Пікірлер

• 
  @Helenar.R.Guimaraes2 күн бұрын

  Hello, I find your channel acidentally, searching for a old video of Wind Waker on KZread. Good to know that people still apreciating this amazing game. You dress like a character from a child book, what is amazing, have a wonderful day!

• 
  @jamesbowman6392 күн бұрын

  Jordan Peterson's lectures and frameworks have almost nothing to with Catholicism and Christianity. He just borrows from them to frame is own silly perspectives.

• 
  @KojimaMadeMeAComrade14 күн бұрын

  This clown wants Jordan to notice his clean room. Cute.

• 
  @alexneff23 күн бұрын

  Dose it have lesbian space witches? If not im not interested...

• 
  @profmccoige23 күн бұрын

  It (Legacy of the Force) has straight space witches...one of whom gets murdered in very significant plot development.

• 
  @legoinglegion45823 күн бұрын

  Hi, this is the first of your videos that I've stumbled upon, and I really enjoyed the message! I, like many have some "anxiety," as you put it, about whether X upcoming Star Wars story will be any good. But from what I've seen and heard in online discourse, I don't think I feel as intensely disappointed, angry, or even sometimes apathetic as many others do. When I see online comments that pronounce Star Wars dead in reaction to whatever the latest thing is, I sort of roll my eyes since we have over 45 years' worth of stories that generally are still accessible. Though I'm on the younger side and therefore have been discovering many of the pre-Disney EU stories for the first time in the last few years. Perhaps many of these people already read, watched, or played these stories when they came out, so they don't have the same novelty that they do for me, which makes it extra painful when the stories that should be novel end up being lackluster. On another note, it's so cool to hear someone talking more in-depth about individual an individual aspect of Legacy of the Force. I read that series last year, and really enjoyed it! Don't worry, it wasn't the first EU series I read. 😅 I read the Thrawn trilogy before LotF. Speaking of which, one of the concepts from that series, (specifically The Last Command) that I seems like someone of your background would have interesting things to say about it when Joruus C'baoth begins going all-out with his mind domination techniques. It was a year or two since I read it but the chapter about an Imperial Army officer's mind being controlled by and becoming dependent on the Dark Jedi was really interesting to me, in a creepy way of course. Related to that, I think in the first book Thrawn and C'baoth discuss their respective interpretations of "power" which was interesting. Do you plan on discussing any of these concepts?

• 
  @profmccoige23 күн бұрын

  I definitely will, especially the conceptions of power in the Thrawn trilogy, as well as Luke's self-doubt that leads him to being tricked by C'baoth. First though in this series I'll probably be talking about my favourite EU book, "I, Jedi" for a few videos, then probably a few things from the New Jedi Order series.

• 
  @mardy373225 күн бұрын

  In the star wars galaxy, technological progress has somewhat stagnated. It's an aspect of the worldbuilding that I really enjoy. We spend a lot of time in outer rim territories where resources are more scarce and it leads to most technology being reused or repurposed in some way. And it leads to a really interesting aesthetic, much different from the pristine and polish we typically associate with futuristic tech in fiction. It means that a several decades old droids like R2 and 3PO are still relevant. Space travel has existed in the same form for so long that it has become trivialized, and you can get your ship fixed in a local workshop with salvaged parts. Add the supernatural element of the force and it really does feel like a fantasy.

• 
  @catholicphoenix796925 күн бұрын

  Wholesome and cute.

• 
  @droe257026 күн бұрын

  Star Trek is fantasy, too. Sorry.

• 
  @djciregethigher27 күн бұрын

  Congrats!!!!

• 
  @cosmicnomad857527 күн бұрын

  Wasn’t able to make the stream last night but you make some great points

• 
  @ballisticus127 күн бұрын

  Star Wars, "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away" is classic fairy tale opening...

• 
  @BUY_YOUTUB_VIEWS_67428 күн бұрын

  I'm wathcing all your videos :D

• 
  @ThedisciplemikeАй бұрын

  Is there a place i can find your information so that we can correspond? This is precisly the topic and content ive been really focused on lately, and have written a couple papers on it

• 
  @ThedisciplemikeАй бұрын

  God bless you professor! Do you teach at a Catholic seminary? Id love to have one of your classes

• 
  @profmccoigeАй бұрын

  The best place to find me is in my Discord server, which is linked in the description of all of my livestreams. As for seminary classes, Saint Leo University is a small Benedictine college, which does have a theology program, but isn't a seminary per se.

• 
  @michaelsmith3069Ай бұрын

  Bro decide what you’re gonna say before you start recording and then start the video. And ungoliant is not the mother of all spiders. She assumes a spider form in early times and then when she flees morgoths balrogs she mates with the spiders she finds, and then kills them. Therefore spiders already existed. Therefore your conclusion is baseless.

• 
  @Catholic_skaldАй бұрын

  My boi

• 
  @Catholic_skald2 ай бұрын

  Use save states in addition to manual saves!

• 
  @offthematrix53102 ай бұрын

  Thanks, I wasn't aware the Lewis recognized the significance of technique. It was Ellul's main focus.

• 
  @cherrycolteryahn57272 ай бұрын

  oh

• 
  @BUY_YOUTUB_VIEWS_d0dd1153 ай бұрын

  I can't get over how seamlessly this video blends entertainment and education.

• 
  @timadamson33783 ай бұрын

  Nope. Families exist prior to those born into them. So do communities. Your premise is simply arbitrary.

• 
  @slaughterbottle693 ай бұрын

  I also wonder if there’s any reason for the Song of Healing being used for both its own purpose and for the clock tower and Happy Mask Salesman’s theme. I always thought they seemed decently unrelated other than the fact that he gives you the song, and I don’t know how to parse the difference in all honesty. Part of me wants to chalk it up to a somewhat shoehorned motif due to time restraint.

• 
  @slaughterbottle693 ай бұрын

  20:08 I do wonder if that has to do with the specific major. Philosophy really seems like the kind of major most people there either wanted to do or were pushed to do.

• 
  @EMlNENCJA3 ай бұрын

  AI’s are plants confirmed. … Or a sort of ultimate „anti-centrist” types of beings: both extremes with no middle: Cuz they grow and reason.

• 
  @williambranch42834 ай бұрын

  Peterson isn't actually Christian. He sees psychological utility in having based beliefs not based on Dr Who etc.

• 
  @koffeeblack57174 ай бұрын

  Not sure I can follow you here. Yes, there is a sense in which a nation only exists in mente (which is not nonexistence per se but a mode of existence, i.e. intentional existence). But a nation can also be thought of as relations. And to use the family example, you, as an individual, are in some sense constituted by your relationships. If you were to "delete" my brother from existence, a part of who I am would be gone. I am made up of those relationships of love that I have. This is a web conception of personhood where each node or cross section is the person who exists in real relations with other persons. This also allows us to understand the mystery of living in the body of Christ (where we are each members of a greater whole- standing in real relationships) and The Trinity (where the ceiling of reality, as it were, just is persons who are their subsistent relations of love to each other). I doubt one can really understand contemplative or mystical realities unless this is appreciated. Reality is trans-individual in an important sense, or at least trans-individual if individuality is conceived as otherwise than being constituted by subsistent relationality.

• 
  @scottrgood4 ай бұрын

  I’ve been waiting for someone to methodically document every detail. Looks sweet.

• 
  @bazemore12344 ай бұрын

  It was an elseworld's story, but Superman: Secret Identity is an excellent example. Also, in 2002, there was an episode(s) of the Justice League cartoon "Legends"

• 
  @profmccoige4 ай бұрын

  Oh, I LOVE Secret Identity! Excellent example!

• 
  @bazemore12344 ай бұрын

  @profmccoige It's such a shame so many people don't understand his story: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dKKbxa6nfL3NcZs.htmlsi=7p27wRw42tDFG20H

• 
  @danielleach94324 ай бұрын

  Maybe I'm overthinking? Isn't it the problem of sandwich one of senescence? Even if one cared enough to refrigerate or freeze, there's no way that a sandwich will last. Even rocks disintegrate and become something else. I now know that Being and Goodness are transcendentals, synonymous with Metaphysics and Ethics, and are likened as one, according to the Scholastics. Thank you.

• 
  @NicholasSinard4 ай бұрын

  Mental models, i.e. ways of thinking, are so heavily influenced by narratives, and this meta trope in stories helps to illustrate it so well. No surprise this trope is so powerful

• 
  @Augnatius4 ай бұрын

  I always find it funny when lefties realize that Pope Francis is Catholic. They believed their own propaganda about him that they get "screwed over" when the Pope says something in accordance with Christianity.

• 
  @nicodemous524 ай бұрын

  I don't remember the book off the top of my head. But not so long ago I read a moral philosophy book that in the introduction the author was saying how any modern philosophy student should be able to hold their own in a debate with and preceded to list off some of the greatest philosophical minds in history. That book was exactly what I expected from it after reading that. Complete and utter crap.

• 
  @profmccoige4 ай бұрын

  In my experience, most modern philosophy students have enough trouble understanding premodern philosophers, let alone debating them and their ideas.

• 
  @nicodemous524 ай бұрын

  Anybody remember when Wisecrack was, Thug Notes? That's what it started as, channel name and all. The rebranded after a year or two and made that a show rather than the whole channel.

• 
  @Jacobp-li9fi4 ай бұрын

  Wisecrack is just a bunch of leftists

• 
  @sellicott4 ай бұрын

  Thank you for suffering through this so that I didn't have to tear my hair out by myself. Blessings from a Presbyterian brother in Christ.

• 
  @GobbleGobble5714 ай бұрын

  Is this guy a real professor? I'd love to take a class

• 
  @profmccoige4 ай бұрын

  Yes! Though I don't usually teach online, but if you're genuinely interested in taking a college class or transferring, DM me somewhere (X or FB).

• 
  @narendrasomawat59784 ай бұрын

  Wisecracks is a leftist propagandist channel. He just wants repotition destruction of jp or Christianity.

• 
  @artemisspawnofzeus77324 ай бұрын

  You should really let the beginning of the video play for a bit before you start debunking it. Like, the introduction doesnt really need to be debunked, nothing wrong was said. Jordan peterson HAS been talking more about roman catholocism lately. Like, context needs to be given and that all that videos do at the beginning. Let like, 90 to 120 seconds of the video play before you start debunking. Then you can do the debunking after each point 5 second pauses cause it makes sense but like, why are we pausing every half second as wisecrack just introduces who JP is? Like, even if they dont do thr most honest job of portaying who he is, its not like he needs an introduction to anyone in your audience. Wisecrack can say whatever they want about unrelated JP facts, like his fight with the canadian government and his intellectual past. You need to get to the meat. Its a 2 hour breakdown you can afford to let the intro be an intro rather than brutalizing it beyond recognition.

• 
  @Thedisciplemike4 ай бұрын

  Good to see you professor!

• 
  @donkeyparadise92764 ай бұрын

  Cool video. There is no such thing as left and right btw

• 
  @Thedisciplemike4 ай бұрын

  Lol what

• 
  @lilxyo4 ай бұрын

  are you dumb or do you just not look stuff up?

• 
  @nicodemous524 ай бұрын

  There is also no such thing as time, or gravity. I fail to see the point.

• 
  @user-xt4xu7mr1j4 ай бұрын

  THANK YOU! THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! I was pulling my hair out watching that video

• 
  @treakfly4 ай бұрын

  Indeed so glad he made this

• 
  @lunarlad80754 ай бұрын

  going to watch the rest of this later, but I'm Glad I found a Catholic response to this terribly uninformed video by wisecrack.

• 
  @lonely-lo11534 ай бұрын

  In general when you realize what Jordan is saying, it’s a whole shrooms trip. Pick your shit off the floor and make something of yourself. No one’s gonna do it for you

• 
  @Thedisciplemike4 ай бұрын

  That doesnt sound like a "shroom trip"

• 
  @bobby-and2crows4 ай бұрын

  You really are 1 in million

• 
  @treakfly4 ай бұрын

  you should read maps of meaning and understand that it IS quite a shroom trip

• 
  @cosmicnomad85754 ай бұрын

  This is really cool, I never really thought about correlating models of Divine Causality to fiction writing like this! It makes sense though

• 
  @YanPagh4 ай бұрын

  Religion and ideology suck. We need none of these abhorrent divisive behaviourisms.

• 
  @catholicphoenix79694 ай бұрын

  This is the Billionth time that you've WREKT WiseCrack. Do you ever get bored of this?

• 
  @profmccoige4 ай бұрын

  Bored? No. Frustrated? Yes. But I do it anyway.

• 
  @twinkie26754 ай бұрын

  Commenting to feed the algorithm

• 
  @benabaxter4 ай бұрын

  Do families exist? I saw that in the longer version of this clip you were clear that the church was an exception to this rule about groups and individuals. However, one of the critiques he levies is that liberalism can't make sense of children. I forgot if you got to that, or if he mentioned that in the interview clip.

• 
  @profmccoige4 ай бұрын

  I didn't address it directly, no, but I would have to think that they similarly do not exist as such, but only as either useful conceptual frameworks, or as a sort of Cambridge quality of the family members.

• 
  @benabaxter4 ай бұрын

  I finished watching this, and I've watched a number of other things with Andrew Jones. I think it would be helpful to look at his podcast series on tyranny. If memory serves, his definition is rule by self-interest. He is, I believe, aware of some of the scholastic issues at root in liberalism. I don't think he treats of scholasticism as an unqualified good, or of the medieval scholastic conclusions---later in the interview with Matt Fradd he went on to say that Christendom did this to itself. In general, many of the critiques you have which most landed or seemed to land against this interview clip did not, I believe, do so, not against the more robust articulations of his thought. Finally, I don't think it matters what liberal philosophy states if what it states is contrary to our experience of liberalism. He is critiquing what is happening now and, while his claims tend to be more structural than material, they are grounded in and persuasive because they are very descriptive of what is going on in the current liberal orders.

• 
  @benabaxter4 ай бұрын

  Andrew Jones makes the case elsewhere that when the Magisterium speaks of liberalism, it means capitalism. This is to my mind a plausible read of Rerum Novarum.