Пікірлер

• 
  @khalidjavaid36773 күн бұрын

  Mard e haq

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 күн бұрын

  Good Comment

• 
  @Avincina18 күн бұрын

  plz

• 
  @arshmonestery901018 күн бұрын

  plz. provide your whatsup no. or email

• 
  @muhammadabbas6155Ай бұрын

  اسلام علیکم۔ آپ سے ایک دست بستہ گزارش ہے ۔ کے نظریہ وحدت الوجود کی تشریح کر دیں۔ چاہیے مختصر ہی ہو اور یے بتا دیں کے کیا۔ ابن عربی اور ملا صدرا رح کا نظریہ ایک ہی ہے یا ان میں فرق پایا جاتا ہے۔

• 
  @arshmonestery9010Ай бұрын

  اس چینل کی بہت سی ویڈیوز میں نظریہ وحدت الوجود ہی پیش کیاگیا ہے۔ یعنی خدا کا واحد وجود ہی ہے جو نزول کرکے مختلف اشیا کاوجود بن رہا ہے اور ان کو ظہور بخش رہا ہے۔ خاص طور پر “توحیدباری تعالی” پر ویڈیو کو دیکھیں۔ ابن عربی اور ملا صدرا کا ایک ہی نظریہ ہے۔ ملا صدرا نے اس کو فلسفیانہ انداز میں پیش کیا ہے جبکہ ابنعربی کا انداز فلسفیانہ نہیں ہے۔

• 
  @muhammadabbas6155Ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 Jazakallah

• 
  @fizaali775Ай бұрын

  Mash allah

• 
  @arshmonestery9010Ай бұрын

  Thanx

• 
  @ahmedmujtaba8154Ай бұрын

  Salaam alaikum Please arrange some meetings where we can sit together and understand your message. Nice work needs to be discussed for better understanding.

• 
  @arshmonestery9010Ай бұрын

  Thanks for appreciation. For planning further communications in this regard, please contact at [email protected]

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97782 ай бұрын

  Tashreeh ke bawjood lecture bht heavy ho jata hai kaha se shuru karen ki inka falsafa samajh aaye

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Each video is allotted a number in its description. You can start from Video 1 upto Video 29 (till now). From video 1 to 20 are preliminary videos for preparating the minds for accepting Sadra's philosophy. From video 20 to 29 is pure philosophy and may be learned in this order. I would recommend to take notes of important terms such as Illat-e-istaedadi, imkan-e-zati etc. The total length of these 29 videos is not very much i.e. merely around six hours.

• 
  @syedkazmi76182 ай бұрын

  Interesting. 🎉. And how are you?

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Thanks, fine

• 
  @Avincina2 ай бұрын

  how come i get into to contact with him

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  You may contact at email: [email protected]

• 
  @Avincina2 ай бұрын

  plz tell me contact wtsup of syed amir raza

• 
  @Avincina2 ай бұрын

  slmm

• 
  @AamirHassanBurhanvi2 ай бұрын

  بہترین پیشکش

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn2 ай бұрын

  Thanks for clarifying this significant concept , so we should say that the eye , rose and reflected light waves from rose to the eye and the brain act here as preparatory causes for the immaterial image formed within us . Does our soul play any role here

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Yes! Since every image of sensory knowledge is actualized by the metaphysical world of God and Angels and since our soul also belongs to this world, it may be maintained that the soul has some role too in this actualization..

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn2 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 Thanks

• 
  @Ali-mi9up2 ай бұрын

  Thank you. I enjoy your work thoroughly! Do you have any other sites or places you post/write on.

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Thanks for appreciating. Yes! you can find the books "Wisdom of the Unseen" and "Wisdom of the Eternal Self" at the google books website. Moreover, english translations of some books of Mulla Sadra are also published at amazon.com

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97783 ай бұрын

  Aql ' nafs ' tabiyat please inko define kijiye

• 
  @arshmonestery90102 ай бұрын

  Long description are required for each. Anyway, for aql watch video on "cognitive capabilities". Shortly speaking, Nafs is a collection of imaginations. Tabiat, in Sadrian thoughts about motion, is the form of a physical thing causing motion in it.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn3 ай бұрын

  Salamun alaikum, thanks for enlightening us , I would be highly greatful if you could share your whatsapp number for me so that I can seek guidance on certain issues from you

• 
  @arshmonestery90103 ай бұрын

  You may write an email to [email protected] for whatup no.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn3 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 thanks , I will do so InshaAllah

• 
  @masoomazaidi87593 ай бұрын

  سلام سر جی آسان الفاظ میں بیان فرمائیں

• 
  @arshmonestery90103 ай бұрын

  The difficult part of Sadra's writings has already been avoided. What is presented is the easiest. If you find it difficult to understand, listen the video again and again until you will understand. Anyway, thanx for telling, we will also try to make the text further easier.

• 
  @arifhussain6593 ай бұрын

  salaam. as we are not aware of terms in urdu used in your video, can you please use term in english for our understanding. thanks

• 
  @arshmonestery90103 ай бұрын

  OK, the english translation of key terms will be provided in the texts in the future videos.

• 
  @shaguftakumari47394 ай бұрын

  خدا اور وقت اور زمان اسکی بلکل سمجھ نہیں آتی اسکو بھی سمجھا دیں خدا اگر خالق ہے اور شروع سے ہی خالق ہے اگر صفت خلقیت حادث نہیں تو مطلب ہم جب سے خدا ہے تب سے ہی اسکی مخلوق ہیں

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  آپ کے سوال کا تعلق "ربط حادث بالقدیم" سے ہے۔ اس پر ویڈیو جلد بنائ جائے گی۔ اس ضمن میں فی الحال "خدا اور زمان" پر ویڈیو اور "حقیقت پر حجابات" کی ویڈیوز دیکھی جا سکتی ہیں

• 
  @shaguftakumari47394 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 انکا لنک؟ کیونکہ حادث و قدیم کی بحث وقت سے جڑی ہے اور اسی بحث سے خدا کے مرکب اور عین ذات والی صفات کا مسئلہ جرا ہے میرے نزدیک

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn2 ай бұрын

  Thanks for enlightening us , I think this has something to do with primacy of being not primacy of essence . So whatever is displayed on our senses are all essences not existence which remains hidden but it is real . But we mistakenly consider the essences of things to be real which is a delusion . May Allh show us things as they are not as they appear to be to our senses

• 
  @dabeerraza39194 ай бұрын

  Please send more information

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  Please! Visit the channel for more videos.

• 
  @BahjaatTourAndTravels4 ай бұрын

  Excellent

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @narjissyed38024 ай бұрын

  👍👍🌺

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  thanx

• 
  @viperop41244 ай бұрын

  Sir I got a question,is there any tafseeer for this book?

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  There are many in Persian language but nothing very famous in Urdu.

• 
  @viperop41244 ай бұрын

  Sir, book name please❤

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  Asfaar-e-Arbaa

• 
  @viperop41244 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 VOLUME?

• 
  @arshmonestery90104 ай бұрын

  Volume I

• 
  @viperop41244 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 THANKS ALOT SIR❤️

• 
  @fahimsayyed25275 ай бұрын

  Mashallah ♥️

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @fahimsayyed25275 ай бұрын

  Mashallah ♥️

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @arslankazmi00545 ай бұрын

  Bhtreen....Mulla sadra ka poora falsfa kindly upload krty rhye ga... مولا پاک أپکی توفیقات خیر میں اظافہ کرے

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Inshallah, allah ki toufeeq rahi tow.

• 
  @muhammadabbas61555 ай бұрын

  Bahot Ala .

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @ZZ-kb5el5 ай бұрын

  Best video. Please continue to post Mula Sadra videos.. ALLAH BLESS YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES. AMEN

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Thank you very much for appreciation. God bless you.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn5 ай бұрын

  Thanks for sharing this vedio, my question is when we look at the red rose for example so an image of red rose is formed within our mind or soul ,is this image inside our mind similar or greater in intensity to the red rose which lies out side our senses?

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  When you ask about the intensity, you should be clear about "intensity of what". As far as the epistemic intensity is concerned, the rose image in our mind is more intense than the rose lying outside because the image is knowable itself while the outside rose itself is not knowable. But if you are asking about the intensity of becoming preparatory cause (illat-e-isteadadi) for different outside effects, the outside rose is more intense than the image. Anyway very good question!

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn5 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 Thanks for your reply ,another question is the image of red rose which is formed with in our mind ,is this image immaterial or matter free and is this image formed with in our soul or brain 🧠 because soul is immaterial and brain is physical

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Different kinds of knowledge are different in their abstraction from matter. The most abstracted knowledge is the intellectual one. The sesnory knowledge and its images are the least abstracted from matter. Since, man starts his journey back towards God from the matter, the first kind of knowledge he gets is the sensory knowledge which is least abstracted from matter. As a result, his soul is also least abstracted from matter in the start. As his soul gets intellectual knowledge, it becomes more and more abstracted from the matter. The imaginational knowledge is in between in such an abstraction.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn5 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 Thanks for your reply so sensory knowledge is least abstracted from matter now I presume the image of red rose formed within our soul is semimmaterial not fully immaterial?, I would be highly greatful to you if you could share a vedio regarding the idea of Trans substantial motion or harkate jowhari by Mulla Sadra . I would be highly thankful to you if you could throw some light on this and it's implications on our lives because I believe it is a revolutionary concept of Mulla Sadda

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  I would like to say that the sensory images are formed near the boundary of the physical world and the metaphysical world but on the side of the metaphysical world. The topic of trans-substantial motion will be discussed on its turn. But its consequences have already been described in videos on "Human Evolution", on "Upright Path" and whereever "saoodi herkat" is mentioned and discussed.

• 
  @muhamadjawad28465 ай бұрын

  بہت اچھے

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97785 ай бұрын

  مگر یہ بات درست لگتی ہے کہ عقلی کاوشوں کے ساتھ ساتھ ہمیں تجربی رویہ بھی اختیار کرنا چاہیے اور اشیاء کی حقیقت تک پہنچنے کے ہمیں سائنس کا سہارا لینا چاہیے کیونکہ اس نے ہم پر بہت ساری حقیقتیں آشکار کی ہیں

• 
  @arshmonestery90105 ай бұрын

  Of course, you are right that science has discovered a lot of facts. But what is under discussion is the ultimate reality and source of this world. Modern Science is unable to know this ultimate reality because of its limitations and misunderstandings about the ultimate source of reality. So what is required is that we have to be aware about the limitations of the science. These limitations are explained in the videos about "Matter" and "Cause". It has never been suggested that support should not be taken from the science in getting knowledge lying within its limits.

• 
  @muhammadraza59446 ай бұрын

  JazakAllah

• 
  @muhammadraza59446 ай бұрын

  JazakAllah

• 
  @muhammadraza59446 ай бұрын

  JazakAllah

• 
  @muhammadraza59446 ай бұрын

  JazakAllah

• 
  @muhammadraza59446 ай бұрын

  JazakAllah

• 
  @arshmonestery90106 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @user-me3xw5dk9h7 ай бұрын

  آپ کا کام بہت مفید ہے بلخصوص علم دوست افراد کیلئے اللہ تعالیٰ آپ کو سلامت رکھے آمین

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  Bohat Shukria

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn6 ай бұрын

  Thanks for sharing, so we can say God is creating and recreating this whole cosmos moment to moment ,some one has best explained this concept by giving example like when we look at the flowing river we see our image on the water which seems still to our senses but in fact this image is created and recreated on water many times in a second because water is flowing

• 
  @arshmonestery90106 ай бұрын

  Yes! what you want to say is right. But using the word 'recreate' here is not correct because this appears to mean that God is taking a series of acts one after the other. No. Gos is pure unity. So His Act of Creation is also One. This means He creates the whole of the world in one sweep by taking His Single Act of Creation. This One Divine Act appears to us as a series of different instants along the flow of time at this lowest level of multiplicity.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn6 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 thanks for your Clarification , so creation and recreation is not appropriate for divine act

• 
  @arshmonestery90106 ай бұрын

  Yes, because to say 'some act is repeated by God' is against His Unity and Immutability.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn7 ай бұрын

  Salamun alaikum brother, I watched your vedio again about Mulla Sadras understanding on the unity of knower ,knowledge and known here I have a question like when we see an object say a red flower ,do we see the same red flower which lies externally or Mulla Sadra is saying that upon encounter of our senses with the external object say a red rose our soul is activated and creates the same image of red rose with in our soul which is greater in intensity or which is existentially stronger than the red rose which lies externally, please throw some light on this

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  What we know exactly or what we see exactly is not the external object. Rather, what we know or see exactly is the image which is formed into our minds by the higher spiritual world. Since, the external object plays a preparatory role in this process, it appears to us that we are seeing the external object.

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn7 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 thanks so does this image which is formed in our soul by higher spiritual world corresponds exactly with the image which lies outside our senses?

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  There is no correspondence as far as the aspect of knowledge is concerned because no form is directly knowable in the outside world as its one part is absent from the other. Due to this absence, the outside material forms are not directly knowable. But there is some correspondence between this unknowable material form and the knowable mental image/form because this unknowable form serves as a preparatory cause for the mental one. Moreover, there may also be some correspondence between the two in the spiritual world as both forms are created by the spiritual world. @@adilkhan-uz4zn

• 
  @adilkhan-uz4zn6 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 thanks a lot for enlightening us

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97787 ай бұрын

  Is lehaz se ek qatil ne apne andar saza ki istedadi illat ko tashkeel karli par usme saza ki illat e zati asar andaz kyun nhi huyi?

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  Whenever an evil-doer does an evil act, he fulfills illat-e-istaedadi for getting a negative mark on his soul and this mark is made immediately by illat-e-zati. As far as the affliction of this bad mark i.e. punishment is concerned, it may not be felt immediately by the evil-doer because the marks on the soul during this worldly life are overshadowed by new marks continuously coming from the outside world. But after death, all the negative and positive marks made on the soul would appear and affect the man accordingly.

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97787 ай бұрын

  Wajood asl me kya h? Sartre aur 2re existentialist philosopher me aur falsafa e wahdat ul wajood me kya buniyadi farq h

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  Sartre's existentialism is regarding man's existence that it comes before its essence and its inherent purpose. Wahda-tul-wajood shortly means the being in everything is one and only one and that is of God. Sartre's existentialism is totally different from Sadra's philosophy of being whose further details will come soon.

• 
  @sarkarhaider7 ай бұрын

  Behtareen post

• 
  @arshmonestery90107 ай бұрын

  Shukria

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97788 ай бұрын

  Mulla sadra ka western philosophers rationalist aur Empiricist ke bare me kya nazariya h is per bhi video banye

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Mulla Sadra does not have any specific view regarding ratinoalism and empiricism as these trends were appearing in Europe nearly at the same time when Sadra was writing his books in Iran. But due to lack of communication resources at that time, he does not appear to have specific awareness about these trends in Europe. But, of course, some videos will soon come to show the weaknesses in these trends..

• 
  @shamshadkazmi97788 ай бұрын

  میں منتظر رہونگا

• 
  @kumail1228 ай бұрын

  ماشاالله Very nice, jazakallah

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Thanks

• 
  @yougoogle61068 ай бұрын

  Ager mn ghlt nhi hu to is thereer mn shetan ko mkhlooq e jli sy bhar gina gia hy???

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Gi! Shaitan apne mutlaq mani mein mehaz hadood ka naam he kisi wajoodi haqeeqat ka naam nahi. Lekin yehi hadood jb ksi wajoodi haqeeqat se mil jati hein to usko bhi shetan keh dia jata he. Iss trah woh aik wajoodi haqeeqat ka roop dharta he.

• 
  @yougoogle61068 ай бұрын

  @@arshmonestery9010 apny koi nasha kia hua hy? Iblees ki pori khani quran mn hy

• 
  @whatwethinkwebecome94278 ай бұрын

  Who is the Urdu translator of his book..plz give me link of the Urdu version book .regards

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Translator is Sayyed Aamir Raza. Urdu version of Sadra's Tafseer is not yet published.

• 
  @whatwethinkwebecome94278 ай бұрын

  Salam... Janab you are doing a great and noble job .I would get grateful If you let me know that the Urdu version of Asfaar e arbaa is available in the market? Regards. S.Amjad Mosavi

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Thanks, Asfaar is available at www.amazon.com

• 
  @shabbarzaidi42238 ай бұрын

  عالم وحدت کیا ہے عالم عقل سے پہلے؟

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Gi! Aalm-e-aqal se pehle he.

• 
  @fizaali7758 ай бұрын

  Mahbani karan as dars man satar k awaz ko ya tu kam kran ya khatam hi kardan tu bahtar hoga

• 
  @arshmonestery90108 ай бұрын

  Rahnumai ka bohat shukria, agar koi aawaz na ho tou viewer smajhta he keh uski video ruk gai he. Aawaaz albata budli ja sakti he.

• 
  @muhammadafzal27808 ай бұрын

  ❤ماشاءالله

• 
  @asadabbas64959 ай бұрын

  MashaAllah n jazakAllah, doing great job

• 
  @arshmonestery90109 ай бұрын

  Shukria