Пікірлер

• 
  @GregVillegas-c2d24 күн бұрын

  Hi Marlon, Is there a way to use the combine command with an imported *.STL from a 3d scan that was converted to a mesh body (mesh brep body) and a classic brep body, solidworks extrution, with the main body the classic brep solidworks extrution and the body to subtract the 3d scan converted to mesh body (mesh brep body)? I saw you do it in reverse on the vid but I need the classic brep be the main body. I need the negative of the scan. I used the intersect command after I converted the classic brep to a mesh body. But can't manipulate the converted classic brep converted to a mesh body as good a the classic brep. Thank you Marlon. I'm new to surfacing but have been using solidworks since 1998 using version 1998 -Greg

• 
  @mbanta24 күн бұрын

  Greg, Thank you for question and thank you for watching my video. It is possible to subtract a mesh brep body from a classic brep body using the combine command (with the classic brep body the main body). When you say "3d scan converted to a mesh body" you mean *.stl file imported then converted to a mesh brep body and not a graphics body, correct? Please see the first video for the definition of these body types. It is not possible to subtract a graphics body from a classic brep body. Note you must be using SOLIDWORKS 2022 or later for hybrid mesh bodies.

• 
  @GregVillegas-c2d24 күн бұрын

  I opened the 3d scan (*.stl) with (all files) using open and it came in as (Graphic1) in the feature tree. Not (Mesh1) in the feature tree. Then used the convert to mesh command. I think that means its then becomes a Mesh brep body. When I tried to use combine it was greyed out. Also, when you open as (all files) It comes in as (Graphic1) in the tree and most of the Scan to 3d commands wizards are greyed out. If you open with (Scan to 3d) file types, the (*.stl) comes in as a (Mesh1) in the tree and the Scan to 3d command wizards are not greyed out. Do I have to use the convert to mesh with a (Mesh1) from the tree and not the (Graphic1) from the tree? -Thank You, greg (using Solidworks Pro 2024) It won't let me pick (Mesh1) in the tree when using the convert to mesh command. would holes in the mesh brep body not allow a combine command? The vertex ribs are all grey and not black on my 3d scan so it is a Mesh brep body but combine still wont work. My graphic body is open. Your graphic body is closed in part 2. I couldn't reach some deep slots with the scanner. large gapping open areas in the 3d scan/mesh. I'm hoping that's why it wont combine. I'm going to try and rescan to make it closed. If that's what it means by being (open) Thanks again Marlon!

• 
  @mbanta24 күн бұрын

  @@GregVillegas-c2d Please disable the Scan to 3D add-in. The mesh functionality in core SOLIDWORKS is independent of Scan to 3D. A mesh brep body is not that same as the "mesh" body generated in Scan to 3D. Once imported the graphics body should be converted to a mesh brep body. Please review the mesh modeling videos to learn about the three body types (graphics body, mesh brep and classic brep) and how to convert to mesh brep.

• 
  @gv831624 күн бұрын

  I watched your vid 1... 3 or 4 times and paused it on the 3 different Brep bodies and read it. I'm familiar with it now. Solidworks is not allowing the combine with an open mesh? Or its because I opened the STL with scan to 3d plug in on? Thank you very much Marlon! I've been trying all week to do that one command. I thought Solidworks would be able to do it. 2024 Solidworks Pro...All you have to do is open the file. Not import. I dont remember how it went with the other revisions. Im greg v not at work.

• 
  @user-el1jb4gj9sАй бұрын

  good

• 
  @mbantaАй бұрын

  I am glad you found it useful. Thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @raviwagh767Ай бұрын

  THANKS

• 
  @mbantaАй бұрын

  ...and thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @_NordforsАй бұрын

  Had similar experience with Zamberlan’s. Local Cobblers won’t touch them.

• 
  @mbantaАй бұрын

  It does seem to be a niche service provided by only a few vetted cobblers. Thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @terryfreedom97422 ай бұрын

  This is the worst feature ever added. so much for hitting tab to move from one cell to the next. I never use this and now it forces me to mouse click on each cell separately rather than just tabbing down the list. I have a drawing template that uses custom properties to fill out and it has 40 fields! this is a freaking joke.

• 
  @julianparks84853 ай бұрын

  Of course, it is a Asolo. I had two pairs do this. None of my other boots did this-Vasque, Garmot, Merrell, LLBean. Ridiculous considering the price.

• 
  @mbanta3 ай бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video. Other than this issue, I really like my Asolo boots but maybe I will give one of these other brands a try.

• 
  @paulwellard42063 ай бұрын

  excellent and informative video. Am weighing up to repair (250 euros ) or buy new. Paid 360 euros new. ??

• 
  @mbanta3 ай бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video. I can say that my repaired boots are still holding up well after all this time. That does seem an expensive repair though.

• 
  @garethlewis37433 ай бұрын

  Grass fed cows are carbon neutral.

• 
  @ivanloewen3 ай бұрын

  Hey Marlon, thanks for this extremely helpful presentation, part 1 and 2. I will definitely recommend this to my user group.

• 
  @mbanta3 ай бұрын

  Ivan thanks so much for watching my videos. I am happy to hear that you will recommend them to members of your user group.

• 
  @user-wm8dr8nl9z4 ай бұрын

  That's all well and good if you use this option, but it stops me from moving about the properties using the keyboard, which is really annoying. How is this feature turned off.

• 
  @kevinme98464 ай бұрын

  i agree, this feature is very annoying. there should be a way to disable this drop down. what normally takes the arrow keys to move from one row to the next, is now replaced with constant mouse clicking to jump one row down. i cant even tab through either. awful feature for me.

• 
  @BrianZias4 ай бұрын

  Can’t believe I am just seeing this in my feed

• 
  @HenrikvonMartensHvM4 ай бұрын

  Great explanation of a complex matter!

• 
  @mbanta4 ай бұрын

  Thanks for watching my video.

• 
  @betinhocr5 ай бұрын

  2024 somente?

• 
  @Simon_Rafferty5 ай бұрын

  Thank you for this. It's the first time I've had to deal with meshes in 20 years of SW & the video has helped a lot!

• 
  @mbanta5 ай бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video I am glad it is helpful.

• 
  @pydron6 ай бұрын

  I can't believe that this is only just now coming to SW 2024.

• 
  @frittenpeter6 ай бұрын

  does the comparison depend on the precision of colocation?

• 
  @mbanta6 ай бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video. The answer to your question is yes, the two bodies must be co-located. This is usually the case when you are building classic brep geometry referencing a mesh. Highly recommend view the following videos to learn more about the advanced mesh modeling capabilities in SOLIDWORKS: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g2ismc6LeNHco9Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/dHmKy7WsdJngo9I.html

• 
  @frittenpeter6 ай бұрын

  @@mbanta thank you for your reply, I have a SW part which gets exported as .stl and modified/ remeshed in another software, now I would like to compare the original brep part with the modified .stl and was thinking on using an assembly. I convert the graphics body into a sw mesh body but assembly mates do not work to co-locate the 2 bodys...any advice on how to proceed?

• 
  @mbanta6 ай бұрын

  @@frittenpeter if you watch my other videos on mesh modeling in SOLIDWORKS you can see how geometry can be added to the mesh. Adding sketch geometry and reference geomety is one way to add references that can be used to create assembly mates. My mesh modeling videos are: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g2ismc6LeNHco9Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/dHmKy7WsdJngo9I.html

• 
  @mountainman386 ай бұрын

  This is a really clear and helpful explanation of the body compare feature. I was struggling to figure it out, but with the help of your video I can now use this excellent tool! Thanks.

• 
  @mbanta6 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your comment, I am happy that my video was helpful. And, of course, thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @ootek777 ай бұрын

  introducing? it existed prior to 2023. why was it removed in the first place?

• 
  @dah24376 ай бұрын

  Mine doesn't give this option in 2022 or 2023

• 
  @ootek776 ай бұрын

  @@dah2437 it did in 2021 and prior

• 
  @oscarread52057 ай бұрын

  You’re a legend, I was just looking into getting some boots resoled. This video helped me make the decision. Thanks from Australia 👍

• 
  @mbanta7 ай бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video and for your comment. Those boots have taken me all over the beautiful country of Australia.

• 
  @MovieGenius8 ай бұрын

  I enjoyed the text during the video talking about the history of the song and of this recording. Great work!

• 
  @MovieGenius8 ай бұрын

  Wow! That was awesome!

• 
  @BadBoyFL8 ай бұрын

  Did you identify and fixed it?

• 
  @beestingza8 ай бұрын

  Doesn't Asolo have a repair service also? They probably use the original sole and midsole material so I don't know if that's a plus or not, considering how many people I've heard say Asolo's degrade faster than other brands. Perhaps a vibram repair at an independent shop will last longer.

• 
  @user-vl8dy1os6r8 ай бұрын

  Please help me with application in MBD

• 
  @joelsandoval14079 ай бұрын

  Are you familiar with the bad reputation of this company? Look it up. I bought a pair of ASOLO Power Matic 200 GV EVO worth $400 dollars,.. I figured they are top of the line hiking shoes right! Couldn't be so wrong. The worst boots I've have ever got by far. Soles came off completely "literately" after 5 to 6 wears. I actually saw the sole disintegrate as I walked. The middle of the soles were some type of granulated plastic, that just came off, like eraser sore of material, also the frame side of the soles were braking in to pieces, I've never seen anything like it. Had to use a Mcgaver trick. Good thing we were close to go to the truck and Duc-Tape the shoes to the soles. It ruined the hole trip for me, Long story short... I did contact The company's Cus Serv. The Company will not honor the warranty because had the shoes about 3 years but as I mention, I used the only for a hand full of times. They gave me all kinds of garbage explanations why the soles came off so they wouldn't take care of their peace of garbage shoes. Shame on them, they wanted over $200 dollars to Re-sole the shoes. Never again ASOLO Piece of garbage company. They are Greedy and shameless 👎

• 
  @HopeScreen10 ай бұрын

  one thing. How would i know that the scanned part is at how much distance from the reference planes as the surfaces are not selectable

• 
  @mbanta10 ай бұрын

  If the scanned part is a mesh (as opposed to a point cloud) you actually can measure to mesh facets, fins and vertices. You can also use these to create a reference plane from which you can measure. I would recommend watching these two videos on the powerful mesh functionality in SOLIDWORKS to become more familiar how to work with mesh geometry in SOLIDWORKS: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g2ismc6LeNHco9Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/dHmKy7WsdJngo9I.html

• 
  @karbonfx10 ай бұрын

  nice

• 
  @rodorozco945311 ай бұрын

  Excellent video. Congratulations! One question: Did the repair job include a midsole? I ask that because I have seen several videos where they are repairing a pair of boots because the hydrolysis basically destroyed the midsoles and I noticed that they remove the residual polyurethane and glue the "clean" upper part of the boot to a naked rubber outsole without any midsole. In case they did not add a new midsole, have you noticed any change in how comfortable are your boots after the repair job? Are they as comfortable as they used to be before?

• 
  @mbanta11 ай бұрын

  I would say that the repaired boots are holding up well since they were repaired. I would also say that I do notice a slight difference between the repaired boots and the original, in that the original seemed a little softer when I stepped on a hard surface... when I am paying attention. However, I have been on long hikes with the repaired boots and they have felt fine. I believe the new soles are Vibram Bifida 1375. They don't have a midsole but as i understand it they come in either a single hardness or dual hardness (hard outer sole, softer where the boot is glued to the sole). This dual hardness is, I believe, meant to compensate for the lack of a midsole. Given the communication I enjoyed with Dave Page Cobbler, I bet they would happily communicate with you about these concerns.

• 
  @beestingza8 ай бұрын

  Excellent question. I am currently considering getting my Asolos resoled using their service in Italy. I assume that they put a new midsole on the shoe, but who knows.

• 
  @Jerseyhighlander Жыл бұрын

  That happens because they are cheap crap made with modern high production, don't give a crap about quality, methods that were never intended to have any level of longevity. Boots with glued on soles and plastic was among the stupidest ideas anyone in the industry ever had. The use of Gortex being another. Traditional leather boots with Norwegian Welt Soles will outlast them by orders of magnitude. And the manufacturers aren't even surprised that when wearing them outside, in the woods, they could actually somehow get, wet... Asolo must have a different kind of "outdoors" than the rest of us.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  First thank you for watching my video. I will have to check out boots with Norwegian Welt Soles. I will say that my repaired boots are still holding up really well since I got them in April 2022.

• 
  @Vivinnn_ Жыл бұрын

  Thanks a lot for the very thorough analysis!

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video

• 
  @TheShokida Жыл бұрын

  Nice Video! You do a very good job of explaining what a polymer is? and the hydrolysis of polyurethane.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for your comment and thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @user-ss2qi9jy7k Жыл бұрын

  Hi Marlon, do you have any tips or ideas how to patch a surfaces like stone

• 
  @jorgegranda01 Жыл бұрын

  What year version are the models? I am trying to open and it say: Cannot open. Future version.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  They are saved to SOLIDWORKS 2023. Note that you can add a column to windows explorer that indicates the last version to which a file has been saved ( see www.javelin-tech.com/blog/2019/07/display-solidworks-file-version-in-windows-explorer/ ).

• 
  @lukefortune9112 Жыл бұрын

  For some reason the recycled content does not seem save its value. Any idea how to fix this?

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Can you clarify, are you referring to the recycled content for a material or the % recycled as an end of life process?

• 
  @priyankakanherkar8918 Жыл бұрын

  Great information and very helpful video :) explanation on point. Thanks!

• 
  @isaeljosafatmartinezclavel5283 Жыл бұрын

  Great presentation. Just what I need right now.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for your kind words and for watching my video. Note that I have a fully updated set of tutorials on mesh modeling in SOLIDWORKS on this channel. The two videos are: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g2ismc6LeNHco9Y.html and kzread.info/dash/bejne/dHmKy7WsdJngo9I.html

• 
  @locatingyourself Жыл бұрын

  💐

• 
  @movielover8548 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @mauriciobailey4725 Жыл бұрын

  How can you add a new printer to the list?

• 
  @trexinvert Жыл бұрын

  Is there a way to turn off all these "mesh points" so that I can place lines without "sticking" to those points?

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  you should be able to control the snapping to mesh vertices with the following system option: Tools -> Options -> System Options -> Sketch -> Relations/Snaps -> Snap to endpoints... This applies for all body types. The reason it is more noticeable on mesh based geometry is because there are a large number of facets in a faceted model, each with three vertices. Thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @fernandoarosa Жыл бұрын

  My mesh file presents "topological errors". How I can fix?

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Mesh files have the same watertight/manifold rules as SOLIDWORKS solid body geometry. This is especially true when you attempt to convert a graphics body to a mesh brep body. As a graphics body the tools in SOLIDWORKS allow you to remove offending facets in different ways. This can resolve overlapping and intersecting facet issues. If the removed facets present a problem you can fill the hole by converting to mesh brep and using something like delete hole or other features to fill in the hole. In SOLIDWORKS 2022 or beyond this may create a hybrid mesh body. Note that there are also many free mesh editing tools available for download that have automated tools for cleaning up the mesh. The issue with these is that the run an algorithm for which you may have little control so the result may not always be what you want. Thanks for watching my video.

• 
  @fernandoarosa Жыл бұрын

  @@mbanta excelent!!! Thanks Marlon. Your videos is very good. ✌🏻

• 
  @Chopinetto Жыл бұрын

  Great video. Thanks. Just a question. How long were you wearing those boots until got the delamination issue?

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  I think about ten years. But depending on the exposure to water and amount of usage it can be a much shorter interval of time. The replacement soles are still holding up well.

• 
  @trexinvert Жыл бұрын

  Geeze. This is basically re-modeling a triangular "fractured" surface. I will gladly pay the scanning service to do this so I get a "real" solidworks SOLID. However, you need to know some basic surfacing commands, which most SW users do not know. Good thing I have reviewed and applied. To clarify the term "re-engineering" = redrawing the "fractured/mesh surface" → "finite surface" →solid geometry. Also, that [Surface from Mesh] →"FACETS" command uses "calculate" as both a selection filter and a "group selection" command. So, then you basically just blindly "drop the tolerance" and "click calculate" to grab a massive amount of fractured surfaces to turn them into a single surface. An "alternative" is to grab select points and "geometry fit" a rectangular surface, circle, cylinder wall,...etc. Assuming, that a uniform shape was scanned. Thanks for the video series.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you very much for watching my video. I also greatly appreciate the feedback you have provided and would welcome the opportunity to speak with you to better understand your ideas. One thing I would say is that not all users have the ability to work with a scanning service. I would also say that with the hybrid mesh and mesh brep tools we provide, getting a "real" solid is often not even be required. This can save users quite a bit of time and resources while still allowing them to reference and incorporate mesh geometry in their models. The second mesh video in the series discusses this in more detail.

• 
  @alexandergreat574 Жыл бұрын

  Excellent video thank you, I wonder if you had any talks with the cobbler about reusing the same outsole and repairing the midsole? My boots are from the 90's and the outsole still in great conditions, more so the treat design is also very unique and I don't like the idea of new outsoles.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video and for your comments. I did not talk with the cobbler about replacing only the midsole. That is an interesting suggestion but in my case my original heel was wearing down. The repaired shoe has a sole that is a single piece as opposed to a midsole adhered to an outsole. They still working great.

• 
  @alexandergreat574 Жыл бұрын

  @@mbanta I appreciate the info, cheers!

• 
  @rdzotz Жыл бұрын

  Love the depth of detail in that beauty!

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for your nice comment and thank you for watching my video.

• 
  @billgreen576 Жыл бұрын

  Very helpful. Thank you.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for watching my video. Glad it was helpful.

• 
  @hananabdo3216 Жыл бұрын

  Hello sir, When i decimate graphic body and convert it to mesh an error happen It convert to gray color but with mistakes and Warning message ,,A facet normal problem was found with one of the facets in the file .please check the stl file,, Is that happen because of large number of facets 800000? Thanks in advance.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  This is one of those cases where your reseller would be best to address this by reviewing the model. That being said, 800,000 facets is not such a large number of facets. Also consider decimating in steps. i.e. if you want to get down to 400,000 facets consider multiple decimation steps where you reduce the facet count by a number less than your target reduction amount. i.e. perhaps consider two steps of 200k facet reduction or three steps of 133k facet reduction.

• 
  @hananabdo3216 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you so much for your replying I really learned a lot from your videos ,thanks for your help

• 
  @jeremyregnerus4681 Жыл бұрын

  Hi Marlon, do you have any tips or ideas when a Graphics Body doesn't property convert to a Mesh Body? I have some stls, that are leaving a lot of holes in the surfaces when I try to convert them, but they look file when they are imported as graphics bodies.

• 
  @mbanta Жыл бұрын

  Hmmm... without seeing the files you are importing I can only speculate that though the graphics bodies appear correct when imported into SOLIDWORKS as a graphics body there is a condition within the mesh that is causing the holes when the more stringent requirements for a mesh brep body are applied during conversion. In the past I have seen this sort of thing when converting to a mesh brep body when the original mesh has co-located or overlapping facets and also when the original mesh has disjointed facets (facets that appear to share an edge but don't). A google search for "mesh errors" will show many results that give explanations and examples of overlapping facets and disjointed facets. Disjointed faces in SOLIDWORKS are easy to spot because we color the edges of the face blue. You see this blue color when the mesh body is converted to mesh brep as well. Sometimes delete hole can be used to fill fully bounded holes in a mesh brep surface body. Hope this helps. Good to hear from you Jeremy!

• 
  @WaterFilterLady Жыл бұрын

  I searched for and watched the video to find out how to repair them nyself. I want to avoid paying $150 to have a pair of boots repaired. I have had this happen to two pairs of Asolo boots but never with any others. It recently happened with a pair of Asolos that were almost "like new" as they have gotten less than 60 days of wear. It was rather humid this summer, though and they were in the house. I think I will avoid Asolos in the future.

• 
  @mortonbeard2240 Жыл бұрын

  I like fixing and maintaining my own shoes also. Had to give up on my ASOLO's. Might try the cobbler he used.

• 
  @beestingza8 ай бұрын

  @@mortonbeard2240You had to give up on trying to repair them yourself? I was considering trying to use "Shoe Goo" to rebuild the midsole and attach the sole to the boot, but it will probably be a mess and might even ruin the shoe for future resoling attempts.

• 
  @sear9993 Жыл бұрын

  My Render Layers node doesn't have the depth option. How do I fix this?