Extreme capitalism. I voted for Trump in 2020. I’m voting for Biden in 2024 since Trump’s gotten too extreme for me and Nikki Haley suspended her campaign.
@strega20614 күн бұрын
thats what happens when trump is president
@a.rus1k27 күн бұрын
he cheated abbott, after all this, he actually has $1.46 coming to him
@jeffblanton388328 күн бұрын
Hey Abbott butt
@rayb.1180Ай бұрын
Abbott didn’t wanna pay him $1 a day ($365) cause Lou didn’t work 24hrs,half a day on Saturday, and no work on Sunday. Lou only worked 8hrs a day, but Bud took out $1 a day ($14) for his 2 week vacation 😂😂
@alejandrinasamilpazamarrip19032 ай бұрын
Genial! 👌🏼
@leonwinchester98652 ай бұрын
It's great to see that wages haven't gone up since then.
@evanwesolowski75562 ай бұрын
A joke then, but reality now
@dariowiter30783 ай бұрын
The American tax system at work.....Abbott & Costello style! 💲💲💲💲💲 💸💸💸💸💸 😝😝😝😝😝
@mikedownes47823 ай бұрын
My two favourite parts are when Lou says "24 Hours in a day, except February" and when Bud says at the end "Fine time to take a nap!" 🤣
@seminole6763 ай бұрын
So now I know where we ve got fucking coming from
@brianwhite34283 ай бұрын
That sounds like Joe Biden in charge of the Country
@captain_black324 ай бұрын
The deduction for the lunch break was the most brutal 😂
@BlueFieldGamer5 ай бұрын
Tax cut in a paycheck be like
@gregberzinski7 ай бұрын
this is how the IRS operates
@ianlove12158 ай бұрын
He over charges him for lunch. Says it’s 365 days when he has already deducted Sunday when he doesn’t work as well as others.
@rougn4 ай бұрын
That's the joke....
@user-yg1rh3og2q4 ай бұрын
Why over analyze the joke? just enjoy the genius of these two greats
@teemuleppa33473 ай бұрын
over charges him for lunch???? so everything else was solid? dude....
@zacharynunley9677 Жыл бұрын
Why does this actually seem realistic? Rather close to home I’d say
@alejandrinasamilpazamarrip1903 Жыл бұрын
🤭 jejeje
@alejandrinasamilpazamarrip1903 Жыл бұрын
Half-blood prince muy buena escena 😁👌🏼
@MW-rq5uc Жыл бұрын
These were two of the funniest guys I have ever seen.
@ashleyhamonslofton3684 Жыл бұрын
We t43⁴2tj tdd u
@markenglish8082 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what the IRS does to everyone on 4-15 of every year.
@develynseether4426 Жыл бұрын
Every country has the IRS huh?
@envadeh Жыл бұрын
This is what your boss does
@dariowiter3078 Жыл бұрын
Pretty much since 1914, one year after U.S. Constitution was amended to include the income tax, unfortunately. 😒😒😒😒😒
@elideaver Жыл бұрын
lol
@Earthlovergod2 жыл бұрын
If I get some of it I’ll be lucky.
@mr.skeptical30712 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately this is exactly how most corporations are!!!!!
@jimhiggins14752 жыл бұрын
This is the kind of logic the Gov't uses, to take more money out of people's paychecks
@envadeh Жыл бұрын
Dumb mother fucker this is how your employer treats you
@nickkil35812 жыл бұрын
There is 24hrs in a day, all but February that has 28… 😂😂😂😂 didn’t know that February has 28 hours in a day, my watch must have been missing some hours every February month!!! Castello my guy!!!😂😂
@dariowiter30786 ай бұрын
😝😝😝😝😝
@chucksneed64402 жыл бұрын
That was incredibly jewish.
@nicholasrevill66102 жыл бұрын
What?
@chucksneed64402 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasrevill6610 He was trying to con him out of money using clever tricks, it was very jewish like of him.
@nicholasrevill66102 жыл бұрын
@@chucksneed6440 explain how this isn’t antisemitism
@chucksneed64402 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasrevill6610 It's not antisemitism, it's very very semitic. That's my whole point.
@GenocideLv2 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasrevill6610 explain how that makes it more or less true or funny. Nobody CARES you karen. Act a certain way and you will be treated a certain way
@canofsouls29172 жыл бұрын
No 366
@madeline_from_celeste_real Жыл бұрын
im gonna assume youre in first grade
@-You-Tube-2 жыл бұрын
Comment #365
@grobin37452 жыл бұрын
A fantastic skit in this early movie, with Abbott and Costello as supporting cast members.
@christianbarrett30402 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a typical capitalist finding a way to screw workers out of the wealth they created
@grobin37452 жыл бұрын
Workers don't create wealth. They trade the possibility of success via entrepreneurship, in return for a steady paycheck. Don't fool yourself, and stop trying to fool others.
@transformerreal25242 жыл бұрын
@@grobin3745 go outside
@christianbarrett30402 жыл бұрын
@@grobin3745 You seem to be the one fooled. Wealth is generated by the labor provided by workers. Specifically the worker provides a service or transforms materials into a good. These are then sold for some amount of wealth. Under a capitalist system the amount of wealth the good or service is sold for is increased above cost to produce a profit. Further under capitalism that profit is increased by cutting input costs by numerous means, including reducing the pay of the worker that did the labor in the first place. I will also point out that the entire premise of your explanation already backs up the premise of what I am saying by implicitly acknowledging that the worker has done something to generate wealth which is used in part to pay them a pay check. Please don't delude yourself in others into thinking that workers don't do anything, when instead it is the capitalist that isn't doing anything beyond the initial setup and acquisition of resources.
@aarontheperson68672 жыл бұрын
@@grobin3745 you are lame and wrong
@compfox2 жыл бұрын
@@grobin3745 So you think money creates wealth in itself?
@jonathanswift22512 жыл бұрын
1940 was the debut year of A&C, but it was also a year when the Marx Bros, The Three Stooges, Laurel & Hardy and even Charlie Chaplin were all making films still.
@Selrisitai4 ай бұрын
You mean in film.
@jonathanswift22514 ай бұрын
@@Selrisitai Appearing in films.
@no.62692 жыл бұрын
Getting a dollar a year is a hilarious premise all by itself.
@neilgerace3552 жыл бұрын
FDR had a whole bunch of "dollar-a-year men" ... They helped the USA win the Pacific War.
@develynseether4426 Жыл бұрын
That's 35p in British money back then. That's the equivalent of 4 weeks pay in the year 1300 for a labourer so god knows if there was ever a time someone was paid the equivalent of 1 dollar for a whole years work.
@thestime2 жыл бұрын
Great old comedy skit! Please read all the comments below by all the goofballs who failed to enjoy it for what it was and ruin it by crunching numbers. Get a life, and a sense of humor people!!
@saionteller94272 жыл бұрын
It's still an enjoyable scene when we know what he is owed and sees how confused he got as well we were when summing up the answer we thought😅
@akrenwinkle2 жыл бұрын
I never accuse anyone of having no sense of humor. I've been accused myself, and it's always by those who aren't exactly a barrel of laughs. It's all subjective.
@Official_Happy_2 жыл бұрын
He get's 1 dollar for working 1 day, which is 8 hours, but that irrelevant. What matters is he worked those days, so he instantly is owed 287 (including Saturday what has been halved in value). He took 14 days off so now he is owed 273. Now he loses 1/8 of the dollar because of his 1 hour break. That means 1/8 of 273. That is -34 which means he is owed 239. He had 13 days in holidays so thats another -13. That means in total he is owed $226.
@cosmologicalturtle95282 жыл бұрын
Well, if he gets paid by the day and he’s allowed a lunch break in on his working days then he shouldn’t lose 1/8 of the dollar
@tonybarfridge43692 жыл бұрын
lunch breaks are not deducted, there is an extra hour worked. Saturdays are overtime, and public holidays must be paid. Pay is for hours worked, not for 24 divided by 3. He is deducting time which is not included in the pay day
@Official_Happy_2 жыл бұрын
@@tonybarfridge4369 He clearly stated that he will take that 1 hour away, and for paid holidays I do not know about as I don't work, but even so, that is still the correct answer compared to people starting from $121
@tonybarfridge43692 жыл бұрын
@@Official_Happy_ nobody is paid $1 a day, and then take away 2/3. It was his scam
@parsatayebi76522 жыл бұрын
Haha that's funny how the math is so wrong. They should make a world-renown comedy skit out of it or something...
@DerBingle12 жыл бұрын
Dig Lou's "Mister B" collar
@oscargill4232 жыл бұрын
Alright, breakdown time (this is too sly not to be exposed): _Quick note before we begin: Some comments have pointed out some logic flaws I missed, so I've added those in later._ 365 days @ $1/day = $365 8 hours = 1/3 day 1/3 x $365 = $121 (rounding down, but fair enough so far) _But of course Costello couldn't be expected to work the full 24 hours, so it'd be more reasonable to consider each day he works the number of hours expected a full day's payment, thus effectively nullifying this discount._ Take out Sundays for 52 Sundays a year 121 - 52 = 69 (nice) Here we see our first logical flaw. Abbott "forgets" to take into account his calculation regarding hours worked, thus reducing the payment by triple. The actual fair equation should read: Take out Sundays for 52 Sundays a year @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 52 = approx. 17 (again rounding down, but I reckon it cancels out the rounding down before, since this reduces the amount taken away) 121 - 17 = 104 (already increased by over 30%) Take out half Saturdays for 52 Saturdays a year 52/2 = 26 69 - 26 = 43 Again, Abbott "forgets" to take into account his first calculation, compounding on the previous error. With all errors resolved, the equation is thus: Take out half Saturdays for 52 Saturdays a year @ $1/3 a day 1/6 x 52 = approx. 8.5 (more rounding down because I'm nice) 104 - 8.5 = 95.5 In fact, Costello could gain even more depending on what is meant by "half day". If this means half of what he usually works (i.e. 4 hours), then the equation remains the same. However, if it means a half of the full day (i.e. 12 hours), he would actually gain money, since he works more than usual: (1/2 x 52 - the money that Costello earns in total) - (1/3 x 52 - the money that Costello earns in excess of his usual earnings) = 1/6 x 52 Therefore, he gains what he originally lost: 104 + 8.5 = 112.5 Sadly, this latter option is unlikely given the context: if it had been the case, even Costello would've noticed Abbott's trick, as he would be plainly losing money; thus, I'll work with the value of $95.50 from here. Take out vacation for 14 days 43 - 14 = 29 Once again, Abbott relies on his old trick of "forgetting" his first calculation; doubly clever as this reaffirms the idea that it is actually sound logic (repetition legitimises, shout out to Adam Neely viewers). The completely rectified equation: Take out vacation for 14 days @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 14 = approx. 5 (I've been too lenient) 95.5 - 5 = 90.5 _Edit: Additionally, Abbott already discounted Sundays and half Saturdays, meaning the vacation should only result in 12.5 days worth of payment: 12.5 days @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 12.5 = 4.2 95.5 - 4.2 = 91.3_ Take out one hour for lunch for 365 days 365/24 = approx. 15.2 (Holy crap Abbott's good at math when he wants to be) 29 - 15 = 14 Abbott switches from flawed to flawless logic- ironically- flawlessly. Taking into account past corrections: 90.5 - 15.2 (since we're working with decimal points now apparently) = 75.3 _Edit: (I can't believe I didn't spot this) Abbott has completely disregarded all days he already discounted (Sundays, half Saturdays and the vacation). This means the actual number of days worth of pay discounted should actually be: 365 - 52 - 26 - 12.5 = 275.5 So: 275.5/24 = approx. 11.5 91.3 - 11.5 = 79.8 And this is assuming his lunch hour isn't sandwiched in between his 8 hours, making 9 in total and nullifying the need for this discount entirely._ Take out holidays for 13 days- wait a minute... do these days coincide with the vacation mentioned earlier...? Probably not, again, Costello would've noticed. 14 -13 = 1 You know where this is going 13/3 = approx. 4.3 (you'll see, it works out) 75.3 - 4.3 = 71 _Edited: 79.8 - 4.3 = 75.5_ If Abbott hadn't been -a character in a math related comedy show- a sly manipulative employer (which, to be fair, can also be said of Costello's characters), Costello would've gained up to $71. If the waiter for some strange reason had still interpreted one of Costello's dollars as charity, it would've rounded it out to a nice even $70 (so close... so close). Probably enough to get by until he found another job. _And with the help of @Cam Bowman, we've gotten him another $4.50 for a total of $75.50... unless Cam's theory about Costello's lunch hour is correct, then the figure shoots up to $15 for a whopping $86. Thank you for your help! Together, little by little, we can achieve justice for Costello!_ _And then @Jupi swoops in and multiplies Costello's salary threefold. Legendary._ This, ladies and gentlemen, is why you need maths. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk, next week I discuss why Buster Keaton is a madlad. Sincerely, Oscar Gill P.S. If you find any more errors in my logic, please let me know in the replies and I'll rectify it as quickly as possible!
@ryvic90212 жыл бұрын
Dude you are an absolute madlad for making this wtf
@domowos96092 жыл бұрын
this mf really did all the math for a comedy that was released in the 1940s respect.
@oscargill4232 жыл бұрын
@@ryvic9021 Thanks! It's what I do; I have more breakdown comments than I do videos...
@rainhunter55462 жыл бұрын
You missed where Abbott slyly converted a two week vacation into a 14 day deduction, despite those two weeks containing 2 Saturdays and 2 Sundays A similar thing happens when talking about that 1 hour off for lunch which he applied to 365 days, when it has already been counted out of Sundays and vacation days, and probably Saturdays as well if he's taking a half day on those And that's assuming that taking a 1 hr lunch break means working 7 hours instead of 8. If it's just splitting up the 8 hours it shouldn't be deducted at all.
@Official_Happy_2 жыл бұрын
That's wrong, he get's 1 dollar for working 1 day, which is 8 hours, but that irrelevant. What matters is he worked those days, so he instantly is owed 287 (including Saturday what has been halved in value). He took 14 days off so now he is owed 273. Now he loses 1/8 of the dollar because of his 1 hour break. That means 1/8 of 273. That is -34 which means he is owed 239. He had 13 days in holidays so thats another -13. That means in total he is owed $226.
@jaelge2 жыл бұрын
Unlike the progressive Common Core math theirs actually makes sense.
@PleiadesRuby2 жыл бұрын
My man you're too stupid to centre an image
@bjbell522 жыл бұрын
What is the progressive common core ???? You sound like an IGNORANT right winger who doesn't know that Common Core was started by BOTH PARTIES! DUH.
@loafers92142 жыл бұрын
Hehe 69
@maddoxgreggory42852 жыл бұрын
I'm about to give you a dislike Just for that!!!
@J.S.J.S.J.S.J.S.J.S2 жыл бұрын
wage theft (decolorized)
@richardbaranowski2 жыл бұрын
Can't feel sorry for Costello after the way he ripped off his landlord. (Karma)
@coalrocks2 жыл бұрын
(1 x 8 x 5 x 52) - (1 x 1 x 5 x 52) (Hours worked) (lunch break) Excluding holidays and that vacation, should be $1,820. Only left those out bc the holiday might have been on a weekend and the time of the vacation was specified. If anything he should *at least* have $1,775. But i do gotta admit, he was smooth with it.
@oscargill4232 жыл бұрын
But they were charging by the day, not by the hour. If I'm not mistaken, those amounts should be reduced by a factor of 24. Still better than nothing.
@coalrocks2 жыл бұрын
@@oscargill423 ah, forgot about the day/hour thing
@oscargill4232 жыл бұрын
@@coalrocks So did Costello apparently... that's how good Abbott is at deceiving us
@jbodden69772 жыл бұрын
costello is costello, Bud is the IRS... they taxed him full scale on all the USO shows that he did for free. Somebody should have gone to prison, Costello died in his driveway from a heart attack while the IRS was removing everything from his house... so I heard. There was a movie.
@bjbell522 жыл бұрын
Sorry but you are really far off. Try reading Chris Costello's book "Lou's on First". I'll correct a few of your mistakes but the book is still worth reading (BTW, there was a movie made from the book named "Bud and Lou". It was inaccurate to the point of Chris Costello saying "well, at least they got the name right") 1) Costello died in the hospital of a heart attack caused by the rheumatic fever Lou had most of his life. 2) Most of their tax problems came from a) poor booking and money management b) a dishonest accountant that didn't file their taxes for years and then skipped off to South America with millions of their money. 3) I have no idea about the USO shows. If he worked for free, how could they tax him? 4) Yes, the IRS took almost everything they had to the point where they took Lou's wedding ring off his finger. A&C raised MILLIONS for the U.S. during the war and the strain almost killed Lou. That gratitude for you. It was almost as bad as what the British government did to Alan Turing. Turing broke the German enigma code that saved thousands of lives. Churchill after the war he praised Turing for his contribution to the war effort and then the government went after Turing for being gay and offered him either prison time of chemical castration. Turing committed suicide.
@omniummysterio2 жыл бұрын
him just being pure defeated at the end…
@Phalanx4432 жыл бұрын
Welcome to Liberal Mathematics.
@jbodden69772 жыл бұрын
Shit! This is trickle down if I ever heard it!!! YOu know, GOP math!!!
@drmodestoesq2 жыл бұрын
Abbot is the boss. This is conservative mathematics. If it was Liberal mathematics both would be owing money.
@bjbell522 жыл бұрын
Bodden and drmodestoesq -> you're both wrong; it is liberal math. Conservatives are unable to comprehend the simplest math!
@sorban53522 жыл бұрын
Wait ! We don't get pay in vacation back then ?
@nicholasimholte7359 Жыл бұрын
Or holidays apparently. And while we sleep too!
@TitanicRacing2 жыл бұрын
Of course February has 28 hours in a day
@garrisonvalentinelli13122 ай бұрын
He meant days
@aemilious62672 жыл бұрын
Finally getting to a point where you realize you worked for nothing
@drmodestoesq2 жыл бұрын
Hence the great resignation of the 2020s.
@starvalkyrie2 жыл бұрын
How the ownership class actually does the math.
@jaelge2 жыл бұрын
Whiner. Do you accept employment, ignorant of what they intend to pay you? And it´s not the employer's deductions but the government's. (ownership-class = working achievers, You = envious underachiever
Пікірлер
Extreme capitalism. I voted for Trump in 2020. I’m voting for Biden in 2024 since Trump’s gotten too extreme for me and Nikki Haley suspended her campaign.
thats what happens when trump is president
he cheated abbott, after all this, he actually has $1.46 coming to him
Hey Abbott butt
Abbott didn’t wanna pay him $1 a day ($365) cause Lou didn’t work 24hrs,half a day on Saturday, and no work on Sunday. Lou only worked 8hrs a day, but Bud took out $1 a day ($14) for his 2 week vacation 😂😂
Genial! 👌🏼
It's great to see that wages haven't gone up since then.
A joke then, but reality now
The American tax system at work.....Abbott & Costello style! 💲💲💲💲💲 💸💸💸💸💸 😝😝😝😝😝
My two favourite parts are when Lou says "24 Hours in a day, except February" and when Bud says at the end "Fine time to take a nap!" 🤣
So now I know where we ve got fucking coming from
That sounds like Joe Biden in charge of the Country
The deduction for the lunch break was the most brutal 😂
Tax cut in a paycheck be like
this is how the IRS operates
He over charges him for lunch. Says it’s 365 days when he has already deducted Sunday when he doesn’t work as well as others.
That's the joke....
Why over analyze the joke? just enjoy the genius of these two greats
over charges him for lunch???? so everything else was solid? dude....
Why does this actually seem realistic? Rather close to home I’d say
🤭 jejeje
Half-blood prince muy buena escena 😁👌🏼
These were two of the funniest guys I have ever seen.
We t43⁴2tj tdd u
This is exactly what the IRS does to everyone on 4-15 of every year.
Every country has the IRS huh?
This is what your boss does
Pretty much since 1914, one year after U.S. Constitution was amended to include the income tax, unfortunately. 😒😒😒😒😒
lol
If I get some of it I’ll be lucky.
Unfortunately this is exactly how most corporations are!!!!!
This is the kind of logic the Gov't uses, to take more money out of people's paychecks
Dumb mother fucker this is how your employer treats you
There is 24hrs in a day, all but February that has 28… 😂😂😂😂 didn’t know that February has 28 hours in a day, my watch must have been missing some hours every February month!!! Castello my guy!!!😂😂
😝😝😝😝😝
That was incredibly jewish.
What?
@@nicholasrevill6610 He was trying to con him out of money using clever tricks, it was very jewish like of him.
@@chucksneed6440 explain how this isn’t antisemitism
@@nicholasrevill6610 It's not antisemitism, it's very very semitic. That's my whole point.
@@nicholasrevill6610 explain how that makes it more or less true or funny. Nobody CARES you karen. Act a certain way and you will be treated a certain way
No 366
im gonna assume youre in first grade
Comment #365
A fantastic skit in this early movie, with Abbott and Costello as supporting cast members.
Sounds like a typical capitalist finding a way to screw workers out of the wealth they created
Workers don't create wealth. They trade the possibility of success via entrepreneurship, in return for a steady paycheck. Don't fool yourself, and stop trying to fool others.
@@grobin3745 go outside
@@grobin3745 You seem to be the one fooled. Wealth is generated by the labor provided by workers. Specifically the worker provides a service or transforms materials into a good. These are then sold for some amount of wealth. Under a capitalist system the amount of wealth the good or service is sold for is increased above cost to produce a profit. Further under capitalism that profit is increased by cutting input costs by numerous means, including reducing the pay of the worker that did the labor in the first place. I will also point out that the entire premise of your explanation already backs up the premise of what I am saying by implicitly acknowledging that the worker has done something to generate wealth which is used in part to pay them a pay check. Please don't delude yourself in others into thinking that workers don't do anything, when instead it is the capitalist that isn't doing anything beyond the initial setup and acquisition of resources.
@@grobin3745 you are lame and wrong
@@grobin3745 So you think money creates wealth in itself?
1940 was the debut year of A&C, but it was also a year when the Marx Bros, The Three Stooges, Laurel & Hardy and even Charlie Chaplin were all making films still.
You mean in film.
@@Selrisitai Appearing in films.
Getting a dollar a year is a hilarious premise all by itself.
FDR had a whole bunch of "dollar-a-year men" ... They helped the USA win the Pacific War.
That's 35p in British money back then. That's the equivalent of 4 weeks pay in the year 1300 for a labourer so god knows if there was ever a time someone was paid the equivalent of 1 dollar for a whole years work.
Great old comedy skit! Please read all the comments below by all the goofballs who failed to enjoy it for what it was and ruin it by crunching numbers. Get a life, and a sense of humor people!!
It's still an enjoyable scene when we know what he is owed and sees how confused he got as well we were when summing up the answer we thought😅
I never accuse anyone of having no sense of humor. I've been accused myself, and it's always by those who aren't exactly a barrel of laughs. It's all subjective.
He get's 1 dollar for working 1 day, which is 8 hours, but that irrelevant. What matters is he worked those days, so he instantly is owed 287 (including Saturday what has been halved in value). He took 14 days off so now he is owed 273. Now he loses 1/8 of the dollar because of his 1 hour break. That means 1/8 of 273. That is -34 which means he is owed 239. He had 13 days in holidays so thats another -13. That means in total he is owed $226.
Well, if he gets paid by the day and he’s allowed a lunch break in on his working days then he shouldn’t lose 1/8 of the dollar
lunch breaks are not deducted, there is an extra hour worked. Saturdays are overtime, and public holidays must be paid. Pay is for hours worked, not for 24 divided by 3. He is deducting time which is not included in the pay day
@@tonybarfridge4369 He clearly stated that he will take that 1 hour away, and for paid holidays I do not know about as I don't work, but even so, that is still the correct answer compared to people starting from $121
@@Official_Happy_ nobody is paid $1 a day, and then take away 2/3. It was his scam
Haha that's funny how the math is so wrong. They should make a world-renown comedy skit out of it or something...
Dig Lou's "Mister B" collar
Alright, breakdown time (this is too sly not to be exposed): _Quick note before we begin: Some comments have pointed out some logic flaws I missed, so I've added those in later._ 365 days @ $1/day = $365 8 hours = 1/3 day 1/3 x $365 = $121 (rounding down, but fair enough so far) _But of course Costello couldn't be expected to work the full 24 hours, so it'd be more reasonable to consider each day he works the number of hours expected a full day's payment, thus effectively nullifying this discount._ Take out Sundays for 52 Sundays a year 121 - 52 = 69 (nice) Here we see our first logical flaw. Abbott "forgets" to take into account his calculation regarding hours worked, thus reducing the payment by triple. The actual fair equation should read: Take out Sundays for 52 Sundays a year @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 52 = approx. 17 (again rounding down, but I reckon it cancels out the rounding down before, since this reduces the amount taken away) 121 - 17 = 104 (already increased by over 30%) Take out half Saturdays for 52 Saturdays a year 52/2 = 26 69 - 26 = 43 Again, Abbott "forgets" to take into account his first calculation, compounding on the previous error. With all errors resolved, the equation is thus: Take out half Saturdays for 52 Saturdays a year @ $1/3 a day 1/6 x 52 = approx. 8.5 (more rounding down because I'm nice) 104 - 8.5 = 95.5 In fact, Costello could gain even more depending on what is meant by "half day". If this means half of what he usually works (i.e. 4 hours), then the equation remains the same. However, if it means a half of the full day (i.e. 12 hours), he would actually gain money, since he works more than usual: (1/2 x 52 - the money that Costello earns in total) - (1/3 x 52 - the money that Costello earns in excess of his usual earnings) = 1/6 x 52 Therefore, he gains what he originally lost: 104 + 8.5 = 112.5 Sadly, this latter option is unlikely given the context: if it had been the case, even Costello would've noticed Abbott's trick, as he would be plainly losing money; thus, I'll work with the value of $95.50 from here. Take out vacation for 14 days 43 - 14 = 29 Once again, Abbott relies on his old trick of "forgetting" his first calculation; doubly clever as this reaffirms the idea that it is actually sound logic (repetition legitimises, shout out to Adam Neely viewers). The completely rectified equation: Take out vacation for 14 days @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 14 = approx. 5 (I've been too lenient) 95.5 - 5 = 90.5 _Edit: Additionally, Abbott already discounted Sundays and half Saturdays, meaning the vacation should only result in 12.5 days worth of payment: 12.5 days @ $1/3 a day 1/3 x 12.5 = 4.2 95.5 - 4.2 = 91.3_ Take out one hour for lunch for 365 days 365/24 = approx. 15.2 (Holy crap Abbott's good at math when he wants to be) 29 - 15 = 14 Abbott switches from flawed to flawless logic- ironically- flawlessly. Taking into account past corrections: 90.5 - 15.2 (since we're working with decimal points now apparently) = 75.3 _Edit: (I can't believe I didn't spot this) Abbott has completely disregarded all days he already discounted (Sundays, half Saturdays and the vacation). This means the actual number of days worth of pay discounted should actually be: 365 - 52 - 26 - 12.5 = 275.5 So: 275.5/24 = approx. 11.5 91.3 - 11.5 = 79.8 And this is assuming his lunch hour isn't sandwiched in between his 8 hours, making 9 in total and nullifying the need for this discount entirely._ Take out holidays for 13 days- wait a minute... do these days coincide with the vacation mentioned earlier...? Probably not, again, Costello would've noticed. 14 -13 = 1 You know where this is going 13/3 = approx. 4.3 (you'll see, it works out) 75.3 - 4.3 = 71 _Edited: 79.8 - 4.3 = 75.5_ If Abbott hadn't been -a character in a math related comedy show- a sly manipulative employer (which, to be fair, can also be said of Costello's characters), Costello would've gained up to $71. If the waiter for some strange reason had still interpreted one of Costello's dollars as charity, it would've rounded it out to a nice even $70 (so close... so close). Probably enough to get by until he found another job. _And with the help of @Cam Bowman, we've gotten him another $4.50 for a total of $75.50... unless Cam's theory about Costello's lunch hour is correct, then the figure shoots up to $15 for a whopping $86. Thank you for your help! Together, little by little, we can achieve justice for Costello!_ _And then @Jupi swoops in and multiplies Costello's salary threefold. Legendary._ This, ladies and gentlemen, is why you need maths. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk, next week I discuss why Buster Keaton is a madlad. Sincerely, Oscar Gill P.S. If you find any more errors in my logic, please let me know in the replies and I'll rectify it as quickly as possible!
Dude you are an absolute madlad for making this wtf
this mf really did all the math for a comedy that was released in the 1940s respect.
@@ryvic9021 Thanks! It's what I do; I have more breakdown comments than I do videos...
You missed where Abbott slyly converted a two week vacation into a 14 day deduction, despite those two weeks containing 2 Saturdays and 2 Sundays A similar thing happens when talking about that 1 hour off for lunch which he applied to 365 days, when it has already been counted out of Sundays and vacation days, and probably Saturdays as well if he's taking a half day on those And that's assuming that taking a 1 hr lunch break means working 7 hours instead of 8. If it's just splitting up the 8 hours it shouldn't be deducted at all.
That's wrong, he get's 1 dollar for working 1 day, which is 8 hours, but that irrelevant. What matters is he worked those days, so he instantly is owed 287 (including Saturday what has been halved in value). He took 14 days off so now he is owed 273. Now he loses 1/8 of the dollar because of his 1 hour break. That means 1/8 of 273. That is -34 which means he is owed 239. He had 13 days in holidays so thats another -13. That means in total he is owed $226.
Unlike the progressive Common Core math theirs actually makes sense.
My man you're too stupid to centre an image
What is the progressive common core ???? You sound like an IGNORANT right winger who doesn't know that Common Core was started by BOTH PARTIES! DUH.
Hehe 69
I'm about to give you a dislike Just for that!!!
wage theft (decolorized)
Can't feel sorry for Costello after the way he ripped off his landlord. (Karma)
(1 x 8 x 5 x 52) - (1 x 1 x 5 x 52) (Hours worked) (lunch break) Excluding holidays and that vacation, should be $1,820. Only left those out bc the holiday might have been on a weekend and the time of the vacation was specified. If anything he should *at least* have $1,775. But i do gotta admit, he was smooth with it.
But they were charging by the day, not by the hour. If I'm not mistaken, those amounts should be reduced by a factor of 24. Still better than nothing.
@@oscargill423 ah, forgot about the day/hour thing
@@coalrocks So did Costello apparently... that's how good Abbott is at deceiving us
costello is costello, Bud is the IRS... they taxed him full scale on all the USO shows that he did for free. Somebody should have gone to prison, Costello died in his driveway from a heart attack while the IRS was removing everything from his house... so I heard. There was a movie.
Sorry but you are really far off. Try reading Chris Costello's book "Lou's on First". I'll correct a few of your mistakes but the book is still worth reading (BTW, there was a movie made from the book named "Bud and Lou". It was inaccurate to the point of Chris Costello saying "well, at least they got the name right") 1) Costello died in the hospital of a heart attack caused by the rheumatic fever Lou had most of his life. 2) Most of their tax problems came from a) poor booking and money management b) a dishonest accountant that didn't file their taxes for years and then skipped off to South America with millions of their money. 3) I have no idea about the USO shows. If he worked for free, how could they tax him? 4) Yes, the IRS took almost everything they had to the point where they took Lou's wedding ring off his finger. A&C raised MILLIONS for the U.S. during the war and the strain almost killed Lou. That gratitude for you. It was almost as bad as what the British government did to Alan Turing. Turing broke the German enigma code that saved thousands of lives. Churchill after the war he praised Turing for his contribution to the war effort and then the government went after Turing for being gay and offered him either prison time of chemical castration. Turing committed suicide.
him just being pure defeated at the end…
Welcome to Liberal Mathematics.
Shit! This is trickle down if I ever heard it!!! YOu know, GOP math!!!
Abbot is the boss. This is conservative mathematics. If it was Liberal mathematics both would be owing money.
Bodden and drmodestoesq -> you're both wrong; it is liberal math. Conservatives are unable to comprehend the simplest math!
Wait ! We don't get pay in vacation back then ?
Or holidays apparently. And while we sleep too!
Of course February has 28 hours in a day
He meant days
Finally getting to a point where you realize you worked for nothing
Hence the great resignation of the 2020s.
How the ownership class actually does the math.
Whiner. Do you accept employment, ignorant of what they intend to pay you? And it´s not the employer's deductions but the government's. (ownership-class = working achievers, You = envious underachiever
@@jaelge Bootlicker detected.
Don't sign the contract then
"What's with the but!?!" fucking sent me XD