortunate that I couldn't make it, but I am already looking forward for the next edition!
🤗 🅿🆁🅾🅼🅾🆂🅼