Luck = Dealer! Are they using a mechanical shuffle or not. Do they completely mix up the deck before placing in mec shuffle? Do they perform a perfect hand shuffle 7x before the final cut, to completely randomize the deck? The statistics sited in poker are bogus. You can not use data in statistical analysis that is excluded from the total data set. Once the deck is shuffled and dealer cut the winning hand has been determined. 9 person table 18 (9 pairs hole cards) + 8 (3 burn, 5 board cards). The rest of the deck is no longer in use. So basically it doesn't matter how many types of cards are in the remaining deck, and that data can not be used in any statistical analysis.
@adamo3653211 сағат бұрын
Show us one example where they actually fold and ladder up. I have never seen it happen. This whole "technique" is cringe AF.
@adamo3653211 сағат бұрын
I like Joey but it pisses me off that he is virtually never shown playing. For all I know he could be horrible at poker lol.
@snowflakeca207918 сағат бұрын
Mental health apparently is DIRECTLY related to you GUT HEALTH… Same bacteria downstairs is upstairs too.
@brocktonstockton4052Күн бұрын
There is no way you are playing at 97.5 GTO without RTA.
@samuraijack1371Күн бұрын
this effect should almost never happen in practice. - you are hoping that someone wakes up with a hand where inspite of the insane ICM pressure has to put all its stack in the middle -you are banking on the fact that the shorter of the other 2 stacks actually loses and busts. Now guess thats the probability of any of this? <0.2% i guess? there are so many big mistakes happening that focusing on this this is trivial.
@joas162Күн бұрын
In the cEV sim all stacks are even; how do you think things change when you are the only shortstack?
@FloydMaxwellКүн бұрын
Your first example: 3:1 pot odds/how often do you need to win. Let's say you invested $1 in a $3 pot. Three times. You need to win one of those 3 pots to win back the $3 you invested. 1 in 3 (not 1 in 4).
@FloydMaxwellКүн бұрын
Maybe the problem is the lingo being used -- "you're getting 3:1" -- it would appear this means, you put in 1 and stand to win 3. But in fact it means, you put in 1 into a pot of 4. The lingo itself is confusing.
@GTOWizard13 сағат бұрын
If you split the cost of a pizza with 3 friends, you'd expect to get 1/4 of the pie, not 1/3. The same logic applies to pot odds.
@Cuyl19892 күн бұрын
yea，i feel just a lot pictures comes out of my brain what does turn comes out or river, whats my opponent's response if i do something, just like play chess. U can use information and reading of the board, and ur hands blocking range to simulate decisions.
@jimz10242 күн бұрын
Example 2: Most interesting part to discuss is the non turn barreling of Kdiamonds. Interesting because it is choosing to fire all of the other board pairing diamonds, likely due to potential of running into boats, and a big chunk of our opponents range when the money goes in being top pair two pair or sets which can become houses by the river
@jimz10242 күн бұрын
Example 1: Reverse Implied Odds
@thomasmatthews803 күн бұрын
Superb. I wonder though how the more modern use of Dynamic and Static as opposed to wet and dry fits ok with this?
@scottkay4834 күн бұрын
AI art, yuck
@OKOKOOO-xl2kk4 күн бұрын
Hey Man, would you say the rakes for 0.25$/0.5$ blinds on holdem 6 max players table on ggpoker are considered fairly ok and beatable comparable to the other sites? and is there also a rake on postflop pots too?
@user-wg7hf6gk6i4 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for sharing your experience and knowledge about trading.
@datd144 күн бұрын
More merch please
@LinusK5005 күн бұрын
It seems like the way you're calculating MDF is wrong. If you know your opponent will sometimes give up, when he reaches the river without a made hand, and he sometimes gets to the river with a made hand, then that ratio is the one you need to be calculating, not how often the opponent thinks you will fold.
@tadontplay05 күн бұрын
Brew is a B coffee word 1:45
@IbeatGTO6 күн бұрын
Sounds like a lot of fun ... and variance!
@FirstLast-zy6wv7 күн бұрын
Science and the tools produced by science can help those who are not chosen to feel for a while as if they are.
@riverrazor50037 күн бұрын
I love your videos. Thank you so much for all you've done for us.
@scottdeathridge14957 күн бұрын
I would argue that a live 4 bet range from a maniac is still a lot of suited and high cards. They just play them like aces which means calling with a wider range that is more robust than theirs😅
@noahmaryanoff987 күн бұрын
Matt Hunt best Gto Wizard Coach!
@joas1627 күн бұрын
Is this the AI talking? I always assumed it was a man. I guess that's unconscious sexism from my part.
@Stockholm_Syndrome7 күн бұрын
Wait for a premium starting hand and just go for it.
@ThaSPAWN5 күн бұрын
Yes...
@lorisdalcin237 күн бұрын
Best content in poker community ❤
@matheusstotti8 күн бұрын
so what about when steve is pressuring me up in these cases at a semi ft 5k players? Are you studying this topic deeper? Would really love to see your work and share some ideas
@pctotty8 күн бұрын
My strategy against maniacs is usually along the lines of, pickup QQ, re-raise, get jammed on, call and lose to J4 off suit, when they make the eventual full house.
@pudelinocacalat29517 күн бұрын
classic
@FATCACAK7 күн бұрын
Terrible strat. Be the other guy
@IbeatGTO6 күн бұрын
JJ vs J5 last week. Board 764 Q 8
@slowery433 күн бұрын
no one asked you, we truly don't care what you do you have zero credibility, no history.... no one came here hoping to find out what pctotty would do
@slowery433 күн бұрын
@@IbeatGTO no one cares, this is not all about your supposed poker play
@MRMUZO-gx7yp8 күн бұрын
This is a gem 🍸🪩🎱🎸💎!
@SuhendraLie8 күн бұрын
"Steve" might as well be "Nick" or "Alan"
@IbeatGTO6 күн бұрын
lol, I see what you did there.
@justsomeguy16718 күн бұрын
8:09 i got 9.1 for some reason not 8.1 but ill double check that.
@kezman82a8 күн бұрын
This "Steve 25" sounds like Alan Keating
@LavCrvuljak8 күн бұрын
how did you calculate preflop ranges, afaik you still don't have preflop solver? ETA on preflop solver?
@GTOWizard7 күн бұрын
We have preflop solving available for heads up spots! Multiway pre and post is coming later.
@joeingram18 күн бұрын
Excited to watch this one
@GokuTheSuperSaiyan18 күн бұрын
Keep it on the downlow but carrot corner is the best KZread channel right now for advanced poker content
@joeingram18 күн бұрын
@@GokuTheSuperSaiyan1 I love his content for the games he plays - one of my favorite channels
@GokuTheSuperSaiyan18 күн бұрын
@@joeingram1Ay good stuff
@Stockholm_Syndrome7 күн бұрын
@@GokuTheSuperSaiyan1 Carrot is good. I also recommend @hungryhorsepoker
@TheNow_Now8 күн бұрын
tldr: people that overstab and bet too much, its best to play a x 100 oop, to x/r all in. good strategy at many low stakes games as well
@kezman82a8 күн бұрын
a x 100? what does that mean?
@TheNow_Now8 күн бұрын
@@kezman82a 'check 100% strategy'
@ianrthompson8 күн бұрын
@@kezman82acheck 100% when out of position regardless of holding or flop texture.
@drezayzel8 күн бұрын
Amazing quality video. Thank you.
@bensilburn8 күн бұрын
Nice explanation! What I don't understand is why not play 100% ICM from the get go, since that showed the best results?
@joas1628 күн бұрын
Good luck at the series Espen! Hope you can find some peace of mind and get in a good grind mode.
@GTOWizard8 күн бұрын
What's the username of the LAG you're about to crush now? 😈
@xGETxREKTx8 күн бұрын
Stefan11222
@tiramisu_1th8 күн бұрын
Tiramisu1th
@FATCACAK6 күн бұрын
IBombItYouVomit
@zozolecek8 күн бұрын
if you see someone wearing a gto hoodie at your table make sure your wallets big enough for the amount of cash its about to hold
@joas1629 күн бұрын
I think this was the most dense in depth video I've ever seen. Lots of concepts to study more deeply. Very humbling to hear someone with such a deep understanding of the game. One question on the concept of stable/unstable equity: is that mostly driven by what hands we can valuebet on the river or also by the part of our range that likes betting 'unstable boards' because of added equity?
@Cuyl198910 күн бұрын
Who is this Video maker? So good! I like those words he use there like "PotShare" gives a lot of picture what u doing. And I super like at the end he said“good luck with ur grinding!”, yea! what r we doing its gringding +EV everyday.
@GTOWizard8 күн бұрын
The author is Tombos21 Glad you enjoyed the video!
@Cuyl19898 күн бұрын
@@GTOWizard I just read his reaserch( Visualizing the bunching effect），its so good, i can understand the process how he inferred it. the result doesnt matter, but how he inferred it , thats so important for me to understand the theory.
@ResonNL10 күн бұрын
I always hated the math side of poker cause its really boring. To be honest, I have never known any of this stuf but I've been a winning poker player for over 20 years.
Пікірлер
Luck = Dealer! Are they using a mechanical shuffle or not. Do they completely mix up the deck before placing in mec shuffle? Do they perform a perfect hand shuffle 7x before the final cut, to completely randomize the deck? The statistics sited in poker are bogus. You can not use data in statistical analysis that is excluded from the total data set. Once the deck is shuffled and dealer cut the winning hand has been determined. 9 person table 18 (9 pairs hole cards) + 8 (3 burn, 5 board cards). The rest of the deck is no longer in use. So basically it doesn't matter how many types of cards are in the remaining deck, and that data can not be used in any statistical analysis.
Show us one example where they actually fold and ladder up. I have never seen it happen. This whole "technique" is cringe AF.
I like Joey but it pisses me off that he is virtually never shown playing. For all I know he could be horrible at poker lol.
Mental health apparently is DIRECTLY related to you GUT HEALTH… Same bacteria downstairs is upstairs too.
There is no way you are playing at 97.5 GTO without RTA.
this effect should almost never happen in practice. - you are hoping that someone wakes up with a hand where inspite of the insane ICM pressure has to put all its stack in the middle -you are banking on the fact that the shorter of the other 2 stacks actually loses and busts. Now guess thats the probability of any of this? <0.2% i guess? there are so many big mistakes happening that focusing on this this is trivial.
In the cEV sim all stacks are even; how do you think things change when you are the only shortstack?
Your first example: 3:1 pot odds/how often do you need to win. Let's say you invested $1 in a $3 pot. Three times. You need to win one of those 3 pots to win back the $3 you invested. 1 in 3 (not 1 in 4).
Maybe the problem is the lingo being used -- "you're getting 3:1" -- it would appear this means, you put in 1 and stand to win 3. But in fact it means, you put in 1 into a pot of 4. The lingo itself is confusing.
If you split the cost of a pizza with 3 friends, you'd expect to get 1/4 of the pie, not 1/3. The same logic applies to pot odds.
yea，i feel just a lot pictures comes out of my brain what does turn comes out or river, whats my opponent's response if i do something, just like play chess. U can use information and reading of the board, and ur hands blocking range to simulate decisions.
Example 2: Most interesting part to discuss is the non turn barreling of Kdiamonds. Interesting because it is choosing to fire all of the other board pairing diamonds, likely due to potential of running into boats, and a big chunk of our opponents range when the money goes in being top pair two pair or sets which can become houses by the river
Example 1: Reverse Implied Odds
Superb. I wonder though how the more modern use of Dynamic and Static as opposed to wet and dry fits ok with this?
AI art, yuck
Hey Man, would you say the rakes for 0.25$/0.5$ blinds on holdem 6 max players table on ggpoker are considered fairly ok and beatable comparable to the other sites? and is there also a rake on postflop pots too?
Thank you very much for sharing your experience and knowledge about trading.
More merch please
It seems like the way you're calculating MDF is wrong. If you know your opponent will sometimes give up, when he reaches the river without a made hand, and he sometimes gets to the river with a made hand, then that ratio is the one you need to be calculating, not how often the opponent thinks you will fold.
Brew is a B coffee word 1:45
Sounds like a lot of fun ... and variance!
Science and the tools produced by science can help those who are not chosen to feel for a while as if they are.
I love your videos. Thank you so much for all you've done for us.
I would argue that a live 4 bet range from a maniac is still a lot of suited and high cards. They just play them like aces which means calling with a wider range that is more robust than theirs😅
Matt Hunt best Gto Wizard Coach!
Is this the AI talking? I always assumed it was a man. I guess that's unconscious sexism from my part.
Wait for a premium starting hand and just go for it.
Yes...
Best content in poker community ❤
so what about when steve is pressuring me up in these cases at a semi ft 5k players? Are you studying this topic deeper? Would really love to see your work and share some ideas
My strategy against maniacs is usually along the lines of, pickup QQ, re-raise, get jammed on, call and lose to J4 off suit, when they make the eventual full house.
classic
Terrible strat. Be the other guy
JJ vs J5 last week. Board 764 Q 8
no one asked you, we truly don't care what you do you have zero credibility, no history.... no one came here hoping to find out what pctotty would do
@@IbeatGTO no one cares, this is not all about your supposed poker play
This is a gem 🍸🪩🎱🎸💎!
"Steve" might as well be "Nick" or "Alan"
lol, I see what you did there.
8:09 i got 9.1 for some reason not 8.1 but ill double check that.
This "Steve 25" sounds like Alan Keating
how did you calculate preflop ranges, afaik you still don't have preflop solver? ETA on preflop solver?
We have preflop solving available for heads up spots! Multiway pre and post is coming later.
Excited to watch this one
Keep it on the downlow but carrot corner is the best KZread channel right now for advanced poker content
@@GokuTheSuperSaiyan1 I love his content for the games he plays - one of my favorite channels
@@joeingram1Ay good stuff
@@GokuTheSuperSaiyan1 Carrot is good. I also recommend @hungryhorsepoker
tldr: people that overstab and bet too much, its best to play a x 100 oop, to x/r all in. good strategy at many low stakes games as well
a x 100? what does that mean?
@@kezman82a 'check 100% strategy'
@@kezman82acheck 100% when out of position regardless of holding or flop texture.
Amazing quality video. Thank you.
Nice explanation! What I don't understand is why not play 100% ICM from the get go, since that showed the best results?
Good luck at the series Espen! Hope you can find some peace of mind and get in a good grind mode.
What's the username of the LAG you're about to crush now? 😈
Stefan11222
Tiramisu1th
IBombItYouVomit
if you see someone wearing a gto hoodie at your table make sure your wallets big enough for the amount of cash its about to hold
I think this was the most dense in depth video I've ever seen. Lots of concepts to study more deeply. Very humbling to hear someone with such a deep understanding of the game. One question on the concept of stable/unstable equity: is that mostly driven by what hands we can valuebet on the river or also by the part of our range that likes betting 'unstable boards' because of added equity?
Who is this Video maker? So good! I like those words he use there like "PotShare" gives a lot of picture what u doing. And I super like at the end he said“good luck with ur grinding!”, yea! what r we doing its gringding +EV everyday.
The author is Tombos21 Glad you enjoyed the video!
@@GTOWizard I just read his reaserch( Visualizing the bunching effect），its so good, i can understand the process how he inferred it. the result doesnt matter, but how he inferred it , thats so important for me to understand the theory.
I always hated the math side of poker cause its really boring. To be honest, I have never known any of this stuf but I've been a winning poker player for over 20 years.